conclusion for social stratification essay

9.1 What Is Social Stratification?

Learning objectives.

By the end of this section, you should be able to:

• Differentiate between open and closed stratification systems
• Distinguish between caste and class systems
• Explain why meritocracy is considered an ideal system of stratification

Sociologists use the term social stratification to describe the system of social standing. Social stratification refers to a society’s categorization of its people into rankings based on factors like wealth, income, education, family background, and power.

Geologists also use the word “stratification” to describe the distinct vertical layers found in rock. Typically, society’s layers, made of people, represent the uneven distribution of society’s resources. Society views the people with more resources as the top layer of the social structure of stratification. Other groups of people, with fewer and fewer resources, represent the lower layers. An individual’s place within this stratification is called socioeconomic status (SES) .

Most people and institutions in the United States indicate that they value equality, a belief that everyone has an equal chance at success. In other words, hard work and talent—not inherited wealth, prejudicial treatment, institutional racism, or societal values—determine social mobility. This emphasis on choice, motivation, and self-effort perpetuates the American belief that people control their own social standing.

However, sociologists recognize social stratification as a society-wide system that makes inequalities apparent. While inequalities exist between individuals, sociologists are interested in larger social patterns. Sociologists look to see if individuals with similar backgrounds, group memberships, identities, and location in the country share the same social stratification. No individual, rich or poor, can be blamed for social inequalities, but instead all participate in a system where some rise and others fall. Most Americans believe the rising and falling is based on individual choices. But sociologists see how the structure of society affects a person's social standing and therefore is created and supported by society.

Factors that define stratification vary in different societies. In most societies, stratification is an economic system, based on wealth , the net value of money and assets a person has, and income , a person’s wages or investment dividends. While people are regularly categorized based on how rich or poor they are, other important factors influence social standing. For example, in some cultures, prestige is valued, and people who have them are revered more than those who don’t. In some cultures, the elderly are esteemed, while in others, the elderly are disparaged or overlooked. Societies’ cultural beliefs often reinforce stratification.

One key determinant of social standing is our parents. Parents tend to pass their social position on to their children. People inherit not only social standing but also the cultural norms, values, and beliefs that accompany a certain lifestyle. They share these with a network of friends and family members that provide resources and support. This is one of the reasons first-generation college students do not fare as well as other students. They lack access to the resources and support commonly provided to those whose parents have gone to college.

Other determinants are found in a society’s occupational structure. Teachers, for example, often have high levels of education but receive relatively low pay. Many believe that teaching is a noble profession, so teachers should do their jobs for love of their profession and the good of their students—not for money. Yet, the same attitude is not applied to professional athletes, executives, or those working in corporate world. Cultural attitudes and beliefs like these support and perpetuate social and economic inequalities.

Systems of Stratification

Sociologists distinguish between two types of systems of stratification. Closed systems accommodate little change in social position. They do not allow people to shift levels and do not permit social relationships between levels. Closed systems include estate, slavery, and caste systems. Open systems are based on achievement and allow for movement and interaction between layers and classes. How different systems operate reflect, emphasize, and foster specific cultural values, shaping individual beliefs. In this section, we’ll review class and caste stratification systems, plus discuss the ideal system of meritocracy.

The Caste System

Caste systems are closed stratification systems where people can do little or nothing to change the social standing of their birth. The caste system determines all aspects of an individual’s life: occupations, marriage partners, and housing. Individual talents, interests, or potential do not provide opportunities to improve a person's social position.

In the Hindu caste tradition, people expect to work in an occupation and to enter into a marriage based on their caste. Accepting this social standing is considered a moral duty and people are socialized to accept their social standing. Cultural values reinforced the system. Caste systems promote beliefs in fate, destiny, and the will of a higher power, rather than promoting individual freedom as a value. This belief system is an ideology. Every culture has an ideology that supports its system of stratification.

The caste system in India has been officially dismantled, but is still deeply embedded in Indian society, particularly in rural areas. In India’s larger cities, people now have more opportunities to choose their own career paths and marriage partners. As a global center of employment, corporations have introduced merit-based hiring and employment to the nation shifting the cultural expectations of the caste system.

The Class System

A class system is based on both social factors and individual achievement. A class consists of a set of people who share similar status based on factors like wealth, income, education, family background, and occupation. Unlike caste systems, class systems are open. People may move to a different level (vertical movement) of education or employment status than their parents. Though family and other societal models help guide a person toward a career, personal choice and opportunity play a role.

They can also socialize with and marry members of other classes. People have the option to form an exogamous marriage , a union of spouses from different social categories. Exogamous marriages often focus on values such as love and compatibility. Though social conformities still exist that encourage people to choose partners within their own class, called an endogamous marriage , people are not as pressured to choose marriage partners based solely on their social location.

Meritocracy

Meritocracy is a hypothetical system in which social stratification is determined by personal effort and merit. The concept of meritocracy is an ideal because no society has ever existed where social standing was based entirely on merit. Rather, multiple factors influence social standing, including processes like socialization and the realities of inequality within economic systems. While a meritocracy has never existed, sociologists see aspects of meritocracies in modern societies when they study the role of academic and job performance and the systems in place for evaluating and rewarding achievement in these areas.

The differences between an open and closed system are explored further in the example below.

Status Consistency

Sociologists use the term status consistency to describe the consistency, or lack thereof, of an individual’s rank across the factors that determine social stratification within a lifetime. Caste systems correlate with high status consistency, due to the inability to move out of a class, whereas the more flexible class system demonstrates lower status consistency.

To illustrate, let’s consider Serena. Serena earned her high school diploma but did not go to college. Completing high school but not college is a trait more common to the lower-middle class. After high school, she began landscaping, which, as manual labor, tracks with lower-middle class or even lower class. However, over time, Serena started her own company. She hired employees. She won larger contracts. Serena became a business owner and earned more money. Those traits represent the upper-middle class. Inconsistencies between Serena’s educational level, her occupation, and income show Serena’s flexibility in her social status, giving her low status consistency. In a class system, hard work, new opportunities, coupled with a lower education status still allow a person movement into middle or upper class, whereas in a caste system, that would not be possible. In a class system, low status consistency correlates with having more choices and opportunities.

Social Policy and Debate

Leaving royalty behind.

Meghan Markle, who married a member of the British royal family, for years endured unceasing negative media attention, invasion of privacy, and racially abusive comments. She and her husband–Prince Harry, grandson to Queen Elizabeth–undertook a series of legal actions to push back against overly aggressive media outlets. But because of the continued harassment and disagreements with others in the royal family, Meghan and Harry decided to step down from their royal obligations and begin a disassociation from the British monarchy. In doing so, they gave up honorary positions, titles, and financial support. For Meghan, who had been born in the U.S. and had earned her wealth through a successful career, these changes may not be so jarring. Prince Harry, however, had been "His Royal Highness" since he was born; by nature of his ancestry he was entitled to vast sums of money, property, and cultural-political positions such as Honorary Air Commandant, Commodore-in-Chief, and President of the Queen's Commonwealth Trust. Harry would also lose the military rank he had earned through almost ten years of military service, including two combat deployments to Afghanistan. Would Megxit work for him? What gave him those honors in the first place?

Britain’s monarchy arose during the Middle Ages. Its social hierarchy placed royalty at the top and commoners on the bottom. This was generally a closed system, with people born into positions of nobility. Wealth was passed from generation to generation through primogeniture , a law stating that all property would be inherited by the firstborn son. If the family had no son, the land went to the next closest male relation. Women could not inherit property, and their social standing was primarily determined through marriage.

The arrival of the Industrial Revolution changed Britain’s social structure. Commoners moved to cities, got jobs, and made better livings. Gradually, people found new opportunities to increase their wealth and power. Today, the government is a constitutional monarchy with the prime minister and other ministers elected to their positions, and with the royal family’s role being largely ceremonial. The long-ago differences between nobility and commoners have blurred, and the modern class system in Britain is similar to that of the United States (McKee 1996).

Today, the royal family still commands wealth, power, and a great deal of attention. After the death of Queen Elizabeth II in September 2022, Prince Charles ascended the throne. When he retires or passes away, the position will go to Prince William, Prince Harry's older brother.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, meanwhile, moved to Los Angeles and signed a voiceover deal with Disney while also joining Netflix in a series production. They founded an organization focusing on non-profit activities and media ventures. Living in LA and working to some extent in entertainment, they will likely be considered a different type of royalty.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.

Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute OpenStax.

Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/1-introduction

• Authors: Tonja R. Conerly, Kathleen Holmes, Asha Lal Tamang
• Publisher/website: OpenStax
• Book title: Introduction to Sociology 3e
• Publication date: Jun 3, 2021
• Location: Houston, Texas
• Book URL: https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/1-introduction
• Section URL: https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/9-1-what-is-social-stratification

© Jan 18, 2024 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.

Social Stratification and Inequality

Cite this chapter.

• Jane D. McLeod 4 &
• James M. Nonnemaker 5  

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

2035 Accesses

27 Citations

1 Altmetric

Social stratification refers to differential access to resources, power, autonomy, and status across social groups. Social stratification implies social inequality; if some groups have access to more resources than others, the distribution of those resources is inherently unequal. Societies can be stratified on any number of dimensions. In the United States, the most widely recognized stratification systems are based on race, social class, and gender.

• Mental Health
• Psychological Distress
• Social Comparison
• American Sociological Review
• Relative Deprivation

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 87 , 49–74.

Google Scholar  

Amaro, H., Russo, N. F., & Johnson, J. (1987). Family and work predictors of psychological well-being among Hispanic women professionals. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 11 , 505–521.

Amato, P. R., & Zuo, J. (1992). Rural poverty, urban poverty, and psychological well-being. Sociological Quarterly , 33 , 229–240.

Aneshensel, C. S. (1992). Social stress: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology , 18 , 15–38.

Aneshensel, C. S., Frerichs, R. R., & Huba, G. J. (1984). Depression and physical illness: A multiwave, nonrecursive causal model. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 25 , 350–371.

Aneshensel, C. S., & Pearlin, L. I. (1987). Structural contexts of sex differences in stress. In R. C. Barnett, L. Biener, & G. K. Baruch (Eds.), Gender and stress (pp. 75–95 ). New York: Free Press.

Aneshensel, C. S., Rutter, C. M., & Lachenbruch, P. A. (1991). Social structure, stress, and mental health: Competing conceptual and analytic models. American Sociological Review , 56 , 166–178.

Aneshensel, C. S., & Sucoff, C. A. (1996). The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 37 , 293–310.

Avison, W. R., & Turner, R. J. (1988). Stressful life events and depressive symptoms: Disaggregating the effects of acute stressors and chronic strains. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 29 , 253–264.

Barone, C., Weissberg, R. P., Kasprow, W. J., Voyce, C. K., Arthur, M. W., & Shriver, T. P. (1995). Involvement in multiple problem behaviors of young urban adolescents. Journal of Primary Prevention , 15 , 261–283.

Belle, D. (1982). The stress of caring: Women as providers of social support. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 496–505 ). New York: Free Press.

Belle, D. (1990). Poverty and women’s mental health. American Psychologist , 45 , 385–389.

Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure . New York: Free Press.

Blendon, R., Aiken, L., Freeman, H., & Corey, C. (1989). Access to medical care for black and white Americans. Journal of the American Medical Association , 261 , 278–281.

Blum, H. M., Boyle, M. H., & Offord, D. R. (1988). Single-parent families: Child psychiatric disorder and school performance. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry , 27 , 214–219.

Boisjoly, J., Duncan, G.J., & Hofferth, S. (1995). Access to social capital. Journal of Family Issues , 16 , 609–631.

Burke, A. W. (1984). Racism and psychological disturbance among West Indians in Britain. International Journal of Social Psychiatry , 30 , 50–68.

Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review , 56 , 836–849.

Cahill, J. (1983). Structural characteristics of the macroeconomy and mental health: Implications for primary prevention research. American Journal of Community Psychology , 11 , 553–571.

Calnan, M., & Johnson, B. (1985). Health, health risks and inequalities. Sociology of Health and Illness , 7 , 55–75.

Caspi, A., Bolger, N., & Eckenrode, J. (1987). Linking person and context in the daily stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 52 , 184–195.

Caspi, A., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (1988). Emergent family patterns: The intergenerational construction of problem behaviour and relationships. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationships within families: Mutual influences (pp. 218–240 ). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent games . New York: Free Press.

Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., Elder, G. H., Jr., Lorenz, F. O., Simons, R. L., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1992). A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Development , 63 , 526–541.

Conger, R. D., Lorenz, F. O., Elder, G. H., Jr., Simons, R. L., & Ge, X. (1993). Husband and wife differences in response to undesirable life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 34 , 71–88.

Danziger, S., & Wheeler, D. (1975). The economics of crime: Punishment or income redistribution. Review of Social Economy , 33 , 113–131.

Dohrenwend, B. P., & Dohrenwend, B. S. (1969). Social status and psychological disorder: A causal inquiry . New York: Wiley Interscience.

Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dooley, D., & Catalano, R. (1979). Economic, life, and disorder changes: Time-series analyses. American Journal of Community Psychology , 7, 381–396.

Dressler, W. W. (1988). Social consistency and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 29 , 79–91.

Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903). The souls of black folk: Essays and sketches . Chicago: McClurg.

Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125 ). New York: Academic Press.

Eberts, P., & Schwirian, K. P. (1968). Metropolitan crime rates and relative deprivation. Criminologica , 5 , 43–57.

Eckenrode, J. (1984). Impact of chronic and acute stressors on daily reports of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 46 , 907–918.

Elder, G. H., Jr.,Van Nguyen, T., & Caspi, A. (1985). Linking family hardship to children’s lives. Child Development , 56 , 361–375.

Ensminger, M. E. (1995). Welfare and psychological distress: A longitudinal study of African-American urban mothers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 36 , 346–359.

Faris, R., & Dunham, H. W. (1939). Mental disorders in urban areas: An ecological study of schizophrenia and other psychoses . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Farley, R., & Allen, W. R. (1987). The color line and the quality of life in America . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Fenwick, R., & Tausig, M. (1994). The macroeconomic context of job stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 35 , 266–282.

Fernando, S. (1984). Racism as a cause of depression. International Journal of Social Psychiatry , 30 , 41–49.

Finch, M. D., Shanahan, M. J., Mortimer, J. T., & Ryu, S. (1991). Work experience and control orientation in adolescence. American Sociological Review , 56 , 597–611.

Furstenberg, E F., Jr. (1992). How families manage risk and opportunity in dangerous neighborhoods. In W. R. Heinz (Ed.), Institutions and gatekeeping in the life course (pp. 121–149 ). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

Gecas, V., & Schwalbe, M. L. (1983). Beyond the looking-glass self: Social structure and efficacy-based self-esteem. Social Psychology Quarterly , 46 , 77–88.

Gecas, V., & Seff, M. A. (1990). Social class and self-esteem: Psychological centrality, compensation, and the relative effects of work and home. Social Psychological Quarterly , 53 , 165–173.

Gibbs, J. T., & Fuery, D. (1994). Mental health and well-being of black women: Toward strategies of empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology , 22 , 559–582.

Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Pugh, M. D. (1986). Friendships and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology , 91 , 1170–1202.

Golding, J. J., Potts. M. K., & Aneshensel, C. S. (1991). Stress exposure among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Journal of Community Psychology , 19 , 37–59.

Goodban, N. (1985, September). The psychological impact of being on welfare. Social Service Review , 403–422.

Gougis, R. A. (1986). The effects of prejudice and stress on the academic performance of black Americans. In Ulric Neisser (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 145–158 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Grant, P. R., & Brown, R. (1995). From ethnocentrism to collective protest: Responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly , 58 , 195–211.

Hagan, J. (1991). Destiny and drift: Subcultural preferences, status attainments, and the risks and rewards of youth. American Sociological Review , 56 , 567–582.

Halpern, R. (1993). Poverty and infant development. In C. H. Zeanah, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of infant mental health (pp. 73–86 ). New York: Guilford.

Hinshaw, S. P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin , 111 , 127–155.

Holland, A., & Andre, T. (1994). The relationship of self-esteem to selected personal and environmental resources of adolescents. Adolescence , 29, 345–360.

Homel, R., & Burns, A. (1989). Environmental quality and the well-being of children. Social Indicators Research , 21 , 133–158.

Horan, P. M., & Gray, B. (1974). Status inconsistency, mobility, and coronary heart disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 15 , 300–310.

Hornung, C. A. (1977). Social status, status inconsistency and psychological stress. American Sociological Review , 42 , 623–638.

Horwitz, A. V. (1984). The economy and social pathology. Annual Review of Sociology , 10 , 95–119.

House, J. S., & Harkins, E. B. (1975). Why and when is status inconsistency stressful? American Journal of Sociology , 81 , 395–412.

Howard, J. A. (1995). Social cognition. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 90–117 ). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Huber, J. (1990). Macro-micro links in gender stratification. American Sociological Review , 55 , 1–10.

Hughes, E. C. (1944). Dilemmas and contradictions of status. American Journal of Sociology , 50 , 353–359.

Hughes, M., & Demo, D. H. (1989). Self-perceptions of black Americans: Self-esteem and personal efficacy. American Journal of Sociology , 95, 139–159.

Jackson, E. F. (1962). Status consistency and symptoms of stress. American Sociological Review , 27, 469–480.

Jackson, E. F., & Curtis, R. F. (1972). Effects of vertical mobility and status inconsistency: A body of negative evidence. American Sociological Review , 37 , 701–713.

Jarrett, R. L. (1995). Growing up poor: The family experiences of socially mobile youth in low income African-American neighborhoods. Journal of Adolescent Research , 10 , 111–135.

Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life . New York: Basic Books.

Kessler, R. C. (1979). Stress, social status, and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 259–272.

Kessler, R. C. (1982). A disaggregation of the relationship between socioeconomic status and psychological distress. American Sociological Review , 47 , 752–764.

Kessler, R. C., & McLeod, J. D. (1984). Sex differences in vulnerability to undesirable life events. American Sociological Review , 49 , 620–631.

Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1983). Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Gibbs, J., Manning, V., & Lund, M. (1995). Physical and psychiatric correlates of gender discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 19 , 473–492.

Langner, T. S., & Michael, S. T. (1963). Life stress and mental health . New York: Free Press.

Lempers, J. D., Clark-Lempers, D., & Simons, R. L. (1989). Economic hardship, parenting, and distress in adolescence. Child Development , 60 , 25–39.

Lennon, M. C. (1987). Sex differences in distress: The impact of gender and work roles. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 28 , 290–305.

Lennon, M. C., & Rosenfield, S. (1992). Women and mental health: The interaction of job and family conditions. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 33 , 316–327.

Lenski, G. E. (1954). Status crystallization: A non-vertical dimension of social status. American Sociological Review , 19 , 405–413.

Lieberson, S. (1985). Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory . Berkeley: University of California Press.

Liem, R., & Liem, J. (1978). Social class and mental illness reconsidered: The role of economic stress and social support. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 19 , 139–156.

Link, B. G., Lennon, M. C., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1993). Socioeconomic status and depression: The role of occupations involving direction, control, and planning. American Journal of Sociology , 98 , 1351–1387.

Loring, M., & Powell, B. (1988). Gender, race, and DSM-III: A study of the objectivity of psychiatric diagnostic behavior. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 29, 1–22.

Maclver, R. M. (1950). The ramparts we guard . New York: Macmillan.

Maly, M. T. (1992). Socioeconomic status and early adolescent self-esteem. Sociological Inquiry , 62 , 375–382.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review , 98 , 224–253.

Massey, D. S., Condran, G. A., & Denton, N. A. (1987). The effect of residential segregation on black social and economic well-being. Social Forces , 66 , 29–56.

Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1987). Trends in the residential segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians: 1970–1980. American Sociological Review , 52 , 802–825.

Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mattlin, J. A., Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1990). Situational determinants of coping and coping effectiveness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 31 , 103–122.

McCarthy, J. D., & Yancey, W. L. (1971). Uncle Tom and Mr. Charlie: Metaphysical pathos in the study of racism and personal disorganization. American Journal of Sociology , 76 , 648–672.

McGuire, J. S., & Austin, J. F. (1987). Beyond survival: Children’s growth for national development. Assignment Children , 2, 1–51.

McLeod, J. D., & Edwards, K. (1995). Contextual determinants of children’s responses to poverty. Social Forces , 73 , 1487–1516.

McLeod, J. D., & Kessler, R. C. (1990). Socioeconomic status differences in vulnerability to undesirable life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 31 , 162–172.

McLeod, J. D., & Nonnemaker, J. M. ( 1997, August). Explaining children’s responses to poverty . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Toronto.

McLeod, J. D., & Shanahan, M. J. (1993). Poverty, parenting, and children’s mental health. American Sociological Review , 58, 351–366.

McLeod, J. D., & Shanahan, M. J. (1996). Trajectories of poverty and children’s mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 37 , 207–220.

McLoyd, V. C. (1990). The impact of economic hardship on black families and children: Psychological distress, parenting, and socioemotional development. Child Development , 61 , 311–346.

Menaghan, E. G. (1983). Individual coping efforts: Moderators of the relationship between life stress and mental health outcomes. In H. B. Kaplan (Ed.), Psychosocial stress: Trends in theory and research (pp. 157–191 ). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review , 3 , 672–682.

Messner, S. F. (1989). Economic discrimination and societal homicide rates: Further evidence on the cost of inequality. American Sociological Review , 54 , 597–611.

Mintz, N. L., & Schwartz, D. T. (1964). Urban ecology and psychosis: Community factors in the incidence of schizophrenia and manic depression among Italians in Greater Boston. International Journal of Social Psychiatry , 10 , 101–118.

Mirowsky, J. (1985). Depression and marital power. American Journal of Sociology , 91 , 557–592.

Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1983). Paranoia and the structure of powerlessness. American Sociological Review , 48 , 228–239.

Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1986). Social patterns of distress. Annual Review of Sociology , 12 , 23–45.

Mirowsky, J., Ross, C. E., & Van Willigen, M. (1996). Instrumentalism in the land of opportunity: Socioeconomic causes and emotional consequences. Social Psychology Quarterly , 59 , 322–337.

Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review , 100 , 674–701.

Mohutsica-Makhudu, Y. N. K. (1989). The psychological effects of apartheid on the mental health of black South African women domestics. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development , 17 , 134–142.

Moore, G. (1990). Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. American Sociological Review , 55, 726–735.

Moritsugu, J., & Sue, S. (1983). Minority status as a stressor. In R. Feiner, L. Jason, J. Moritsugu, & S. Faber (Eds.), Preventive psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 162–174). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

Neff, J. A. (1983). Urbanicity and depression reconsidered: The evidence regarding depressive symptomatology. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease , 171 , 546–552.

Neighbors, H. W., Jackson, J. S., Campbell, L., & Williams, D. (1989). The influence of racial factors on psychiatric diagnosis: A review and suggestions for research. Community Mental Health Journal , 25, 301–311.

Newacheck, P. W., Butler, L. H., Harper, A. K., Prontkowski, D. L., & Franks, P. E. (1980). Income and illness. Medical Care , 18 , 1165–1176.

Ogbu, J. U. (1986). The consequences of the American caste system. In Ulric Neisser (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 19–56 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Olson, S. L., & Banyard, V. (1993). Stop the world so I can get off for a while. Family Relations , 42 , 50–56.

Parks, R. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology , 33, 881–893.

Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). Developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist , 44 , 329–335.

Pearlin, L. I. (1991). The study of coping: An overview of problems and directions. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp. 261–276 ). New York: Plenum Press.

Pearlin, L. I. (1992). Structure and meaning in medical sociology. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 33 , 1–9.

Pearlin, L. I., & Lieberman, M. A. (1979). Social sources of emotional distress. Research in Community and Mental Health , 1, 217–248.

Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The stress of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 19 , 2–21.

Pettigrew, T. F. (1967). Social evaluation theory: Convergences and applications. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 241–311 ). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Pollitt, E. (1987). Effects of iron deficiency in mental development: Methodological considerations and substantive findings. In F. Johnson (Ed.) Nutritional anthropology (pp. 225–254 ). New York: Alan R. Liss.

Pollitt, E. (1994). Poverty and child development: Relevance of research in developing countries to the United States. Child Development , 65 , 283–295.

Popkin, S. J. (1990). Welfare: Views from the bottom. Social Problems , 37 , 64–79.

Porter, J. R., & Washington, R. E. (1979). Black identity and self-esteem: A review of studies of black self-concept: 1968–1978. Annual Review of Sociology , 5 , 53–74.

Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (1990). Immigrant America: A portrait . Berkeley: University of California Press.

Pugliesi, K. (1995). Work and well-being: Gender differences in the psychological consequences of employment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 36 , 57–71.

Riesman, D. (1950). The lonely crowd . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review , 15 , 351–357.

Rosenberg, M. (1962). The dissonant religious context and emotional disturbance. American Journal of Sociology , 68 , 1–10.

Rosenberg, M. (1977). Contextual dissonance effects: Nature and causes. Psychiatry , 40 , 205–217.

Rosenberg, M. (1981). The self-concept: Social product and social force. In M. Rosenberg, & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 593–624 ). New York: Basic Books.

Rosenberg, M., & Pearlin, L. I. (1978). Social class and self-esteem among children and adults. American Journal of Sociology , 84 , 53–77.

Rosenfield, S. (1989). The effects of women’s employment: Personal control and sex differences in mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 30 , 77–91.

Roxburgh, S. (1996). Gender differences in work and well-being: Effects of exposure and vulnerability. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 37 , 265–277.

Rushing, W. A. (1971). Class, culture, and “social structure and anomie”. American Journal of Sociology , 76 , 857–872.

Ryff, C. D. (1987). The place of personality and social structure research in social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53 , 1192–1202.

Salgado de Snyder, V. N. (1987). Factors associated with acculturative stress and depressive symptomatology among married Mexican immigrant women. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 11 , 475–488.

Schroeder, C. W. (1943). Mental disorders in cities. American Journal of Sociology , 48 , 40–47.

Schwalbe, M. L. (1985). Autonomy in work and self-esteem. Sociological Quarterly , 26, 519–535.

Seff, M. (1992, August). Welfare, work status, and women’s self evaluations . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Pittsburgh.

Seidman, E., & Rapkin, B. (1983). Economics and psychosocial dysfunction: Toward a conceptual framework and prevention strategies. In R. Feiner, L. Jason, J. Moritsugu, & S. Farber (Eds.), Preventive psychology: Theory, research and practice (pp. 175–198). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development and death . San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology , 22 , 299–322.

Simon, R. W. (1995). Gender, multiple roles, role meaning, and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 36 , 182–194.

Singer, E. (1981). Reference groups and social evaluations. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 66–93 ). New York: Basic Books.

Spenner, K. I. (1988). Social stratification, work, and personality. Annual Review of Sociology , 14 , 69–97.

Thoits, P. A. (1987). Gender and marital status differences in control and distress: Common stress versus unique stress explanations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 28 , 7–22.

Thoits, P. A. (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly , 54 , 101–112.

Thompson, V. L. S. (1996). Perceived experiences of racism as stressful life events. Community Mental Health Journal , 32 , 223–233.

Turner, R. J., & Avison, W. R. (1989). Gender and depression: Assessing exposure and vulnerability to life events in a chronically strained population. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease , 177 , 443–455.

Turner, R. J., & Marino, F. (1994). Social support and social structure: A descriptive epidemiology. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 35 , 193–212.

Turner, R. J., Wheaton, B., & Lloyd, D. A. (1995). The epidemiology of social stress. American Sociological Review , 60 , 104–125.

Tweed, D. L., Goldsmith, H. F., Jackson, D. J., Stiles, D., Rae, D. S., & Kramer, M. (1990). Racial congruity as a contextual correlate of mental disorder. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry , 60 , 392–403.

Ulbrich, P. M., Warheit, G. J., & Zimmerman, R. S. (1989). Race, socioeconomic status, and psychological distress: An examination of differential vulnerability. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 30 , 131–146.

Umberson, D. (1993). Sociodemographic position, world views, and psychological distress. Social Science Quarterly , 74 , 575–589.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1985). Statistical abstract of the United States 1986 (106th Ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990). Money income and poverty status of families and persons in the U.S. : 1989 (Current Population Reports, Series P-60). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Waters, M.C. (1990). Ethnic options: Choosing identities in America . Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wheaton, B. (1983). Stress, personal coping resources, and psychiatric symptoms: An investigation of interactive models. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 24 , 208–229.

Wheaton, B. (1990). Life transitions, role histories, and mental health. American Sociological Review , 55 , 209–223.

White, M., Kasl, S. V., Zahner, G. E. P., & Will, J. C. (1987). Perceived crime in the neighborhood and mental health of women and children. Environment and Behavior , 19 , 588–613.

Williams, D. R. (1990). Socioeconomic differentials in health: A review and redirection. Social Psychology Quarterly , 53 , 81–99.

Williams, D. R., Yu, Y., Jackson, J. S., & Anderson, N. B. (1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socioeconomic status, stress and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology , 2 , 335–351.

Williams, R. M., Jr. (1975). Relative deprivation. In L. A. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (pp. 355–378 ). New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

Willie, C. V. (1978). The president’s commission on mental health: A minority report on minorities. New England Sociologist , 1 , 13–22.

Wilson, W. J. (1991). Studying inner-city social dislocations: The challenge of public agenda research. American Sociological Review , 56 , 1–14.

Wiltfang, G. L., & Scarbecz, M. (1990). Social class and adolescents’ self-esteem: Another look. Social Psychology Quarterly , 53 , 174–183.

Woodward, A. M., Dwinnel, A. D., & Arons, B. S. (1992). Barriers to mental health care for Hispanic Ameri- cans: A literature review and discussion. Journal of Mental Health Administration , 19 , 224–236.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, USA

Jane D. McLeod

Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, USA

James M. Nonnemaker

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-1772, Los Angeles, California, USA

Carol S. Aneshensel

Division of Sociomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, Columbia University, 10032, New York, New York, USA

Jo C. Phelan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

McLeod, J.D., Nonnemaker, J.M. (1999). Social Stratification and Inequality. In: Aneshensel, C.S., Phelan, J.C. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36223-1_16

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36223-1_16

Publisher Name : Springer, Boston, MA

Print ISBN : 978-0-387-32516-3

Online ISBN : 978-0-387-36223-6

eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Home — Essay Samples — Sociology — Social Stratification

Essays on Social Stratification

Webers three dimensions of stratification, brave new world setting analysis, made-to-order essay as fast as you need it.

Each essay is customized to cater to your unique preferences

+ experts online

The Role of Social Stratification in Inequality Within The Education System

The concept of social stratification and my position in it, comparison of the views on social stratification by friedrich nietzsche and w.e.b. dubois, the issue of social stratification and gender, let us write you an essay from scratch.

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Analysis of The Estate System of Social Stratification

Social stratification in relation to egyptian and american culture, the role of class stratification in pedro paramo, an analysis of social stratification within american schools, get a personalized essay in under 3 hours.

Expert-written essays crafted with your exact needs in mind

How Stratified Societies Can Positively Influence Our Economy

Education inequality in america and social stratification, the complexity of outsiders: misjudged or misunderstood, functionalism and conflict theory as the frameworks for inequality, social stratification in modern america, inequality's impact on policing practices, relevant topics.

• Sociological Imagination
• Modern Society
• Social Change
• Stereotypes
• Globalization
• Sociological Perspective
• Premarital Sex
• Emile Durkheim

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Module 7: Stratification and Inequality

Social stratification, social inequality, and global stratification, learning objectives.

• Describe social stratification and social inequality
• Explain global stratification

Social Stratification

Figure 1.  Strata in rock illustrate social stratification. People are sorted, or layered, into social categories. Many factors determine a person’s social standing, such as income, education, occupation, geography, as well as age, race, gender, and even physical abilities. (Photo courtesy of Just a Prairie Boy/flickr)

Social stratification is a system of ranking individuals and groups within societies. It refers to a society’s ranking of its people into socioeconomic tiers based on factors like wealth, income, race, education, and power. You may remember the word “stratification” from geology class. The distinct horizontal layers found in rock, called “strata,” are an illustrative way to visualize social structure. Society’s layers are made of people, and society’s resources are distributed unevenly throughout the layers. Social stratification has been a part of all societies dating from the agricultural revolution, which took place in various parts of the world between 7,000-10,000 BCE. Unlike relatively even strata in rock, though, there are not equal numbers of people in each layer of society. There are typically very few at the top and a great many at the bottom, with some variously populated layers in the middle.

Social Inequality

Social inequality  is the state of unequal distribution of valued goods and opportunities. All societies today have social inequality. Examining social stratification requires a macrosociological perspective in order to view societal systems that make inequalities visible. Although individuals may support or fight inequalities, social stratification is created and supported by society as a whole through values and norms and consistently durable systems of stratification.

Most of us are accustomed to thinking of stratification as economic inequality. For example, we can compare wages in the United States to wages in Mexico. Social inequality, however, is just as harmful as economic discrepancy. Prejudice and discrimination—whether against a certain race, ethnicity, religion, or the like—can become a causal factor by creating and aggravating conditions of economic inequality, both within and between nations.

Gender inequality is another global concern. Consider the controversy surrounding female circumcision (also known as female genital mutilation or FGM). Nations favoring this practice, often through systems of patriarchal authority, defend it as a longstanding cultural tradition among certain tribes and argue that the West shouldn’t interfere. Western nations, however, decry the practice and are working to expose and stop it.

Inequalities based on sexual orientation and gender identity exist around the globe. According to Amnesty International, a range of crimes are commonly committed against individuals who do not conform to traditional gender roles or sexual orientations (however those are culturally defined). From culturally sanctioned rape to state-sanctioned executions, the abuses are serious. These legalized and culturally accepted forms of prejudice, discrimination, and punishment exist everywhere—from the United States to Somalia to Tibet—restricting the freedom of individuals and often putting their lives at risk (Amnesty International 2012).

Watch the selected first few minutes of this video to learn about stratification in general terms. You’ll learn some key principles regarding social stratification, namely that:

• Stratification is universal, but varies between societies;
• It is a characteristic of society and not a matter of individual differences; in other words, we need to use the sociological imagination to understand social stratification and see it as a social issue and not just an individual problem;
• It persists across generations, although it often allows for some degree of social mobility;
• Stratification continues because of beliefs and attitudes about social stratification

Thinking Deeply about Inequality

How do you think wealth should best be distributed in the United States? Check out this  interactive animation on economic inequality from the Economic Policy Institute .

Link to Learning

Imagine that the United States is divided into quintiles (bottom 20%, second 20%, middle 20%, fourth 20%, and top 20%).

• How do you think wealth is distributed in the United States? What percentage would you attribute to each quintile?
• What do you think is the ideal distribution?

Now watch the video “Wealth Inequality in America”  and compare your responses to the actual distribution of wealth. Keep in mind that these numbers are from 2012, but the rates of inequality have not improved since then.

Global Stratification

Figure 2. (a) A family lives in this grass hut in Ethiopia. (b) Another family lives in a single-wide trailer in a trailer park in the United States. Both families are considered poor, or lower class. With such differences in global stratification, what constitutes poverty? (Photo (a) courtesy of Canned Muffins/flickr; Photo (b) courtesy of Herb Neufeld/flickr)

While stratification in the United States refers to the unequal distribution of resources among individuals, global stratification refers to this unequal distribution among nations. There are two dimensions to this stratification: gaps between nations and gaps within nations. When it comes to global inequality, both economic inequality and social inequality may concentrate the burden of poverty among certain segments of the earth’s population (Myrdal 1970).

As mentioned earlier, one way to evaluate stratification is to consider how many people are living in poverty, and particularly extreme poverty, which is often defined as needing to survive on less than $1.90 per day. Fortunately, until the COVID-19 pandemic impacted economies in 2020, the extreme poverty rate had been on a 20-year decline. In 2015, 10.1 percent of the world’s population was living in extreme poverty; in 2017, that number had dropped an entire percentage point to 9.2 percent. While a positive, that 9.2 percent is equivalent to 689 million people living on less than $1.90 a day. The same year, 24.1 percent of the world lived on less than $3.20 per day and 43.6 percent on less than $5.50 per day in 2017 (World Bank 2020). The table below makes the differences in poverty very clear.

Global stratification compares the wealth, economic stability, status, and power of countries across the world, and also highlights worldwide patterns of social inequality within nations.

In the early years of civilization, hunter-gatherer and agrarian societies lived off the earth and rarely interacted with other societies (except during times of war). As civilizations began to grow and emerging cities developed political and economic systems, trade increased, as did military conquest. Explorers went out in search of new land and resources as well as to trade goods, ideas, and customs. They eventually took land, people, and resources from all over the world, building empires and establishing networks of colonies with imperialist policies, foundational religious ideologies, and incredible economic and military power.

In the nineteenth century, the Industrial Revolution created unprecedented wealth in Western Europe and North America. Due to mechanical inventions and new means of production, people began working in factories—not only men, but women and children as well. The Industrial Revolution also saw the rise of vast inequalities between countries that were industrialized and those that were not. As some nations embraced technology and saw increased wealth and goods, others maintained their ways; as the gap widened, the non-industrialized nations fell further behind. Some social researchers, such as Walt Rostow, suggest that the disparity also resulted from power differences. Applying a conflict theory perspective, he asserts that industrializing nations appropriated and took advantage of the resources of traditional nations. As industrialized nations became rich, other nations became poor (Rostow 1960).

Sociologists studying global stratification analyze economic comparisons between nations. Income, purchasing power, and investment and ownership-based wealth are used to calculate global stratification. Global stratification also compares the quality of life that individual citizens and groups within a country’s population can have.

Poverty levels have been shown to vary greatly. The poor in wealthy countries like the United States or Europe are much better off than the poor in less-industrialized countries such as Mali or India. In 2002, the UN implemented the Millennium Project, an attempt to cut poverty worldwide by the year 2015. To reach the project’s goal, planners in 2006 estimated that industrialized nations must set aside 0.7 percent of their gross national income—the total value of the nation’s good and service, plus or minus income received from and sent to other nations—to aid in developing countries (Landler and Sanger, 2009; Millennium Project 2006).

Although some successes have been realized from the Millennium Project , such as cutting the extreme global poverty rate in half, the United Nations has now moved ahead with their program of economic growth and sustainable development in their new project,  Sustainable Development Goals , adopted in September of 2015.

Think It Over

• The wealthiest 300 individuals in the world have more wealth than the poorest 3 billion individuals. Does this surprise you? Why or why not?
• Why has the wealth gap between the wealthiest countries and the poorest countries grown larger? How is this different from dominant narratives in the media?
• What changes could be made to reduce global stratification and inequality?

Contribute!

Improve this page Learn More

• Modification, adaptation, and original content. Authored by : Sarah Hoiland and Lumen Learning. Provided by : Lumen Learning. License : CC BY: Attribution
• What Is Social Stratification?. Authored by : OpenStax CNX. Located at : https://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]:LYDnfp5S@3/What-Is-Social-Stratification . License : CC BY: Attribution . License Terms : Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]
• Global Stratification and Classification. Provided by : OpenStax College. Located at : https://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]:7TCPamHd@3/Global-Stratification-and-Classification . License : CC BY: Attribution . License Terms : Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected].
• Global Stratification and Classification. Provided by : OpenStax. Located at : https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/10-1-global-stratification-and-classification . Project : Sociology 3e. License : CC BY: Attribution . License Terms : Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/10-1-global-stratification-and-classification
• Global Wealth Inequality. Authored by : TheRulesOrg. Located at : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWSxzjyMNpU . License : Other . License Terms : Standard YouTube License
• Social Stratification: Crash Course Sociology #21. Provided by : CrashCourse. Located at : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlkIKCMt-Fs . License : Other . License Terms : Standard YouTube License

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Social Stratification Essay

Related Papers

CEPAL Review

Guillermo Diaz

Obafemi Awolowo University Press

Oyekola Isaac A.

No society is classless or without strata. Stratification is part and parcel of social life. Every society defines a means of categorising each person into a particular social group. The placement of each individual in turn determines his value, as defined by the larger society; hence, the greater role of society in defining every person’s value. Differences in values and statuses of individual engender stratification in the society. If social stratification affected only such matters as who gets elected as President or who becomes the Chief Executive Officer, separate chapter might not be dedicated to its discussion. But social stratification does much more: It results in some members of society benefiting greatly and others suffering. Most societies of the world are organised so that their institutions systematically distribute benefits and burdens unequally among different categories of people. Social arrangements are not neutral, but serve and promote the goals and interests of some people more than those of other people. In this Chapter, we shall discuss the concept of social stratification in terms of definition, functions, dimensions, systems, and theories before assessing it in the Nigerian social context.

Reazaul Islam

Siyabonga Ngubane

Damian M Chase-Begay

Kathya Araujo

International Journal IJRITCC

Human beings are identical to this point as their physical shape is involved. however the physical look of individuals, their intellectual, ethical, philosophical, intellectual, economic, religious, political and other factors are specific. No two individuals are precisely alike. diversity and inequality are inherent in society. subsequently, human society is everywhere stratified. All societies arrange their individuals in terms of superiority, inferiority, and equality. The vertical scale of evaluation, this placing of people in strata, or layers, is referred to as stratification. the ones inside the top stratum have more strength, privilege and prestige than those below. individuals of a group examine fluctuatent people, as while selecting a mate, or employing a worker, or dealing with a neighbour, or growing friendship with an man or woman.They also evaluate organisations consisting of castes, races, schools, cities, athletic groups. those comparisons are valuations, and when contributors of a collection agree, those decisions are social evaluations. All societies differentiate participants in terms of roles and all societies evaluate roles in another way. some roles are seemed as more critical or socially extra precious than others.The humans who perform the extra fantastically esteemed roles are rewarded more notably. Thus stratification is existed between human beings.

Nazmul Hossain Sohan

RELATED PAPERS

Paul Dunlop

Le Quang Tan

Eng. Mwamzali Shiribwa

Juan Santiago Tamayo Arango

Maria Camila Cardona Cifuentes

Research on Animal Production

Iman Haghiyan

Ocean Science Discussions

Zhenwen Wan

Vimalpriya Nagaraj

Journal of Energy Engineering

Jae-Heun Oh

Kurt Ruetzler

International Nano Letters

Usman Muslim

Majalah Kedokteran Neurosains Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Saraf Indonesia

diatri lastri

Emanuella Gomes Maia

Medycyna Weterynaryjna

Michał Dzięcioł

East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine

Catherine Jami

javier navarro

Agie Hanggara

Csaba Vágvölgyi

Advances in Therapy

Steven J Lichtenstein

International Journal of Case Reports and Images

soumya makarla

Ana Alebić-Juretić

Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications

Anouar Abdelhakim BOUDHIR

See More Documents Like This

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Essay Plans

Marked essays.

Data which is presented as statistical data or numerical is described as  being a Quantitative method . Sociologist, among others will contend that  quantitative method , like questionnaire and others would better be suited to  undergo the rigours of sociological research. This is so because of the  advantages that they hold. However, in contrast sociologist would disagree  with this statement.                 Quantitative methods , such as questionnaires, structured interviews and  official statistics has advantages that would prove to be more efficient. In  sociology, for a research to be valid r carried out effectively, the data  collected must be objective. This view is supported by the positivist, Emile  Durkheim and auguste Comte. Quantitative methods collect empirical data which  further means that data being collected is objective. Empirical data is  statistical, anything dealing with numbers and if the data being collected is  numerical it suggest that the method used was unbiased. Also quantitative  methods are nothing cognitive, as cognitive information cannot be measured or  understood. Also cognitive data would be studying the perception and not  exactly what is happening.                 It is argued that in quantitative methods , the researcher is detached from  the study and is not influenced by his personal belief. Therefore the  information would not be flawed, because the researcher would just say  what’s happening and would not have his personal views. This would have  resulted from the empirical data collected. For example, a researcher who is  doing a research on: why are students in Jane brown High school prone to  violence. The research her would practice observable phenomena and report  what she sees and not what she thinks the individual is thinking.                 Furthermore, quantitative research methods are easily replicable. This  means that the data/information collected will always be the same years after  the research was conducted. However, new information or knowledge can be  added to what is already there because it is accumulative. No matter how long  the research was conducted it will always remain the same because numbers  cannot change, but an explanation can. This makes quantitative methods one of  the preferred methods . In coherence, quantitative research methods   facilitates theory formulation, this is so as a large amount of data is  collected that the researcher is used to formulate theories that seek to  explain social phenomena.                 Other reasons why quantitative methods would be better suited is that it  saves the researcher time and money, which means that the researcher would  not have to spend a lot of time on the research as it will directly get to  the point.                 Nevertheless, some sociologist would disagree with the fact that  quantitative methods would be best suited because no method in sociology,  they say can be objective. One disadvantage of using quantitative method is  that there is no indication about the respondents’ personal state of mind,  for example, mood, attitude or feelings. Weber in his theory contend that in  sociology, any research being conducted the researcher must practice  verstehen. Verstehen is subjective, this, there is no objectivity in  sociology researchers. This would therefore mean that quantitative methods   are not best suited for sociological research. Weber contends that a  researcher must be attached to the research such that verstehen is practiced;  this would involve the placing of oneself in the respondents’ shoes. He  further states that through thus process, the researcher will be able to  understand the actions and the meaning behind them.                 Additionally, Atkinson and Cicourel believe that other methods such as  qualitative research methods would have a better advantage over quantitative  methods . This is so because they also believe like Weber that there is no  objectivity in any sociological research. Atkinson and Cicourel posit this  view because even with the statistical data collected through the  quantitative method the information gathered id subjective. The statistical  data is influence by the perception of the person collating and analyzing the  data.                 Qualitative methods would be best suited for sociological researches  because they provide explanation and look beyond the numbers. The  interpretive theorist believe that the study of humans is complex, because  humans have consciousness and consciousness fluctuates and will not always  remain in the same manner to external stimuli, and the is no universal law of  human behaviour.                 Analyzing the statement from both views, quantitative methods would be best  suited to undergo the rigours of sociological research to an extent and then  there is the other view that qualitative methods would be better because of  its subjectivity which is best for sociological researches.

Sociology is a discipline that has been the subject of debate within the social sciences about whether it can be considered a science or not. While some scholars argue that sociology is a science due to its use of empirical evidence and scientific methods to study social phenomena, others argue that it is not a science because social phenomena are inherently complex and difficult to measure. This essay will evaluate the major positions in this debate, providing a more detailed definition of science, exploring the limitations and challenges of using scientific methods in sociology, and using a wider range of academic sources to support the arguments.

One of the main arguments for sociology as a science is its use of empirical evidence and scientific methods. The positivist perspective, which sees sociology as a hard science like physics or chemistry, argues that sociology should use the same methods as natural sciences, such as experiments and quantitative surveys, to generate reliable and valid data. For example, Durkheim's study of suicide used statistical methods to demonstrate the relationship between social factors and suicide rates. However, critics argue that such methods are limited in their ability to capture the complexity of social phenomena, and may be subject to issues of reliability, validity, and generalizability.

Another argument for sociology as a science is its ability to generate testable hypotheses and theories. According to the falsificationist perspective, sociology should generate hypotheses that can be tested through empirical evidence, with theories that have been falsified by data being discarded. For example, Merton's strain theory of deviance was based on the hypothesis that individuals who experience strain are more likely to engage in deviant behavior. However, critics argue that such an approach neglects the role of interpretation and subjectivity in social research, and may overlook important aspects of social life that cannot be easily quantified.

On the other hand, some scholars argue that sociology is not a science because social phenomena are inherently complex and difficult to measure. The interpretive perspective, for example, argues that sociology should use qualitative methods such as participant observation and interviews to understand the meanings that individuals attach to their experiences. For example, Bourdieu's study of cultural capital demonstrated how social class and cultural background can influence an individual's taste in art and culture. However, critics argue that such methods may lack objectivity and reliability, and may be subject to the researcher's biases and interpretations.

Despite these debates, it is important to recognize that both quantitative and qualitative methods have their strengths and weaknesses. For example, Hochschild's study of emotion management in airline flight attendants used a mixed-methods approach to explore the complex and often contradictory emotions that attendants experienced on the job. By using both quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews, Hochschild was able to capture both the objective and subjective aspects of the attendants' experiences. This demonstrates that a mixed-methods approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the social world.

In conclusion, while the debate surrounding sociology as a science is ongoing, it is clear that there are both strengths and limitations to using scientific methods in sociology. While sociology may not be a hard science like physics or chemistry, it is still a valuable tool for understanding society and making informed decisions about social policies. Therefore, it is important to continue the debate surrounding the nature of sociology and to develop new research methods that can address the complexities of the social world. By doing so, we can continue to advance our understanding of society and contribute to the development of more effective social policies.

Discuss the similarities and differences between Conflict/Marxist theories and Functionalist theories in sociology. [25 marks] 2004

Introduction

Sociology is a field of study that attempts to understand human society and social behavior. It is a broad discipline with several theoretical perspectives, two of which are Conflict/Marxist theories and Functionalist theories. These two theories attempt to explain social phenomena, but they differ in their assumptions and explanations. This essay discusses the similarities and differences between Conflict/Marxist theories and Functionalist theories in sociology.

Similarities between Conflict/Marxist theories and Functionalist theories

Both Conflict/Marxist theories and Functionalist theories recognize the importance of social structures in shaping society. They acknowledge that institutions, such as the family, government, education, and the economy, play a crucial role in creating and maintaining social order. Additionally, both theories attempt to explain the dynamics of social order and change. They are concerned with how societies maintain stability and the factors that lead to social change.

Differences between Conflict/Marxist theories and Functionalist theories

Conflict/Marxist theories focus on social inequality and the struggle for power and resources. They argue that society is divided into classes, and the struggle for power and resources between these classes is the primary cause of social change. Functionalist theories, on the other hand, emphasize social harmony and the maintenance of social order. They argue that society is like a biological organism, with different parts working together to maintain stability and equilibrium.

Conflict/Marxist theories view society as inherently unstable and in constant conflict, while Functionalist theories view society as stable and well-functioning. Conflict/Marxist theories are critical of the status quo and focus on the ways in which society is unequal and oppressive. Functionalist theories, however, are more accepting of the status quo and view social inequality as a necessary component of society.

Examples of Conflict/Marxist and Functionalist theories in action

An example of Conflict/Marxist theory in action is the struggle for workers' rights. Conflict/Marxist theorists argue that workers are oppressed by capitalists who control the means of production and exploit their labor. The workers' struggle for better wages and working conditions is a response to this oppression. An example of Functionalist theory in action is the importance of social norms in maintaining order. Functionalist theorists argue that social norms, such as laws and customs, are necessary for social order and that individuals who violate these norms are punished to maintain social stability.

Criticisms of Conflict/Marxist and Functionalist theories

Critics of Conflict/Marxist theories argue that they oversimplify complex social phenomena and do not pay enough attention to individual agency. Critics of Functionalist theories argue that they fail to account for social inequality and the inability to explain social change adequately.

In conclusion, Conflict/Marxist theories and Functionalist theories are two different theoretical perspectives in sociology. Although they share some similarities, they differ in their assumptions and explanations. Conflict/Marxist theories focus on social inequality and the struggle for power and resources, while Functionalist theories emphasize social harmony and the maintenance of social order. These theories provide a framework for understanding society and social behavior, but they also have their limitations and criticisms. Nonetheless, they remain relevant and continue to shape sociological research and thinking.

Question: Assess the extent to which a longitudinal approach is useful for the study of either HIV/AIDS or teenage pregnancy in the Caribbean. Unit & Module: Unit 1 Module 1 - Sociology, Culture & Identity Year: 2009 Essay: A longitudinal design is the study of one group over a period of time noting change and continuity. In this essay, the writer shall discuss the practicality of the longitudinal design in studying HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean. Longitudinal designs or approaches aim to study a particular group and monitor it over a specific period of time. The goal is to notice and document any changes, developments or actions which continuously occur. This approach would be appropriate for studying HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean. The target group in this study would be persons who have either virus, paying attention to how the virus progresses and affects them and their bodies. HIV/AIDS are viruses who attack the human body. Persons who contract these viruses usually start off with a cold/flu virus which eventually transforms into more than that. After that stage, the virus then attacks the immune system of the host. These viruses are initially mild and further progress into a life-threatening illness. Therefore, because of the nature of a longitudinal design, it would be the perfect approach in carrying out a study like this. In using this design, the researcher should monitor the hosts of the viruses as they go through each stage. Longitudinal designs also aim to give information on cause and effect relationships. So, this approach could pay much attention to the effects on the body caused by the virus, for example, deterioration in the condition and of the body itself. Overall, this approach is the most appropriate to investigate such a study. A longitudinal design is not the only data collection method that can be utilized but can arguably be the best one. This study could be conducted with the use of a questionnaire distributed to persons who have contracted the viruses but it could be more time consuming and less cost-effective to do such. The study could also be conducted using interviews but if conducted using that method, it could take extremely long. A longitudinal design unlike a questionnaire or an interview can study the entire target group at one time thus making the research process less tedious. In conclusion, a longitudinal approach can be seen as the most useful data collection method to carry out a study on HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean due to its characteristics and process. It is more cost-effective and less time consuming than a questionnaire or interviews would be in this study.

Question: It is becoming evidently clear that the family is no longer in the main agent of socialization in society. Discuss. Unit & Module: Unit 1 Module 1 - Sociology, Culture & Identity Year: N/A Essay: Socialization is the process of learning the culture of one’s society. Giddens stated that it is through the process of socialization that people become members of society, thereby learning acceptable behaviors and becoming skilled in the ways of their culture. Durkheim believes that socialization is important as it lets individuals know what is expected of them and it also constrains behaviour. Maconis (2007) states that socialization is an important ingredient for personality development. This can be seen in Davis’ case with Anna and Isabelle, who were isolated from the rest of society, from birth to age six. Upon being found, they were unable to speak, unresponsive and incapable of functioning properly. Socialization thus aids in forming our personalities and also avoids punishment in society. Socialization first begins with the family. This is referred to as primary socialization. This essay will discuss the role of the family in socialization, highlighting the reasons why family is no longer the main agent of socialization and identifying other agents of socialization. To begin, the family was essentially the main agent of socialization. They contribute to primary socialization, which takes place from birth, teaching individuals the culture of society. In our early life, the family is very important in shaping our ideas, beliefs, and behaviour. According to Murdock, the family plays important roles in society. These roles include, socializing children into the culture of society, reproducing the next generation, providing the basic needs and aiding in companionship and gratification. In addition, functionalism sees that the family is a universal social institution in society that takes care of the needs of society. Hubert Spencer suggests that society is just like an organism. The organism consists of different parts, which contribute to equilibrium and the wellbeing of this organism. Similarly, the family is the “different parts” in society, that maintain order in society. Each part function to meet Parson’s functional prerequisites. The integration of the various parts, that is, the different roles in the family, provides consensus and patterned relationships. Additionally, although the family is seen as “the cornerstone in society” and provides the means of primary socialization, there are various factors contributing to its decline as the main agent. Through primary socialization, individuals have developed negative attitudes. This is evident as social issues are usually traced back to the family as the source. This is because family is portrayed as the “building blocks” of society. The family has also broken down due to job opportunities. This has led to mothers, whose traditional role was to socialize the children, now working and staying longer periods, away from the home. Due to the lack of the family as the agent of primary socialization, individuals now utilize other agents as they interact with new groups, thus promoting, secondary socialization. Furthermore, solutions for the decline of the family as the main agent includes; the use of new agents, anticipatory socialization and resocialization. Other agents of socialization include school, religious institutions, peers, the media and the community. These agents contribute to secondary socialization, as the individuals interact with other groups, apart from the family. These agents also aid in the resocialization of individuals, where they reinforce the values and beliefs of society. These agents may also play a role in anticipatory socialization, where individuals deliberately seek help to socialize them into the expected behaviour. Religious intuitions are an example of an agent who contributes to anticipatory socialization. However, it must be noted that just like the family, all agents are flawed. For example, religious institutions portray certain activities like adultery in a negative manner to “boost family values”. Therefore, various agents which are not flawless, aid in secondary and anticipatory socialization, as well as resocialization of individuals. To conclude, the family was considered the main agent of socialization. According to functionalism, the family played numerous roles to ensure the transmission of values, norms, and beliefs in society, in an attempt to maintain consensus and stability in society. However, due to numerous factors such as interactions with new groups, the creation of alternatives and job opportunities, the family is no longer the main agent, and there are now other agents who contribute to secondary socialization. These agents include school, religious institutions, peers, the media and the community. These agents although they have flaws, also play an important role in the socialization of individuals.

Question: Within the social sciences, there is a debate about whether sociology is a science or not. Evaluate the major positions in this debate.

A popular debate in sociology concerns whether sociology should be studied as a science or not. Science is defined as the use of systematic methods of research and investigation and the logical analysis of arguments in order to develop an understanding of a particular subject matter. The sociologists that claim it is a science are known as positivists. Those that dispute their viewpoint are known as interpretivists, who suggest that society cannot be measured and oversimplified into a mere thing to be studied. Within this essay, the major arguments made for each viewpoint will be discussed as well as an evaluation of each position on this debate. Positivism is a sociological tradition stating that human behaviour within society can be studied using the same procedures and methods employed in studying natural sciences. Those methods include observation and multivariate analysis as noted by Nasser Mustapha 2009. This tradition was founded by French sociologist Auguste Comte. Comte advanced his theory of positivism by furthering his belief that human behaviour was controlled in the same way that matter was constricted. Positivists adhere to their claim that sociology possesses certain features that allows it to be identified as a science. They make the claim that sociology is theoretical, meaning that data is obtained by research and utilized in formulating theories. This can be seen as sociologists may employ different approaches in order to study the same phenomena and can be related to scientists also utilizing various approaches in order to study the same matter. Sociology can be said to have both a cumulative and a value free nature. Sociology’s cumulative nature means that sociologists are able to develop and refine the older theories established by their predecessors. For example, Emile Durkheim expanded on Herbert Spencer’s idea that society can be viewed as an organism. This concept is similar to that of scientific studies which over time has disputed and modified theories as time has developed. Positivists also hold the view that similar to studying natural sciences; sociology is value-free, meaning it is merely reported without any of the researcher’s moral conclusions on social life. Due to their beliefs, positivists utilize quantitative methods in acquiring information. Quantitative research methods involve statistics and numerical data which ensure that it is easy to quantify and is a reliable source of data. Max Weber, a German sociologist, opposed Comte’s theory that sociology should and can be studied as a natural science. This perspective is known as Interpretivism and is the other tradition of the study of sociology as noted by Mustapha. Interpretivists mainly oppose positivism as it simplifies society to be studied as a single thing. They view human behaviour as something that cannot be measured because it is based on emotions and feelings. Human behaviour also will differ depending on who they are interacting with. Interpretivists are also critical of their view that human behaviour is controlled and contained by the laws and norms of society. Due to this view, they adopt humanistic and subjective research methods referred to as qualitative methods in order to obtain data. Not all sociologists have agreed that sociology is a science and have made very strong cases to support their claims. Their main argument is that human behaviour changes based on several factors which include who exactly they are interacting with. Due to human behaviour being rather subjective (personal) makes it very difficult to study it as a being objective (detached). Alternatively, positivists have made a very strong argument for studying sociology as a natural science. They have linked many of its characteristics which make it very suitable to be considered a science.

Essay submitted by user shanique hayden General Comments on Essay:

1. The writer demonstrated a very good understanding to the subject matter - quatitative research methods vs qualitative research methods.

2. Good use of language and expression.

3. The writer did not cite sociologists, in the discussion/analysis phase of the essay, although their arguments/points of views on the strenghts of the quantitative research method was stated.

Mark out of 25

Knowledge & Understanding 6

Interpretation & Analysis 7

Synthesis and Evaluation 7

Total 20/25 Quantitative methods are better suited to undergo the rigours of sociological research. Discuss.     Quantitative research methods can be described as those methods employing the use of more scientific and numerical data. Quantitative research methods are predominantly used in the positivist approach to research and it was the method adopted by Emile Durkheim in his study on suicide. This research method is also deemed as reliable and practical.      Emile Durkheim did his study on suicide in nineteenth century. In conducting his study, he used the positivist approach which warrants the use of social facts, statistical data, correlations, causation, multivariate analysis and laws of human behaviour. Durkheim's research methodology was therefore quantitative. His quantitative method allowed him to make very good use of the statistical data available to him which helped to propel his theory. He used this statistical data to explain why the suicide rates among Roman Catholics and Protestants were either higher or lower than those of other groups. This data also enabled him to make a correlation between the suicide rates and the group with which it is associated. After making his correlations, he used multivariate analysis, which involves trying to isolate the effects of a particular independent variable upon the dependent variables, to isolate the most important variables and also to determine if there was a genuine causal relationship between these factors and suicide. The quantitative method proves to be better suite d in this situation as it would be difficult to obtain the information for the study using other means such as the qualitative method of research. This is due to the fact that the persons under study are d e ad and so would not be able to provide the information needed for the research. Therefore due to the method used it was easy for conclusions to be drawn about the situation based on data such as statistics that were available.      Quantitative research methods are deemed to be reliable. Reliability means that the study done can be replicated and the same results will be produced. Quantitative methods usually produce standardized data in a statistical form which makes it easy for the results to be repeated and checked.  On the other hand qualitative methods are seen as failing to meet the standards of reliability because the procedures used to collect data are often unsystematic, the results are hardly ever quantified and so there is no way that a qualitative study can be replicated and the reliability of the findings checked.      Practicality alludes to efficiency of the time and effort associated with the study. Quantitative methods are generally less time consuming and require less personal commitment when compared to the qualitative method. It is also possible to study larger and more representative samples which could provide a better understanding of the population under study. Qualitative methods however are less practical as they require a lot of time and most times the study has to be confined to a small group thus at times making the sample non-representative of the population under study and so accurate generalizations cannot be made.    To conclude qualitative method of research provides the research with the use of statistical data thus making it easier to study phenomenon where the direct individuals under study are not available for interviews, for example suicide victims. This research method is also reliable and so other persons in the field of study can improve on the study or use the study to assist in another. The research method is also very practical which becomes useful when there is not a lot of time or resources and when the population size is quite large, thus requiring a large representative sample. However it must be noted that while quantitative methods are better suited for conducting some research in sociology, it is not suited for all and so the writer would like to conclude that quantitative methods are better suited to undergo some rigours of sociological research but not all.

Scholar Essays

Capesociology.org.

• Note to Parents
• Submit Essay for marking
• Frequently Asked Questions

Connect with Us

• Empirical Evidence
• Multiple Choice
• Question Bank
• Revision Exercises
• Visual Summaries

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essay Examples >
• Essays Topics >
• Essay on Sociology

Essay On Social Stratification

Type of paper: Essay

Topic: Sociology , Social Issues , Women , Education , Society , Racism , Theory , AMP

Published: 11/08/2019

ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS

Introduction

Social inequality, a condition in which people in the society lack same social rank, may be caused by factors like race, gender, education and employment which consequently determines other factors like crime, poverty and health levels in a society. Social stratification can be contended as the main cause of social inequalities in the society. Moreover, gender inequality is the most evident and common cause of social inequalities in the society (Fink, 2000, pp. 19-20).

Gender, a property that distinguishes individuals based on their societal gender roles and biological roles actually cause inequality in the society to a greater extent. In the society women are perceived inferior as compared to men and most often are subjected to carry out and execute house hold chores. Moreover, women do not get better employments and jobs or even if so, they do not get better positions or pay and wages as compared to their male counterparts. Women in most communities are belittled and undermined to the extent that most of them do not get education since the society perceives it as a waste of time and resources. A part from gender race also may be another source of social inequalities. For example, In America blacks are subjected to prejudice especially in regard to education, employment and other social needs. They eventually engage in devious behavior like robbery and drug trafficking which increases the chances of incarceration.

New Right view point theory debates the factors leading to gender disparity and inequality based on the biological differences that exist between males and females from delivery or birth. The theory proposes that males are able to dominate women due to their masculine bodies, aggressiveness and are more physically strong as compared to females. The theory does not guarantee social inequalities or differences based on biological differences rooted to birth; it proposes for the review of gender disparities and inequalities between males and females in a positive way in terms roles in the society. For instance, males should always be the providers in the society while women should be undertaking daily chores (Jacobsen, 2007, pp. 8-10).

Marxist theory on gender and family propose for a new revolution in the society that would put into consideration fresh and novel gender relations between males and females in the society. The theory is based on the perspective view of capitalism which advocates for private ownership of things rather that communal. It criticizes patriarchy debating that it is a hindrance to economic development since human relation determines the extent to which development can take place. It dismisses the times when women were considered inferior in the society and encourages the development of a new system whereby women and men hold a good relationship free from oppression and prejudice. Moreover, he contends that human beings should consider themselves valuable and important as compared to personal interests and he specifically puts emphasis to women whom for a long time have been segregated (Lerro, 2005, pp. 84)

Social stratification can be described as the process by which the society groups and classifies individuals in regard to their supremacy, gender, race, education level, authority, assets, prosperity or other social status in the society. Studies on social stratification are very vital in defining and explaining some of the causes of crimes, poverty and poor health conditions in a society. In contemporary Britain, a modern capitalist society, the upper class can be debated as having too much wealth as compared to the lower class. The working class comprises mainly of the contract labourers which can be semiskilled or totally unskilled and work as service persons in industries. On the other hand, the middle class belong to the higher ranks of clerical workers, managers and businesspeople. In terms of labour, women do not get well paying jobs as compared to males which is evidenced in the political field (Jackson, 2010, pp.

Fink, G. (2000). Social Stratification and Health: Education’s Benefit beyond Economic Status and Social Origins. Encyclopaedia of Stress, Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, pp. 19-32. Jackson, J. A. (2010). Some Measurement of Social Stratification in Britain. Social Studies, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133-138. Jacobsen, J. P. (2007). The Economics of Gender. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved from <http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=5Sm-OUf62tYC&printsec=copyright#v=onepage&q&f=false> Lerro, B. (2005). Power in Eden: The Emergence of Gender Hierarchies in the Ancient World. Cheshire: Trafford Publishing (UK) Ltd. Retrieved from < <http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=qab5_1nhXk8C&pg=PA83&dq=marxist+theory+on+gender+inequality&hl=en&ei=JI9STbWKEIem4AaQnsGtCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=marxist%20theory%20on%20gender%20inequality&f=false>

Cite this page

Share with friends using:

Removal Request

Finished papers: 615

This paper is created by writer with

If you want your paper to be:

Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate

Original, fresh, based on current data

Eloquently written and immaculately formatted

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Get your papers done by pros!

Other Pages

Beauty personal statements, elicit case studies, schizophrenic case studies, quaker case studies, rumor case studies, stereo case studies, reservoir case studies, authenticity case studies, briarcliff manor essays, windle essays, wormer essays, braxton essays, benzo essays, alpha2 essays, dinucleotide essays, capd essays, clarence thomas essays, bondar essays, bloodborne essays, bronchopulmonary essays, desensitize essays, example of design report training rubric communication skills training essay, the strengths and weaknesses of the decayed missing and filled teeth dmft index essay examples, example of essay on my literacy life, the creation of the legal system essay examples 2, heart disease essay examples, sample research paper on rites of passage, free report about hazard management, nutrition education for children between two and six years of age using computer based essays example, peggy little course works example, example of essay on press release, good example of hydroeletric essay, good example of the nature of islamic art essay, free fall prevention essay sample, good case study about human trafficking in bangladesh, free research paper about healthcare quality regulation and risk management, blue supergiant stars essay example, free book review on 039 on killing 039 by lt colonel dave grossman, cumulative scientific interferences research paper sample, a beautiful thing creative writings example, example of essay on u s government, free african american studies book review sample.

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline