pro death penalty in the philippines argumentative essay

• Free Essays
• Citation Generator

Yes to Death Penalty in the Philippines

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Death penalty.

Today, capital punishment is still apparent in society. People are put to death because of murder or rape. The different types of punishment used are anywhere from hanging to lethal injection. The death penalty is a better deterrent than imprisonment because taking offenders life is more of a severe punishment. By using the death penalty as a type of punishment, it will in the future prevent other criminals from committing similar crimes and eventually make our society a much better place to live.…

Persuasive Essay On Death Penalty

The death penalty is a controversial topic that has existed since the beginning of civilization. The death penalty, and capital punishment are interchangeable terms that provide legalized murders at the hands of the government. This form of killing is permitted in approximately 38 states (Capital Punishment, 2011). The death penalty has been a way for humans to control one another throughout history. The death penalty is a chancy way of instilling justice. In addition, there is no guarantee that the person sentenced to death is completely innocent. For many years, the death penalty has been the cause of many innocent and untimely deaths. The death penalty is a final decision to a possible mistake. Also, the death penalty infringes on…

Nicholas Yarris Death Penalty

The death penalty does not belong in this society.It causes many innocent people to be unjustly killed.It is inhuman and criminals deserve to rot in prison, not die and be free.therefore everyone should strongly oppose the horrific death…

Is Capital a Bad Public Policy

Hanging, the firing squad, the gas chamber, the electric chair, lethal injection; these are some present methods of the death penalty. Capital punishment has been used in America for a long time, and has always presented conflicts. There are many groups that protest capital punishment, and there are many groups that are for it. The controversies it presents have to do with the cost, if it is humane, or if it is moral. With all of these problems taken into consideration, it is clear to anyone that capital punishment is the wrong choice. Capital punishment has proven to neither deter criminals, neither directly reduce crime rate nor even rightfully punish rebellious members of society. Rather, capital punishment has cost the American people millions of dollars in maximum-security prisons and executions, wrongfully sentenced innocent men and women, and blatantly gone against the eighth amendment of the Constitution of the United States.…

furman v. georgia

The death penalty or capital punishment has been part of our humanity for years and years. Existed since ancient times, according to people a person who has committed an atrocious act, was sentence to death penalty or capital punishment. The death penalty begins back in the 18th century B.C. in the code of king Hammaurabi of Baylon; who was accused of committing 25 crimes. In years past, the punishments where more crucial then today, the execution procedures had no boundaries, forms of killing where endless. Drowning, whacking, “damnatio ad Bestia” which was death cause by a wild animal, dismemberment: dividing the body into quarter-usually with an ax, throwing then off a high place, impalement: one of the most crucial consisting in beating them with a stick, buried alive, the guillotine: decapitation, wretch they refer as the “quick, clean and humane” way of doing the killing, death by torture, stoning crucifying was also consider a death penalty act. Jesus Christ was crucified in Jerusalem part of his punishment for being the son of God. Within times pass the process change a little to decapitation, execution, hanging, electrocution, execution by gas and the one use to date lethal injection. (1. History of death penalty)…

Timothy Mcveeigh The Death Penalty Essay

The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

should the death penalty be reinstated in the uk?

The death penalty is never the right choice. In America last year fifty three people were executed, and at this time in the USA over 3500 people are on death row. The amount of people on death row shows that the use of Capital punishment is not decreasing crime in America. Therefore Capital Punishment has no point. The latest country to abolish the death penalty for all crimes was Albania in early 2007. The abolition of Capital Punishment in Albania shows that the death penalty obviously doesn 't work. The country tried using it and it failed. Since 1973, there were 138 death row exonerations in the United States. That 's 138 innocent people who were mistakenly sentenced to death in a U.S. Court room, and later had their convictions overturned due to further research in light of new evidence. The fact is: the death penalty is much more of a retribution measure than a preventative measure. There is no clear cut proof that the death penalty will prevent people from killing each other…

Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly?

Capital punishment has been used around the world for many thousands of years as a way of enforcing justice when someone has done wrong by what standards that the cultures have. Over the past few centuries capital punishment has started to be questioned by many people in Europe and in the United States. Many people who support the death penalty cite reasons such as deterrence and not wanting to spend money a person who will never be a productive member of society again. Many who are in opposition to the death penalty say that the death penalty is killing innocent people and is actually not saving any money at all and that it is in fact costing too much and that it is wrong to simply kill someone who commits a crime. There are also questions to the fairness of the death penalty and many who question if it is being applied fairly. Both sides of the debate over the morality and legitimacy of capital punishment will be presented in this paper with this author taking one side. While the thought of having someone put to death is not something that anyone would like, the death penalty is the only way for ultimate justice to be administered for victims provided that it is fairly administered.…

Exploratory Paper on Death Penalty

The death penalty or in other words capital punishment is a form of execution used for a long time. It is a form of punishment that was and still is used by several countries for various types of crimes for hundreds of years. However the death penalty has become a very debatable and confronting issue for last decades due to the fact of people having different opinions on this issue. In some countries it is considered to be a part of the judicial system, while in other countries it is considered to be an act violating human rights. During the first decade of 21st century, about two thirds of world vide countries have abolished the capital punishment due to the fact it is a violation of moral codex and human rights. There are always pros and cons to every action humans are able to do, so it is with the issue of death penalty. Countries such as China, USA, Japan or India have still retained to the execution of criminals by death penalty. However there are many intergovernmental and human rights organization such as the European Union that understands the death penalty to be one of the most pressing human rights issues of all time. (Babcock S., 2007) People are questioning the courts if death penalty really deters the crime, or if it is just a need to satisfy society’s desire for revenge. We can find many arguments against it; however the answer to question of abolishing the death penalty by the entire world is unclear and in far future. China is the country known for using many forms of inhuman punishment methods. There can be find an evidence showing the China to be the country with the highest execution case rate. I could not believe these statements, so I decide to search this issue and…

Death Penalty Synthesis

The death penalty goes back as far as the 17th century. From burning alive to beating to death, the death penalty was carried out in some of the cruelest and most painful ways one could imagine. Although more efficient ways of execution have been discovered, such as lethal injections, capital punishment is still ruthless and a lot of times unnecessary. Capital punishment is like the easy way out of dealing with criminals by “eliminating the complexities of judge and jury” (Source J), when there are much more efficient punishments that could be used when dealing with a felony. Capital punishment should not be used for so many different reasons; it is immoral, very costly and mistakes that could be prevented happen way too often.…

Death Penalty In Prisons

The death penalty now viewed as so barbaric that the views around the world have shifted so much that the U.S continuous to be the only country in Western Democracy to carry it out (Manning & Rhoden-Trader, 2000). The U.S has now begun to recognize so many problems that the death penalty system has such as it being unequally applied to minorities time and time again. Furthermore, the cost of carrying out an execution is staggering compared to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Inmates that were sitting on death row have been and continue to be exonerated which means innocent people can be put to death. One other major problems with the death penalty and statistics have shown that it simple does not deter crime. For these reasons and more I believe we should abolish the death penalty and never look…

Death Penalty: the Christian View

Capital punishment or death penalty is usually imposed on persons who committed heinous crimes and are those that endanger the safety of the society. Some countries and societies implement capital punishment while others do not. There are various reasons for this policy of countries, including the social view on the death penalty and the prevailing religious view in the society among others.…

Capital Punishment

Death penalty is one the debatable topics throughout the world. There is a conflict between law and ethics. Public opinion does not coincide with the state opinion. There are 33 countries, which use death penalty as capital punishment. According to Amnesty International Report, in 2011, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and USA topped the list. According to statistics, in USA 33 states use death penalty as capital punishment and other 17 does not. (Amnesty International, 2011) Death penalty’s primary goal is to make people think twice before doing crime. The Death penalty helps to decrease the murder’s rate, however it could violate human right.…

Death Penalty: Eye for an Eye

Capital Punishment: An Eye for an Eye For many years there has been a constant debate between supporters and non-supporters of the death penalty. Many people argue that the death penalty is as much a murder as the crime committed by the offender. Others may say that it provides closure and justice. I am a strong supporter of the death penalty. There are many others like myself. The world is full of the most dangerous and ruthless criminals that should be put to death. There are many pros that the death penalty has to offer that make the world a better place to live. The death penalty is proven to deter crime. Many individuals think twice before committing a crime because of the death penalty. Spectators that have witnessed an execution say that watching an execution has changed their lives. Spectators can advise others to refrain from doing crimes by telling others of their experience. Prison is one place where many people would not expect crime, but sadly there is as much crime in prison as there is on the outside. The death penalty deters inmates from committing crimes in prison because the death penalty can still be added on to their sentence. Crimes are also deterred in prison because some of the most ruthless criminals are isolated and are on death row. Criminologist state that when execution rates go up, murder rates go down. Criminologists also state that each execution deters eighteen murders. Many experts state that speeding up executions would deter crime at a much faster rate. There has been an overall drop in homicides. Nationally the decline was 2.7 percent. With cities that have populations over one million murder rates have declined 9.8 percent. The death penalty also gives families of murder victims’ closure and justice. Many families say that the death penalty is a deterrent in crime. Many families say that even though they feel relief after the murderers’ death, the pain of a lost loved one will never go away. Families want closure and do not…

The Death Penalty

The death penalty is a big issue in our society today. Many people are confused if the death penalty is right or wrong. I feel that the death penalty should be carried out. I have many reasons why the death penalty should be carried out. The death penalty would save government money and help keep criminal activity under control.…

Related Topics

• Capital punishment
• Human rights

Sample details

• Punishment,
• Death Penalty,

Philippines

• Views: 1,187

Related Topics

• Life imprisonment
• Mandatory sentencing
• Capital Punishment
• North Korea
• South Korea
• Afghanistan
• Death Penalty Pros And Cons
• Is The Death Penalty Effe...
• Mass Incarceration
• Corporal punishment

Re-imposition of death penalty in the philippines Argumentative Essay

The increasing rates of crimes in the Philippines, including kidnapping, murder, rape, car-napping, riding in tandem, and drug smuggling, have led many to call for the restoration of the death penalty as the country’s capital punishment. Criminals commit these heinous crimes without hesitation because they know that the punishment in the Philippines is light. Restoring the death penalty is seen as the best way to discipline and change the point of view of all citizens of the Philippines, as well as to deter drug smugglers in other countries. Lethal injection is suggested as the most humane form of punishment. Although implementing the death penalty is bad, it may be necessary to protect the lives of many persons in the state who are in danger from criminals. However, it is important to use the death penalty correctly so that it does not violate human rights. The right to life is a gift of God that must be respected and protected, even when a person is convicted of a crime.

As this present days the rates of crimes are Increasing Like kidnapping, murder, rape, car-napping, riding In tandem, drug smuggling and many more. This gruesome crimes has been done by the criminal without any hesitation. Why? Because they know that the capital punishment of the Philippines was light. Criminal knows that If they committed a crime they will be sent off to jail not having any punishment like death penalty.

I think that it is time to restore the death penalty as the capital enmeshment of the Philippines to discipline and to change the point of view of all citizens of the Philippines including the other countries. Restoring the death penalty is the best way to defeat the increasing rate of crimes. The citizens of the Philippines will be afraid of committing a crime if the death penalty is implemented and also the drug smugglers in other countries.

My idea in this issue was to use lethal injection as the punishment of death penalty, this punishment was not barbaric. Instead of torturing or applying a barbaric punishment In the criminal, the government can use Ethel Injection. Implementing the death penalty Is bad but If the lives of many persons In the state Is In danger to criminals, we must act and determine how to solve this problem.

Death penalty must Implement and use correctly so that It cannot violates the human right of the people. We have the right to life, life is the gift of God. We need to respect it and to care with it. This rights will be interfered when a person is convicted with a crime and the decision of the courts was a death sentence through death penalty or euthanasia concept of mercy killing is applied.

Cite this page

https://graduateway.com/re-imposition-of-death-penalty-in-the-philippines/

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Check more samples on your topics

Yes to death penalty in the philippines argumentative essay.

Death Penalty

Cases occur every second, whether in the country or worldwide, causing people to question justice and bringing problems and suffering, particularly for victims. The death penalty is carried out using an electric chair, where proven suspects or criminals are executed by electricity within seconds. Being predominantly Catholic, the Philippines strictly upholds moral standards. As a teenager,

Thesis statement pro death penalty Argumentative Essay

There Is nothing more final than death. As such before we decide such a major Issue as the Death Penalty we better be sure of what we are doing! Superficially it may seem very simple – you kill therefore you should die – but is it really that simple? Let’s take a closer look…. In

Argument: Is the Death Penalty Effective? Argumentative Essay

The death penalty gives closure to the victims of families who have endured the tragedy that many of us fear the most. When someone Is executed who killed a family member, vengeance is a part of the emotions that everyone feels. Families of murder victims would get a sense of closure knowing the person who

Death penalty thesis statement Argumentative Essay

Throughout history, societies have punished criminals by executing them, but today many countries have abolished the death penalty. In the united States however, the federal government and many of the states continue to sentence convicted criminals to death. This leads us to the question: Should the government have the power to sentence convicted criminals to

Is the death penalty effective argumentative

I'm for the death penalty because I believe intentionally taking another human beings life then, yours should be taken also. If the death penalty was not enforced the criminal would still be living with the satisfaction of killing someone. Although, they are locked up in prison for the rest of their life, they're still being

Should the Death Death Penalty Be Legal? Sample

In 2011 43 people received capital penalty and in 2010 46 people were besides killed because of capital penalty. Now in the twelvemonth 2012 there are 3. 146 decease row inmates waiting to be executed. A Gallic philosopher. Albert Camus one time said “Capital penalty is the most premeditated of murders” . Do you believe

The Death of the Death Penalty

Is The Death Penalty Effective

“Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.” (Tolkien, 1954) Majority of America have their own strong beliefs as to whether capital punishment should remain in todays society. Those who oppose the death penalty

Death to the Death Penalty

The death penalty has been around as far back as the Bible times. Perhaps even later. It hasn’t been until the last century or so that its ethicality has been questioned. As of now, every single country in Europe except Belarus has abolished the death penalty and this is actually a prerequisite to enter the

Teenage Pregnancy in the Philippines Argumentative Essay

In the year 2013, the total count of the population in the Philippines adds up to 105. 72 million, which makes the country the twelfth most populated nation in the world, such a huge number for a relatively small country. In addition to that, over the past ten years, the number of Filipinos who got

Hi, my name is Amy 👋

In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Death Penalty In The Philippines

The controversy over the death penalty essay.

Why is the death penalty used as a means of punishment for crime? Is this just a way to solve the nations growing problem of overcrowded prisons, or is justice really being served? Why do some view the taking of a life morally correct? These questions are discussed and debated upon in every state and national legislature throughout the country. Advantages and disadvantages for the death penalty exist, and many members of the United States, and individual State governments, have differing opinions. Yet it seems that the stronger arguments, and evidence such as cost effectiveness, should lead the common citizen to the opposition of Capital Punishment.

A Critical Analysis of the Death Penalty

The debate on whether or not the death penalty should be abolished has been ongoing for quite a long period of time. While there are those who believe that the death penalty does not serve its intended purpose, proponents of the same are convinced that the relevance of the same cannot be overstated and hence it should not be abolished. In this text, I examine the arguments for and against the death penalty.

Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Death Penalty

Death penalty is a constant source of controversy and divided opinion depending on who you ask. The punishment of death is given to criminals who commit severe crimes. The severity of crimes that attract the death penalty is debatable due to the severity of the crime. The justice system is based upon punishment for crimes committed by emphasizing the punishment fitting the crime committed. Countries such as China and Singapore, and United States, issue the death penalty to punish murderers or rapist, therefore fueling the already going debate on how to befit the punishment is in such cases. All the death penalty aims to achieve is the punishment to those who break the rules. The death penalty has well documented weaknesses as well as strengths. Not least of is brutality and finality, some of these frailties lead to the calls for its abolishment. The death penalty is inhumane. Wrongly applied as well as completely unjustifiable sometimes killing innocent people irrespective of the crime. Life sentence of imprisonment without parole or pardon achieves all that the death penalty seeks to achieve without costing the society its moral standing and families losing those they love.

Death Penalty Executive Branch

The death penalty, or capital punishment, refers to a death to a person by a state for their crimes; where the executive branch made an attempt to address the considered but was unsuccessful, where the Legislative branch talks about and try to modify the death penalty, where the supreme court is handling the cases in trail.

Illinois Prison Research Paper

Capital punishment can be a tough topic to approach because people tend to have many different opinions on it. The death penalty is an advantage to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals. There is a huge difference in expenses of a lethal injection and life in prison. The death penalty can be an extremely beneficial tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to

Persuasive Essay On Abolish The Death Penalty

The death penalty is one of the greatest controversial punishments in the world. There are numerous people who agree with this practice and plenty more who do not agree and believe we should be done with it all together. Some important credential people who give compelling arguments for abolishing the death penalty is Diann Rust-Tierney and Barry Scheck, whereas; the people against abolishing it is Robert Blecker and Kent Scheidegger.

Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished In Australia

BODY 1- We can prevent disgraceful crimes from happening by bringing back the death penalty; by following this adjustment there will be minor crimes being committed. Recent research shows that each execution carried out is correlated with approximately 74 fewer murders each following year. Death penalty serves a definite purpose of reducing crime as well as bringing justice

The Death Penalty: United States Justice System

The death penalty is engaged to show governmental power and is used against people to show others that you will not have the right to live if commit such a terrible crime. People have been killed by the death penalty for many reasons such as treason, terrorism, espionage and murder. Having the death penalty gives closure to the families victim, justice is better served, and deters criminals from committing crimes. Think about if you were close to a victim who traumatized or even killed by a master criminal. You would want the same to be served to the harsh owt law who endangered your

Does Capital Punishment Have A Deterrent Effect?

The other sides of people think that death penalty should be permitted because it deters crime rate and there exists the death penalty in the constitution. Death penalty prevents crime because people are scare to die. In the article “Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel Data”, it shows that death penalty “has a strong deterrent effect; each execution results, on average, in eighteen fewer murders with a margin of error of plus or minus ten.” It means that the capital punishment has a power to decrease the murder rate because people are afraid with the death penalty. Death penalty helps people to stop doing unlawful happening, because they know that they will receive death if they try to murder

Essay about The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

• 7 Works Cited

Death penalty sends a bad message to the society. The people in the society are made to believe that human life has no value, and when one commits a heinous crime like murder, they deserve to die. This is a bad message to the society because, the society should be taught to respect each others life and that every individual has a right to life. A humane society does not kill or support the killing of their fellow human beings, therefore, capital punishment is a violent homicide that teaches the society the permissibility of killing in order to solve social issues, and this is a bad sign. Hence, death penalty should not be allowed because it is the worst example to the society.

Outline Of Death Penalty

In America many people believed that death penalty was the constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment and the guarantees of due process of law and of equal protection under the law. Now, we believe that the state should not give itself the right to kill human beings – especially when it kills with happiness and with ceremony, in the name of the law or in the name of its people, and now we could vote if there could be death penalty.

Life Imprisonment Is Better Than Death Penalty

The death penalty is something few people love. Death penalty involves a myriad of bureaucratic processes given that the judiciary must use long and complicated sessions to ensure no citizen is wrongly executed for the crimes they have not done. However, there are cases where even the innocent persons are not protected from mischievous executions and end up being executed for crimes they did not commit. Most people argue that death penalty is cruel while life imprisonment is inhumane but less cruel. There is also the possibility of parole in case of a life sentence. Apparently, life imprisonment is a better than death penalty given that it costs less, and the money saved can be channeled to some other important programs that improve the life of the citizens. The detention also reduces the possibility of the accused to reverse the mistake. Millions of dollars saved are advantageous in improving schools, infrastructure, police forces, strengthening public programs, improving mental health services, enabling drug treatment, and preventing child abuse. This piece of writing will argue why life imprisonment is better than death penalty.

David Brruck The Death Penalty Analysis

The death penalty is always a topic that is required a lot of argument ever since it was legalized by the state of law. The argument keeps continuing until today determine whether the death penalty is good or bad to our society that we are living. Death penalty is a solution that will give victims a disclosure and it was made for the purpose of an ultimate warning for the criminals, but doubtfully will it work. The death penalty is really cruelty but some people think that the death penalty is not that cruelty compare to what the criminal did to his/her victims. Sometime with the death penalty you can kill innocent people without knowing it until there is no way of turning back. The death penalty is like what they usually said, “an eye for an eye”. David Bruck wrote his idea in the essay concerning about the death penalty was on the controversial side, he did not take his side on whether the situation of the law system on the death penalty is right or wrong. He has his explanation for every time he switches side on the topic.

Persuasive Essay : Euthanasia Is A Form Of Death

Death penalty is unacceptable. It is also a shortcut punishment on the end of the offender. It is just a way to satiate the need for revenge of the family of the victim(s), but in all aspects, it does not value life. And if people will start to think in such a way, the sense of morality of people will dissipate until they would not have any sense of respect to any living thing. By the time that people get used to this, they will regard killing as something normal already. In that way, life becomes nothing and people are expendables.

Argumentative Essay On Capital Punishment

Capital punishment is beneficial to the community. It provides the society with a sense of security. The death penalty contains a positive influence on the future. A heavily debated topic is, “Does capital punishment deter people more than a life sentence to prison?” An explanation on why will be covered later. An issues many people have with capital punishment, is when it is just or not just. This is a topic many stray away from, because it is difficult to decide. Finding the right consequence for an action is difficult. While this paper is for the use of capital punishment, it is clearly not needed for every crime, or even every murder. Overusing capital punishment, such as using it for every murder, will negatively impact the country, and not using it has the same effect.

Related Topics

• Capital punishment
• Corazon Aquino
• Criminology

a place where you can feel enjoyment

Introduction.. ü, sunday, august 24, 2008.

• Argumentative Essay: Pro Death Penalty

4 comments:

The Death Penalty in the US: A Review Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters, contact info below   NOTE: Detailed review of any of the below topics, or others, is available upon request   In this brief format, the reality of the death penalty in the United States, is presented, with the hope that the media, public policy makers and others will make an effort to present a balanced view on this sanction.   Innocence Issues   Death Penalty opponents have proclaimed that 129 inmates have been "released from death row with evidence of their innocence", in the US, since the modern death penalty era began, post Furman v Georgia (1972).   The number is a fraud.   Those opponents have intentionally included both the factually innocent (the "I truly had nothing to do with the murder" cases) and the legally innocent (the "I got off because of legal errors" cases), thereby fraudulently raising the "innocent" numbers. This is easily confirmed by fact checking.   Death penalty opponents claim that 24 such innocence cases are in Florida. The Florida Commission on Capital Cases found that 4 of those 24 MIGHT be innocent -- an 83% error rate in for the claims of death penalty opponents. Other studies show their error rate to be about 70%. The totality of reviews points to an 80% error/fraud rate in these claims, or about 26 cases - a 0.3% actual guilt error rate for the nearly 8000 sentenced to death since 1973.  The actual innocents were all freed.   It is often claimed that 23 innocents have been executed in the US since 1900.  Nonsense.  Even the authors of that "23 innocents executed" study proclaimed "We agree with our critics, we never proved those (23) executed to be innocent; we never claimed that we had."  While no one would claim that an innocent has never been executed, there is no proof of an innocent executed in the US, at least since 1900.   No one disputes that innocents are found guilty, within all countries.  However, when scrutinizing death penalty opponents claims, we find that when reviewing the accuracy of verdicts and the post conviction thoroughness of discovering those actually innocent incarcerated, that the US death penalty process may be one of the most accurate criminal justice sanctions in the world.    Under real world scenarios, not executing murderers will always put many more innocents at risk, than will ever be put at risk of execution.   Deterrence Issues   16 recent US studies, inclusive of their defenses,  find a deterrent effect of the death penalty.   All the studies which have not found a deterrent effect of the death penalty have refused to say that it does not deter some.  The studies finding for deterrence state such.  Confusion arises when people think that a simple comparison of murder rates and executions, or the lack thereof, can tell the tale of deterrence.  It cannot.    Both high and low murder rates are found within death penalty and non death penalty jurisdictions, be it Singapore, South Africa, Sweden or Japan, or the US states of Michigan and Delaware.  Many factors are involved in such evaluations.  Reason and common sense tell us that it would be remarkable to find that the most severe criminal sanction -- execution -- deterred none.  No one is foolish enough to suggest that the potential for negative consequences does not deter the behavior of some.  Therefore, regardless of jurisdiction, having the death penalty will always be an added deterrent to murders, over and above any lesser punishments.   Racial issues   White murderers are twice as likely to be executed in the US as are black murderers and are executed, on average, 12 months more quickly than are black death row inmates.   It is often stated that it is the race of the victim which decides who is prosecuted in death penalty cases.  Although blacks and whites make up about an equal number of murder victims, capital cases are 6 times more likely to involve white victim murders than black victim murders.  This, so the logic goes, is proof that the US only cares about white victims.   Hardly.  Only capital murders, not all murders, are subject to a capital indictment.  Generally, a capital murder is limited to murders plus secondary aggravating factors, such as murders involving burglary, carjacking, rape, and additional murders, such as police murders, serial and multiple murders.  White victims are, overwhelmingly, the victims under those circumstances, in ratios nearly identical to the cases found on death row.   Any other racial combinations of defendants and/or their victims in death penalty cases, is a reflection of the crimes committed and not any racial bias within the system, as confirmed by studies from the Rand Corporation (1991), Smith College (1994), U of Maryland (2002), New Jersey Supreme Court (2003) and by a view of criminal justice statistics, within a framework of the secondary aggravating factors necessary for capital indictments.   Class issues   No one disputes that wealthier defendants can hire better lawyers and, therefore, should have a legal advantage over their poorer counterparts.  The US has executed about 0.15% of all murderers since new death penalty statutes were enacted in 1973.  Is there evidence that wealthier capital murderers are less likely to be executed than their poorer ilk, based upon the proportion of capital murders committed by different those different economic groups? Not to my knowledge.   Arbitrary and capricious   About 10% of all murders within the US might qualify for a death penalty eligible trial.  That would be about 64,000 murders since 1973.  We have sentenced 8000 murderers to death since then, or 13% of those eligible.  I doubt that there is any other crime which receives a higher percentage of maximum sentences, when mandatory sentences are not available.  Based upon that, as well as pre trial, trial, appellate and clemency/commutation realities, the US death penalty is likely the least arbitrary and capricious criminal sanctions in the  US.   Christianity and the death penalty   The two most authoritative New Testament scholars, Saints Augustine and Aquinas, provide substantial biblical and theological support for the death penalty. Even the most well known anti death penalty personality in the US, Sister Helen Prejean, author of Dead Man Walking, states that "It is abundantly clear that the Bible depicts murder as a capital crime for which death is considered the appropriate punishment, and one is hard pressed to find a biblical 'proof text' in either the Hebrew Testament or the New Testament which unequivocally refutes this.  Even Jesus' admonition 'Let him without sin cast the first stone,' when He was asked the appropriate punishment for an adulteress (John 8:7) -- the Mosaic Law prescribed death -- should be read in its proper context.  This passage is an 'entrapment' story, which sought to show Jesus' wisdom in besting His adversaries.  It is not an ethical pronouncement about capital punishment."  A thorough review of Pope John Paul II's position, reflects a reasoning that should be recommending more executions.   Cost Issues   All studies finding the death penalty to be more expensive than life without parole exclude important factors, such as (1) geriatric care costs, recently found to be $69,0000/yr/inmate, (2) the death penalty cost benefit of providing for plea bargains to a maximum life sentence, a huge cost savings to the state, (3) the death penalty cost benefit of both enhanced deterrence and enhanced incapacitation, at $5 million per innocent life spared, and, furthermore, (4) many of the alleged cost comparison studies are highly deceptive.   Polling data   76% of Americans find that we should impose the death penalty more or that we impose it about right (Gallup, May 2006 - 51% that we should impose it more, 25% that we impose it about right)   71%  find capital punishment morally acceptable - that was the highest percentage answer for all questions (Gallup, April 2006, moral values poll). In May, 2007, the percentage dropped to 66%, still the highest percentage answer, with 27% opposed. (Gallup, 5/29/07)   81% of the American people supported the execution of Timothy McVeigh, with only 16% opposed. "(T)his view appears to be the consensus of all major groups in society, including men, women, whites, nonwhites, "liberals" and "conservatives."  (Gallup 5/2/01).   81% of Connecticut citizens supported the execution of serial rapist/murderer Michael Ross (Jan 2005).   While 81% gave specific case support for Timothy McVeigh's execution, Gallup also showed a 65% support AT THE SAME TIME when asked a general "do you support capital punishment for murderers?" question. (Gallup, 6/10/01).   22% of those supporting McVeigh's execution are, generally, against the death penalty (Gallup 5/02/01). That means that about half of those who say they oppose the death penalty, with the general question,  actually support the death penalty under specific circumstances, just as it is imposed, judicially.   Further supporting the higher rates for specific cases, is this, from the French daily Le Monde December 2006 (1): Percentage of respondents in favor of executing Saddam Hussein:USA: 82%; Great Britain: 69%; France: 58%; Germany: 53%; Spain: 51%; Italy: 46%   Death penalty support is much deeper and much wider than we are often led to believe, with 50% of those who say they, generally, oppose the death penalty actually supporting it under specific circumstances, resulting in 80% death penalty support in the US, as recently as December 2006.   --------------------------------   Whatever your feelings are toward the death penalty, a fair accounting of how it is applied should be demanded.   copyright 1998-2008 Dudley Sharp Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part,  is approved with proper attribution.   Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters e-mail  [email protected],  713-622-5491, Houston, Texas   Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS , VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.   A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.   Pro death penalty sites  homicidesurvivors(dot)com/categories/Dudley%20Sharp%20-%20Justice%20Matters.aspx www(dot)dpinfo.com www(dot)cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPinformation.htm www(dot)clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm www(dot)coastda.com/archives.html www(dot)lexingtonprosecutor.com/death_penalty_debate.htm www(dot)prodeathpenalty.com www(dot)yesdeathpenalty.com/deathpenalty_co yesdeathpenalty.googlepages.com/home2   (Sweden) www(dot)wesleylowe.com/cp.html

The Death Penalty: More Protection for Innocents Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters, contact info below   Often, the death penalty dialogue gravitates to the subject of innocents at risk of execution. Seldom is a more common problem reviewed. That is, how innocents are more at risk without the death penalty.   To state the blatantly clear, living murderers, in prison, after release or escape, are much more likely to harm and murder, again, than are executed murderers.   Although an obvious truism, it is surprising how often  folks overlook the enhanced incapacitation benefits of the death penalty over incarceration.   No knowledgeable and honest party questions that the death penalty has the most extensive due process protections in US criminal law.   Therefore, actual innocents are more likely to be sentenced to life imprisonment and more likely to die in prison serving under that sentence, that it is that an actual innocent will be executed.   That is. logically, conclusive.   16 recent studies, inclusive of their defenses, find for death penalty deterrence.   A surprise? No.   Life is preferred over death. Death is feared more than life.   Some believe that all studies with contrary findings negate those 16 studies. They don't. Studies which don't find for deterrence don't say no one is deterred, but that they couldn't measure those deterred.   What prospect of a negative outcome doesn't deter some? There isn't one . . . although committed anti death penalty folk may say the death penalty is the only one.   However, the premier anti death penalty scholar accepts it as a given that the death penalty is a deterrent, but does not believe it to be a greater deterrent than a life sentence. Yet, the evidence is compelling and un refuted that death is feared more than life.   Some death penalty opponents argue against death penalty deterrence, stating that it's a harsher penalty to be locked up without any possibility of getting out.   Reality paints a very different picture.   What percentage of capital murderers seek a plea bargain to a death sentence? Zero or close to it. They prefer long term imprisonment.   What percentage of convicted capital murderers argue for execution in the penalty phase of their capital trial? Zero or close to it. They prefer long term imprisonment.   What percentage of death row inmates waive their appeals and speed up the execution process? Nearly zero. They prefer long term imprisonment.   This is not, even remotely, in dispute.   Life is preferred over death. Death is feared more than life.   Furthermore, history tells us that lifers have many ways to get out: Pardon, commutation, escape, clerical error, change in the law, etc.   In choosing to end the death penalty, or in choosing not implement it, some have chosen to spare murderers at the cost of sacrificing more innocent lives.   Furthermore, possibly we have sentenced 20-25 actually innocent people to death since 1973, or 0.3% of those so sentenced. Those have all been released upon post conviction review. The anti death penalty claims, that the numbers are significantly higher, are a fraud, easily discoverable by fact checking.   6 inmates have been released from death row because of DNA evidence. An additional 9 were released from prison, because of DNA exclusion, who had previously been sentenced to death.   The innocents deception of death penalty opponents has been getting exposure for many years. Even the behemoth of anti death penalty newspapers, The New York Times,  has recognized that deception.   To be sure, 30 or 40 categorically innocent people have been released from death row . . . (1) This when death penalty opponents were claiming the release of 119 "innocents" from death row. Death penalty opponents never required actual innocence in order for cases to be added to their "exonerated" or "innocents" list. They simply invented their own definitions for exonerated and innocent and deceptively shoe horned large numbers of inmates into those definitions - something easily discovered with fact checking.   There is no proof of an innocent executed in the US, at least since 1900.   If we accept that the best predictor of future performance is past performance, we can reasonable conclude that the DNA cases will be excluded prior to trial, and that for the next 8000 death sentences, that we will experience a 99.8% accuracy rate in actual guilt convictions. This improved accuracy rate does not include the many additional safeguards that have been added to the system, over and above DNA testing.   Of all the government programs in the world, that put innocents at risk, is there one with a safer record and with greater protections than the US death penalty?   Unlikely.   Full report -All Innocence Issues: The Death Penalty, upon request.   Full report - The Death Penalty as a Deterrent, upon request   (1) The Death of Innocents: A Reasonable Doubt, New York Times Book Review, p 29, 1/23/05, Adam Liptak, national legal correspondent for The NY Times copyright 2007-2008, Dudley Sharp Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part,  is approved with proper attribution.   Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters e-mail [email protected] 713-622-5491, Houston, Texas   Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS, VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.   A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.   Pro death penalty sites  homicidesurvivors(dot)com/categories/Dudley%20Sharp%20-%20Justice%20Matters.aspx www(dot)dpinfo.com www(dot)cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPinformation.htm www(dot)clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm www(dot)coastda.com/archives.html www(dot)lexingtonprosecutor.com/death_penalty_debate.htm www(dot)prodeathpenalty.com www(dot)yesdeathpenalty.com/deathpenalty_com yesdeathpenalty.googlepages.com/home2 (Sweden) www(dot)wesleylowe.com/cp.html

Catholic and other Christian References: Support for the Death Penalty Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters, contact info below   Religious positions in favor of capital punishment are neither necessary not needed to justify that sanction. However, the biblical and theological record is very supportive of the death penalty.   Many of the current religious campaigns against the death penalty reflect a fairly standard anti death penalty message, routed in secular arguments. When they do address  religious issues, they often neglect solid theological foundations, choosing, instead, select biblical sound bites which do not impact the solid basis of death penalty support. The strength of the biblical, theological and traditional support for the death penalty is, partially, revealed, below.   Some references:   (1)"The Death Penalty", Chapter XXVI, 187. The death penalty, from the book Iota Unum, by Romano Amerio,    Thoughtful deconstruction of current Roman Catholic teaching on capital punishment by a faithful Catholic Vatican insider and expert theologian.   http://www.domid.blogspot.com/2007/05/amerio-on-capital-punishment.html titled "Amerio on capital punishment "Friday, May 25, 2007     (2)  "Catholic and other Christian References: Support for the Death Penalty", at http://www.homicidesurvivors.com/2006/10/12/catholic-and-other-christian-references-support-for-the-death-penalty.aspx    (3)  "Capital Punishment: A Catholic Perspective", by Emmanuel Valenza (Br. Augustine) at http://www.sspx.org/against_the_sound_bites/capital_punishment.htm     (4) "The Purpose of Punishment (in the Catholic tradition)", by R. Michael Dunningan, J.D., J.C.L., CHRISTIFIDELIS, Vol.21,No.4, sept 14, 200 http://www.st-joseph-foundation.org/newsletter/lead.php?document=2003/21-4   (5) "MOST CATHOLICS OPPOSE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT?", KARL KEATING'S E-LETTER, Catholic Answers, March 2, 2004 http://www.catholic.com/newsletters/kke_040302.asp     (6) "THOUGHTS ON THE BISHOPS' MEETING: NOWADAYS, VOTERS IGNORE BISHOPS" , KARL KEATING'S E-LETTER, Catholic Answers,, Nov. 22, 2005 http://www.catholic.com/newsletters/kke_051122.asp (7) "God’s Justice and Ours" by Antonin Scalia, First Things, 5/2002 http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2022   (8)  "A Seamless Garment In a Sinful World" by John R. Connery, S. J., America, 7/14/84, p 5-8).   (9) "The Death Penalty", by Solange Strong Hertz at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/HOMEPAGES/REMNANT/death2.htm   (10) "Capital Punishment: What the Bible Says", Dr. Lloyd R. Bailey, Abingdon Press, 1987. The definitive biblical review of the death penalty. --------------------- 70% of Catholics supported the death penalty as of May, 2oo5, Gallup Poll, Moral Values and Beliefs. The May 2-5, 2005 poll also found that 74% of Americans  favor the death penalty for murderers, while 23% oppose. copyright 1999-2008 Dudley Sharp Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part,  is approved with proper attribution. Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters e-mail  [email protected],  713-622-5491, Houston, Texas   Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS , VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.   A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.   Pro death penalty sites  homicidesurvivors(dot)com/categories/Dudley%20Sharp%20-%20Justice%20Matters.aspx www(dot)dpinfo.com www(dot)cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPinformation.htm www(dot)clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm www(dot)coastda.com/archives.html www(dot)lexingtonprosecutor.com/death_penalty_debate.htm www(dot)prodeathpenalty.com www(dot)yesdeathpenalty.com/deathpenalty_co yesdeathpenalty.googlepages.com/home2 (Sweden) www(dot)wesleylowe.com/cp.html

A worthy essay title grabs the attention of the readers which makes them to read the whole thing to further find out what you wrote and how you develop an argument within your essay or how much it is stated in an effective manner.. This is why giving a title to an essay is crucial – how effectively you are using words to start an essay and how creatively you are crafting your essay title.

Post a Comment

ENGLCOM last day.

To: ms. kathy, best novel ♥, hey its me ü, my blog archives.. ü.

• Reflective Essay 2: My experiences and Improvement...
• Cause and Effect Essay : Water Pollution
• Comparison and Contrast Essay : DEATH NOTE
• Definition Essay : Love, Loved
• Descriptive Essay : The Ultimate Chocolate Chip Co...
• ►  July (2)

Essay About Death Penalty In The Philippines

Research paper on casey anthony.

The death penalty on the other hand would have been effective if the overall public minded to consider it a system for ending criminal acts. While a monstrous number would ensure the nonattendance of the death penalty in their real system, the wrongdoing rate continues going higher for countries that still practice the death penalty. Regardless, there is lacking accurate data to exhibit that death penalty has been convincing similarly as maintaining a strategic distance from criminal acts. It infers

Corruption In The Book 'Just Mercy'

Being forced into an airless prison without any room for your voice to be heard is a nightmare the Justice System holds over those who are unfairly represented. “Just Mercy,” a true story that showcases the ruthlessness of people in power who have wrecked the Justice System. Walter McMillan is part of an extensive percentage of innocent individuals who were convicted for crimes they never committed. The Justice System will give unbiased justice when people are given proper advocacy, corrupt officials are replaced and systematic disparities are eliminated. Justice without real advocacy for an individual does not demonstrate true equity the system says it does.

8th Amendment Essay

Our judicial system should prioritize incarceration and how lengthy a sentence someone should receive based on the crimes committed. The death penalty may claim to serve justice, but its fatal flaws expose a fundamentally broken and

Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Sentencing In The United States

Mandatory sentencing laws often target moral vices like alcohol, sex, drugs, and to friendships and family via prohibition, and crimes that threaten a person's livelihood. The idea is that there are some crimes that are so serious there is no way to accept the offender back into the general population without first punishing them sufficiently. Some crimes are viewed as serious enough to require an indefinite removal from society by a life sentence, or sometimes capital punishment. It is viewed as a public service to separate these people from the general population, as it is assumed that the nature of the crime or the frequency of violation supersedes the subjective opinion of a judge. Remedying the irregularities in sentencing that arise from judicial discretion are supposed to make sentencing more fair and balanced.

Jeffrey Reiman's Arguments Against Capital Punishment

The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.

David Bruck The Death Penalty Analysis

I believe that the men who commit murders should be treated just as they treated their victims. They do not deserve the luxury of life and they should be put down as soon as possible. The men who commit these crimes take away their rights when they decide to take the life of another human being. Regardless of the hardship that courts must go through to end the lives of terrible men, it is the price you pay to ensure that these men will never be on the streets again. Putting them to death prevents the risk of prison attacks along with prison escapes.

Annotated Bibliography On Death Penalty

This article discusses individual cases and crimes and gives analysis of the arguments made against death penalty in real world. Firstly it discusses the deterrence argument while going through a number of cases. The conclusion is that it has no effect on reducing homicides but ironically it breeds violence as in some cases offenders committed a capital crime in a territory where execution still prevails while they could have easily avoided it. Second thing discussed is the cost, the research in article shows that it costs significantly more money to put a convict to death than to incarcerate him for life in a prison. Moreover it is shown that in many cases criminals are executed while there are reasonable doubts in their convictions and some have avoided execution by just a few hours before being exonerated.

Summary Of Igor Primoratz's The Ethical Life

I am not one to argue that capital punishment is without its flaws, nor am I one to argue that the death penalty is not inherently ugly in its entirety. I simply make the argument that the death penalty, or capital punishment, is a necessary evil. To accomplish this, I will begin by dissecting the arguments made by Stephen Nathanson in An Eye for an Eye. Nathanson states that for some crimes, it would not be considered morally acceptable to provide equal punishment to crimes committed. For example, I listed earlier that if we applied the equal punishment principle flatly across our justice system, it would require us to not only kill murderers, but also rape rapists, torture torturers, and kidnap kidnappers.

Death Penalty In Canada Essay

Canada, one of the countries in the world that have a low murder rate. But even with such low rates, why do some Canadians want to reinstate the death penalty? Is it really necessary to bring back what we have already abolished? Or should we fight our urges for vengeance and look for a solution that 's morally right? Clifford Olson, Allan Legere, Robert Pickton, Paul Bernardo and Karla Holmolka.

Argumentative Essay: Race And The Death Penalty

Ronald Carlson wanted nothing more but justice for his sister who had been murdered. Ronald talks about how he would have killed the man with his own hands if he would have gotten the chance but his mind quickly changed after he seen his sister's murder being executed, he has a new view on the situation now. He talks about how watching the execution left him full of horror and emptiness. Ronald asks a question that should be addressed he said, “Our justice system should not be dictated by vengeance.” He asked, “As a society, shouldn’t we be more civilized than the murderers we condemn?”

Essay On The Cost Of Death Penalty

Cost of the Death Penalty When it comes to the topic of the death penalty being cost effective. Most of us will readily agree that the death penalty is the most expensive, that it’s a financially impractical punishment for convicted murders. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether capital punishment with one execution is more expensive than life a sentence without the possibility of parole, Others maintain that since many law enforcement officials consider that it is an effective deterrent against homicides and a sufficient use of taxpayer dollars. My own view is that those convicted of capital punishment should be sentenced to life imprisonment without getting any parole because it is more cost effective.

Analysis Of The Death Penalty Of Death By Anna Quindlen

Execution is the act of carrying out of a sentence of death on a condemned person. This is carried out either by lethal injection or electrocution. Execution despite its barbaric nature has survived in many legal system and will continue to because it: reinforces a state of security of the general public, detters other individuals from committing such crimes, and enforces the concept of cause and effect within the legal system. In the text “The Penalty of Death” H.L. Mencken discusses not only why he supports executions, but also the ripple effects this action has on a society. While in a text entitled “Death Penalty,” Anna Quindlen discusses her objections to execution, because, as she states:”it consists of stooping to the level of the

Robespierre: Good Or Evil?

A demon’s wings that is colored white is the most frightening of all. He who strongly believes that his ideal is just, right and for the good of the people; but in the eyes of so many people, what he does is inhumane and evil; thus comparable to a demon. Robespierre is someone that describes the earlier statements. He thinks his belief is right but the wrong aspect about this is he clings too much on that belief that he forgets reality. In reality, his contribution is terrorizing the people and tarnishing the values of the government.

Essay On Harsh Punishment

In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

The Pros And Cons Of Capital Punishment

Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.

More about Essay About Death Penalty In The Philippines

Related topics.

• Capital punishment
• Capital punishment in the United States

Should Death Penalty Be Legalized in the Philippines Argumentative Essay

By : jeteika

• 31 Mar, 2022

all the others because of his lack of emotion. Meursault was a heartless person in the eyes of some people. It was quite easy for the court to impose the death penalty on him. They knew that if he didn`t even care about his mother`s life, he wouldn`t take care of other people`s lives. He wouldn`t even care about his own. During his first meeting with the magistrate, “he almost shook his hand, but just in time he remembered that he had killed a man” (64). He didn`t care about the life he had just made. The passage of a bill by the Philippine House of Representatives to reinstate the death penalty puts the country on a dangerous path, in flagrant violation of its obligations under international law, Amnesty International said today. Philippines/the-1987-constitution-of-the-republic-of-the-philippines-article-ii/ In 2007, the Philippines ratified the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which commits countries to abolish the death penalty. Countries that are parties to the Covenant and the Protocol cannot reintroduce the death penalty without violating their obligations under international human rights law. This would likely lead to more than just statements of concern from foreign trading partners such as the European Union.

Innocence Project. (2012, October 3). Retrieved fromcaliforniainnocenceproject.org/2012/10/documentary-on-wrongful-conviction-in-the-philippines-to-air-on-pbs/ “The idea that the death penalty will rid the country of drugs is simply false. The resumption of executions will not rid the Philippines of drug problems or deter crime. It is an inhumane, ineffective punishment and it is never the solution. Attempts by the Philippines to reintroduce them are clearly illegal. This will only make the country known as one of the few countries to revive its terrible efforts,” said Champa Patel, Amnesty International`s Director for Southeast Asia and the Pacific. A chronology of the death penalty in the Philippines. ==References== Not being brought back by anyone deserves to die for his crime; Life imprisonment is a better option for a criminal to be punished. There would be too many problems if the death penalty were in force. Innocent people would die because the justice system does not handle the case carefully and they cannot defend themselves well. As a Catholic nation, there is no consensus today that the death penalty brings justice.

Catholics believe that only the Lord can decide a person`s fate. The death penalty should not be imposed in the country because the criminal justice system is flawed in relation to Catholic doctrine. The death penalty is a controversial and burning issue. While some have good reasons to be for, others have strong reasons to be against. Reading Nathanson, the article I selected and the film Last Dance give implicit or explicit reasons for being against the death penalty. Berns makes an argument in favour of the death penalty. I will analyze these sources and take a critical look at the various perspectives. I will start with the analysis. The introduction of the death penalty will mean shedding more blood in the name of Duterte`s “war on drugs.” This will lead the Philippines further into an abyss of human rights violations. And the government will lose its credibility and influence to negotiate on behalf of Filipinos who must be executed abroad.

Republic Act No. 7659 stipulates that a criminal convicted of a heinous crime with due process shall be executed. This law protects the accused, whether guilty or not, in order to have the freedom to testify and prove his innocence. When deciding on an offender`s case, special attention is paid before the death penalty is imposed. The Supreme Court`s decision cannot be made immediately because there are many factors that must prove whether the man is guilty and deserves the death penalty. Amnesty International opposes the death penalty for all crimes and in all circumstances. Under international law, the death penalty must be limited to the most serious crimes, and drug-related offences do not reach this threshold. Nor is there any evidence that the death penalty has a unique deterrent effect. Successfully banning the death penalty for people with mental illness, arguing that they do not know what they are capable of or what the consequences would be.

Many people executed on death have hallucinated or suffered from schizophrenia, PTSD or bipolar disorder. Race – The majority of prosecutors who deal with the death penalty are white people in the states. It ranges from 94.5% to 100%. Death is in no one`s hands. The death penalty, or death penalty, was imposed on a criminal who was deemed incapable of life by the state as punishment for his heinous crimes. The death penalty has been in force in the country since the beginning of the Spanish era, the time of martial law and the time of Fidel Ramos and Estrada (A Chronology of the Death Penalty in the Philippines). The death penalty should not be introduced in the Philippines because the judicial system is flawed and contrary to Catholic teachings. The death penalty should not be introduced in the Philippines because it is contrary to Catholic doctrine.

The Catholic Church is against the death penalty. Last year, even Pope Francis himself called on all Catholics to help abolish the death penalty. The Catholic body is against the death penalty because it does not believe in the abduction of human life. They are for life because it is not in their hands that the author must die, but in the hands of God. Life imprisonment instead of the death penalty is considered a sufficient solution to keep the criminal alive while not endangering the safety of the public (Bishop Chaput). The bill was passed at a time when the country has been hit by a wave of more than 8,000 deaths, many of them due to extrajudicial executions in its “war on drugs” since President Rodrigo Duterte came to power on June 30, 2016. The death penalty has existed for centuries and virtually every country in the world has used it at some point in its history. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, some common methods of execution centuries ago were crucifixions, stoning, beaten deaths, drownings, fires, and live stabbings (DPIC, 2016).