writehuman is the most powerful paraphraser

Elevate AI to Human Perfection

Bypass ai detection with the world's most powerful ai humanizer..

enhanced ai model toggle

Humanize AI text in three easy steps:

Copy ai-generated text, paste into writehuman.ai, click write human to humanize ai text, bypass ai detection with writehuman.

Bypass ZeroGPT AI Detection

Effortlessly Humanize AI Text

Protect your ai privacy with real undetectable ai.

Remove AI detection

Choose the plan that's right for you .

humanizing ai text with writehuman

Built-in AI Detector for Ultimate Al Bypass

Humanize ai text, built-in free ai detector, create undetectable ai, quality humanizer output, leading anti-ai detector, frequently asked questions, recent ai humanizer posts.

people converting ai to human text

Breaking Down AI Writing: The Role of AI to Human Text in Content Creation

Author Ivan Jackson Photo

Top 5 Methods to create Undetectable AI

writehuman joins lighthouse labs

Richmond-based AI startup WriteHuman joins Lighthouse Labs

How it works: mastering the art of undetectable ai writing with writehuman, understanding ai writing detection, bypass ai detection with natural language processing (nlp), humanize ai text to craft content at scale, bypassing ai detectors and humanize ai text, the magic of rewriting and originality, from ai to human: the best ai humanizer., unleash the power of quality ai writing.

Bypass AI detection with WriteHuman

© 2024 WriteHuman, LLC. All rights reserved.

How would you rate Smodin?

Help us improve Smodin by leaving us feedback!

Max Limit Reached (3 / week)

Get the most out of smodin.io, ai content detector.

Feel confident your text isn't detectable by AI with our 95% accurate AI Content Detector.

Author (AI Writer)

Let our AI writer write your next essay, article, paragraph, or anything else.

Plagiarism Checker

Feel confident that your text is unique with our plagiarism checker.

Smodin’s AI Content Detection Remover

Smodin’s AI content detection remover uses a sophisticated rewriting technology that intelligently analyzes AI-generated content and restructures it while preserving its original meaning and coherence. We use advanced natural language processing algorithms, that paraphrase and rephrase your AI-generated content, making it more human-like and less recognizable by AI detection systems.

Recommended Usage and Tips for AI Content Detection Remover

Quality Input : Start with well-structured, grammatically correct, and accurate prompts. This ensures that the rewriting process maintains the integrity of your original message.

Review and Edit : While our tool is highly effective, you get the best results when you review the rewritten content for accuracy, tone, and consistency. Make necessary adjustments as you see fit.

Iterative Rewriting : In some cases, it might be beneficial to rewrite the content multiple times to reduce the chances of AI detection further. Experiment with different iterations to find the best version.

Why you should use AI content detection remover?

Smodin’s AI Content Detection Remover provides users with a powerful solution for maintaining the creative essence of AI-generated content while bypassing AI detection software and tools. Our tool expertly restructures and rewrites your content, making it less recognizable as AI-generated while preserving its unique insights and ideas. Moreover, manually rewriting AI-generated content can be a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. This tool streamlines this task, allowing you to focus on other essential aspects of writing, including feeding better prompts, checking for accuracy, finding the right references, etc.

How to Avoid AI Plagiarism Detection

We have the solution to avoid AI detection: the recreate method. In the world of ChatGPT and large language models, AI writing is a must-have tool in your tool belt. However, there are ways to successfully detect AI generated content, and the only way to automatically prevent it is with a model trained on thousands of samples of human written data... and that is exactly what Smodin's recreate method is. Smodin's recreate method eliminates all AI detection methods in a single click, allowing you to efficiently create any content you need. There are situations, however, when text written by AI is too generic to be written by a human; for these situations it is recommended to generate a new text or make more than one attempt to produce a human-sounding text.

Check Text for Plagiarism

After you rewrite your text, you should make sure that the text passes plagiarism detection. Use our multi-lingual plagiarism detection application to quickly check the text for plagiarism!

What is AI Content Detection?

AI content detection is determining if a text is written by AI based on the randomness of the words. AI writing models tend to have a specific way of producing text based on the most frequent word orders. Is your text produced by an AI? Find out below!

Other Supported Languages

© 2024 Smodin LLC

Original Writing, Made Easy With Quetext

Quetext's plagiarism checker analyzes your text to identify plagiarism, resolve other writing issues, and build citations with ease. You wouldn't want to write without it.

DeepSearch™ technology

With contextual analysis, word placement, and our smart algorithms, checking your writing has never been easier

Lightspeed recognition

Our software pairs speed with the accuracy of DeepSearch™ technology

Privacy comes standard

We back industry-leading technology with a three-part pledge, Our Commitment to you

The #1 Tool for Detecting Plagiarism for

We've helped more than 5 million students, teachers, and professionals identify potential plagiarism in their work.

Academic Sources

Citation Generator

News Sources

Online Textbooks



Rich & Intuitive Feedback .

Find plagiarism with less stress with a click of a button and an easy, immersive experience.

ColorGrade™ Feedback

Easily spot exact matches vs. near-exact or 'fuzzy' matches with corresponding colors.

Interactive Snippet Text

Easily drill-down on your matches side-by-side with our interactive and intuitive snippet text viewer.

Comprehensive Plagiarism Score

Our comprehensive plagiarism score is backed by billions of internet sources

Plagiarism Report

Need some inspiration?

Check out our latest blog posts, quetext faq, is quetext reliable.

Quetext is reliable, safe, and extremely effective for verifying original work with ease. Rigorous testing is involved with every update made to the product, and the comprehensive plagiarism score users receive is backed by billions of internet sources. Students, teachers, and content writers alike rely on Quetext for fast and accurate verification.

How effective is Quetext?

Quetext is extremely effective for writers who need to verify their content's originality. Not only does the plagiarism checker quickly and accurately identify any and all instances of plagiarized writing, but it also generates citations where necessary, right on the spot. It can be easy to lose track of sources, and Quetext is there to help writers stay on top of them without creating extra work.

What is the pricing for Quetext?

Quetext has both a free and a paid plan, depending on what your needs are. The free plan is a great place to start, as it comes with plagiarism checks on 500 words (1 page), ColorGrade™ feedback, contextual analysis, fuzzy matching, and conditional scoring. But for just $8.25 a month, you get so much more: 100,000 words (200 pages) that can go through the plagiarism checker, DeepSearch™ Extended, Citation Assistant, a downloadable originality report, custom URL exclusion, interactive snippet text, and premium support. You can learn more and get started on our Quetext Pricing page.

Try Quetext today!

Ready to stop wasting time with that old-school "plagiarism tool" from the 90's? Start using Quetext today for free!

  • Press enter for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers
  • Press enter for Keyboard Navigation
  • Press enter for Accessibility menu

[ u n d e t e c t a b l e A I ] Advanced AI Detector and Humanizer

How to use our tool to detect and check for ai content, humanize ai texts, and bypass ai detectors like copyleaks, writer, gptzero, and originality, transform ai generated text into undetectable human-like content, ai generated content, how can undetectable transform your copy, bypass the most advanced ai detectors on the market., create human-like, keyword-rich content that ranks high on search engines., ensure your emails and seo content won't be flagged as spam., express your originality and creativity without the constraints of ai detection., a powerful, yet simple tool designed for serious writers and content creators, begin with your ai-generated text, let us do our magic, enjoy your human-like content, discover the power of an ai detection remover and ai humanizer tool, looking for the most accurate, free ai detector, awards & recognition, why choose undetectable ai, frequently asked questions, what is undetectable ai, who can benefit from using undetectable ai, does undetectable ai bypass ai detectors, how is your pricing determined, will my content still rank well on search engines.

Free plagiarism checker by EasyBib

Check for plagiarism, grammar errors, and more.

  • Expert Check

anti essay free

Check for accidental plagiarism

Avoid unintentional plagiarism. Check your work against billions of sources to ensure complete originality.

anti essay free

Find and fix grammar errors

Turn in your best work. Our smart proofreader catches even the smallest writing mistakes so you don't have to.

anti essay free

Get expert writing help

Improve the quality of your paper. Receive feedback on your main idea, writing mechanics, structure, conclusion, and more.

What students are saying about us

anti essay free

"Caught comma errors that I actually struggle with even after proofreading myself."

- Natasha J.

anti essay free

"I find the suggestions to be extremely helpful especially as they can instantly take you to that section in your paper for you to fix any and all issues related to the grammar or spelling error(s)."

- Catherine R.

anti essay free

Check for unintentional plagiarism

Easily check your paper for missing citations and accidental plagiarism with the EasyBib plagiarism checker. The EasyBib plagiarism checker:

  • Scans your paper against billions of sources.
  • Identifies text that may be flagged for plagiarism.
  • Provides you with a plagiarism score.

You can submit your paper at any hour of the day and quickly receive a plagiarism report.

What is the EasyBib plagiarism checker? 

Most basic plagiarism checkers review your work and calculate a percentage, meaning how much of your writing is indicative of original work. But, the EasyBib plagiarism checker goes way beyond a simple percentage. Any text that could be categorized as potential plagiarism is highlighted, allowing you time to review each warning and determine how to adjust it or how to cite it correctly.

You’ll even see the sources against which your writing is compared and the actual word for word breakdown. If you determine that a warning is unnecessary, you can waive the plagiarism check suggestion.

Plagiarism is unethical because it doesn’t credit those who created the original work; it violates intellectual property and serves to benefit the perpetrator. It is a severe enough academic offense, that many faculty members use their own plagiarism checking tool for their students’ work. With the EasyBib Plagiarism checker, you can stay one step ahead of your professors and catch citation mistakes and accidental plagiarism before you submit your work for grading.

anti essay free

Why use a plagiarism checker? 

Imagine – it’s finals week and the final research paper of the semester is due in two days. You, being quite familiar with this high-stakes situation, hit the books, and pull together a ten-page, last-minute masterpiece using articles and materials from dozens of different sources.

However, in those late, coffee-fueled hours, are you fully confident that you correctly cited all the different sources you used? Are you sure you didn’t accidentally forget any? Are you confident that your teacher’s plagiarism tool will give your paper a 0% plagiarism score?

That’s where the EasyBib plagiarism checker comes in to save the day. One quick check can help you address all the above questions and put your mind at ease.

What exactly is plagiarism? 

Plagiarism has a number of possible definitions; it involves more than just copying someone else’s work. Improper citing, patchworking, and paraphrasing could all lead to plagiarism in one of your college assignments. Below are some common examples of accidental plagiarism that commonly occur.

Quoting or paraphrasing without citations

Not including in-text citations is another common type of accidental plagiarism. Quoting is taking verbatim text from a source. Paraphrasing is when you’re using another source to take the same idea but put it in your own words. In both cases, it’s important to always cite where those ideas are coming from. The EasyBib plagiarism checker can help alert you to when you need to accurately cite the sources you used.

Patchwork plagiarism

When writing a paper, you’re often sifting through multiple sources and tabs from different search engines. It’s easy to accidentally string together pieces of sentences and phrases into your own paragraphs. You may change a few words here and there, but it’s similar to the original text. Even though it’s accidental, it is still considered plagiarism. It’s important to clearly state when you’re using someone else’s words and work.

Improper citations

Depending on the class, professor, subject, or teacher, there are multiple correct citation styles and preferences. Some examples of common style guides that are followed for citations include MLA, APA, and Chicago style. When citing resources, it’s important to cite them accurately. Incorrect citations could make it impossible for a reader to track down a source and it’s considered plagiarism. There are EasyBib citation tools to help you do this.

Don’t fall victim to plagiarism pitfalls. Most of the time, you don’t even mean to commit plagiarism; rather, you’ve read so many sources from different search engines that it gets difficult to determine an original thought or well-stated fact versus someone else’s work. Or worse, you assume a statement is common knowledge, when in fact, it should be attributed to another author.

When in doubt, cite your source!

Time for a quick plagiarism quiz! 

Which of the following requires a citation?

  • A chart or graph from another source
  • A paraphrase of an original source
  • Several sources’ ideas summarized into your own paragraph
  • A direct quote
  • All of the above

If you guessed option E than you’d be correct. Correct punctuation and citation of another individual’s ideas, quotes, and graphics are a pillar of good academic writing.

What if you copy your own previous writing?

Resubmitting your own original work for another class’s assignment is a form of self-plagiarism, so don’t cut corners in your writing. Draft an original piece for each class or ask your professor if you can incorporate your previous research.

What features are available with the EasyBib plagiarism checker? 

Along with providing warnings and sources for possible plagiarism, the EasyBib  plagiarism checker works alongside the other EasyBib tools, including a grammar checker  and a spell checker . You’ll receive personalized feedback on your thesis and writing structure too!

The  plagiarism checker compares your writing sample with billions of available sources online so that it detects plagiarism at every level. You’ll be notified of which phrases are too similar to current research and literature, prompting a possible rewrite or additional citation. You’ll also get feedback on your paper’s inconsistencies, such as changes in text, formatting, or style. These small details could suggest possible plagiarism within your assignment.

And speaking of citations, there are also  EasyBib citation tools  available. They help you quickly build your bibliography and avoid accidental plagiarism. Make sure you know which citation format your professor prefers!

Great! How do I start? 

Simply copy and paste or upload your essay into the checker at the top of this page. You’ll receive the first five grammar suggestions for free! To try the plagiarism checker for free, start your EasyBib Plus three-day free trial.* If you love the product and decide to opt for premium services, you’ll have access to unlimited writing suggestions and personalized feedback.

The EasyBib plagiarism checker is conveniently available 24 hours a day and seven days a week. You can cancel anytime.  Check your paper for free today!.

*See Terms and Conditions

Visit www.easybib.com for more information on helpful EasyBib writing and citing tools.

For informational guides and on writing and citing, visit the EasyBib guides homepage .

Free Paraphrasing Tool to Avoid Plagiarism

3 hours!

You've finished your essay, but are worried about plagiarism? We’ve got good news for you. Our free online paraphrasing tool is here to rewrite your texts. Be sure never to be accused of plagiarizing!

In this article, you’ll find:

  • The paraphrasing tool;
  • Ways to steer clear of plagiarism;
  • All you need to know about sentence rewriting;
  • Answers to frequently asked questions about this topic.

Free Paraphrasing Tool to Avoid Plagiarism.

  • What Is a Paraphrasing Tool?
  • How to Use the Rewording Tool
  • What Makes Our Online Rephrasing Tool Handy?
  • How to Reword a Sentence
  • How to Reword a Quote

✅ What Is a Paraphrasing Tool?

To paraphrase means to present an idea in different words. A big part of this technique is consulting a thesaurus for synonyms. Luckily, you can put the dull dictionary aside and let the plagiarism changer do the job for you.

When writing a paper, make sure you properly cite all your sources. Also, keep your content unique. Failing to do this will result in plagiarism.

Cue the rephrasing generator. This quick machine:

  • Provides alternative word suggestions;
  • Replaces any part of speech with synonyms;
  • Keeps your intended meaning;
  • Guarantees plagiarism-free results.

🖥️ How to Use the Rewording Tool

With our free paraphrasing tool, you can rewrite a text in your own words in a matter of seconds. In this step-by-step guide, you’ll find everything you need to do:

  • Open the website and paste your document into the box.
  • Click “paraphrase my text.”
  • Pick the synonyms you like.
  • You’re done! Now you can copy your paraphrased text.
  • Be sure to do a plagiarism check. For example, the online writing tool Grammarly has a professional plagiarism checker.

👍 What Makes Our Online Word Changer Handy?

Now that you know how our tool rephrases your sentences, you’re probably wondering why you need it. Here are its benefits;

  • Unlike expensive software with the same purpose, it’s free and always available .
  • It offers various synonyms to choose from , saving you time, and ensuring that your text still makes sense.
  • Rephrasing helps avoid plagiarism .
  • The generator can also assist you in creating summaries .

We’ve got your back, but it’s good to know how to stay away from trouble by yourself. Read on to get acquainted with various rewriting strategies.

✏️ How to Rephrase: Strategies to Avoid Plagiarism

Plagiarism is the act of stealing someone’s intellectual property. It can be deliberate but often happens unintentionally. In academia, this mostly means taking someone’s idea and not crediting the source. But don't worry: there are many ways avoid this. Here are the basics:

  • Always using a plagiarism checker . This way, you’ll know for sure that what you’ve written is 100% yours.
  • Quoting means adopting the original author’s wording directly and putting it in quotation marks. Make sure to resort to direct quoting only if it strengthens your argument, or if the quote is particularly expressive.
  • A summary is a shortened version of the source. You don’t paraphrase its entire contents but break it down into the crucial parts.
  • Taking notes while reading articles. Try to formulate the central ideas in simple words. This way, you'll automatically have a first draft of what you want to paraphrase.
  • Lastly, changing the sentence structure while paraphrasing will help you sound natural.

Keep reading to learn more about rewording sentences and quotes.

📖 How to Reword a Sentence

Paraphrasing is very similar to summarizing. Both are key skills for writers. With these recommendations, you’ll always rewrite correctly and without plagiarizing.

To some terms, such as "globalization," you’ll hardly find alternatives. However, common words can easily be replaced.

Use various conjunctions or break the sentences up.

Replace nouns with verbs, verbs with adjectives, or vice versa.

This includes:

  • Switching the voice from passive to active and the other way round.
  • Turning clauses into phrases and vice versa, e.g., by omitting or adding pronouns.

This being said, the most effective method to rephrase something is by using all these techniques combined. Here are some examples:

“Categorization has become a major field of study, thanks primarily to the pioneering work of Eleanor Rosch, who made categorization an issue. (Lakoff 1987: 7)”

“Eleanor Rosch, who was the first to point out the importance of categorization, paved the way to make it an important subject. (see Lakoff 1987: 7)”

In this version, you can see multiple strategies at work. The structure is different, and all possible words were substituted. Yet, it still contains the original meaning. That’s precisely what we want!

Let’s have a look at this variant instead:


“Categorization is now a major field of study. It can be credited to the pioneering work of Eleanor Rosch, the first person to make categorization an issue.”

While the voice is switched in this paraphrase, it still is too close to the original. It uses the same wording and doesn’t credit the source.

Here’s another example:

“In a rare instance of consensus, linguists agree that grammar is extremely complex and hard to properly describe. (Langacker 2008: 27)”

“Linguists rarely agree with each other, but they all acknowledge that grammar is problematic and that it’s nearly impossible to explain it correctly. (Langacker 2008: 27)”

This version has synonyms and adds an extra preposition. Unfortunately, the alternatives "problematic" and "explain" tamper with the original meaning. Let's see how to paraphrase this paragraph properly:

“While linguists rarely share the same opinions, they all admit that grammar is almost impossible to depict comprehensively due to its intricate nature. (Langacker 2008: 27)”

In this case, the concept stays the same. The phrases are changed; there are a new structure and extra conjunction. Perfect!

💬 How to Reword a Quote

If you want your assignments to sound natural, provide the proper context for your quotes. It includes introducing them with phrases such as according to, in the words of, as defined by . Citing is appropriate, if:

  • The wording is especially valuable;
  • You need to support a claim;
  • You want to debate and analyze the author’s position.

When writing, use a mix of direct quotes and paraphrases with an emphasis on the latter. Once you cite a source, adhere to specific standards. Stick to any one of these styles throughout your entire text:

  • An in-text APA style reference can be either narrative , e.g. Zaliznyak & Šmelev, 1997, or parenthetical , e.g. (Zaliznyak & Šmelev, 1997).
  • MLA formatting style requires the author’s last name and the page, for example, Clasmeier 37.
  • When citing Chicago style , all source data (name, title, publisher, year, page) goes into the footnotes.

We're happy if this article was useful to you. And don't forget: if you want to save yourself some time, try our free paraphrasing tool!

📌 Is Rewording Plagiarism?

📌 how do you rewrite articles in your own words, 📌 can i use the rewriting tool to avoid plagiarism, 🔗 references.

  • Avoiding Plagiarism: Choosing Whether to Quote or to Paraphrase: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Paraphrasing, Summarizing, and Quoting: Australia University
  • Quoting, Paraphrasing, & Summarizing: Ashford University
  • Paraphrasing: American Psychological Association
  • Chicago Quoting and Paraphrasing: Massey University
  • MLA In-Text Citations: Purdue University

Get Discount

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript.

GPT Essay Checker for Students

How to Interpret the Result of AI Detection

To use our GPT checker, you won’t need to do any preparation work!

Take the 3 steps:

  • Copy and paste the text you want to be analyzed,
  • Click the button,
  • Follow the prompts to interpret the result.

Our AI detector doesn’t give a definitive answer. It’s only a free beta test that will be improved later. For now, it provides a preliminary conclusion and analyzes the provided text, implementing the color-coding system that you can see above the analysis.

It is you who decides whether the text is written by a human or AI:

  • Your text was likely generated by an AI if it is mostly red with some orange words. This means that the word choice of the whole document is nowhere near unique or unpredictable.
  • Your text looks unique and human-made if our GPT essay checker adds plenty of orange, green, and blue to the color palette.
  • 🔮 The Tool’s Benefits

🤖 Will AI Replace Human Writers?

✅ ai in essay writing.

  • 🕵 How do GPT checkers work?

🔗 References

🔮 gpt checker for essays: 5 key benefits.

People have yet to learn where AI and machine learning are taking us, but it has already caused many problems in the education system. This AI essay detector can resolve some of them, at least as of the moment.

There are 5 key benefits of the above GPT checker for essays and other academic writing projects.

Elon Musk, one of Chat GPT creators, said that it was “scary good” and that humanity is approaching the creation of “dangerously strong AI.”

In an interview , Bill Gates commented on the program: “It gives a glimpse of what is to come. I am impressed with this whole approach and the rate of innovation.” And these words give us goosebumps.

Over the first week of its functioning, the program exceeded 1 million users . Therefore, developers are interested in monetizing it, and launching a paid Beta-version won’t take long.

We prefer not to throw out compliments to the chatbot and instead let you check for yourself . It is a chat with AI. The best way to start is to ask a question. It is free so far (still under research), so you can ask as many questions as you please.

We should care about AI-generated content because, in a decade, it will be an everyday reality. Even more so, it is a hot-button issue now. For now, GPT 3 can’t replace human writers. However, AI essay detection has already become an issue for teachers.

You can try asking ChatGPT to write an essay for you. But we do not recommend pass it off as written by you. Not only because it's unethical (although it is). The fact is that ChatGPT has a number of drawbacks that you need to consider before using it.

Chat GPT in Essay Writing – the Shortcomings

  • The tool doesn’t know anything about what happened after 2021. Novel history is not its strong side. Sometimes it needs to be corrected about earlier events. For instance, request information about Heathrow Terminal 1 . The program will tell you it is functioning, although it has been closed since 2015.
  • The reliability of answers is questionable. AI takes information from the web which abounds in fake news, bias, and conspiracy theories.
  • References also need to be checked. The links that the tool generates are sometimes incorrect, and sometimes even fake.
  • Two AI generated essays on the same topic can be very similar. Although a plagiarism checker will likely consider the texts original, your teacher will easily see the same structure and arguments.
  • Chat GPT essay detectors are being actively developed now. Traditional plagiarism checkers are not good at finding texts made by ChatGPT. But this does not mean that an AI-generated piece cannot be detected at all.

🕵 How Do GPT Checkers Work?

An AI-generated text is too predictable. Its creation is based on the word frequency in each particular case.

Thus, its strong side (being life-like) makes it easily discernible for ChatGPT detectors.

Once again, conventional anti-plagiarism essay checkers won’t work there merely because this writing features originality. Meanwhile, it will be too similar to hundreds of other texts covering the same topic.

Here’s an everyday example. Two people give birth to a baby. When kids become adults, they are very much like their parents. But can we tell this particular human is a child of the other two humans? No, if we cannot make a genetic test. This GPT essay checker is a paternity test for written content.

❓ GPT Essay Checker FAQ

  • Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists - Nature
  • How to... use ChatGPT to boost your writing
  • Will ChatGPT Kill the Student Essay? - The Atlantic
  • ChatGPT: how to use the AI chatbot taking over the world
  • Overview of ChatGPT - Technology Hits - Medium
  • Free Essays
  • Writing Tools
  • Lit. Guides
  • Donate a Paper
  • Referencing Guides
  • Free Textbooks
  • Tongue Twisters
  • Job Openings
  • Expert Application
  • Video Contest
  • Writing Scholarship
  • Discount Codes
  • IvyPanda Shop
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Copyright Principles
  • DMCA Request
  • Service Notice

This page contains a free online GPT checker for essays and other academic writing projects. Being based on the brand-new technology, this AI essay detector is much more effective than traditional plagiarism checkers. With this AI checker, you’ll easily find out if an academic writing piece was written by a human or a chatbot. We provide a comprehensive guide on how to interpret the results of analysis. It is up to you to draw your own conclusions.

US court leery of free-speech challenge to school's anti-racism training

The judge's chair, the witness stand and stenographer's desk are seen in court room 422 of the New York Supreme Court

  • Plaintiffs say they were forced to agree with training on white privilege
  • Judge who dismissed lawsuit said it was frivolous
  • Appeals panel skeptical that plaintiffs suffered an injury

Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab

anti essay free

Thomson Reuters

Dan Wiessner (@danwiessner) reports on labor and employment and immigration law, including litigation and policy making. He can be reached at [email protected].

Read Next / Editor's Picks

The Apple Inc logo hanging at the entrance to the Apple store on 5th Avenue in New York

Industry Insight

anti essay free

Mike Scarcella, David Thomas

anti essay free

Karen Sloan

anti essay free

Henry Engler

anti essay free

Diana Novak Jones

plagiarism report

Prevent plagiarism, run a free plagiarism check.

  • Knowledge Base
  • Best Free Plagiarism Checkers in 2023

10 Best Free Plagiarism Checkers in 2023 | Tested & Reviewed

Published on June 8, 2023 by Koen Driessen .

To find the best free plagiarism checker in 2023, we extensively tested and reviewed all popular tools to answer questions like, “How much plagiarism can they detect?” and “Are they actually free?”

Table of contents

Research methodology, general conclusions: free vs. paid checkers, 1. scribbr review, 2. quetext review, 3. duplichecker review, 4. small seo tools review, 5. pre post seo review, 6. grammarly review, 7. plagiarism detector review, 8. check-plagiarism.com review, 9. search engine reports review, 10. plagiarismchecker.co review, frequently asked questions about plagiarism checkers.

The plagiarism tools in this research are tested using 4 test documents , ranging from unedited to heavily edited.

Each test document consisted of plagiarized sections from 140 sources like Wikipedia articles, news articles, open-access journal articles, websites, theses and dissertations, and PDFs.

This setup allowed us to analyze:

  • The reliability of plagiarism checker tools, even when texts are edited to varying degrees
  • The depth and breadth of the tools’ content databases (whether they only covered websites or also journal articles)

Read more about the research methodology

We found that free tools were frequently misleading in their advertising and were lacking in many ways compared to paid ones. Our research led to these conclusions:

best plagiarism checker scribbr

  • Offers a limited free version
  • Finds far more plagiarism than other tools
  • Detects plagiarism even in edited texts
  • Won’t store or sell your documents
  • Money-back happiness guarantee, with live support available
  • Self-Plagiarism Checker feature allows you to check for self-plagiarism
  • You need to go premium to find out your precise similarity score and view the entire report

Scribbr offers a limited free version that’s perfect for checking if your paper contains potential plagiarism. To view the full report, you need to buy the premium version, which costs between $19.95 and $39.95 depending on the word count. There’s no word limit, so you can upload as big a document as you want.

Quality of matches

Scribbr’s checker, developed in partnership with Turnitin, heavily outperformed all free and paid tools in terms of the amount of plagiarism detected: 83% vs. an average of 42% across free tools.

It performed particularly well with source types relevant to students, such as journal articles and dissertations. Importantly, Scribbr was far more successful than other tools at detecting plagiarism in heavily edited texts, showing it has no trouble with paraphrasing plagiarism.

Scribbr could also consistently provide full matches instead of partial ones, matching the whole plagiarized passage to the correct source.

You see your results in a straightforward downloadable report. Different sources are highlighted in different colors, making it more readable.

The issues identified can be fixed with Scribbr’s Citation Generator , generating correctly formatted citations wherever they are needed.

In addition, Scribbr offers a Self-Plagiarism Checker . This unique tool allows users to upload their own unpublished documents in addition to the public database, to detect any possible self-plagiarism.

However, you can’t edit your text directly in the tool, and it’s not possible to re-check your document for free.


Scribbr will not store, sell, or share your uploaded documents. Data is automatically deleted after 30 days, or students can opt to manually delete their document after the check.

Live customer support is offered in multiple languages to assist users. A guide and other resources explaining plagiarism issues are easily accessible.

Scribbr also has a happiness guarantee: if you’re not satisfied with the tool for any reason, you can ask for a new check or a refund.

Check out Scribbr

que text

  • Built-in citation assistant helps to add missing citations
  • Documents not stored in database
  • Support options available (but no live support)
  • Finds partial matches
  • Not clear how the free trial works
  • Monthly subscription of at least $8.25 after free trial
  • Not effective for scholarly sources
  • Doesn’t detect all plagiarism

Quetext offers a free trial of 500 words, after which users must pay for a premium plan.

Additionally, uploading files to Quetext is a Pro feature. If you don’t pay, you’ll have to copy-paste the text from your document instead.

The paid version costs at least $8.25 per month (more expensive plans are available), which allows you to check up to 100,000 words.

Quetext detects more plagiarism (49% on average) than any free tool, but it’s unable to match each source text fully to a single source. Different sentences are attributed to different sources.

While Quetext claims to check against academic sources, we found it didn’t perform well at identifying plagiarism from sources such as journal articles and student dissertations.

Quetext’s plagiarism report is relatively straightforward to understand and provides a useful overview. A precise percentage is shown, with similarities in the text highlighted.

However, different sources are not highlighted in different colors, making the report somewhat difficult to read. Instead, orange highlighting is used for partial matches, red for full matches.

There’s also a built-in citation assistant that can help you fix plagiarism by adding citations. Unfortunately, it’s not very robust. Citations generated this way may not be accurate, and you have to add a lot of information manually.

Quetext states that it doesn’t save your text to a database and that all text submitted remains private and encrypted.

Information about the service is available in the form of FAQs on the website, and it’s also possible to contact the company by submitting a request form.

Check out Quetext


  • Free (1,000 words per scan)
  • Doesn’t save uploaded documents
  • Relatively user-friendly reports
  • Distracting ads for other services
  • Low level of plagiarism detected
  • Performs very poorly with edited text
  • No color coding for different sources

DupliChecker’s service is free, though you can only upload 1,000 words at a time. If you go for one of their premium plans, you can go up to 25,000.

If you do want to upgrade, a large number of different premium plans are offered on the site, which can be somewhat confusing to navigate. The cheapest is $10 a month.

The level of plagiarism detected by DupliChecker was relatively low (44%).

While the tool was able to find some plagiarism, it was unable to find any full matches. Overall, it performed about as well as other checkers like Small SEO Tools.

DupliChecker’s website is unfortunately full of ads for their other services and for similar sites. A distracting animated “Make it unique” button appears in the report, advertising their rewriting tool.

In the online report, all plagiarized text is highlighted in one color, and it is difficult to figure out what source each source block is matched with.

The site claims not to save uploaded documents, and it deletes content after the check is complete to avoid data leakage. No live support is available, but there is a contact form on the website.

Check out DupliChecker


  • Various options for document uploads
  • Page is slow, somewhat confusing, and full of ads
  • Scans individual sentences rather than full texts

Small SEO Tools is free to use, although you can only check 1,000 words at a time without paying.

You can run multiple checks if you need to scan more than that, although the site requires you to complete CAPTCHAs to upload multiple documents.

Small SEO Tools was unable to identify most plagiarism in our test documents, with an average of only 44%. Since it scans individual sentences separately, it was only ever able to produce partial matches.

Plagiarized text is highlighted (though all in one color), and you can click on it to be shown the source it was matched with.

The page is cluttered with a lot of ads that you can easily confuse with the buttons you need to press.

The report itself is relatively clear. While plagiarized text is highlighted in one color, the tool clearly links matched text with the source identified for it.

Small SEO Tools claims not to store your content after checking it. You don’t have to register to use the tool. Users can also contact a support email to request their personal data be erased.

Check out Small SEO Tools


  • 1,000-word upload limit
  • Color-coded highlighting
  • Some full matches
  • Citation assistant
  • Live support option
  • Detects a low proportion of plagiarism
  • Report is hard to read
  • Messy, ad-heavy page design
  • Color coding doesn’t distinguish between different sources

It’s unclear whether Pre Post SEO is actually a free tool. While the website claims there’s a search query limit for visitors, the limit is not clearly specified and did not seem to apply when we tested our documents.

You can only scan up to 1,000 words per search and cannot see a complete list of matched sources (instead, you must check them manually). These limits are removed if you sign up for their premium plan, which costs $10 to $45 a month.

Pre Post SEO did find the occasional full match, but in most cases it was only able to find partial matches, like most free checkers. Overall, it performed about as well as tools like DupliChecker and Small SEO Tools.

The page where the checker is hosted is full of distracting and irrelevant ads, making the user experience frustrating.

A different color was used for verbatim plagiarism and paraphrasing plagiarism, but the tool’s judgment was often wrong. Other than that, the same color was used for different sources, which made the report hard to read.

Pre Post SEO states that it does not store or sell your documents. There is a live support option on the site and a form you can use to request support.

Check out Pre Post SEO


  • Language and citation assistant available
  • Does not sell or share documents with third parties
  • Finds a relatively low percentage of plagiarism
  • Same colors used for different sources

Despite the way it’s advertised, Grammarly’s checker is not free. All you can do is see a screen that tells you there’s plagiarism in your text without giving you any details of where it is, how much of it there is, or what the sources are.

After this you’ll be directed to download the Grammarly app and subscribe to their premium service ($30 per month). There’s a limit of 100,000 characters (about 20,000 words) even after paying.

Grammarly was able to find more full matches than most free tools. However, it performed particularly poorly with academic sources and received a low percentage overall, scoring a total of 40%.

As a premium service, Grammarly has a clearer and more visually appealing style than most free checkers. The original formatting of the document remains mostly intact, but the tool uses the same color for all sources, making the results hard to parse.

The subscription also gets you a language and style tool and a citation assistant.

Grammarly does not store, sell, or share documents with third parties.

The site provides a support page with tips, tutorials, and FAQs, and you can submit a question via a form. Live support is not available.

Check out Grammarly

plag detector

  • Free to use (1,000-word limit)
  • Does not store or sell your document
  • Technical issues with long documents
  • Difficult to match text with sources in the report
  • Different sources highlighted in the same color

Plagiarism Detector is free to use and users do not need to register. However, there is a limit of 1,000 words per document. By paying, you can raise this limit to 25,000 words per document.

Plagiarism Detector’s performed about as well as other 100% free tools (40%).

The tool was mostly only able to find partial matches, attributing individual sentences to one or more sources.

Plagiarism Detector’s reports are somewhat difficult to read. The same colors are used for different sources, and hovering over a plagiarized section doesn’t show you the source. Instead, you need to find it in a separate list.

Plagiarism Detector states that it will not store or sell your documents. No live support is available, but there is a help request form.

Check out Plagiarism Detector

Check Plagiarism

  • Offers a citation generator
  • Difficult to match text with sources in the downloadable report
  • Scans sentence by sentence —rarely gets a full match

It’s unclear whether Check-plagiarism.com is actually free. The site describes the free upload limit in a confusing way, allowing you a certain number of “queries” (sentences) per month. However, these limits are not clearly specified and did not seem to apply when we tested our documents.

Check-plagiarism.com performed slightly worse than most 100% free tools, scoring a total of 39%.

While the tool was able to find some full matches, it mostly found partial matches.

The same color was used for different sources, which made the report hard to read. A different color was used for verbatim plagiarism and paraphrasing plagiarism, but the tool was often wrong.

You can check up to 1,000 words at once for free. 

In the downloadable report, the format of the text is mostly retained. The report provides a long list of sources that are difficult to cross-reference with the text above.

The version of the report shown on the site itself is slightly better, as a box next to the plagiarized text allows you to see the text identified as the source. There is a “rewrite” function, along with a (manual) citation tool.

Check-plagiarism.com claims that the reports generated on their site are “highly secured and un-accessible.”

There are some FAQs listed on the site, but the answers provided are not very clear. They have live messaging support along with a contact form.

Check out Check-plagiarism.com


  • Genuinely free for most purposes (1,000-word upload limit)
  • Lots of distracting ads
  • Unable to find most of the plagiarism
  • Same highlight colors for different sources

Search Engine Reports is free to use, and users do not need to register. However, there is a limit of 1,000 words per scan. By paying, you can raise this limit to 30,000 words per scan.

The methodology this tool uses to find matches appears highly unreliable. It seems to simply search Google for each sentence in your document, counting it as plagiarism if it finds a match.

It identified only a low proportion of the plagiarism (38%) in our test documents. Due to its methodology, it was usually unable to find full matches, and it performed particularly poorly with scholarly sources such as dissertations and journal articles.

The report shown on the site gives a list of individual sentences marked as plagiarized or original. You can click a link next to each source, but all it does is google the sentence in question. The downloadable report highlights plagiarism within the text and shows a list of sources, but it doesn’t clearly link each sentence with a source.

There is also a language statistics function that lets you see words that appear frequently in the text to help limit repetition.

Search Engine Reports claims not to store any uploaded content in their database. There is no live support, but there is a contact form.

Check out Search Engine Reports


  • Uploaded documents not stored/sold
  • Detects a very low amount of plagiarism
  • Misleading about costs—only free for five documents
  • Low word limit of 800
  • Lots of distracting ads and pop-ups

The tool claims it’s free, but it actually only allows you to upload five documents before requiring you to sign up for one of their many premium plans. These documents have an unusually low word limit of 800.

The premium plans offer options to increase (but not remove) this word limit. The cheapest is $15 per month, which only increases the limit to 1,000 words—a limit many other tools offer for free.

Plagiarismchecker.co gave some of the worst results out of all the checkers we tested, with an average of 30%. It was never able to provide a full match for a source text, only partial.

The tool is frustrating to use due to the high number of ads it displays and the low word limit.

The downloadable report sometimes didn’t include the plagiarism percentage, making it impossible to know how much of the text was plagiarized/original.

The report itself is difficult to read. All plagiarized text is highlighted in one color and is not clearly matched with the source identified for it.

The site claims that uploaded content is not stored in a database or shared with others. It also claims that “our advanced AI-powered algorithm ensures that your content must be protected under the copyright laws.” It’s not clear what this means.

While the site claims to have 24-hour support, there is no live support. There is a contact form on the site.

Check out Plagiarismchecker.co

Yes, Scribbr offers a limited free version of its plagiarism checker in partnership with Turnitin. It uses Turnitin’s industry-leading plagiarism detection technology and has access to most content databases.

Run a free plagiarism check

If you’re a university representative, you can contact the sales department of Turnitin .

Scribbr is an authorized Turnitin partner

Plagiarism can be detected by your professor or readers if the tone, formatting, or style of your text is different in different parts of your paper, or if they’re familiar with the plagiarized source.

Many universities also use plagiarism detection software like Turnitin’s, which compares your text to a large database of other sources, flagging any similarities that come up.

It can be easier than you think to commit plagiarism by accident. Consider using a plagiarism checker prior to submitting your paper to ensure you haven’t missed any citations.

The accuracy depends on the plagiarism checker you use. Per our in-depth research , Scribbr is the most accurate plagiarism checker. Many free plagiarism checkers fail to detect all plagiarism or falsely flag text as plagiarism.

Plagiarism checkers work by using advanced database software to scan for matches between your text and existing texts. Their accuracy is determined by two factors: the algorithm (which recognizes the plagiarism) and the size of the database (with which your document is compared).

Your document will be compared to the world’s largest and fastest-growing content database , containing over:

  • 99.3 billion current and historical webpages.
  • 8 million publications from more than 1,700 publishers such as Springer, IEEE, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, and Taylor & Francis.

Note: Scribbr does not have access to Turnitin’s global database with student papers. Only your university can add and compare submissions to this database.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Driessen, K. (2023, June 08). 10 Best Free Plagiarism Checkers in 2023 | Tested & Reviewed. Scribbr. Retrieved February 19, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/plagiarism/best-free-plagiarism-checker/

Is this article helpful?

Koen Driessen

Koen Driessen

Other students also liked, types of plagiarism and how to recognize them, how to avoid plagiarism | tips on citing sources, best plagiarism checkers of 2023 compared, what is your plagiarism score.

Harvard officials denounce 'antisemitic' photo shared by student groups

The student groups have apologized for the post.

Harvard University officials are denouncing a cartoon deemed antisemitic after it was posted and then deleted on social media by a student group collective.

The infographic from the student groups Harvard Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity Committee and the African American Resistance Organization was intended to explain similarities between the Black and Palestinian liberation movements, according to the groups.

The graphic depicts a hand marked with the Jewish Star of David, with a dollar sign in the middle, according to Harvard interim president Alan M. Garber. The hand is holding a rope that is tied in a noose around the necks of a Black and Arab figure. An arm, marked as the "third world," is depicted as cutting the rope with a sword marked "liberation movement."

MORE: The Israel-Hamas war has college campuses on edge. How some are tackling the issue.

The cartoon prompted immediate backlash from the university and students and staff on campus.

"Perpetuating vile and hateful antisemitic tropes, or otherwise engaging in inflammatory rhetoric or sharing images that demean people on the basis of their identity, is precisely the opposite of what this moment demands of us," Gerber said in a statement Tuesday in response to the post and backlash.

PHOTO: Harvard University is seen in Cambridge, Mass., Dec. 12, 2023.

Gerber highlighted the ongoing tensions over the conflict between Israel and Hamas, pointing to complaints from Jewish, Israeli, Muslim, Palestinian, and Arab community members feeling "targeted, rejected, and ostracized."

Harvard University is one of several U.S. universities that have been mired in controversy since the terrorist attack by Hamas in Israel on Oct. 7 in which at least 1,200 were killed, according to Israeli officials. In the Gaza Strip, at least 29,313 people have been killed by Israeli forces since Oct. 7, according to the Hamas-controlled Ministry of Health.

Gerber continued, "The war and its effects on the lives of people directly affected by the conflict demand our profound concern and sympathy. We must approach one another with compassion, open minds, and mutual respect, our discourse grounded in facts and supported by reasoned argument.

The student groups who posted the cartoon have since apologized.

"The original antisemitic image wholly violated our internal standards and betrayed our fundamental values of justice and liberation," said the joint statement from the Harvard Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity Committee and African American Resistance Organization.

"The inclusion of the offensive caricature was an unprompted, painful error – a combination of ignorance and inadequate oversight," the groups' statement said.

The groups stated that though the image was promptly removed, "it should never have been published to begin with. We wholeheartedly apologize for the immense harm we caused."

Shortly after the Hamas terrorist attack on Israel, several pro-Palestine student groups issued a statement on the conflict, saying the Israeli regime is "entirely responsible for all unfolding violence."

"Today's events did not occur in a vacuum. For the last two decades, millions of Palestinians in Gaza have been forced to live in an open-air prison. Israeli officials promise to 'open the gates of hell,' and the massacres in Gaza have already commenced. Palestinians in Gaza have no shelters for refuge and nowhere to escape. In the coming days, Palestinians will be forced to bear the full brunt of Israel's violence," the Harvard student groups said in their statement after the attack.

MORE: Free speech debate intensifies after controversial hearing with university presidents

After the statement was released, the groups faced fierce backlash nationwide, with critics accusing them of supporting the Hamas attack – which the groups denied.

Then-Harvard president Claudine Gay was grilled alongside several other university presidents in a congressional hearing to answer criticism that they weren't doing enough to counter antisemitism on campus.

Since then, tensions on campus have continued. The university has since created the Antisemitism Advisory Group as well as the Presidential Task Force on Combating Islamophobia and Anti-Arab Bias.

In January, a group of Jewish students at Harvard filed a federal lawsuit claiming the school has "become a bastion of rampant anti-Jewish hatred and harassment" and alleging the administration has failed to protect them.

A spokesperson for Harvard University issued a statement to ABC News after the lawsuit was filed, saying, "We do not comment on pending litigation."

In early February, the U.S. Department of Education opened an investigation into possible discrimination at Harvard after Arab and Muslim students filed a civil rights complaint against the university for its alleged failure to protect pro-Palestinian students from harassment, intimidation and threats.

In a statement, Harvard told ABC News, "We support the work of the Office of Civil Rights to ensure students' rights to access educational programs are safeguarded and will work with the office to address their questions."

Related Topics

  • Antisemitism

Top Stories

anti essay free

Trump asks judge to delay the penalties in his civil fraud case

anti essay free

Police don't believe nonbinary student died from altercation

  • 3 hours ago

anti essay free

Parents of Gabby Petito and Brian Laundrie reach settlement in distress lawsuit

anti essay free

Trump faces warning signs that his fundraising prowess may have limits in 2024 campaign

  • Feb 21, 4:09 PM

anti essay free

NY AG says she may seize Trump's buildings if he can't pay his $354M civil fraud fine

  • Feb 20, 4:50 PM

ABC News Live

24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events

  • International edition
  • Australia edition
  • Europe edition

a view of an alleged former detention centre, known as Yengisheher-2, in Shule County in Kashgar in China's northwestern Xinjiang region

Genetics journal retracts 18 papers from China due to human rights concerns

Researchers used samples from populations deemed by experts and campaigners to be vulnerable to exploitation, including Uyghurs and Tibetans

A genetics journal from a leading scientific publisher has retracted 18 papers from China, in what is thought to be the biggest mass retraction of academic research due to concerns about human rights.

The articles were published in Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine (MGGM), a genetics journal published by the US academic publishing company Wiley. The papers were retracted this week after an agreement between the journal’s editor in chief, Suzanne Hart, and the publishing company. In a review process that took over two years, investigators found “inconsistencies” between the research and the consent documentation provided by researchers.

The papers by different scientists are all based on research that draws on DNA samples collected from populations in China . In several cases, the researchers used samples from populations deemed by experts and human rights campaigners to be vulnerable to exploitation and oppression in China, leading to concerns that they would not be able to freely consent to such samples being taken.

Several of the researchers are associated with public security authorities in China, a fact that “voids any notion of free informed consent”, said Yves Moreau, a professor of engineering at the University of Leuven, in Belgium, who focuses on DNA analysis. Moreau first raised concerns about the papers with Hart, MGGM’s editor-in-chief, in March 2021.

One retracted paper studies the DNA of Tibetans in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, using blood samples collected from 120 individuals. The article stated that “all individuals provided written informed consent” and that work was approved by the Fudan University ethics committee.

But the retraction notice published on Monday stated that an ethical review “uncovered inconsistencies between the consent documentation and the research reported; the documentation was not sufficiently detailed to resolve the concerns raised”.

Xie Jianhui, the corresponding author on the study, is from the department of forensic medicine at Fudan University in Shanghai. Xie did not respond to a request for comment, but the retraction notice states that Xie and his co-authors did not agree with the retraction.

Several of Xie’s co-authors are affiliated with the public security authorities in China, including the Tibetan public security authorities. Tibet is considered to be one of the most closely surveilled and tightly monitored regions in China. In Human Rights Watch’s most recent annual report , the campaign group said that the authorities “enforce severe restrictions on freedoms of religion, expression, movement, and assembly”.

Another of the retracted studies used blood samples from 340 Uyghur individuals in Kashgar, a city in Xinjiang, to study the genetic links between them and Uyghurs from other regions. The scientists said the data would be a resource for “forensic DNA and population genetics”.

The retracted papers were all published between 2019 and 2021. In 2021, after Moreau raised concerns about the papers in MGGM, eight of the journal’s 25 editors resigned. The journal’s editor in chief, Hart, has remained in her post. Hart and MGGM did not respond to a request for comment.

MGGM is considered by some to be a mid-ranking genetics publication. It has an impact factor of 2.473, which puts it roughly in the top 40% of journals. It is considered to be a relatively easy forum for publication, which may have been a draw for Chinese researchers looking to publish in English-language journals, said David Curtis, a professor of genetics at University College London. Curtis resigned from his position as editor-in-chief of Annals of Human Genetics, another Wiley journal, after the publisher vetoed a call to consider boycotting Chinese science because of ethical concerns, including those relating to DNA collection.

MGGM states that its scope is human, molecular and medical genetics. It primarily publishes studies on the medical applications of genetics, such as a recent paper on genetic disorders linked to hearing loss. The sudden pivot towards publishing forensic genetics research from China came as other forensic genetics journals started facing more scrutiny for publishing research based on DNA samples from vulnerable minorities in China, said Moreau. He argues that may have pushed more controversial research towards mid-ranking journals such as MGGM that do not specialise in forensic genetics.

On its information page, MGGM states that it “does not consider studies involving forensic genetic analysis”. That caveat was added in 2023, after an editorial review of the journal’s aims.

In recent years there has been a growing scrutiny on research that uses DNA or other biometric data from individuals in China, particularly those from vulnerable populations. In 2023 , Elsevier, a Dutch academic publisher, retracted an article based on blood and saliva samples from Uyghur and Kazakh people living in Xinjiang, a region in north-west China where there are also widespread reports of human rights abuses.

The Wiley retractions come days before a Chinese government deadline requiring universities to submit lists of all academic articles retracted in the past three years. According to an analysis by Nature, nearly 14,000 retraction notices were published last year, of which three-quarters involved a Chinese co-author.

A spokesperson for Wiley said: “We are continuing to learn from this case, and collaboration with international colleagues is valuable in developing our policies.

“Investigations that involve multiple papers, stakeholders and institutions require significant effort, and often involve lag time in coordinating and analysing information across all involved, as well as translation of materials. We recognise that this takes a significant amount of time but always aim to act as swiftly as possible.”

In recent years, China has outstripped the EU and the US in terms of total research output, and the impact of its research is also catching up with output from the US.

  • Asia Pacific

Most viewed

Go Premium

Paraphrasing Tool


Future of Writing your AI writing Assistant- Rewording

Rewording Offer a Premier Paraphrasing Solution!

Our AI writing assistant can boost your writing at Rewording, Time saving in rephrase of sentences and phara rephrase. This feature is powered with Rewording cutting-edge to any text, sentence, paragraph, essay, or article online. Select your language while para phrase io, and be an expert in seconds.


How to Use Rewording Paraphraser?

Optimizing writing development with rewording our ultimate re phrase tool para phraser io glance at all powered by ai writing assistant technology. save your time.

Set your power how much you want 45% to 100% text to change.

Auto language detector and Select and get your desired language while re phrase your word.

Select your tone Normal, Fun, or Creative voice out your words.

Simple Copy-paste, drag and drop, or upload text from images and documents.

History auto saver by registering your account at the rewording paraphrasing tool.

Explore and find your perfect combination of synonyms.

Scan up to 10,000 characters at once for phara rephrase your words.

Confidence is an advanced and unique work.

Why Use Rewording Paraphaser?

Rewording unique features do you have content that needs to be paraphrased and translated into another language we've got you covered you can translate into any language you desire while paraphrasing it. try it your self, now.


Rewording Premier Paraphrasing tool!

Highlights, rewording is an eager friendly, like you student or professional, simply rephrase sentences or text from essays, and articles in any language and para phraser io at any language and easy-adjust your word power from 40% to 100% with our re phrase tool. and simple copy-paste, drag and drop, or upload text from images and documents..


Impact of Rewording Paraphaser Tools?

Keep yourself refreshed, the beauty of writing is kind of tiring, this gives our freshness a haggardness, have you any ideas around using instant phara rephrase and focusing on your peace of mind, rewording offers para phrase io and not mislead while adding your personal touch remember to credit your sources using proper citation. get back to and ramp up your work without sacrificing your beauty..

Top 3 Benefits Just for You!

Trusted by over 10,000 users

Over 1,000,000 hours saved

10,000 character limit

Rewording.io is a free AI-powered online paraphrasing tool and grammar checker that helps you save time and avoid accidental plagiarism. Rewording.io has one of the highest character limits (10,000 characters) compared to other rewording tools. This tool is developed by a small team who wants to help writers create high-quality content across the web, fast and accurately! Turn manual writing processes into automated processes with our content rewriter, it’s simple and free.

How does paraphrasing work?

Paraphrase can refresh your sentence by replacing best synonyms and putting some ideas in your own text with the help of AI technology.

What’s the difference between paraphrasing and summarizing?

Paraphrasing is using existing content but writing it in a different way to make it your own but With Summarizer, you can take control of your content's presentation.

Is Rewording.io free to use?

When using Rewording.io for the first time, you receive 1 free credit. Creating an account grants you another free credit. If you exhaust your free credits, you can buy additional ones at affordable prices. Thank you for your support!

How much does Rewording.io cost?

It costs 1 credit each time you use our Paraphrasing tool or our Summarizing tool. It costs 5 credits each time you use our Plagiarism checking tool. Our cheapest plan starts at just 20 credits for $1.60. The more credits you purchase, the bigger discount you get. We also have monthly subscription and bulk credit purchase options available.

Do I need to create an account?

You can reword any text 1 time without creating an account. If you sign up for an account you will earn 1 free additional credit and you will have a higher character limit. You will also have access to a dashboard that contains your paraphrasing history, and you can also purchase more credits for your account when you’re signed in.

What is the best paraphrasing and rewording tool?

The best paraphrasing tool is one that has high credit limits, affordable plans, and different languages to choose from. Don’t settle for less - get the best by using Rewording.io for all your paraphrasing needs.

Is paraphrasing cheating?

No, paraphrasing is not cheating when done correctly. When paraphrasing, you should also add your own thoughts so you don’t repeat what has already been said. You should also cite the original author so you are not taking credit from them and passing the work off as your own.

Are paraphrasing tools illegal?

It is not illegal to use a paraphrasing tool. When you paraphrase text, that text becomes completely new. Every sentence becomes unique, especially when using the power of AI to help you choose the best synonyms.

Do paraphrasing tools plagiarise?

No, paraphrasing tools do not plagiarize, they use state-of-the-art AI technology to turn unoriginal sentences into original sentences. A paraphraser tool helps you create completely original and unique content that does not exist anywhere else.

Do credits expire?

If you purchase pay-as-you-go credits, those credits never expire. If you purchase a monthly subscription, then your credits will be reset at the end of the month and any unused credits will expire. Unused credits do not roll-over to the next month.

How can I contact you?

You can email us at [email protected]

  • Share full article


The Ezra Klein Show logo

  • February 21, 2024   •   1:02:55 Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work
  • February 16, 2024   •   25:12 Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden
  • February 9, 2024   •   1:05:42 Building the Palestinian State With Salam Fayyad
  • February 6, 2024   •   59:17 What Relationships Would You Want if You Believed They Were Possible?
  • February 1, 2024   •   1:09:13 ‘Why Haven’t the Democrats Completely Cleaned the Republicans’ Clock?’
  • January 25, 2024   •   1:08:34 ‘The Strongest Democratic Party That Any of Us Have Ever Seen’
  • January 19, 2024   •   1:08:27 ‘I Have No Idea How This Ends. I’ve Never Seen It So Broken.’
  • January 16, 2024   •   48:25 A Republican Pollster on Trump’s Undimmed Appeal
  • January 12, 2024   •   1:04:35 The Constitution Says Insurrectionists Can’t Hold Office. So What Is Trump?
  • January 9, 2024   •   1:02:26 How to Discover Your Own Taste
  • January 5, 2024   •   58:44 Tired? Distracted? Burned Out? Listen to This.
  • December 19, 2023   •   56:13 How My Conversations on Israel-Gaza Have Shaped My Thinking

Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden

It requires them to embrace an old-fashioned approach to winning a campaign..

Produced by ‘The Ezra Klein Show’

[You can listen to this episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” on the NYT Audio app , Apple , Spotify , Amazon Music , Google or wherever you get your podcasts .]

A full transcript of this audio essay is available here:

Ezra Klein: My heart breaks a bit for Joe Biden. This is a man who has been running for president since he was young. He wins the presidency, finally, unexpectedly, when he’s old. And that age brought him wisdom. It brought an openness that hadn’t always been there in him. He’s governed as a throwback to a time before “I alone can fix it,” a time when presidents were party leaders, coalition builders.

Biden has held together a Democratic Party that could easily have splintered. Think back to the 2020 campaign, when he beat Bernie Sanders, when he beat Elizabeth Warren, when his victory was seen as, was in reality, the moderate wing triumphing over the progressive wing, the establishment over the insurgents.

But instead of making them bend the knee, instead of acting as a victor, Biden acted as a leader. He partnered with Bernie Sanders. He built the unity task forces. He integrated Warren’s and Sanders’s ideas and staff into not just his campaign but also his administration.

I had a conversation recently with Pramila Jayapal, the chair of the House progressive caucus, and I asked her why the Democratic Party hadn’t ruptured the way Republicans did. She pointed me back to that moment. Biden, she said, made this “huge attempt to pull the Democratic Party back together before the 2020 election in a way I’ve really never seen before.”

And it worked. Democrats had 50 votes in the Senate. Fifty votes that stretched from Bernie Sanders on the left all the way to Joe Manchin on the right. Biden and Chuck Schumer, they often could not lose even one of those votes, and at crucial moments, they didn’t.

With that almost-impossible-to-hold-together coalition, the Biden administration and congressional Democrats passed a series of bills — the bipartisan infrastructure deal, the Inflation Reduction Act, the CHIPS and Science Act — that will make this a decade of infrastructure and invention. A decade of building, of decarbonizing, of researching. They expanded the Affordable Care Act, and it worked — more than 21 million people signed up for the A.C.A. last year, a record. They did what Democrats have promised to do forever and took at least the first steps toward letting Medicare negotiate drug prices.

And the Biden team, they said they were going to run the economy hot, that at long last, they were going to prioritize full employment, and they did. And then inflation shot up. Not just here but in Europe, in Canada, pretty much everywhere. The pandemic had twisted global supply chains and then the economy had reopened, and people desperate to live again took their pandemic savings and spent. And the Biden team, in partnership with Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve, got the rate of inflation back down, and we are still beneath 4 percent unemployment.

And I don’t want to just skip over that accomplishment. Most economists said that could not be done. The overwhelming consensus was we were headed for a recession, that the so-called soft landing was a fantasy. It got mocked as “immaculate disinflation.” But that is what happened. We didn’t have a recession. We are still seeing strong wage gains for the poorest Americans. Inequality is down. Growth is quick. America is far stronger economically right now than Europe, than Canada, than China. You want to be us.

And yet Biden’s poll numbers are dismal. His approval rating lingers in the high 30s. Most polls show him losing to Donald Trump in 2024. Then comes the special counsel report, which finds no criminal wrongdoing in his treatment of classified information, which is — remember — the question the special counsel was appointed to investigate. But the counsel takes a drive-by on Biden’s cognitive fitness. Says a jury would think him a “well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.” Says Biden doesn’t remember when his son Beau died.

And Biden, enraged, does what people have been asking him to do this whole time. He takes the age issue head on. And he gives a news conference full of fury.

And then, when he is about to leave, he comes back to take one more question — this one on Israel and Gaza, where he says that America is no longer lock step behind Benjamin Netanyahu’s invasion, and then describing the effort he put in getting President Sisi to open the Egyptian border for aid, he slips. He calls Sisi the president of Mexico. Makes the kind of slip anyone can make, but a kind of slip he is making too often now, a kind of slip that means more when he makes it than when someone else does.

Since the beginning of Biden’s administration, I have been asking people who work with him: How does he seem? How read in is he? What’s he like in the meetings? Maybe it’s not a great sign that I felt the need to do that, that a lot of reporters have been doing that, but still. And I am convinced, watching him, listening to the testimony of those who meet with him — not all people who like him — I am convinced he is able to do the job of the presidency. He is sharp in meetings; he makes sound judgments. I cannot point you to a moment where Biden faltered in his presidency because his age had slowed him.

But here’s the thing. I can now point you to moments when he is faltering in his campaign for the presidency because his age is slowing him. This distinction between the job of the presidency and the job of running for the presidency keeps getting muddied, including by Biden himself.

This is the question Democrats keep wanting to answer, the question the Biden administration keeps pretending only to hear: Can Biden do the job of president? But that is not the question of the 2024 campaign. The insistence that Biden is capable of being president is being used to shut down discussion of whether he’s capable of running for president.

I’ve had my own journey on this. I’ve written a number of columns about how Biden keeps proving pundits wrong, about how he’s proved me wrong. He won in 2020 despite plenty of naysayers. The Democrats won in 2022, defying predictions. I had, in 2022, been planning to write a column after the midterms saying there should be a primary because Democrats need to see how strong of a campaigner Biden still was. The test needed to be run. But when they overperformed, that drained all interest among the major possible candidates in running. That test wasn’t going to happen. But still, I thought, Biden might surprise again. I’d grown wary of underestimating him.

We had to wait till this year — till now, really — to see Biden even begin to show what he’d be like on the campaign trail. And what I think we’re seeing is that he is not up for this. He is not the campaigner he was, even five years ago. That’s not insider reporting on my part. Go watch a speech he gave in Pennsylvania, kicking off his campaign in 2019. And then go watch the speech he gave last month, in Valley Forge, kicking off his election campaign. No comparison here. Both speeches are on YouTube, and you can see it. The way he moves, the energy in his voice. The Democrats denying decline are only fooling themselves.

But even given that, I was stunned when his team declined a Super Bowl interview. Biden is not up by 12 points. He can’t coast to victory here. He is losing. He is behind in most polls. He is behind, despite everything people already know about Donald Trump. He needs to make up ground. If he does not make up ground, Trump wins.

The Super Bowl is one of the biggest audiences you will ever have. And you just skip it? You just say no?

The Biden team’s argument, to be fair, is this: Who wants to see the president during the Super Bowl, anyway? And even if they did the interview, CBS would just choose three or four minutes of a 15-minute interview to air. What if CBS chooses a clip that makes Biden look bad?

That’s all true. But that’s all true in the context of a team that does not believe that the more people see Biden, the more they will like him. There’s a reason other presidents do the Super Bowl interview. There’s a reason Biden himself did it in 2021 and 2022, that Trump said he’d gladly take Biden’s place this year.

I was talking to James Carville, who’s one of the chief strategists behind Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign, and he put this really well to me. He said to me that a campaign has certain assets, but the most desirable asset is the candidate. And the Biden campaign does not deploy Biden like he is a desirable asset.

Biden has done fewer interviews than any recent president, and it’s not close. By this point in their presidencies, Barack Obama had given more than 400 interviews and Trump had given more than 300. Biden has given fewer than 100. And a bunch of them are softball interviews — he’ll go on Conan O’Brien’s podcast, or Jay Shetty’s mindfulness podcast. The Biden team says this is a strategy, that they need apolitical voters, the ones who are not listening to political media. But one, this strategy isn’t working — Biden is down, not up. And two, no one really buys this argument. I don’t buy this argument. This isn’t a strategy chosen from a full universe of options. This is a strategic adaptation to Biden’s perceived limits as a candidate. And what’s worse, it may be a wise one.

I want to say this clearly: I like Biden. I think he’s been a good president. I think he is a good president. I don’t like having this conversation. And I know a lot of liberals, a lot of Democrats are going to be furious at me for this show.

But to say this is a media invention, that people are worried about Biden’s age because the media keeps telling them to be worried about Biden’s age? If you have really convinced yourself of that, in your heart of hearts, I almost don’t know what to tell you. In poll after poll, 70 percent to 80 percent of voters are worried about his age. This is not a thing people need the media to see. It is right in front of them, and it is also shaping how Biden and his campaign are acting.

Democrats keep telling themselves, when they look at the polls, that voters will come back to Biden when the campaign starts in earnest and they begin seeing more of Trump, when they have to take what he is and what it would mean for him to return seriously.

But that is going to go both ways. When the campaign begins in earnest, they will also see much more of Joe Biden. People who barely pay attention to him now, they will be watching his speeches. They will see him on the news constantly. Will they actually like what they see? Will it comfort them?

That was why that news conference mattered. That news conference had a point. It had a purpose. The purpose was to reassure voters of Biden’s cognitive fitness, particularly his memory. And Biden couldn’t do that, not for one night, not for fewer than 15 minutes. And these kinds of gaffes have become commonplace for him. He recently said he’d been speaking to the former French president Francois Mitterrand when he meant Emmanuel Macron. He said he’d been talking to the former German chancellor Helmut Kohl when he meant Angela Merkel.

None of these matter much on their own. The human mind just does this. But it does it more as you get older. And they do matter collectively. Voters believe Biden is too old for the job he seeks. He needs to persuade them otherwise, and he is failing at that task — arguably the central task of his re-election campaign.

And that can become a self-fulfilling cycle. His staff knows that news conference was a disaster. So how will they respond? What will they do now? They will hold him back from aggressive campaigning even more, from unscripted situations. They will try to make doubly sure that it doesn’t happen again. But they need a candidate — Democrats need a candidate — who can aggressively campaign, because again — and I cannot emphasize this enough — they are currently losing.

Part of my job is talking to the kinds of Democrats who run and win campaigns constantly. All of them are worried about this. None of them say that this is an invention or not a real issue. And this is key: It’s not the age itself they are worried about. The age of 81 doesn’t mean anything. It’s the impression Biden is giving of age. Of slowness. Of frailty.

The presidency is a performance. You are not just making decisions, you are also acting out the things people want to believe about their president — that the president is in command, strong, energetic, compassionate, thoughtful, that they don’t need to worry about all that is happening in the world, because the president has it all under control.

Whether it is true that Biden has it all under control, it is not true that he seems like he does. Some political strategists I know think that’s why his poll numbers are low. That even when good things happen, people don’t really think he did them. One was telling me that what worries him most about Biden is how stable his approval rating is — it doesn’t really go up or down. Inflation has gone down a lot in recent months. People feel a lot better about the economy. You can see that in consumer sentiment data. But Biden’s approval rating, it has not gone up. His performance on Ukraine did not make it go up. The passage of the Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS Act did not make it go up. To this strategist, it looked like a lot of Americans just don’t give Biden credit for things even when he deserves them. And Biden isn’t now a capable or aggressive enough campaigner to win that credit for himself.

The arguments I see even some smart Democrats making so they don’t have to look at this directly are self-defeating. The one I hear most often is that Trump is also old. He’s 77. He also mixes up names — he recently called Nancy Pelosi Nikki Haley. He sometimes speaks in gibberish. And it’s all true. But that is a reason to nominate a candidate who can exploit the fact that Trump is old and confused. The point is not to give Trump an even match. The point is to beat Trump.

Another argument I see is that this is ageism. This is an unfair thing to point out about Biden. It is age discrimination and, I have actually seen people make this argument, age discrimination is illegal in the workplace. But it is not illegal in the electorate. If the voters are ageist and Biden loses because of it, there is no recourse. You cannot sue the voters for age discrimination.

And then there’s the argument you’ve heard on my podcast. An argument I’ve made before. Biden doesn’t look like a strong candidate, but Democrats keep on winning. Biden won in 2020. Democrats won in 2022. They’ve been winning special elections in 2023. They just won George Santos’s seat in New York. There’s an anti-MAGA majority in this country and they will come out to stop Trump. And I think that might be true. I still think Biden might win against Trump, even with all I’ve said. It’s just that there’s a very good chance he might lose. Maybe even better than even odds. And Trump is dangerous. I want better odds than that.

I think one reason Democrats react so defensively to critiques of Biden is they’ve come to a kind of fatalism. They believe it is too late to do anything else. And if it is too late to do anything else, then to talk about Biden’s age is to contribute to Donald Trump’s victory.

But that’s absurd.

It is February. Fatalism this far before the election is ridiculous. Yeah, it’s too late to throw this to primaries. But it’s not too late to do something.

So then what? Step one, unfortunately, is convincing Biden that he should not run again. That he does not want to risk being Ruth Bader Ginsburg — a heroic, brilliant public servant who caused the outcome she feared most because she didn’t retire early enough. That in stepping aside he would be able to finish out his term as a strong and focused president, and people would see the honor in what he did, in putting his country over his ambitions.

The people whom Biden listens to — Barack Obama, Chuck Schumer, Mike Donilon, Ron Klain, Nancy Pelosi, Anita Dunn — they need to get him to see this. Biden may come to see it himself.

I take nothing away from how hard that is, how much Biden wants to finish the job he has started, keep doing the good he believes he can do. Retirement can be, often is, a trauma. But losing to Donald Trump would be far worse.

Let’s say that happens: Biden steps aside. Then what? Well, then Democrats do something that used to be common in politics but hasn’t been in decades. They pick their nominee at the convention. This is how parties chose their nominees for most of American history. From roughly 1831 to 1968, this is how it worked. In a way, this is still how it works.

I’m going to do a whole episode on how an open convention works, so this is going to be a quick version. The way we pick nominees now is still built around conventions. When someone wins a primary or a caucus, what he actually wins is delegate slots. How that works is different in different states. Then they go to the convention to choose the actual nominee.

The whole convention structure is still there. We still use it. It is still the delegates voting at the convention. What’s different now than in the past is that most delegates arrive at the convention committed to a candidate. But without getting too into the weeds of state delegate rules here, if their candidate drops out, if Biden drops out, they can be released to vote for who they want.

The last open convention Democrats had was 1968, a disaster of a convention where the Democratic Party split between pro- and anti-Vietnam War factions, where there was violence in the streets, where Democrats lost the election.

But that’s not how most conventions have gone. It was a convention that picked Abraham Lincoln over William Seward. It was a convention that chose F.D.R. over Al Smith. I’ve been reading Ed Achorn’s book “The Lincoln Miracle: Inside the Republican Convention That Changed History.” My favorite line in it comes from Senator Charles Sumner, who sends a welcome note to the delegates, “whose duty it will be to organize victory.”

Whose duty it will be to organize victory — I love that. That’s what a convention is supposed to do. It’s what a political party is supposed to do: organize victory. Because victory doesn’t just happen. It has to be organized.

Everybody I have talked about this, literally everybody, has brought up the same fear. Call it the Kamala Harris problem. In theory, she should be the favorite. But she polls slightly worse than Biden. Democrats don’t trust that she would be a stronger candidate. But they worry that if she wasn’t chosen it would rip the party apart. I think this is wrong on two levels.

First, I think Harris is underrated now. I’ve thought this for a while. I’ve said this before, that I think she’s going to have a good 2024. Is she a political juggernaut, a generational political talent? Probably not. But she’s a capable politician, which is one reason Biden chose her as his running mate in the first place. She has not thrived as vice president. The D.C. narrative on her has turned extremely negative. But when Kamala Harris ran campaigns as Kamala Harris, this wasn’t how she was seen. And Harris, in private settings — she’s enormously magnetic and compelling.

Her challenge would be translating that into a public persona, which is — and let’s be blunt about this — a hard thing to do when you’ve grown up in a world that has always been quick to find your faults. A world that is afraid of women being angry, of Black people being angry. A world where, for most of your life, it was demanded of you that you be cautious and careful and measured and never make a mistake. And then you get on the public stage and people say, oh, you’re too cautious and too careful and too measured. It’s a very, very, very hard bind to get out of. But maybe she can do it.

Still, it is the party’s job to organize victory. If Harris cannot convince delegates that she has the best shot at victory, she should not and probably would not be chosen. And I don’t think that would rip the party apart. There is a ton of talent in the Democratic Party right now: Gretchen Whitmer, Wes Moore, Jared Polis, Gavin Newsom, Raphael Warnock, Josh Shapiro, Cory Booker, Ro Khanna, Pete Buttigieg, Gina Raimondo, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Chris Murphy, Andy Beshear, J.B. Pritzker — the list goes on.

Some of them would make a run at the nomination. They would give speeches at the convention, and people would actually pay attention. The whole country would be watching the Democratic convention, and probably quite a bit happening in the run-up to it, and seeing what this murderer’s row of political talent could actually do. And then some ticket would be chosen based on how those people did.

Could it go badly? Sure. But that doesn’t mean it will go badly. It could make the Democrats into the most exciting political show on earth. And over there on the other side will be Trump getting nominated and a who’s who of MAGA types slavering over his leadership. The best of the Democratic Party against the worst of the Republican Party. A party that actually listened to the voters against a party that denies the outcome of the elections. A party that did something different over a party that has again nominated a threat to democracy who has never — not once — won the popular vote in a general election.

That seems like an OK contrast to me.

Yes, the Democratic Party has been winning elections recently. But it is winning those elections in part because it takes candidate recruitment seriously. That was true in 2020. Biden wasn’t the candidate that set the base’s heart aflutter, but he seemed like the candidate with the best shot at winning. So Democrats did the strategic thing and picked him. And they won. In 2022, Democrats carefully chose candidates who fit their districts, who fit their states while Republicans chose MAGA-soaked extremists. And that is why those Democrats won.

The lesson here is not that Democrats don’t need to think hard about who they run in elections. It’s that they do need to think hard about who they run in elections. And they have been. They need to be strategic, not sentimental. And they have been. Because the alternative is Donald Trump. And Donald Trump is dangerous. And right now, Donald Trump is ahead.

I have this nightmare that Trump wins in 2024. And then in 2025 and 2026, out come the campaign tell-all books, and they’re full of emails and WhatsApp messages between Biden staffers and Democratic leaders, where they’re all saying to each other, this is a disaster, he’s not going to win this, I can’t bear to watch this speech, we’re going to lose. But they didn’t say any of it publicly, they didn’t do anything, because it was too dangerous for their careers, or too uncomfortable given their loyalty to Biden.

I’ve said on the show before that we live in a strange era with the parties. We’ve gone from the cliché being that Democrats fall in love and Republicans fall in line, to the reality being that Democrats fall in line and Republicans fall apart. I’ve mostly meant that as a critique of Republican chaos, but too much order can be its own kind of pathology. A party that is too quick to fall in line, that cannot break line, is a party that will be too slow, maybe unable, to solve hard problems.

So yes, I think Biden, as painful as this is, should find his way to stepping down as a hero. That the party should help him find his way to that, to being the thing he said he would be in 2020, the bridge to the next generation of Democrats. And then I think Democrats should meet in August at the convention to do what political parties have done there before: organize victory.

I recognize there’s going to be a lot of questions and comments and pushback to this piece. So we’re going to do an “Ask Me Anything” episode next week — on this, on 2024 broadly. We’ve set up a voice mail box, if you want to leave a message that could get played on the show. Please keep them under a minute. We’re not going to use ones that are very long. The number for that is 212-556-7300. Or you can email us, both text and a voice note, at [email protected].

You can listen to our whole conversation by following “The Ezra Klein Show” on the NYT Audio app , Apple , Spotify , Google or wherever you get your podcasts . View a list of book recommendations from our guests here .

An image of President Joe Biden

This audio essay for “The Ezra Klein Show” was fact-checked by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , X and Threads .

We've detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.

Why did this happen?

Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy .

For inquiries related to this message please contact our support team and provide the reference ID below.



    anti essay free

  2. Anti Essay Help Service

    anti essay free

  3. A template for developing an Anti

    anti essay free

  4. A for and against essay

    anti essay free

  5. Anti essay

    anti essay free

  6. Anti essay

    anti essay free


  1. Essay: Anti-social

  2. Submitting an essay Last Minute Be Like 😂


  1. Writing Help for Essays, Term Papers & Research Papers

    Writing Help for Essays, Term Papers & Research Papers | Anti Essays Example Essays and Topics to Inspire the Best Writing Discover thousands of topics and model essays to help you refine your thesis, get inspiration for your paper, and battle writer's block. Write your essay with no mistakes.

  2. Free AI Detector

    0/500 words Analyze text % Why use Scribbr's AI Detector Authority on AI and plagiarism Our plagiarism and AI detection tools and helpful content are used by millions of users every month. Unlimited free AI checks Perform an unlimited number of AI content checks for free, ensuring all of your work is authentic. No sign-up required

  3. Free AI Paraphrasing Tool

    Free AI Paraphrasing Tool Quickly rephrase and reword any text for essays, articles, emails, and more. Paraphrase this copy... English Settings 👔 Formal Writing tone Paraphrase Use cases of Ahrefs' Paraphrasing Tool

  4. #1 Free Paraphrasing Tool

    The paraphrasing tool is ad-free! Multi-lingual Use our paraphraser for texts in different languages. What's a paraphrasing tool? This AI-powered paraphraser lets you rewrite text in your own words. Use it to paraphrase articles, essays, and other pieces of text. You can also use it to rephrase sentences and find synonyms for individual words.

  5. WriteHuman: Undetectable AI and AI Humanizer

    1 Click Write Human to humanize AI text WriteHuman is a powerful AI detection remover that works seamlessly with Turnitin, ZeroGPT, and others. Bypass AI Detection with WriteHuman Protect your online privacy and maintain anonymity. Supercharge your text with WriteHuman to eliminate AI tracking and bypass AI detection.

  6. AI Content Detection Remover: Rewrite & Bypass AI Detection

    Smodin's AI Content Detection Remover provides users with a powerful solution for maintaining the creative essence of AI-generated content while bypassing AI detection software and tools. Our tool expertly restructures and rewrites your content, making it less recognizable as AI-generated while preserving its unique insights and ideas.

  7. Free Plagiarism Checker in Partnership with Turnitin

    3,475 reviews on What you get with a premium plagiarism check Plagiarism Checker Catch accidental plagiarism with high accuracy with Scribbr's Plagiarism Checker in partnership with Turnitin. AI Detector Detect AI-generated content, like ChatGPT3.5 and GPT4, with Scribbr's AI Detector in partnership with Turnitin.

  8. Plagiarism Checker

    Grammarly's online plagiarism checker can help you ensure that you have properly identified and cited anything in your text that isn't 100 percent original. We originally designed our online plagiarism checker for students, but it's a useful tool for writers in any field who want to create fresh, original, plagiarism-free work.

  9. Original Writing, Made Easy

    Get started Try Quetext today! Ready to stop wasting time with that old-school "plagiarism tool" from the 90's? Start using Quetext today for free! Signup Free! Plagiarism Checker by Quetext. Our proprietary DeepSearch™ plagiarism checker searches for similarities across billions of documents

  10. Free AI Paragraph Rewriter

    Ahrefs' Paragraph Rewriter can be beneficial for content creators, editors, or writers who need to enhance or refine their written content. By inputting a paragraph into the tool, users can receive a rewritten version that offers improved clarity, structure, and overall quality. This use case can save time and effort in the manual editing ...

  11. Free AI-Powered Essay and Paper Checker—QuillBot AI

    Accuracy Students often ask a friend or family member, "Can you check my paper?" But some errors are so common that they're likely to be missed this way. With our essay checker, you can be sure you're seeing and fixing every error. Academic integrity Yes, there are essay writing services out there, but they're unethical.

  12. Free Essay Checker

    Grammarly's free essay-checking tool will help you review your papers for grammatical mistakes, unclear sentences, and misused words. Save time and be confident your work will make the grade! ... Don't turn your essay in before running it through Grammarly. You can instantly catch writing mistakes, refine your sentences, and receive ...

  13. AI Detector, AI Checker, & AI Humanizer

    Instead of only being a ChatGPT detector, our tool integrates with both free and paid AI detectors. So, it will recognize text from GPT3, GPT4, Claude, Bard and any other AI writing tool. Experience the power of collective intelligence as our AI detector shows you how various other AI detectors perceive your text.

  14. Essay Checker: Free Grammar & Plagiarism Check

    Thankfully, the EasyBib Plus plagiarism tool provides all-in-one support to cover all your bases. Our premium essay checker is convenient, easy to use, and includes access to a grammar and spell checker, plus a plagiarism checker. With a single scan, you'll receive personalized feedback to help identify potentially missing citations and help ...

  15. Plagiarism Checker: Free Scan for Plagiarism

    Simply copy and paste or upload your essay into the checker at the top of this page. You'll receive the first five grammar suggestions for free! To try the plagiarism checker for free, start your EasyBib Plus three-day free trial.* If you love the product and decide to opt for premium services, you'll have access to unlimited writing ...

  16. Free Paraphrasing Tool to Avoid Plagiarism

    Free Paraphrasing Tool to Avoid Plagiarism 13,000 characters left Timely delivery! Get your custom-written paper in 3 hours! Learn More Paraphrase words with capital letter Something went wrong while handling your request Paraphrase my text Rate: (Votes: 0 ) Here is your result: Your result will be here Copy Copied Stats: 0 Sentences 0

  17. Essay Rewriter Tool for Students

    The Essay Rewriter tool is easy to use. Follow these steps to obtain a perfectly paraphrased text. Copy the original that you need to rewrite. Paste it into the tool, checking if the text length doesn't exceed the limit. Select the required paraphrasing rate. Press the "Rewrite" button. Copy the result for further use.

  18. The Fight Over Academic Freedom

    Feb. 16, 2024. Academic freedom is a bedrock of the modern American university. And lately, it seems to be coming under fire from all directions. For many scholars, the biggest danger is at public ...

  19. Plagiarism Checker

    Plagiarism Checker To be specific, Plagiarism checking or content's similarity detection is a process of identifying the occurrence of plagiarism or copyright infringement within a work of content for writer, teacher, student blogger, webmaster, or any document. What we offer! Multiple File Formats Use multiple ways of uploading text.

  20. Free Paraphrasing Tool

    Grammarly's free paraphrasing tool lets you quickly create high-quality paraphrases to simplify your own or others' writing in a new and. articulate way. Save time by paraphrasing even the most complicated sentences in one click. Make your points eloquently by customizing the length and formality of each paraphrase to fit your needs.

  21. GPT Essay Checker

    Once again, conventional anti-plagiarism essay checkers won't work there merely because this writing features originality. Meanwhile, it will be too similar to hundreds of other texts covering the same topic. ... This page contains a free online GPT checker for essays and other academic writing projects. Being based on the brand-new ...

  22. Essaybot: Free Essay Writing Tool

    Essaybot is a 100% free professional essay writing service powered by AI. We offer essay formats for Argumentative Essay, Expository Essay, Narrative Essay, ITELS & TOEFL Essay and many more. Provide academic inspiration and paragraphs to help you in writing essays and finding citations. Finish your essay in 30 minutes!

  23. US court leery of free-speech challenge to school's anti-racism

    A U.S. appeals court panel on Thursday seemed unlikely to revive claims that a Missouri school district violated staff members' free-speech rights by requiring them to attend an anti-racism ...

  24. 10 Best Free Plagiarism Checkers in 2023

    Koen Driessen. Koen has written multiple theses and founded, together with Bas and Richard, the thesis editing company Scribbr in 2012. Extensive testing shows that the best free plagiarism checkers in 2023 are Scribbr, Quetext, DupliChecker, and Small SEO Tools.

  25. Harvard officials denounce 'antisemitic' photo shared by student groups

    Harvard University is seen in Cambridge, Mass., Dec. 12, 2023. Harvard University officials are denouncing a cartoon deemed antisemitic after it was posted and then deleted on social media by a ...

  26. Genetics journal retracts 18 papers from China due to human rights

    Wed 14 Feb 2024 20.40 EST. A genetics journal from a leading scientific publisher has retracted 17 papers from China, in what is thought to be the biggest mass retraction of academic research due ...

  27. Paraphrasing Tool

    10,000 character limit. Rewording.io is a free AI-powered online paraphrasing tool and grammar checker that helps you save time and avoid accidental plagiarism. Rewording.io has one of the highest character limits (10,000 characters) compared to other rewording tools. This tool is developed by a small team who wants to help writers create high ...

  28. Opinion

    They did what Democrats have promised to do forever and took at least the first steps toward letting Medicare negotiate drug prices. And the Biden team, they said they were going to run the ...

  29. Fighting Deepfakes: Whats Being Done? Biden Robocalls to Taylor Swift

    On Feb. 8, the US Federal Communications Commission made it illegal for companies to use AI-generated voices in robocalls. The ban came two days after the FCC issued a cease-and-desist order ...