Same Sex Marriage Argumentative Essay, with Outline
Published by gudwriter on January 4, 2021 January 4, 2021
Example 1: Gay Marriages Argumentative Essay Outline
Same-sex marriage should be legal because it is a fundamental human right. To have experts write for you a quality paper on same sex marriage, seek help from a trusted academic writing service where you can buy research proposals online with ease and one you can be sure of getting the best possible assistance available
Elevate Your Writing with Our Free Writing Tools!
Did you know that we provide a free essay and speech generator, plagiarism checker, summarizer, paraphraser, and other writing tools for free?
Same-sex marriage provides legal rights protection to same sex couples on such matters as taxes, finances, and health care.
- It gives them the right to become heirs to their spouses and enjoy tax breaks just like heterosexual married couples.
- It makes it possible for them to purchase properties together, open joint accounts, and sign documents together as couples.
Same sex marriage allows two people in love to happily live together.
- Homosexuals deserve to be in love just like heterosexuals.
- The definition of marriage does not suggest that it should only be an exclusive union between two people of opposite sexes.
Perhaps you may be interested in learning about research proposals on human trafficking .
Same sex marriage gives homosexual couples the right to start families.
- Gay and lesbian partners should be allowed to start families and have their own children.
- A family should ideally have parents and children.
- It is not necessary that the parents be a male and female.
Same sex marriage does not harm the institution of marriage and is potentially more stable.
- Legalization of civil unions or gay marriages does not negatively impact abortion rates, divorce, or marriage.
- Heterosexual marriages have a slightly higher dissolution rate on average than opposite sex marriages.
Opponents of same sex marriage may argue that it is important for children to have a father and mother for a balanced upbringing.
- They hold that homosexual couples only have one gender influence on children.
- They forget that that children under the parental care of same sex couples get to mingle with both male and female genders in various social places.
Opponents may also argue that same-sex marriages reduce sanctity of marriage.
- To them, marriage is a religious and traditional commitment and ceremony.
- Unfortunately, such arguments treat marriage as a man-wife union only.
- They fail to recognize that there are people who do not ascribe to any tradition(s) or religions.
- Same sex marriage is a human right that should be enjoyed just like traditional heterosexual marriages.
- It protects the legal rights of lesbian and gay couples and allows them to actualize their love in matrimony.
- It enables them to exercise their right to start families and bring up children.
- It is only fair that all governments consider legalizing same sex marriages.
Read on the best motivational speech ideas .
Argumentative Essay on Same Sex Marriage
For many years now, same-sex marriage has been a controversial topic. While some countries have legalized the practice, others still consider it not right and treat it as illegal. Same-sex marriage is defined as a marriage or union between two people of the same sex, such as a man and a man. Some countries have broadened their perspective on this issue even though for many years, it has never been legally acknowledged, with some societies even considering it a taboo. The United Kingdom, Spain, France, Argentina, the Netherlands, and recently the United States are some of the countries that have legalized it (Winter, Forest & Senac, 2017). Irrespective of any arguments, same-sex marriage should be legal because it is a fundamental human right.
First, same-sex marriage, if recognized by society, provides legal rights protection to same sex couples on such matters as taxes, finances, and health care. If people live together in a homosexual relationship without being legally married, they do not enjoy the security to protect what they have worked for and saved together. In case one of them dies, the surviving partner would have no right over the property under the deceased’s name even if they both funded its acquisition (Winter, Forest & Senac, 2017). Legalizing same-sex unions would cushion homosexual partners from such unfortunate situations. They would have the right to become heirs to their spouses and enjoy tax breaks just like heterosexual married couples. Legalization would also make it possible for them to purchase properties together, open joint accounts, and sign documents together as couples.
Same sex marriage also allows two people in love to become one in a matrimonial union and live happily together. Denying homosexual couples the right to marry is thus denying them the right to be in love just like heterosexuals do. Moreover, the definition of marriage does not suggest that it should only be an exclusive union between two people of opposite sexes. According to Gerstmann (2017), marriage is a formally or legally recognized union between two people in a personal relationship. As per this definition, people should be allowed to marry once they are in love with each other irrespective of their genders. Reducing marriage to a union between a man and woman is thus a direct infringement into the rights of homosexuals.
Additionally, gay marriages give homosexual couples the right to start families. Just like heterosexual couples, gay and lesbian partners should be allowed to start families and have their own children. Essentially, a family should ideally have parents and children and it is not necessary that the parents be a male and female. Same sex partners can easily adopt and bring up children if their marriage is legalized and recognized by the society in which they live (Gerstmann, 2017). As one would concur, even some heterosexual couples are not able to sire their own children and resort to adopting one or even more. This is a right that should be extended to same sex couples too given that they may not be able to give birth on their own.
Further, same sex marriage does no harm whatsoever to the institution of marriage, and is potentially more stable. According to a 2009 study, legalization of civil unions or gay marriages does not in any way negatively impact abortion rates, divorce, or marriage (Langbein & Yost, 2009). This makes it quite uncalled for to argue against or prohibit gay marriages. In yet another study, only 1.1 percent of legally married gay couples end their relationships as compared to the 2 percent annual divorce rate among opposite-sex couples (Badgett & Herman, 2011). This implies that heterosexual marriages have a slightly higher dissolution rate on average than opposite sex marriages. It could then be argued that gay marriages are more stable than traditional man-woman marriages. The two types of marriages should thus be given equal chance because neither affects the other negatively. They also have more or less equal chances of succeeding if legally recognized and accepted.
Opponents of same sex marriage may argue that it is important for children to have a father and a mother. They may say that for children to have a good balance in their upbringing, they should be influenced by a father and a mother in their developmental years. Such arguments hold that homosexual couples only have one gender influence over the lives of children and that this is less fulfilling (Badgett, 2009). However, the arguments fail to recognize that children under the parental care of same sex couples get to mingle with both male and female genders in various social places. At school, the children get to be cared for and mentored by both male and female teachers who more or less serve almost the same role as parents.
Those who are opposed to same sex unions may also argue that such marriages reduce sanctity of marriage. To them, marriage is a religious and traditional commitment and ceremony that is held very sacred by people. They contend that there is need to do everything possible to preserve marriage because as an institution, it has been degrading slowly over time. Their concern is that traditional marriages are being devalued by same sex marriages which are swaying people away from being married and instead choosing to live with same sex partners (Nagle, 2010). It is clear here that such arguments treat marriage as a man-woman union only and are thus not cognizant of the true meaning of marriage. Moreover, they fail to recognize that traditions and religions should not be used against same sex couples because there are people who do not ascribe to any tradition(s) or religions.
Same sex marriage is a human right that should be enjoyed just like traditional heterosexual marriages. It protects the legal rights of lesbian and gay couples and allows them the well-deserved opportunity of actualizing their love in matrimony. In addition, it enables them to exercise their right to start families and bring up children. Arguments made against this form of marriage, such as that it undermines traditional marriages, are based on opinions and not facts. Moreover, it is not important for a child to have a father and a mother because there are other places in which they actively interact with people of different sexes. As such, it is only fair that all governments consider legalizing gay marriages.
Badgett, M. V., & Herman, J. L. (2011). Patterns of relationship recognition by same-sex couples in the United States [PDF]. The Williams Institute. Retrieved from https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Marriage-Dissolution-FINAL.pdf .
Badgett, M. V. (2009). When gay people get married: what happens when societies legalize same-sex marriage . New York, NY: NYU Press.
Gerstmann, E. (2017). Same-sex marriage and the constitution . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Langbein, L., & Yost, M. A. (2009). Same-sex marriage and negative externalities. Social Science Quarterly , 90(2), 292-308.
Nagle, J. (2010). Same-sex marriage: the debate . New York, NY: The Rosen Publishing Group.
Winter, B., Forest, M., & Senac, R. (2017). Global perspectives on same-sex marriage: a neo-institutional approach . New York, NY: Springer.
Explore a persuasive essay about strengthening community handled by our tutors following the prompt provided.
Example 2: Sample Essay Outline on Same Sex Marriages
Thesis: Same sex marriage, just like opposite sex marriage, should be legal.
Pros of Same Sex Marriage
Same sex couples are better at parenting.
- Children brought up by same sex couples do better in terms of family cohesion and overall health.
- Children under the guardianship of lesbian mothers perform better academically and socially.
Same sex marriage reduces divorce rates.
- The divorce rates in a state were reduced significantly after the state legalized gay marriages. Higher divorce rates were recorded in states where gay marriages are prohibited.
- Divorce is not good for family cohesion.
Same sex marriage increases psychological wellbeing.
- Bisexuals, gays, and lesbians feel socially rejected if society views same-sex marriages as illegal or evil.
- After some states banned this kind of marriage, bisexuals, gays, and lesbians living there experienced increased anxiety disorders.
Cons of Same Sex Marriage
Same sex marriages may diminish heterosexual marriages.
- It could be possible for children in homosexual families to think that same sex unions are more fulfilling.
- They might want to become homosexuals upon growing up.
For a holistic development, a child should have both mother and father.
- Absence of a father or a mother in a family leaves a gaping hole in the life of a child.
- A child needs to learn how to relate with both male and female genders right from when they are born.
Other non-typical unions may be encouraged by same sex unions.
- People who get involved in such other acts as bestiality and incest may feel encouraged.
- They might start agitating for their “right” to get married to animals for instance.
Why Same Sex Marriage Should Be Legal
Marriage is a fundamental human right.
- All individuals should enjoy marriage as a fundamental right.
- Denying one the right to marry a same sex partner is akin to denying them their basic right.
Marriage is a concept based on love.
- It is inaccurate to confine marriage to be only between a man and woman.
- Marriage is a union between two people in love with each other, their gender or sexual orientation notwithstanding.
opponents of same-sex marriage argue that a relationship between same-sex couples cannot be considered marriage since marriage is the union between a man and a woman.
- However, this definitional argument is both conclusory and circular.
- It is in no way logical to challenge gay marriage based on this archaic marriage definition.
Same sex marriage should be legalized by all countries in the world. In the U.S., the debate surrounding its legalization should die off because it is irrelevant. People have the right to marry whoever they like whether they are of the same sex.
Same Sex Marriage Essay Example
The idea of same sex marriage is one of the topics that have been widely debated in the United States of America. It has often been met with strong opposition since the majority of the country’s citizens are Christians and Christianity views the idea as evil. On the other hand, those who believe it is right and should be legalized have provided a number of arguments to support it, including that it is a fundamental human right. This debate is still ongoing even after a Supreme Court ruling legalized this type of marriage. However, this debate is unnecessary because same sex marriage, just like opposite sex marriage, should be legal.
It has been proven through studies that same sex couples are better at parenting. A University of Melbourne 2014 study indicated that compared to children raised by both mother and father, children brought up by same sex couples do better in terms of family cohesion and overall health. Similarly, the journal Pediatrics published a study in 2010 stating that children under the guardianship of lesbian mothers performed better academically and socially (Gerstmann, 2017). The children also experienced fewer social problems.
Same sex marriages also reduce divorce rates. According to Gerstmann (2017), the divorce rates in a state were reduced significantly after the state legalized gay marriages. This was as per the analysis of the before and after divorce statistics. Likewise, higher divorce rates were recorded in states where gay marriages are prohibited. Generally, divorce is not good for family cohesion especially in terms of caring for children. Children need to grow up under the care of both parents hence the need for their parents to stay together.
In addition, same sex marriage increases psychological wellbeing. This is because bisexuals, gays, and lesbians feel socially rejected if society views same-sex marriages as illegal or evil. A study report released in 2010 showed that after some states banned this kind of marriage, bisexuals, gays, and lesbians living there experienced a 248% rise in generalized anxiety disorders, a 42% increase in alcohol-use disorders, and a 37% rise in mood disorders (Winter, Forest & Senac, 2017). In this respect, allowing such marriages would make them feel normal and accepted by society.
Same sex marriages may diminish heterosexual marriages and the longstanding marriage culture in society. Perhaps, it could be possible for children in homosexual families to think that same sex unions are more fulfilling and enjoyable than opposite-sex relationships. As a result, they might want to become homosexuals upon growing up. This would mean that standardized marriages between opposite sexes face a bleak future (Nagle, 2010). Such a trend might threaten to throw the human race to extinction because there would be no procreation in future generations.
Same sex unions also fall short because for a holistic development, a child should have both a mother and a father. Absence of a father or a mother in a family leaves a gaping hole in the life of a child. The two major genders in the world are male and female and a child needs to learn how to relate with both of them right from when they are born (Nagle, 2010). A father teaches them how to live alongside males while a mother teaches them how to do the same with females.
Further, other non-typical unions may be encouraged by same sex unions. If the marriages are accepted worldwide, people who get involved in such other acts as bestiality and incest may feel encouraged (Winter, Forest & Senac, 2017). They might even start agitating for their “right” to get married to animals, for instance. This possibility would water down and deinstitutionalize the whole concept of consummation and marriage. This would further diminish the existence of heterosexual marriages as people would continue to find less and less importance in them.
Same sex unions should be legal because marriage is a fundamental human right. It has been stated by the United States Supreme Court fourteen times since 1888 that all individuals should enjoy marriage as a fundamental right (Hertz & Doskow, 2016). In making these judgments, the Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that the Due Process Clause protects as one of the liberties the freedom to make personal choice in matters of marriage. The Court has maintained that this free choice is important as it allows free men to pursue happiness in an orderly manner. Thus, denying one the right to marry a same sex partner is akin to denying them their basic right.
People should also be legally allowed to get into same sex unions since marriage is a concept based on love. It is traditionally inaccurate to confine marriage to be only between a man and a woman. The working definition of marriage should be that it is a union between two people in love with each other, their gender or sexual orientation notwithstanding (Hertz & Doskow, 2016). Making it an exclusively man-woman affair trashes the essence of love in romantic relationships. If a man loves a fellow man, they should be allowed to marry just like a man and a woman in love may do.
As already alluded to, opponents of same-sex marriage argue that a relationship between same-sex couples cannot be considered marriage since marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Based on this traditional definition of marriage, they contend that gay and lesbian couples should not marry. However, as noted by Carpenter (2005), this definitional argument is both conclusory and circular and is thus seriously flawed and fallacious. It is in no way logical to challenge gay marriage based on this archaic marriage definition. That marriage only happens when one man and one woman come together in a matrimony is a constricted view of the institution of marriage. Moreover, there are no reasons accompanying the definition showing that it is the right one or should be the only one (Carpenter, 2005). Therefore, it should be expanded to include same-sex couples. The lack of reasons to support it makes it defenseless thus weak.
Same sex marriages should be legalized by all countries in the world. In the U.S., the debate surrounding its legalization should die off because it is irrelevant. People have the right to marry whoever they like whether they are of the same sex or not. Just like love can sprout between a man and a woman, so can it between a man and a fellow man or a woman and a fellow woman. There is absolutely no need to subject gays, lesbians, and bisexuals to unnecessary psychological torture by illegalizing same sex marriage.
Carpenter, D. (2005). Bad arguments against gay marriage. Florida Coastal Law Review , VII , 181-220.
Gerstmann, E. (2017). Same-sex marriage and the constitution . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hertz, F., & Doskow, E. (2016). Making it legal: a guide to same-sex marriage, domestic partnerships & civil unions . Berkeley, CA: Nolo.
Nagle, J. (2010). Same-sex marriage: the debate . New York, NY: The Rosen Publishing Group.
Winter, B., Forest, M., & Senac, R. (2017). Global perspectives on same-sex marriage: a neo-institutional approach . New York, NY: Springer.
Example 3: Same Sex Marriage Essay
Same Sex Marriage Essay- Changing Attitudes on Gay Marriage. Discuss how the idea of gay marriage has changed over the last decade and show the progression of the movement.
Changing Attitudes on Same Sex Marriage Essay Outline
Thesis: Gay marriage was regarded as an abomination in the early years, but in recent times the attitude of the society towards same-sex marriage is gradually changing.
In 1965, 70% of Americans were opposed to same-sex marriage.
- They cited its harmfulness to the American life.
- Prevalence of AIDS among gay people further increased this opposition.
Social gay movements contributed to change in the attitude of the society towards gay marriage.
- Gay movements increased the exposure of members of the society to gay marriage while showing their sufferings.
- Through social movements, the society saw the need for equality and fair treatment of gay persons.
Political movements in support of gay marriage have as well contributed to change in the attitude of the society towards gay marriage.
- Political bodies and politicians pushed for equality of gay people in efforts to garner political mileage.
- The influence of politicians changed the attitude of the society towards gay marriage.
The incidence of gay people, particularly in the United States has contributed to change in the attitude of the society towards gay marriage.
- Increase in the number of gay persons pushed people into accepting gay marriage.
- The media contributed in gathering compassion from members of the society by evidencing the sufferings of gay people.
The judiciary upheld the legitimacy of same-sex marriage.
- In 2014, 42 court rulings were made in favor of gay marriage.
- There are more than 30 states today with policies in support of same-sex marriage.
The increased push for the freedom of marriage contributed to changing the attitude on gay marriage.
- The Supreme Court ruling in 1987 that stopped governments from restricting the freedom of marriage worked in favor of same-sex marriage.
Supporters of same sex marriage have also increasingly argued that people should be allowed to marry not necessarily based on their gender but on the love between them.
- Restricting marriage to a union between heterosexual couples only creates a biased view of human sexuality.
- An adult should be allowed the freewill to seek for the fulfillment of love by starting a relationship with a partner of whichever gender of their choosing.
Gay marriage has been the subject of social, political and religious debates for many years but over the past two decades, the attitude of the society towards same-sex marriage has changed. Social gay movements and increased incidence of gay people has compelled the community to accept and tolerate gay marriages. The judiciary has as well contributed to this change in attitude by pushing the freedom and right to marriage.
Changing Attitudes on Same Sex Marriage Sample Essay
In the early years, gay marriage was an abomination and received criticism from many members of society. The principal reason as to why many people in society were objected to gay marriage was that it went against religious and societal values and teachings (Decoo, 2014). However, over the past three decades, the perception of society towards the practice has changed. The degree of its social tolerance and acceptance has gradually improved. In the 2000s, numerous social and political lobby groups pushed for a change in insolences towards gay marriage (Decoo, 2014). Though these lobby groups have tried to advocate for the rights of gay people, their principal focus was to change people’s attitudes towards homosexuality.
According to a study conducted in the year 1965 investigating the attitudes of Americans towards gay marriage, seventy percent of the respondents were opposed to the idea of same-sex marriage citing its harmfulness to the American life. Most Americans felt that the practice went against the social and moral values of the American society. In the years between 1975 and 1977, the number of Americans who were not objected to gay marriage increased (Decoo, 2014). However, this number decreased in the years of 1980, when the prevalence of AIDS among gay people hit alarming levels. In the years that followed, the attitudes of the American society towards gay marriage rapidly changed.
The rise of gay social movements has contributed significantly to a change in attitude of the society towards gay marriage. In the early years, people were not exposed to issues of same-sex marriage, but the gay social movements focused on increasing the exposure of gay marriage, while advocating for their equal treatment (Keleher & Smith, 2018). These movements were able to reveal the injustices and unfair treatment that gays were exposed to, and how such unfair treatment tarnishes the image of the society (Keleher & Smith, 2018). The movements persuaded the society to embark on ways of addressing injustices meted out on gay people. Through highlighting these injustices, members of the society acknowledged the need for reforms to bring about impartiality and non-discrimination in marriage.
Political movements in support of gay marriage have as well contributed to changing the attitude of the society towards the practice. As a matter of fact, one of the strategies that gay social movements employed in their advocacy for gay rights were political maneuvering (Demock, Doherty & Killey, 2013). The lobby groups approached aspiring politicians, who would advocate for equal rights of gays to garner political mileage. With time, politicians would use the subject to attack their competitors who were opposed to the idea of same sex marriage (Demock, Doherty & Killey, 2013). This increased political support for gay marriage influenced members of the society into changing their attitude towards the same.
The ever increasing number of gays, particularly in the United States, has contributed to a change in the attitude of the world society towards gay marriage. As the number of gays increased in the U.S., it became hard for members of the society to continue opposing this form of marriage (Demock, Doherty & Killey, 2013). Many families had at least one or more of their family members who would turn out to be gay. The perception of gay people by such families would therefore change upon learning that their loved ones were also gay (Demock, Doherty & Killey, 2013). The media also played a significant role in gathering compassion from the members of the society by portraying the injustices that gay people experienced (Demock, Doherty & Killey, 2013). The society would as a result be compelled to sympathize with gays and lesbians and thus change their stance on same-sex marriage.
Further, the judiciary has also contributed to the change in the attitude of the society towards gay marriage. There were states in the U.S. that initially illegalized same sex marriages, prompting gay people to file discrimination lawsuits (Coontz, 2014). Reports indicate that in the year 2014, there were more than 42 court rulings that ruled in favor of same-sex couples (Coontz, 2014). Some critics of same-sex marriage termed these rulings as judicial activism. They argued that the judiciary was frustrating the will of the American society, which was opposed to same-sex marriage (Coontz, 2014). Following these rulings and the increased advocacy for equality and fair treatment of gay people, some states implemented policies is support of same-sex marriage (Coontz, 2014). Today, the entire United States treats the practice as legal, as was determined by the Supreme Court back in 2015.
The increased push for the freedom of marriage has also contributed to changing the attitude on gay marriage. In the early years, there were states, especially in the United States, that opposed interracial marriages, so that a white could not marry an African-American, for instance (Coontz, 2014). In the years before 1967, there were states that restricted people with tuberculosis or prisoners from getting married. Other states also discouraged employers from hiring married women. However, in 1987 the Supreme Court ruled that state governments had no right to deny people of their freedom of marriage (Coontz, 2014). When such laws were regarded as violations of human rights, gay people also termed the restriction of same-sex marriage as a violation of their liberty and freedom to marry.
Supporters of same sex marriage have also increasingly argued that people should be allowed to marry not necessarily based on their gender but on the love between them and their decision as two adults. According to such people, restricting marriage to a union between heterosexual couples only creates a biased view of human sexuality. For example, they point out that this extreme view fails to acknowledge that gay couples also derive fulfilment from their romantic relationships (Steorts, 2015). They additionally contend that an adult should be allowed the freewill to seek for this fulfillment by starting a relationship with a partner of whichever gender of their choosing. Whether they love a man or a woman should not be anybody’s concern. The argument also notes that gay couples who have come out clearly demonstrate that they are happy in their relationships.
Gay marriage has been the subject of social, political, and religious debates for many years but over the past two decades, the attitude of the society towards it has significantly changed. Social gay movements and increased numbers of gay people has compelled the community to accept and tolerate the practice. The judiciary has as well contributed to this change in attitude by pushing the freedom and right to marriage, thereby finally making the practice legal in the United States.
Coontz, S. (2014). “Why America changed its mind on gay marriageable”. CNN . Retrieved June 23, 2020 from http://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/13/opinion/coontz-same-sex-marriage/index.html
Decoo, E. (2014). Changing attitudes toward homosexuality in the United States from 1977 to 2012 . Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
Demock, M., Doherty, C., & Kiley, J. (2013). Growing support for gay marriage: changed minds and changing demographics. Gen , 10 , 1965-1980.
Keleher, A. G., & Smith, E. (2008). Explaining the growing support for gay and lesbian equality since 1990. In Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA .
Steorts, J. L. (2015). “An equal chance at love: why we should recognize same-sex marriage”. National Review . Retrieved June 23, 2020 from https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/05/yes-same-sex-marriage-about-equality-courts-should-not-decide/
Our article explores the intricacies of same-sex marriage discourse, offering a debated essay with a structured outline. Explore our speech writer generator free tool and create a good speech.
More examples of Argumentative Essays written by our team of professional writers
- American Patriotism Argumentative Essay
- Argumentative Essay On Marijuana Legalization
- Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Sample
- Argumentative Essay on Abortion – Sample Essay
- Gun Control Argumentative Essay – Sample Essay
- Can Money Buy Happiness Argumentative Essay
- Artificial Intelligence Argumentative Essay
- Illegal Immigration Argumentative Essay
If you are having any issues choosing a suitable topic for your argumentative essay, worry no more for we have a variety of argumentative topics to choose from and convince others of your position. Y ou can also get college homework help from Gudwriter and receive a plagiarism free paper written from scratch.
Special offer! Get 20% discount on your first order. Promo code: SAVE20
Free essays and research papers, artificial intelligence argumentative essay – with outline.
Artificial Intelligence Argumentative Essay Outline In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become one of the rapidly developing fields and as its capabilities continue to expand, its potential impact on society has become a topic Read more…
Synthesis Essay Example – With Outline
The goal of a synthesis paper is to show that you can handle in-depth research, dissect complex ideas, and present the arguments. Most college or university students have a hard time writing a synthesis essay, Read more…
Examples of Spatial Order – With Outline
A spatial order is an organizational style that helps in the presentation of ideas or things as is in their locations. Most students struggle to understand the meaning of spatial order in writing and have Read more…
Read our research on: Israel | Internet & Technology | Family & Relationships
Regions & Countries
An argument against same-sex marriage: an interview with rick santorum.
The debate over same-sex marriage in the United States is a contentious one, and advocates on both sides continue to work hard to make their voices heard. To explore the case against gay marriage, the Pew Forum has turned to Rick Santorum, a former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania and now a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Sen. Santorum is also the author of the 2005 book It Takes a Family: Conservatism and the Common Good , in which he makes the case for promoting families anchored by a married mother and father.
A counterargument explaining the case for same-sex marriage is made by Jonathan Rauch, a senior writer at The National Journal .
Featuring: Rick Santorum , Senior Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center; Former U.S. Senator
Interviewer: David Masci , Senior Research Fellow, Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
In this Q&A: Why oppose gay marriage? The “go-slow” approach Child welfare Christian values
Question & Answer
Gay rights advocates and others say that gay and lesbian people want to get married for the same reasons that straight people do – they want to be in caring, stable relationships, they want to build a life and even start a family with someone else. Why shouldn’t they be able to do this?
See, I think that’s the foundational flaw with this whole debate. The law is as it has been for 200-plus years, and so the burden is on them to make the persuasive case as to why they should be married, not just for their benefit but for what the impact is on society and marriage as a whole, and on children.
I would argue that the gay community has not made the argument. They may have made the argument as to why they want it, but they have not made any arguments as to why this is beneficial for society. They have not made any argument – convincing or otherwise, that I’m aware of – as to what the impact would be on heterosexual marriages and what the impact would be on children.
They have no studies. They have no information whatsoever about what it would do to the moral ecology of the country, what it would do to religious liberty, what it would do to the mental and physical health of children – nothing. They’ve made no case. Basically the case they’ve made is, “We want what you want, and therefore you should give it to us.”
So you’re saying that advocates of same-sex marriage are not seeing the big picture?
Yes. I have a book that was written a few years ago called It Takes a Family . In that book I have a chapter on moral ecology, and I explain that if you go to the National Archives, you will come to a section that has, as far as the eye can see, rows and rows and rows of environmental impact statements, because we have laws in this country that say before you go out and you put in a bridge across a creek, you have to go out and see whether what you’re doing is disturbing the landscape there.
Yet when it comes to something that I happen to believe is actually more important than a particular plot of land – the entire moral ecology of our country, who we are as a people, what we stand for, what we teach our children, what our values and ethics are – people argue that we can build the equivalent of a strip mall without even thinking about what those consequences are.
Some people in favor of gay marriage have argued for a “go-slow” approach, acknowledging that we’re in largely unknown territory and that a majority of Americans are not yet comfortable with same-sex marriage. Does that attitude allay any of your fears?
No. They want the convenient accelerator of the courts to put this in play, and then they want the judicious temperament of the American democratic system to govern it. I don’t think you can have your cake and eat it too. Same-sex marriage advocates are not going to state legislatures, except in some cases for civil unions. They are using the courts.
If the courts are going to be your accelerator, then get ready for a ride. And if the courts ultimately say, “Marriage must be allowed between anybody and anybody,” the gay rights advocates are not going to say, “Well, you’ve gone too far.” No, I think the go-slow argument is there to make us feel better, but it doesn’t hold water.
Another argument made by gay rights advocates is that with or without marriage, gay families are already a widespread reality. They point out that we already have gay couples living together, some with children. And they ask: Isn’t it better that they be legally married to each other, if for no other reason than for the benefit and the welfare of the children?
The answer is no – because of the consequences to society as a whole. And again, those are consequences that they choose to ignore. What society should be about is encouraging what’s best for children. What’s best for children, we know, is a mother and a father who are the parents of that child, raising that child in a stable, married relationship, and we should have laws that encourage that, that support that.
What you’re talking about with same-sex marriage is completely deconstructing marriage and taking away a privilege that is given to two people, a man and a woman who are married, who have a child or adopt a child. We know it’s best for children and for society that men and women get married. We know it’s healthier. We know it’s better for men. We know it’s better for women. We know it’s better for communities.
What we don’t know is what happens with other options. And once you get away from the model of “what we know is best” and you get into the other options, from my perspective, there’s no stopping it. And also from my perspective, you devalue what you want to value, which is a man and woman in marriage with a child or children. And when you devalue that, you get less of it. When you get less of it, society as a whole suffers.
Do you feel confident that if same-sex marriage became the norm in our society that we would get less traditional marriage?
The answer is yes, because marriage then becomes, to some degree, meaningless. I mean, if anybody can get married for any reason, then it loses its special place. And, you know, it’s already lost its special place, in many respects, because of divorce. The institution of marriage is already under assault. So why should we do more to discredit it and harm it?
Stanley Kurtz of the Ethics and Public Policy Center has written extensively about this, about what the impact is in countries that have adopted same-sex marriage. We have, in fact, seen a decline in the number of marriages, a delay in people getting married, more children being born out of wedlock and higher rates of divorce. None of those things are good for society. None of those things are good for children.
But can you lay these changes at the feet of same-sex marriage?
Yes, I think you can lay them at its feet. Kurtz notes that the marriage rate in the Netherlands was always actually one of the lowest in the EU. And once same-sex marriage was put in place, it broke below the line.
As a person who has positioned himself as a defender of Christian values, why is gay marriage particularly opposed to those values?
Well, the laws in this country are built upon a certain worldview, and it is the Judeo-Christian worldview. And that worldview has been expressed in our laws on marriage for 200-plus years. Up until 25 years ago, we would never have sat here and done this interview. It would have been beyond the pale. And so it is clearly a dramatic departure from the Judeo-Christian ethic that is reflected in our laws that say marriage is a sacred union between a man and a woman.
When you look ahead, do you feel optimistic that your side in this debate will ultimately prevail?
What I’ve noticed about this debate is that fewer and fewer people are stepping up and taking the position I’m taking because they see the consequences of doing so. I don’t think there is an issue that is a tougher issue for people to stand up against in American culture today than this one, both from the standpoint of the mainstream media and the popular culture condemning you for your – they can use all sorts of words to describe you – intolerant, bigot, homophobe, hater. The other side takes it personally. And so it makes it very difficult for folks to stand up and argue public policy when the other side views it as a personal, direct assault on them. So it’s very, very hard for me to be optimistic when we have a battle of ideas and one side is universally hammered for being intolerant bigots and the other side is enlightened and tolerant – which I think is false, but it is the pervasive attitude.
We know that the American public doesn’t approve of same-sex marriage, but they are uncomfortable about it because, again, the public perception is if you feel that way, you’re a bigot or a hater. And if the culture continues to send that message, if our educational system sends that message, which it does, you know, eventually the culture will change and people’s opinions will change.
The push back is what most people know: that mothers and fathers bring something unique. I mean, I have six children. I know that two mothers would not be able to give to my children what a mother and a father can give to my children. For instance, my daughter’s relationship with men is, in many respects, formed by her relationship with me. There are volumes of evidence showing that if little girls don’t have a father, it impacts their ability as adults to bond with men in healthy relationships.
What do we know, really, about children raised by same-sex couples? We’re into, in many respects, an unknown territory. There is already a difficult environment for children in America today, at least from the traditional Judeo-Christian perspective. So I think this is a fight worth fighting, even if it’s not a popular fight.
This transcript has been edited for clarity, spelling and grammar.
Sign up for our Religion newsletter
Sent weekly on Wednesday
Table of Contents
The pope is concerned about climate change. how do u.s. catholics feel about it, across u.s. religious groups, more see decline of marriage as negative than positive, 5 facts about religion in south and southeast asia, buddhism, islam and religious pluralism in south and southeast asia, support for legal abortion is widespread in many countries, especially in europe, most popular.
About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .
- Writing services
- Dissertation services
- Admission services
- Our Writers
Same Sex Marriage Persuasive Essay Writing
Table of contents:
- Body paragraphs
When you’re writing a persuasive essay about a controversial topic such as same-sex marriage, which has recently been legalized in Australia, it’s important that your thesis takes a strong stand either for or against. Your introduction should emphatically state what your essay is going to be about.
Pro: The recent legalization of same-sex marriage is a great step forward not only for gay people but for human rights in Australia.
Con: Same-sex marriage redefines what marriage means and legitimizes homosexuality, which is immoral.
Whether you are talking up the pros or the cons, you should start by making an outline of your reasons, which will then form the body of your essay. Make sure you back up your reasons with plausible evidence, anecdotes, or appeals to emotion. If necessary, you can concede a point or two to the other side; this helps your argument as you then look fair and reasonable.
Body paragraph examples
Pro: Every person has the innate human right to have a legalized relationship with the person they mutually love, gay, bisexual, or straight. Australia recognizing this right is a positive thing for all people, as it means everyone, no matter their sexual orientation, is treated equally in the eyes of the law.
The redefinition of marriage to include same-sex couples is actually a good thing. It means there aren’t specific, designated roles that couples have to play. Men can keep houses, women can be the main breadwinner. This is not to say that everyone will be, or that it wasn’t happening already, but it means it’s just more open as a possibility. And it means that same sex couples who need such rights as next-of-kin rights, the right to visit their loved one in the hospital, or the right to have their loved one make decisions on their behalf, are now treated fairly.
Con: Homosexuals wanting to have their immoral relationships sanctified by the government has meant that the word “marriage” basically means nothing now, because it’s been watered down so much.
The Bible says that there are specific roles for men to play in a marriage and specific roles for women to play. Throwing those roles out the window is equivalent to the moral breakdown of society. To be against same sex marriage is to be against the depredation of Australian society in general.
Your conclusion should be a summary of what you’ve covered in the body of your essay, just to remind your audience of the points you made, and should end with a call to action, even if just to think about the topic you’ve covered from a different point of view.
Pro: In conclusion, Australia’s government is to be commended for passing same-sex marriage. The future is bright for gay people and all those who love them. After all, if a member of your family was gay, you would want to be able to attend their wedding, wouldn’t you?
Con: Australia passing same-sex marriage into law was a blow for all decent people. But it’s not too late to have this misguided decision repealed. Contact your senator or representative today!
- Essay samples
- Essay writing
- Crafting a Powerful Essay on Political Polarization
- Oral Health Overview Essay: Preventing Tooth Decay in Australia
- How to Write a Good Expository Essay About Macbeth
- How to Write An Expository Essay About Love
- How to Write a Great Expository Essay About Life
Price per page
Get all these features for $93.12 FREE
If you don't know exactly what type of paper you need or can't find the necessary one on the website - don't worry! Contact us and we'll help you out!
- Money Back Guarantee
- Write My Essay
- Custom Essay
- Essay Writer
- Do My Essay
- Type My Essay
- Pay For Essay
- Cheap Essay
- Write My Paper
- Write My Assignment
- Assignment Writer
- Buy Assignment
- Assignment Help
- Do My Assignment
- Nursing Essay Writing Service
- Management Essay
- Business Essay
- Law Essay Writing Service
- Education Essay Service
- Marketing Essay
- Accounting Essay
- Sociology Essay
- Social Issues
Same Sex Marriage
- Words: 1448
- Views: 1,047
- Social Justice
- Nuclear family
- Prison overcrowding
- Family planning
- Social constructionism
- Prejudice and discrimination
- Teenage Suicide
- Human Rights
- Family History
Same Sex Marriage Affirmative Side Argumentative Essay
Same sex marriage is known as a marriage between two persons of the same biological sex or gender . It is one of the most controversial yet sensitive topics that have been discuss around the world. Politicians are having debates on this subject trying to decide whether it should be legal for same sexes to be married. Same sex marriage is often viewed as being wrong by religious people because marriage is portrayed as a woman and man uniting not woman to woman or man to man. Here in the Philippines, Political parties such as the Gabriela Women’s Partylist are actively lobbying and advocating for lesbian and gay rights and to insist that society not discriminate on the basis of sexual preference.
Unlike in the Philippines there are few countries who are now supporting and allowing same sex marriage including Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Sweden. The purpose of this study is to advocate the positive effects of legalizing same-sex marriage in the Philippines and to support gays and lesbian people in their rights.
ready to help you now
Without paying upfront
The study will be supported by some research materials. I. Historical Background Here is the short research about Same Sex Marriage regarding both foreign and local literature. A. Short History 1. Foreign Literature The foreign literature contains the views of other countries in legalizing Same Sex Marriage and benefits. Providing same-sex couples with the same legal and social recognition of their relationships in no way infringes upon the rights of others.
Allowing same-sex marriage is about extending the privileges already enjoyed by the majority to an excluded minority who differ simply in terms of the sex of the person with whom they are in a committed relationship. Further, and very importantly, lifting the ban on same-sex marriage is not only about addressing the rights of this minority group; it is about protecting the rights of people in general. If we say exclusion to certain basic privileges is okay for some, then we are opening up the doors to introducing laws as we see fit to exclude others.
In a different space and time, it may be your rights or those of your loved ones that are affected. Equality, respect, dignity, and a sense of belonging are ideals and values endorsed by Australian society. When these values are not upheld for some, it has the potential to affect us all. The lack of opportunity for same-sex couples to formalise their relationships, as do different-sex couples, sends the message that their relationships are not of equivalent standard and that they are second class citizens.
As same-sex sexuality is no more a choice than heterosexuality, restricting marriage to different-sex couples will not stop committed relationships between members of the same sex. What it will do is continue to promote prejudice and intolerance towards a select group of individuals who nonetheless pay the same taxes, fight the same wars, and abide by all other citizenry responsibilities . (http://www. australianmarriageequality. om/wp/faqs/what-are-the-benefits-of-same-sex-marriage/)
The lack of opportunity for the gay and lesbian community to legally and socially validate their committed relationships not only affects the couples involved but also their families. Same-sex attracted individuals do not exist on the fringe of society or in isolation. They are someone’s son, daughter, mother, father, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, grandparent, or grandchild. Having a family member treated differently by the community at large can negatively impact the family as a whole.
Those who argue against same-sex marriage in the name of ‘the family’ seem to overlook the many heterosexual family members that are adversely affected by the social exclusion of one of their own. (http://www. huffingtonpost. com/2012/12/16/gay-marriage-unexpected-benefits_n_2311315. html) 2. Local Literature The local literature stated the views of Filipino people in allowing Same Sex Marriage. Addition to that, the rights of homosexual was included here. “Same-sex marriage may be allowed under exceptional circumstances. Art. 6 of the Family Code recognizes as valid in the Philippines those marriage solemnized abroad and are valid there as such, except for marriages forbidden under Art. 38 of the Family Code. ” The argument makes sense because none of the provisions cited — Art. 35(1), (4), (5) and (6) and Art. 36, 37 and 38 of the Family Code — prohibit same-sex marriage. This might lead some couples to go abroad, perhaps New York or some other states/countries that recognize same-sex marriage, and have it recognized here in the Philippines.
While a same-sex marriage is allowed in other jurisdictions, it can also recognized here because it would not hurt anybody and would be a net gain for society. ” (Basilio:2010) On Sunday, the Baguio Pride Network, lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender (LGBT) group, celebrated its anniversary by holding a protest action and demanding equal rights. The Baguio Pride Network also called on the government to stop the killings of LGBT members. The group claimed that 104 LGBTs have been killed from January to June of this year.
Meanwhile, Bayan Muna Rep. Teddy Casiño, who attended the event, said his priority right now is to push for the passage of his anti-discrimination bill instead of passing a resolution making same-sex marriage in the country legal. ( http://www. abs-cbnnews. com/nation/regions/06/26/11/same-sex-marriage-baguio-draws-criticisms) B. Definition of Terms Same Sex Marriage is marriage between two persons of the same biological sex or gender identity. (http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage/) Equality is a term means state of being equal. http://www. merriam- webster. com/dictionary/equality) Human Rights means a a right that is believed to belong justifiably to every person . (http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Human_rights /) Freedom is the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. (http://oxforddictionaries. com/us/definition/american_english/freedom/)
Love means an intense feeling of deep affection. (http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Love/) Homosexual is a person who is sexually attracted to people of their own sex. https://www. google. com. ph/) Bibliography Finsterbusch, Kurt. Taking Sides. Maryland, USA: Mc-Graw-Hill companies,Inc. 2007. Houlgate, Laurence. Morals Marriage and Parenthood. California, USA: An International Thompson Publishing Company, 1999. Satris, Stephen. The Structurng og Lesbians and Gay Relationships. USA: Satris Publishing Company, 2006. . Webliography http://www. abs-cbnnews. com/nation/regions/06/26/11/same-sex-marriage-baguio-draws-criticisms http://www. australianmarriageequality. om/wp/faqs/what-are-the-benefits-of-same-sex-marriage/ http://www. huffingtonpost. com/2012/12/16/gay-marriage-unexpected-benefits_n_2311315. html http://www. merriam- webster. com/dictionary/equality/ http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage/ http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Human_rights/ http://oxforddictionaries. com/us/definition/american_english/freedom/ http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Love/ https://www. google. com. ph/ (Basilio: 2010) III. Summary Same-sex marriage is a union between two people who are of the same gender or biological sex.
To sum it all up, the researchers are in favor of finding ways to make same sex marriage legal and hoping to discover the positive effects of having it here in the Philippines. They conducted in this paper the views of both foreign and local people in legalizing it. They found out the countries that advocating and allowing same sex marriage particularly United States, Spain, Canada and Argentina. Also based on the researchers study they had known the reasons why other people especially eligious one are still against same sex marriage simply because they believed God only created man to be united with woman not man to man or woman to woman. Other reason is because gays and lesbian will be more harsh and overconfident on the things that they will do. Also through using research materials the researchers affirms that homosexual community is experiencing discrimination because there voice and rights are being ignored by the Government, but when the time comes that same sex marriage become legal the sufferings they encounter will perish.
So that, the researcher group is still supporting the rights of gays and lesbian to be heard and expecting that others will respect that. They must have the equality they should have and that is the reason that the researchers beg to propose. Conclusion The researchers concluded that when same-sex marriage is legalized in the Philippines the discrimination that gays and lesbian experienced will perish.
There will serve as parents to the children who they adopted and there will be a decrease rate of the homo people who are leaving and transferring to foreign country because they are not welcome and not accepted in our country. There will also be improvement, lots of family that has gay and lesbian member will be happy. Recommendation The researchers recommend this study to use by other researchers as a tool or reference for their study and for the people who wants to learn and gain more knowledge and for them to know what is same-sex marriage, and why should be it legalized in the Philippines.
Cite this page
You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers
- Black Lives Matter
- Child Labor
- Social Class
- Racial Segregation
Check more samples on your topics
“gay “marriage”: societal suicide by charles colson – same sex marriage.
The issue of same sex marriage incites significant debate in contemporary society. Various opinions exist regarding whether it should be permitted and the potential consequences if it were. This ongoing debate has grown more intense as more states consider legalization. In her article titled "What's Wrong with Gay Marriage?", Katha Pollitt advocates for the legalization
Argumentative synthesis on Same Sex Marriage
“I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage. But when you start playing around with constitutions, just to prohibit somebody who cares about another person, it just seems to me that’s not what America’s about.” Barack Obama The marriage has traditionally defined between man and
Same-Sex Marriage Argumentative
There are so many reasons that same-sex marriage shouldn't even be a discussion such as; marriage is or procreation, same-sex marriage isn't the optimum environment to raise children, and same-sex marriage violates the sacred institution of marriage. Same-sex marriage is one Of the most talked about topics in the news and in today's society because
Argumentative Essay on Affirmative Action
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Affirmative action works. There are thousands of examples of situations where people of color, white women, and working class women and men of all races who were previously excluded from jobs or educational opportunities, or were denied opportunities once admitted, have gained access through affirmative action. When these policies received executive branch and judicial support,
An Argumentative Essay On Premarital Sex
Reconciling the diverse opinions on the issue of premarital sex is not a task that can be achieved without engaging in critical analytical reasoning. To a great extent, the disparity in views on premarital sex is a function of the different cultures and moral templates of people across the globe. However, the controversy on premarital
Love Marriage Is Better Than Arrange Marriage
Life is filled with challenges and sacrifices, including the beautiful relationship of marriage. Marriage is a significant bond that many individuals experience in their lifetime. The way we shape our lives determines its quality. Love marriages are considered more preferable than arranged marriages because they involve marrying someone you truly love and desire to spend
The Sanctity of Marriage: Homosexuality and Marriage
There is so much controversy concerning homosexuality and marriage. This controversy has recently risen and been debated in court inMassachusetts. Around three percent of our country experiences exclusivehomosexuality (Swan n.p.). Gay marriage must be banned because it hasnegative consequences for our society, does not follow American Tradition,and most importantly, homosexuality is immoral. Granted homosexuality allows people to
The Same-Sex Marriage Should Be Legalized in US
The very first lines of the document of which our county was founded upon states that: "All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, bribery, and the pursuit of happiness. " Is the right to marry whom you wish not a part
No One Deny Same Sex Marriage
The next case, Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015, concerned the ban of same-sex marriages. Ruth has a vast history in the LGBTQ+ community, being an ally that is thought of highly. She has been an activist for the community’s rights as well as a past in being an officiant of same-sex marriages. Due to that fact,
Hi, my name is Amy 👋
In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.
- Essay Database >
- Essays Samples >
- Essay Types >
- Argumentative Essay Example
Marriage Argumentative Essays Samples For Students
129 samples of this type
While studying in college, you will surely have to write a lot of Argumentative Essays on Marriage. Lucky you if putting words together and transforming them into relevant content comes easy to you; if it's not the case, you can save the day by finding an already written Marriage Argumentative Essay example and using it as a template to follow.
This is when you will definitely find WowEssays' free samples collection extremely useful as it embodies numerous professionally written works on most various Marriage Argumentative Essays topics. Ideally, you should be able to find a piece that meets your criteria and use it as a template to build your own Argumentative Essay. Alternatively, our skilled essay writers can deliver you a unique Marriage Argumentative Essay model crafted from scratch according to your custom instructions.
Good Example Of Argumentative Essay On Marriages
Gay marriage argument essays: should it be legalized, introduction, good argumentative essay on same sex marriage.
Don't waste your time searching for a sample.
Get your argumentative essay done by professional writers!
Just from $10/page
Free Argumentative Essay On Unnatural Objections And Corvinos Replies
Is homosexuality really immoral, gay marriage and federal benefits argumentative essays example.
[Client’s Name] [Client’s Professor] [Client’s Subject] [Date Passed]
Good Argumentative Essay On Same-Sex Marriage
Adam and eve not adam and steve argumentative essay samples, good example of how the marriage changed argumentative essay, good human development argumentative essay example, good argumentative essay about how marriage has changed in americanameinstitution.
Quote: The basic building block of the society is family that essentially arises from marriage unions.
Sample argumentative essay on legalizing same-sex marriage, sample argumentative essay on love and marriage in the canterbury tales, free why same sex marriage is bad for society argumentative essay sample, same sex marriage argumentative essay examples, free their eyes were watching god by zora neale hurston argumentative essay sample, gay marriage argumentative essays example, argumentative essay on why homosexuals should be able to marry, free argumentative essay on the return of martin guerre, free argumentative essay about hei-kyung hong, mozart, and batti, batti o bel masetto, example of alimony for female eggs argumentative essay, argumentative essay on should gay marriages be legalized, example of argumentative essay on arranged marriages, aristotle and gay marriage argumentative essay, gay marriage movement argumentative essay, example of argumentative essay on john stuart mill, diary of a mad black woman argumentative essay, should gay couples be able to marry argumentative essay, example of argumentative character analysis of josie argumentative essay, argumentative essay on underage marriage.
Thesis statement: Whichever way we look at it, underage marriages are not right, and they should be abolished in every country once and for all. - Body Paragraph
Underage marriage is a violation of the rights of the young girl who gets married.
- The minor does not get involved in the marriage negotiations which contravenes the spirit of marriage. - Apart from being denied education, the girl suffers domestic violence. - Body Paragraph
Underage marriage means early motherhood and a large family as a consequence.
Example of same sex marriage arguments essay, gay marriages argumentative essay example, argumentative essay on should gay marriage be legal, controversial subject with argument (same sex marriage) argumentative essay, argumentative essay on same-sex marriage, argumentative essay on changing tides: same-sex marriage policy and public opinion in the united states, example of adultery in the storm argumentative essay, argumentative essay on divorce, the marriage in happy days argumentative essay examples, argumentative essay on the negative effect of divorce for the family, example of argumentative essay on cultural differences in weddings between saudi arabia and usa, electorate determinants 3 argumentative essay sample.
Table of Contents
Man and Woman, Woman and Woman or Man and Man 4 Procreation or Not 4 Optimum Environment for Children 5 Gay Relationships are Moral or Immoral 5 Federal Law 6 President Obama 7 Politicians and Media Figures 8 Conclusion 10 Work Cited 10
Argumentative Essay On Increased Incidence Of Std In Older Adults
Unprotected sex among older adults is giving rise to more incidents of sexually transmitted disease in people between the ages of forty-five to seventy. There will always be a reaction to every action, and having sex without protection is the cause of this increase of sexually transmitted disease among older adults. Protecting oneself from sexually transmitted disease requires the practice of safe sex. Safe sex should be worn as an amour against STDs.
Increased Incidence of STD in Older Adults
Gay marriage in america argumentative essay examples.
Same-sex marriage is the legal union between people of the same sex. The debate concerning the marriage rights and benefits to gay couples has been intense since early 1970s. In 1996, the then US president Bill Clinton, signed DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) into law (Pinello 12). This Act gives a legal definition of Marriage as a legal union between one woman and one man. However, this enactment gave the definition of marriage for federal law purposes only and gave authority to the states to make their own rulings concerning the matter.
Argumentative Essay On Gay Marriage
This thesis aims to highlight the issue of gay marriage that is now being seen in a positive light. It has readily gained acceptance over so many years. People are beginning to see it as an acceptable reality. The roots of its acceptance are also traced through various countries with so many countries beginning to understand how essential it is to allow man with the freedom of anything.
Lessons From Frederick Douglass Argumentative Essay
Same-sex marriage and discrimination, example of engaged couples should be required to take marriage preparation classes argumentative essay, free argumentative essay on gay marriages.
Marriage is a social union between two people, a union that promotes connection. The definition of marriage often varies depending on individual beliefs, cultural values among others. It can be defined as a union where individual relationships such as intimacy and sex are accepted. Marriage is formalized through a wedding either in a law court or in a church. Marriage was naturally supposed to be between people of different sex but in recent times, marriages between people of the same sex have been a normal scenario. Marriage is however not an institution for companionship alone but also for procreation, something gay couples are unable to do.
Argumentative Essay On Children Should Be Involved In Divorce
INTRODUCTION: The term divorce in many aspects of life indicates negative impacts to the children. Research indicates that divorce has also beneficial effects to the children of the affected families. To many, the mention of the term divorces to them, divorce cannot have anything positive, but keen studies show that divorce has some benefits.
THESIS: Children should be involved in divorce.
Legalizing gay marriage argumentative essay examples, argumentative essay on a dolls house henrik ibsen, was nora right to leave at the end of the play, divorce rates and family ecology theory argumentative essay, sample argumentative essay on why people are waiting longer to get married, good example of argumentative essay on marriage, marital lessons from ibsen’s a doll's house argumentative essay, argumentative essay on should homosexuals be able to marry, the difference of power of love between eastern and western culture argumentative essays example, good example of argumentative essay on same-sex marriage, letter to the editor on the rights of the gay community argumentative essay example, cuba revolution policies on gender and sexuality: example argumentative essay by an expert writer to follow, legislating through judicial decision-making: the supreme court argumentative essay sample.
Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]
Use your new password to log in
You are not register!
Now you can download documents directly to your device!
Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.
or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone
The sample is NOT original!
Short on a deadline?
Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED
No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline