• I like to see it lap the Miles —
  • Emily Dickinson

I like to see it lap the Miles — And lick the Valleys up — And stop to feed itself at Tanks — And then — prodigious step

Around a Pile of Mountains — And supercilious peer In Shanties — by the sides of Roads — And then a Quarry pare

To fit its Ribs And crawl between Complaining all the while In horrid — hooting stanza — Then chase itself down Hill —

And neigh like Boanerges — Then — punctual as a Star Stop — docile and omnipotent At its own stable door —

Analysis, meaning and summary of Emily Dickinson's poem I like to see it lap the Miles —

16 comments.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

At first read I thought the horse was metaphor for the sun moving east to west, sundown = (docile and omnipotent at it own stable door) or peer shanties … Second read it became clear that the poem is retelling the delighted experience of seeing a train move through the viewer’s landscape. This is, of course naivety. The iron horse would mercilessly open the west, further decimate native people, kill of the buffalo … Like most technology, a Pandora’s box of good and bad.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

I’m just wondering,why on the 1st stanza the horse image is projected to be unmoved to picture the train’s movement in the middle of its journey. and why the final stanza utilizing simile instead of metaphor as it is on the previous lines.is there any special effect that want to be achieved?i think so, notes the metaphor ‘in horrid-hooting stanza’. How the word ‘stanza’ been directly attached to the horse/train image when there is nothing about stanza/poem has been introduced before? i feel the poem production process in this poem.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

This poem is obviously describing the train as an “iron horse” you idiots.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

Ok, seriously people, this poem is obviously about the ocean. My proof? “I like to see it LAP the Miles” hello? Lap, as in the waves lapped against the shore? I rest my case.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

In my opinion, this poem isnt quite poetry. but it does use iambic tetrameter and it has imagery and symbolism and personification. So you believe what you want.. but im my opinion, poetry means something more than just, “industrialization is good.” Poetry should come from the heart about something close to the heart, and let me tell you, with emily dickinson’s history, technology isnt exactly the closest thing to her heart.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

It’s definitely a train. Feeds itself at tanks, quarry pares where it fits its ribs (this is a tunnel through rock in a moutainside) and hooting downhill with its whistle. It does also remind me of how a poet feels when they write a good poem, too, though. I imagine Emily identified with the power of the iron horse. (locomotive)

emily dickinson 585 analysis

The poem is about her observing a train. Because during her time trains were a huge new trend and it amazed people at the technological advancements being made. So naturally she is going to praise it.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

I thought it was a great poem it has a type of simplistic tune that you do not see very often with Emily Dickinson 2 thumbs way upppp

emily dickinson 585 analysis

Could it be possible that “it” maybe a river or a fast flowing body of water…somehow?

emily dickinson 585 analysis

I don’t understand how anyone in their right mind could say they like this poem or Emiy Dickinson’s poetry for that matter. Robert Frost was a poet she was just someone writing confusing pieces without any real meaning. Basically I think her and her poetry sucks and I hate that it was assigned to me in College. If anyone is offended by this message to bad its my opinion GO HUG A TREE!

emily dickinson 585 analysis

I was required to do some reserch on this poem.By the way,it really impressed me deeply!

emily dickinson 585 analysis

this is one of my favorite poems. when i read it i thought it was a horse but when i looked more closely i discovered that is was more likely a personification of a train. who actually knows but emily? great images and word choices. awesome poem.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

Emily Dickinson is a very clever woman. “it” could be the wind, a train, a horse. it has many possibilities

emily dickinson 585 analysis

The poem is is simple as it is. But its simplicity of comparison amuses me because the author is able to use figurative language at its best!

emily dickinson 585 analysis

This is such a good poem!!!

emily dickinson 585 analysis

“I Like to See It Lap the Miles” compares a train to a horse. The narrator enjoys watching and is amazed at “it”. The portrayer doesn’t like it when “it”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Do you have any comments, criticism, paraphrasis or analysis of this poem that you feel would assist other visitors in understanding the meaning or the theme of this poem by Emily Dickinson better? If accepted, your analysis will be added to this page of American Poems. Together we can build a wealth of information, but it will take some discipline and determination.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

  • My Preferences
  • My Reading List
  • Emily Dickinson's Poems

Emily Dickinson

  • Literature Notes
  • Friendship, Love, and Society
  • About Emily Dickinson's Poems
  • The Texts of Dickinson's Poems and Letters
  • Emily Dickinson's Ideas
  • Emily Dickinson's Poetic Methods
  • Nature: Scene and Meaning
  • Poetry, Art, and Imagination
  • Suffering and Growth
  • Death, Immortality, and Religion
  • Brief Comments on 40 Additional Poems
  • Emily Dickinson Biography
  • Essay Questions
  • Cite this Literature Note

The Poems Friendship, Love, and Society

In an enigmatic four-line poem beginning "That Love is all there is" (1765), Emily Dickinson implies that love is impossible to define and that it transcends the need for definition. She seems to be suggesting that we can recognize love either because it fits our souls perfectly or because we can endure the suffering which it brings. She does not present these alternatives; rather, her lines make these alternate interpretations possible. Such ambiguity permeates her love poems, in which fulfillment is often accompanied by loss. With the exception of the Master letters, whose intended recipient we cannot identify, and her later letters to judge Otis P. Lord, we have nothing by Dickinson which we could call love letters. However, her early correspondence with Susan Gilbert reveals an awareness that the fulfillment of love might be disappointing. Later in life, Emily Dickinson wrote to Samuel Bowles: "My Friends are my 'estate,' " and still later she declared that letters feel to her like immortality because they contain the mind "without corporeal friend." These statements reinforce our sense that perhaps she preferred an imagined consummation of love to any physical reality, and that she sometimes treasured friendship held at a distance more than the actual presence of friends. However, such psychological speculation should be used carefully in interpreting her poems.

There is a blend of love and friendship in a few of Dickinson's poems. Many of her elegies for family members and friends express love and yet do not lament lost loves. Several poems which are addressed to girlfriends have a romantic tinge, but these are not very good. However, there are some poems about dear people who seem to be regarded more as beloved friends than as objects of romantic ardor. In Dickinson's love poems proper, it is possible to distinguish between romantically passionate poems and poems in which there is a curious physical detachment. In this second type, the beloved person sometimes seems so exalted that it is difficult for the reader to see the beloved as an object of desire to the poem's speaker. But the bulk of Dickinson's love poems are certainly not cold, detached, and ethereal. Circumstances and fears may have kept her from physical fulfillment, but the images and actions of many of her love poems are determinedly passionate.

Three popular Dickinson poems about lost friends are similar in length and style. These are "My life closed twice before its close" (1732), I never lost as much but twice" (49), and "Elysium is as far as to" (1760). Like the first two of Dickinson's poems about poetry that we examined in the preceding section, the first two of these poems are petulant and urgent in tone. "My life closed twice" is less colloquial and concrete than the other two, but equally witty. This poem exists only in a transcript, so we have no idea when it was written. Although heaven and hell are mentioned, and although some critics see the parting as deaths, the parting is probably not the result of death. Probably the subject is the departure of dear friends who are expected to be long lost or forever absent. The reference to life's closing shows Dickinson's turning a statement about a death-like feeling into a metaphor. Something closing before the final close suggests both an overwhelming extinction of the senses and a general collapse, as if the speaker could feel nothing but her ecstasy and grief. She seems to be folding up like a flower. The immortality that may reveal another experience as inexpressible as these two emotions lies beyond death. Life can bring to her no more profound an experience, and her tone is exultant at having encountered something ultimate in life. The description of parting as being both "heaven" and "hell' is brilliantly witty; parting increases the value of the departing person because parting makes us suffer terribly. The idea that suffering and friendship produce an experience almost more rewarding than we can hope to find in heaven parallels Dickinson's celebration of art.

"I never lost as much but twice" (49) is a fine example of Dickinson's jocular blasphemy combined with a quite serious theme. We could place this poem under the headings of death and religion as easily as under friendship. The fact that earlier losses were in (literally to) the sod surely refers to the death of friends. The contrast of such losses to a present loss by the use of "but . . . that" indicates that this loss is not to death, but it is just as bad and perhaps harder to explain and accept. The descending angels must have brought new friends. The reference to these friends as "store" suggests that they are a treasure and prepares us for the outburst against God as being both a burglar and a banker. The witty placing of "Father!" after these terms strengthens the accusation that God is playing by unfair rules, and the last line shows an abrupt and stubborn resentment against God's cheating. The manuscript of this poem can be dated at about 1858, a number of years after the deaths of Leonard Humphrey and Benjamin Newton, and yet it is possible that Dickinson is looking back at their deaths and comparing them to the present departure or faithlessness of a friend or a beloved man.

"Elysium is as far as to" (1760), evidently written quite late in Dickinson's life, is a more general poem than the two just discussed, but, rather curiously, it has a stronger sense of physical scene and of the presence of people than either of them. It is true that neither a specific room nor people are described, and that the room may be a symbol of a condition of life, but possibly the very generality of the situation has allowed Dickinson to create more of a scene than she usually attempts. This poem is more complicated than it may at first appear, and it echoes themes from "My life closed twice." "Elysium" is a Latin word for heaven. The heaven described is a state of emotional elevation resulting from anticipation of a friend's achieving great happiness, a happiness intensified by the risk of doom. The fortitude of soul may belong to the speaker of the poem as well as to the friend. If this is true, Dickinson is being made happy both by her admiration of her friend's fortitude and by the joy of sharing such endurance with her friend. Similarly, the anticipated arrival may refer to the friend's awaiting his or her fate, or to the speaker's awaiting the arrival and the fate of the friend. The fine restraint of the poem's conclusion, which reinforces the sense of a hushed atmosphere, implies a favorable outcome for the situation, but it is difficult to tell if it directs our attention more to the friend or to the speaker. The combination of such Latinate terms as Elysium and fortitude with such Anglo-Saxon words as doom and door, a striking trait of Dickinson's style, adds to the forcefulness and verbal music of this poem.

Fears of love that Emily Dickinson may have felt do not make her much different from the rest of us. Exactly what combination of character and circumstances kept her from a romantic union we will never know. Many of her poems relating to passion and love reflect intense anxiety, but we should not stress their possible abnormality any further than the clarification of these poems requires. This allows us to recognize the unusual in her feelings and possible experiences while still being able to relate them to our own feelings. First, we will consider her poems that are burdened with anxiety, next go on to those in which anxiety is mixed with renunciation, and finally look at those in which the choice of love creates some kind of spiritual union or faith, either on earth or in heaven. But we should remember that these categories often overlap.

"In Winter in my Room" (1670) is surely Dickinson's most explicit treatment of her fear and mixed feelings about love and sex — if we dare to call a poem so purely symbolic a fantasy explicit. The poem exists only in a transcript, and so it cannot be assigned even approximately to a period of Dickinson's life, but it very possibly is a product of her earlier mature years, her early thirties. There do not seem to be reasonable alternatives to the view that the worm-turned-snake is the male sexual organ moving toward a state of excitement and making a claim on the sexuality and life of the speaker. Psychoanalytic theory and speculation about the sexual knowledge of reclusive virgins are no more helpful than is common sense in making this interpretation. Traditionally, snakes are symbols of evil invading an Eden, and snakes in Emily Dickinson's poems sometimes represent a puzzling fearfulness in nature, just as Eden often represents a pure innocence which might be spoiled by the intrusion of a lover. Such symbolism does not contradict the sexual symbolism. Rather, viewing the snake as a symbol of evil, in addition to seeing it as a sexual symbol, helps us to see how ambivalent is the speaker's attitude toward the snake — to see how she relates to it with a mixture of feelings, with mingled fear, attraction, and revulsion. In the first stanza, the speaker appears almost childlike, and the worm-snake is a minor threat that she can control. In the second stanza, the creature appears in a changed and terrifying guise. The transformation seems unexpected, but the snake bears a sign (the old string) that he is the creature that she once tried to control. In the third stanza, she admits to the fear and insincerity that make her call the snake "fair." But her attraction cannot be denied. The statement that the snake fathomed her thoughts implies admiration for its power, and the description of its rhythmic movements reveals more admiration than repulsion. The rhythmic projection of the snake may refer even to the speaker's mental processes, as well as to the snake's actual motion. The last stanza clearly distinguishes between her two encounters with the worm-snake. At the second meeting, she gives no thought to controlling or pacifying him; she runs until she evades him, but the fact that she had hoped to hold him off by her staring somehow mutes the terror, possibly by implying an unconscious recognition of what the snake stands for and of how valid are its claims. It is difficult to say just why the concluding statement, "this was a dream," seems essential to the poem. Without it, we would easily recognize the fantasy element. Certainly the next-to-the-last line — "I set me down" — is too unassertive for a conclusion. Possibly the last line is both an acknowledgment of the unconscious source of the fantasy and an insistence on its being taken very seriously. Perhaps Dickinson is saying here that dreams can't lie.

The much debated poem "I started Early — Took my Dog" (520) has been more popular than "In Winter in my Room." Many critics take it to be about death or about threatening nature, but we prefer to side with those who think it is about fearful anticipations of love or passion. The coy tone of the poet suggests that she may be taking refuge from a symbolic experience involving combined sexual attraction and threat by adopting a child-like attitude. In the first two stanzas, the speaker visits the sea of experience, accompanied by her protective dog. Dogs in Dickinson's poems are often symbols of the self, partly stemming from her many years of companionship with her setter, Carlo. The mermaids in their mysterious beauty may symbolize the repression of the speaker's femininity, in which case the more helpful frigates may represent an urge to accept herself as she is. The speaker's calling herself "Mouse" reveals her timidity. In the third stanza, the threatening sea merges with the threat of a man who may be able to move her emotionally and, hence, prepares her for flight. The climbing of the sea up over her protective clothing (apron, belt, and bodice are particularly domestic) becomes almost explicitly sexual when linked with the image of dew being eaten. A drop of dew which becomes part of the sea would lose its identity. This image recalls images of pleasurable engulfment in other Dickinson poems, but here it is clearly threatening. The speaker flees and the man-sea pursues. Silver heel and shoe filled with pearl add aesthetic charm to the sexual threat. The last stanza shows the pursuing sea-lover disregarding the social surroundings. The town is probably a symbol of the social conventions that reinforced Dickinson's own timidity and gave her something to fall back on when she was overwhelmed by fears. The mighty look of the sea resembles the explicitly acknowledged power of the snake in "In Winter in my Room"; and, as in that poem, this one ends with a kind of stand-off, as if the threatening world of love and passion were recognized by the poet and carefully distanced. As we have noted, other interpretations of this poem are quite arguable, partly because the tone of the poem is so ambivalent. But the mixture of fear and attraction with a defensive playfulness seems to support our view. The poem is built with great care, but its artifice may make its effect less powerful and revealing than the effect obtained from the starker symbolism of "In Winter in my Room."

Dickinson's poems about the renunciation of a proffered love tempt readers and critics to seek biographical interpretations. Many early critics took these poems too literally; they assumed them to be reports of scenes in which Emily Dickinson refused the love offers of a married man, while offering him assurances of her peculiar faith and her hope for reunion after death. Such interpretations probably do not reflect the reality behind these poems. In all likelihood the poems present fantasies which would have emotionally satisfied Dickinson more than her actual lonely renunciation did. These fantasies provide dramatic plots for cathartic poems.

"I cannot live with You" (640) is probably her most popular poem of this kind. This painful and tense poem is grammatically difficult and deserves more space than we can give it. Careful study of its images, progression, and grammar would be a valuable exercise in understanding Dickinson's poetic techniques. The speaker addresses a beloved man from whom she is permanently separated in life. To live with him would be life, she says, implying that she is dead without him. Paradoxically, the only life together possible for them will be when they are in the grave. Two stanzas representing the dead as broken chinaware poignantly and reluctantly praise death over the apparent wholeness of life. In the third stanza, the speaker imagines death scenes in which she would prefer to comfort her dying lover rather than to die with him. She is also reluctant to die with him because that would give her the horrible shock of seeing her lover eclipse Jesus and dim heaven itself. The lover is like God, and love is superior to heaven Oust as Dickinson can find the artist's heaven superior to God's). For two stanzas, beginning with "They'd judge Us — How," the speaker's attention moves to the unconventional nature of her love. People, perhaps representing God, would condemn the lovers for breaking some social or ethical tradition. Perhaps the lover is married, a minister, or both, or perhaps the service of heaven is a more general stewardship. The speaker's desperation now threatens the poem's coherence. The fact that the lover saturates her sight (echoing the eclipse of Jesus' face) makes her not care about heaven and its values. Furthermore (perhaps), his being lost (damned) would make her glad to give up her salvation in order to share his fate, and were he saved, any possible separation would be, for her, the same thing as hell. The last stanza does not connect logically to what precedes it. The poem seems to return to the world of the living, and it seems to be saying that the lovers' complicated prospects and perhaps their shocking unconventionality make the future so uncertain that they can depend on only the small sustenance of their present narrow communication and tortured hopes. The short lines and abruptly rocking movement of the poem echo their struggles.

"My Life had stood — a Loaded Gun" (754) is an even more difficult poem, ending with what is probably the most difficult stanza in any of Dickinson's major poems. Defiantly joyous in tone — at least on the surface — until its almost tragic final stanza, this poem presents an allegory about the pursuit of personal identity and fulfillment through love, and yet it is quite possible that the joy of the poem conceals a satire directed back against the speaker, a satire which may be the chief clue to the meaning of the last stanza. The life of the person as a loaded gun probably stands for all of her potential as a person, perhaps creatively as well as sexually. Her being claimed by the owner suggests subservience to a lover as the only way to achieve selfhood — a stereotype of woman's position in society. Her powers are released by the owner-lover, and the landscape of the world rewards her by acknowledging her expression of his power. The Vesuvian face suggests the speaker's sexual release being read into the landscape, and perhaps also the joy on the face of the lover, who remains curiously uncharacterized throughout the poem. The nighttime scene in which the speaker-as-gun takes more pleasure in protecting the owner than in sleeping with him (the grammar makes it possible to conclude that she has not slept with him, or to conclude that she enjoys protecting him more than sharing his bed) gives to the sexual element a strange ambiguity, because she seems equally joyous at resuming her daytime role of releasing destruction. just what she kills is difficult to say, but the yellow eye and emphatic thumb are sinister enough to suggest that the speaker is aware of something demeaning in her dependent, destructive, and self-denigrating role. The poem's joy, or pretended joy, dissolves in the last stanza. The speaker thinks that she may outlive the owner-lover, but she knows that in some sense she cannot. These lines appear to contradict one another completely. The qualification that the speaker-gun has "but the power to kill" undercuts the earlier celebration of her power.

Evidently her celebrating that power as something good is a delusion. The power to kill, then, does not give identity, and its satisfactions are misleading. The last line presents an absolute paradox. The speaker-gun's inability to die will make the owner-lover outlive her. The paradox can be resolved by assuming that die may have a special meaning. Quite possibly to die means to realize some kind of consummation or identity, including the sexual — to achieve the self by a discharge of energy more real than the act of totally serving another. If this is the case, the speaker-gun has never really lived and so the owner-lover must outlive her. Of course the specific fantasies that lie behind the poem are unrecoverable. The poem has been interpreted as a comment on the speaker's relationship with God or on her activity as a poet. Individual beliefs about psychological and sexual motives and symbols can influence the interpretation of this poem. Our interpretation of "In Winter in my Room" and "I started Early — took my Dog" may reinforce our view of this poem.

Although "There came a Day at Summer's full" (322) contains some painful elements, the kinds of fantasies that we have just examined receive a much more gentle, exuberant, and joyful treatment in it. The resignation seen in "I cannot live with You" here turns into a prelude to a triumph beyond death for a love that could not succeed on earth. This poem presents a more visual scene than both "I cannot live with You" and "My Life had stood — a Loaded Gun," but it is still clearly an allegorical scene, and there is no reason to assume that Emily Dickinson ever had an experience like the one it presents. The action occurs on the day of the summer solstice, usually June 21st, the longest day of the year, when the promise of spring, symbolically, if not literally, becomes the fullness of summer. The first two stanzas stress the spiritual triumph of this day for the speaker, which overshadows the fullness of nature and places her and her lover in a world entirely apart from it. She seems to be expressing surprise that nature carries on in its usual way without paying any attention to her great experience. Love is so intrinsic to their companionship that speaking of their love would be a kind of profanation, just as the idea that priestly garbs are essential to sacraments is a profanation. (Nature is brushed aside, and love substitutes both for it and for religion.) The lovers, excluding the world, become their own church and hold their own communion, an act which will prepare them for heaven. However, they are destined to part, but their parting will intensify their relationship. Still maintaining silence, they exchange crucifixes, which seem to substitute for wedding rings, perhaps guaranteeing union through suffering. Their betrothal — depending on how we interpret the grammar of the last stanza — will overcome the grave and give them a marriage in heaven. Probably these lines are saying that their suffering is the sufficient troth that will ensure their marriage. The last line can be read as modifying "marriage," or as describing their general troth and suffering. In this poem, the element of conflict and suffering is held in balance with, or made subservient to, the triumphs of love. The lovers' rapt attention to each other and their disregard of the world contribute to the poem's tone of affirmation. The conflicts dramatized in this poem lack the ambiguity of "I started Early — Took my Dog" and "My Life had stood — a Loaded Gun," where the sexual elements probably puzzled even the author-speaker. Dickinson seems to confront her longings more straightforwardly when she sees them as simple matters of separation.

In "If you were coming in the Fall" (511), Dickinson treats love-separation and hope for earthly or heavenly reunion in an even more straightforward manner. The poem's domestic images show Dickinson using the everyday and trivial to describe strong emotions, but these images also serve to suggest that the speaker is used to her situation. It is a part of her daily life, and she is able to take a detached, but not quite flippant, attitude towards it. The stress on geography implies a physical separation — she never sees the beloved. The image of a fly and the image of time as balls of yarn — these show that she is occupied by routine tasks while she is thinking about the beloved. In the third and fourth stanzas, she grows extravagant, imagining how easy it would be to wait out centuries, or to pass through death, if either would bring her the lover. The counting by hand and the tossed rind (which represents the act of dying) continue the domestic images, not only unifying the poem but reducing the vastness of time and death to something controllable. The last stanza says that since she has no idea how long she must wait for him, she is goaded like a person around whom a bee hovers. The goblin nature of the bee lends mystery and ambivalence to whatever she must suffer to be with her lover. The poem employs four parallel stanzas before its concluding fifth stanza, but rather than creating monotony these build up a pleasant suspense that is given a concentrated expression in the end, where one also senses a concentration of restiveness. This effective conclusion is quite different from the endings of the poems just discussed, and it helps to demonstrate that Dickinson uses a variety of tones and methods in her treatment of similar material.

We move now to a number of love poems in which the reality of consummation, in addition to the choice of a beloved, is more explicit and emphatic, but we should remember that disappointment, renunciation, and irony against the self may always lurk beneath the surface. "Mine — by the Right of the White Election!" (528), which is very popular with readers and anthologists, almost seems a concentration of the conclusions of her love poems. Gaining extraordinary emphasis from its lack of a main verb (which would logically appear in an implied statement such as "He is . . ."), its insistent parallelism, and its concentrated metaphors, this poem declares that a beloved person is the speaker's possession, although he is now physically absent and will be closer — if that is possible — only after death. "White Election" may refer to Emily Dickinson's typically white garb and to her sexual innocence. The prison is her isolation that cannot hide her dedication. "Vision" and "Veto," which critics sometimes use as caption descriptions of Dickinson's view of love, or even of her poetry as a whole, suggest the presence of love in the spirit intensified by the forbidding of its physical presence. Only the "grave's repeal" will give permanent confirmation to what she already somehow possesses. Although this poem has considerable appeal because of its exuberance and technical virtuosity, its somewhat hysterical tone may lessen its effectiveness. The poet's frenetic attitude may influence even our perception of the poem's central purpose, which is to celebrate the possession of a beloved person, by leading us to suspect that considerable doubt may lie behind its overly emphatic affirmation. The poem can also be interpreted as an affirmation of the speaker's assurance of God's choice of her for salvation ("white election"). We prefer our interpretation largely because the phrase "Vision and . . . Veto" echoes Dickinson's sense of an enforced separation from a beloved person.

Possession of an infinitely worshipped person is presented in a different manner in "Of all the Souls that stand create" (664). The subterfuge of life which we put behind at death may refer to the physical elusiveness of the beloved person, to the artificiality of social life, or to both. The notion of separating the before and the after, and the description of life as a process of shifting sands, suggest the greater reality and stability of the afterlife. The concentrated last four lines show an overlapping of the physical and the spiritual. Life is presented as being mistlike in that it obscures real values. One beloved person, a mere atom in all creation, will stand out from every other human being, but will be visible only as a spirit. The speaker rejoices in her preference as if it were an indication of her own superiority. Unlike many of her religiously oriented love poems, this one does no violence to Christian doctrine in its view of life, death, and love. This conventional set of mind contributes to the poem's detachment, for although other of her love poems insist that reunion will occur only in heaven, they still reflect a strong sense of concrete physical presence. Because this poem is so detached, as a result of its being intellectually demonstrative rather than personally dramatic, some readers may find the beloved figure somewhat vague and fatherly.

That Dickinson's hopes for becoming close to a lover fluctuated dramatically at times can be demonstrated by moving from "Of all the Souls that stand create" to two such different poems as "Wild Nights — Wild Nights!" (249) and "The Soul selects her own Society" (303), both among her best and most popular poems. In "Wild Nights — Wild Nights!" Dickinson expresses passionate longing for a loving physical intimacy with the specific person she is addressing. The scene is presented metaphorically and its water images remind us of details in "I started Early — Took my Dog" and "There came a Day at Summer's full." In "Wild Nights — Wild Nights!" she desires a fulfillment that in those poems is feared or looked forward to only after death. Here, the first stanza anticipates nights to be spent with a beloved. Both wildness and luxury are part of a shared, overflowing passion. In the second stanza, these nights become a reality, and the concentrated imagery shows that the wildness stands both for passion and for the threat to it from the socially forbidding world. She imagines herself, at the same time, at sea with love and in a protective harbor, and no longer does she need to traverse the sea of separation and prohibition. Sea and port paradoxically seem to merge. In the final stanza, this merging is suggested by "rowing in Eden," where the combination of sea and port corresponds to the physical reality of harbors, except for their exclusion of storms, and where "Eden" implies the attainment of paradise in this world, rather than after death. At this point, the sea as a place for mooring represents the beloved. The last line acknowledges again that Dickinson is describing a fantasy, not a reality, but in it there is a sigh of relief — assisted by the rhyme that echoes back to the first stanza rather than a cry of desperation. The speaker as a mooring ship suggests a woman nestling against the body of a man and into his life. It is also a fitting symbol for the end of a quest. The suggestions of masculinity in this poem's speaker may reveal in Dickinson an urge to be active in creating a situation that she usually anticipates more passively.

The rarely anthologized but magnificent poem, "I had not minded — Walls" (398), which was added as an appendix to Final Harvest after its first edition, makes yet another interesting contrast to "Wild Nights — Wild Nights!" In this poem the emphasis is on the inaccessibility of a beloved person held at an impossible distance by the laws of society, which laws make a barrier that the speaker says she would find easy to penetrate if it were merely physical and as large as the universe. Perhaps in Dickinson's mind this was the same distance that her imagination joyously traversed in "Wild Nights — Wild Nights!"

"The Soul selects her own Society" (303) is a difficult poem that has been variously interpreted. It seems to stand midway between the yearning of "There came a Day at Summer's full," where fulfillment is hoped for in heaven, and the scene of almost-fulfilled desires in "Wild Nights." Here, Dickinson appears to assert that in some special and mysterious way she is always in the company of one person whom her soul has chosen as its only needed companion. The poem is written not in the usual first person of her love poems, but in a detached and meditative third person, until the last stanza where the speaker appears and comments on the third person figure of the first two stanzas. The "Soul" of the first line may at first appear to represent any person, but close examination shows that it is Dickinson herself, or the speaker of the poem, seen from a distance. Also "Society" at first may appear to be a large group of people, but in reality it is one person. "Divine Majority" paradoxically implies that one person or better yet — two people — have become more important than anyone else. The third line is probably a declaration that no others are present, but since Dickinson proposed the word "obtrude" as an alternative to "present," the line may be an imperative telling other people to stay away. In the second stanza, the soul, or essential self, sees people arriving in chariots, an elevated way of describing carriages (perhaps hinting at heavenly as well as at kingly status), but she indicates that she would not be moved even if an emperor asked for her attention. These figures may stand for people in general or for prospective suitors. In the last stanza, the switch to first person shows Dickinson quietly reveling in the strength of her renunciation. The ample nation is everyone available to her. The chosen one is the beloved whose spirit she lives with or has perhaps taken into herself by the power of imagination. "Valves of her attention" gives the soul the power of concentration. The soul has almost denied everything else in life to lock itself into its strange relationship with the chosen "one." "Stone" represents its complete rejection of the rest of the world. The alternating short-long lengths of the poem's lines, culminating in the two-syllable lines of the last stanza, parallels this closing down of attention and strengthens our sense of a painful but glorious triumph in the concluding lines. Unusually rich in sound effects, including alliteration, rhyme, and modulation of vowels, this is one of Dickinson's greatest successes in poetic technique. Some critics believe that the subject of this poem is the union of the soul with the muse or with God, rather than with a lover.

The idea of a spiritual union with a beloved person is more explicit in several other Dickinson poems, but none is as brilliant as "The Soul selects." Because in several of these poems Dickinson, or her speaker, refers to herself as wife or bride, these poems are sometimes called "the marriage group." However, they are not necessarily any more joyous than "The Soul selects." Probably "I'm 'wife' — I've finished that" (199) is the most revealing of these "marriage " poems. (We did not include "There came a Day" and "Mine — by the Right" here because they are about an anticipated rather than a fulfilled union.) This slow-paced poem has an eerie and detached tone. The placing of quotation marks around "wife" and "woman" suggests that these are chiefly social concepts related to status, or it may indicate that the speaker is changing the meaning of those concepts to suit herself. She regards her earlier pre-marriage state with scorn, implying that she has found her own safety without having gone through a conventional marriage. The soft eclipse of her imagined or spiritual marriage blurs the harsh light of what preceded it, although "eclipse" may also refer to the loss of individuality. The use of "folks" in her contrast between heaven and earth implies that her accomplishment has been easy to will or that it resembles the wish-fulfillment of a dream. Having exchanged pain for comfort, she seems astonished that it could be willed so easily. The paired question and assertion of the last two lines suggests a certain numbness reinforcing the implication that the whole process has been painful and reinforcing the poem's aura of unreality. The poet's attitude toward her triumph is ambiguous; she seems uncertain about its nature, and yet she is reluctant to explore her state further, as if through further questioning she might lose everything.

We find an even more intense mixture of feelings in another marriage" poem, "Title divine — is mine!" (1072), one of Dickinson's most complex and ambiguous poems. Like other poems that we assign to the category of love, this one has also been interpreted as being about God, or poetry, or the achievement of selfhood. In our view, this poem, like "The Soul selects" and "I'm 'wife' — I've finished that," deals primarily with the fantasy of a spiritual marriage to a man from whom the speaker is physically separated. This time, however, she seems quite aware that the suffering is greater than the rewards, and that, in fact, the whole thing is a bitter delusion. The title of wife is divine for two reasons — because society considers it to be, and because it brings elevation. Possibly "divine" also indicates that this marriage exists only spiritually. The missing sign refers to the physical and social reality of marriage. "Acute degree" and "Empress of Calvary" are both paradoxical. The acuteness is the sharp angle of pain. "Calvary" is an elevating suffering, but still the worst suffering imaginable. She has gone through this marriage without the fearfully ecstatic loss of self that other women experience, but her loss is more terrible. In one day she has been born through love, has been made bride, and therefore been bridled like a horse, and has been shrouded, in the sense that her peculiar marriage is a kind of living death. Such a victory is triply ironic. She tries to pronounce the words of love and elevation proper to a real wife, but asks if her way — probably referring to her whole bitter poem — has caught the right tone. On the biographical level, perhaps this poem shows Dickinson's combination of doubts and affirmations about real marriage as much as it shows her anguish over her own ambivalent idea of a spiritual marriage.

Two lesser marriage poems, "She rose to His Requirement" (732) and "A Wife — at Daybreak I shall be" (461) are harder to interpret within the pattern of Dickinson's love poems. "She rose to His Requirement" (732) appears to describe an actual marriage in which a woman gives up the casual play of girlhood for the honorable status of wife. This new state, however, seems to be a considerable disappointment. The woman perhaps has not found the riches of fulfillment that she had expected. However, she allows herself no mention of her disappointments. The comparison of what she does not mention to both pearl and weed suggests that in the depths of the woman's soul there are both secret rewards and secret sufferings. Knowledge of these depths is assigned to the sea rather than to the woman, but the sea seems to be a symbol for part of the woman. This symbolic splitting of woman and sea implies that the woman has detached herself from her husband, and reaps, or faces, special rewards and punishments by herself. Very probably an attempt to look objectively at the rewards and losses of those real-life marriages in which Dickinson did not share, this poem may also contain parallels to her own condition as imagined wife and as poet.

"A Wife — at Daybreak I shall be" (461) places an anxious and almost desperate emphasis on that split between girlhood and the married state that has been a subject of other poems that we have discussed. The chronology here is somewhat overlapping, suggesting an anxious thrust towards a fulfilling future. The speaker alternates between expecting to move from girlhood to marriage and asserting that she has done so. In the second stanza, she repeats the pattern, this time rushing up the stairs of childhood towards her marriage. Now, however, the marriage seems to be in eternity or heaven. The poem may represent a suicidal impulse, or a blending of the idea of spiritual marriage with the idea of a union in heaven. In any case, the poem's repetitive method does not create the complexity of feeling of Dickinson's better and more dramatic poems about an imagined or future marriage.

The infrequently anthologized "I'm ceded — I've stopped being Theirs" (508) makes an interesting connection between the marriage poems and the poems about growth and personal identity. Here, there is no mention of marriage, but the speaker's progression from shallow girlhood, where she gained identity from her family and their values, to her fully realized potentiality in which she hears her true and self-given name, reveals striking parallels to the marriage poems. Her whole existence becomes full, and she is crowned. She has moved from a low rank to the highest imaginable rank. The implied doubts of "I'm 'wife,' I've finished that," the isolation of "The Soul selects," and the irony of "Title divine" are entirely absent from this poem. Probably the condition of a crowned queen here represents that being a poet gives her the feeling that she is a whole person. Thus we see illustrated one of the many thematic overlappings between her love poems and her poems on other subjects.

We have grouped Emily Dickinson's poems on social themes with her love poems partly because both types of her poetry stress her evaluation of people whom she observed. For many poets, society provides a context for their treatment of love, or perhaps a clear delineation of a world from which they withdraw into love. Dickinson's social satire criticizes all kinds of shallowness from which she fled to thoughts of love. Although early critics of Dickinson emphasized her neglect of the social scene, later critics have scrutinized her work to find every conceivable treatment of social themes. We confine ourselves here to mostly a few widely anthologized poems relating to society.

The very popular "I'm Nobody! Who are you!" (288), on the surface, may seem a slight performance, but it is not a superficial poem. On the biographical level, the poem perhaps reflects Dickinson's resentment of shallow writers who gain undeserved attention. Or she may be satirizing the character and situation of people who loom large in the eyes of society — people whom we call "somebodys." Taking assurance from the company of a fellow nobody, the speaker pretends to be worried that they will be held up to public shame for their failure to compete for attention. However, the sudden transition to a denunciation of "somebodys" suggests that if one gains notice as a nobody, it makes one into a kind of somebody. Clearly she prefers a position of invisibility, where she can take her own measure. The somebodys sit in the middle of bogs, a nasty representation of society, and the somebodys bellow to people who will admire them for their names alone. The poet seems to be mildly congratulating herself that unlike the vulgar and pretentious somebodys, she is shy and sensitive. The poem is jocular, amusing, and surely a bit defensive, and its psychology and satire are keen.

Turning her attention more critically to a more specific human type in "What Soft — Cherubic Creatures" (401), Dickinson produces one of her most popular and admired poems, although its unusual compression and its concentrated biblical allusions create difficulties for many readers. The poem is a portrait of excessively genteel women whose claims to status are based entirely on the externals of behavior, dress, and manners. Irony pervades the poem. The softness and cherubic nature of the ladies represents their pretended gentleness and false sweetness (with perhaps a hint at obesity). But the third and fourth lines show us that these women are detached from the real world around them and perhaps they even revel in this detachment. "Plush" describes the softness of upholstery material. The word is an adjective here converted into a noun for a cloth substance too soft to provoke anyone to assault it. Dimity is a dainty white cotton cloth and "dimity convictions" transfers the frailness and pretended innocence of the women's clothing to the women's beliefs. Perhaps we are to see them displaying their false values at religious services or in condescending acts of charity. Their convictions seem limited to a refined horror of ordinary human nature, perhaps in themselves as well as in others. The poem extends this shame about human nature to a shame about Christ, who was quite willing to put on human flesh. The antecedent of "It's" is human nature. The fisherman's degree, we think, refers not, as some critics suggest, to Peter, Christ's disciple, who was a fisherman, but to Christ himself, who, when He associated with fishermen, was a fisher of men. The last two lines state that the women's attitudes would make redemption (the Redeemer) ashamed of them and presumably deny them salvation. The switch from "soft" to "brittle" in reference to the women, that has troubled some critics, is easily explained as a shift from social demeanor to frail values, but also both of these adjectives suggest values that will not endure.

In "She dealt her pretty words like Blades" (479), Dickinson turns her attention to a single lady — perhaps one whom we can imagine imitating the softness of cherubic creatures until the lady has sufficient privacy to reveal a vindictive cutting edge. (Or it may be that she is a different but equally shallow human type.) The aggression here seems the reverse of the repression in some gentlewomen. Probably Dickinson wrote this poem with her sister-in-law, Susan, in mind. The pretty and glittering words suggest the pleasure which a clever woman takes in her speech while being at least partly aware of how much her words hurt those whom she is addressing. The poem's claim that the woman does not believe that she hurts must describe a rationalization in the woman. Since the woman proudly sees herself as being like steel, she judges what she says to people as being properly corrective. Despite her implied denial, she realizes quite well the hurt she gives, but she adds to her original attack by scorning her victims for not exhibiting pain gracefully. The poem is very cleverly built. The first stanza is spoken in detached anger by an observer or a victim. The second stanza imitates the viewpoint of the vicious woman. The third stanza passes a cool judgment on the whole affair, first defending the victim's sensitivity and painful response, and then describing those defenses which finally lead hurt people to withdraw into a protective death-like state. The tone of the last two lines is somewhat jocular. In them, the speaker, drawing upon her own experience, claims a knowledge of suffering so keen that it is like death — a suffering which the attacker refuses to see.

The very popular "Much Madness is divinest Sense" (435) expresses just such a strong feeling of personal suffering, and it leaves the picture and nature of the cruel behavior which it attacks so generalized that one may not immediately notice its social satire. If we wish to make a biographical interpretation, we can note the relationship of its ideas of divinity and a majority to those of "The Soul selects her own Society," where a divine majority of two requires the shutting out of the ordinary majority. In this poem, the discerning eye represents the person who sees that going her own way and choosing her own values may lead to the intensest life, whereas choosing what the world calls sense may produce emptiness, or waste, or pretension, all of which are madness to a sensitive person. The fourth and fifth lines protest against the majority's dictating standards for personal values and conduct, as well as for the rest of society's organization. As she moves from personal situation to social dictatorship, the poet expresses an increasingly mocking anger. The last three lines imply the instruments, social ostracism or even the asylum or prison, which the majority uses to hold people in line. The last line confirms our earlier sense that the concealed speaker feels imprisoned. The poem is brilliantly constructed, with the first three lines illustrating the daring of independent souls, the last three lines showing how they are restricted, and the middle two lines providing the transition from the personal to the social level. This poem ritualizes the internalization of social bondage.

There are three interesting and brief glances at social situations in the poems, "The Popular Heart is a Cannon first" (1226), "The Show is not the Show" (1206), and "This quiet Dust was Gentlemen and Ladies" (813). "The Popular Heart is a Cannon first" seems to describe the celebration of a national holiday, possibly the Fourth of July, when patriotic types fire off cannons, march with drums, and get drunk. It may, however, be chiefly about the drilling of militia soldiers. The second stanza satirizes their sinking into a drunken stupor, and their lying in ditches and jail and ridicules their activities as an improper memorial for historical events.

"The Show is not the Show" (1206) presents more objectively the kind of social criticism shown in "I'm Nobody! Who are You?" Attendance at a public entertainment brings out the showiness or pretense of those who attend more than it reveals anything spectacular in the event. In lines three and four, she seems to be saying that her neighbors are like zoo creatures to her, and the last two lines imply that her view of them is fair because her neighbors are probably making a similar judgment of her.

"This quiet Dust was Gentlemen and Ladies" (813) was a popular Dickinson poem several decades ago, when in the public eye her superficial wit sometimes eclipsed her deeper insights. It makes, perhaps, a gentle companion piece for "What Soft — Cherubic Creatures." Here, the poem looks back at both young and old who were socially pretentious and given to shallow pursuits. Instead of the shocking contrast of dead people and continuing nature that we find in many Dickinson poems on death, this one attributes a certain superficiality or pointlessness to the cycle of nature. The poem itself expresses comic relief, perhaps as if the speaker were glad not to be troubled about either social pursuits or death, It is also possible that the poet in a neutral or slightly elegiac tone is saying not much more than that the cycle of nature resembles the cycle of man.

What may be Dickinson's most popular poem on a social theme, "I like to see it lap the Miles" (585), is devoid of both people and an explicit social scene. However, its satirical treatment of the invasion of her quarter of the world by a mechanical monster that seems to have delighted everyone else but her can be seen as a satire on the advance of industrial society. The poem domesticates a railroad train by presenting it as a horse. The idea of speed is satirized by making the train into a licking animal, while the impersonality of the train's fueling is converted into feeding. In the second and third stanzas, the train-as-horse takes on somewhat disagreeable human qualities as it enjoys its conquest of the landscape while making a racket that the speaker finds horrid. In the last stanza it reaches its goal, and the conjunction of "docile and omnipotent" shows it as both under man's control and potentially breaking loose — or perhaps lending its omnipotence to the humans who have created it. The speaker seems to sigh with relief at the end, perhaps reflecting Dickinson's difficulty in dealing with social subjects.

Quite possibly, Dickinson could not apply her talents to social subjects with much force because they did not arouse in her the kinds of emotion which she struggles to express and control in her best love poems. However, such triumphs of satire as "What Soft Cherubic Creatures" and "She dealt her pretty words like Blades" are partly inspired by angers that resemble the tensions in her love poems.

Previous Poetry, Art, and Imagination

Next Suffering and Growth

has been added to your

Reading List!

Removing #book# from your Reading List will also remove any bookmarked pages associated with this title.

Are you sure you want to remove #bookConfirmation# and any corresponding bookmarks?

emily dickinson 585 analysis

(Article is below...)

  • 18th century
  • 19th century
  • Funny Quotes
  • ParentsCorner

I like to see it lap the Miles- by Emily Dickinson

"I like to see it lap the Miles-" is a poem by Emily Dickinson. In this writing, "it" refers to a train. It is somewhat of a riddle, actually. As she watches "it" "lick", "feed itself", "crawl", and "chase", and even "neigh". It's almost as if it is like a horse.

This poem consists of four stanzas with four lines in each. The second and fourth lines of each stanza contain an imperfect consonent rhyme common in much of Dickinson's poetry. As well, the first and third lines are written in iambic-quadrameter and the second and fourth are written in iambic-triameter. This is also quite common in her writings.

Johnson number: 585

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

You Might Like

  • Rhyme Generation
  • Poetry Generator
  • Poetry Forms
  • 10 Greatest Love Poems
  • Elements Of Poetry
  • Love Calculator
  • How To Write A Poem
  • Film and TV Quotes

[email protected]

  • Copyright © 2004-2022 All rights reserved. This site uses affiliate links and may earn commissions for purchases made.

Poemotopia Logo.

The Brain, within its Groove by Emily Dickinson

emily dickinson 585 analysis

Emily Dickinson’s “The Brain, within its Groove” is one of her poems on the brain. However, in this poem, the word “Brain” means mind or, more accurately, a train of thoughts. This piece, as per Dickinson’s writing style, this piece does not have a title. It was published as poem number 556 in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1955) by Thomas H. Johnson. The given title is borrowed from the first line of the poem.

The text has two versions, with slight differences in punctuation and words. In Poems (1890), Higginson and Todd swapped words for other choices – for instance, the original “trodden’” was replaced with the word “blotted” in the last line. They edited the first series of Dickinson’s Poems to finetune it to the standards of American writing in the 19th-century.

  • Read the full text of “The Brain, within its Groove” below:

Analysis of The Brain, within its Groove by Emily Dickinson

“The Brain, within its Groove”, at first glance, seems to say that the “Brain” is initially focused on a single train of thoughts. It “runs evenly” and “true” when it is focused on its desired path. However, a tiny “Splinter” can derail the “Brain” from its course and open the floodgates of various thoughts, including the painful and raging ones. Dickinson uses the word “Splinter” as a metaphor for a change or an impulse that can influence one’s mind. If a person fails to control the raging current induced by the impulse, it can scoop the “Turnpike,” another form of mental defense, and trod out the symbolic “Mills” where thoughts are processed.

It is a short poem with multiple layers of meanings as Dickinson plays with the expectations of her readers. Her use of the word “Brain” means “a train of thoughts” or simply the human mind. She recourses to the biological image of the grooved brain because it is often used interchangeably with the mind. The moment it encounters a “Splinter,” there can be a cataclysmic shift in its activities; the train of thoughts is derailed, and it can no longer go back to focusing on a single predetermined destination or path.

The poem is rich in visual images of the water or “Current,” machines like “Turnpike” and “Mills” and that of “Floods.” While Dickinson describes the interruption to the thought process, she does not directly say whether it results in a creative or a catastrophic thing. This poem, like Dickinson’s poetry, is unconventional and experimental. It also refuses to remain in its “Groove” as readers come across a number of metaphysical conceits.

Form & Poetic Techniques

“The Brain, within its Groove” is a  short poem consisting of eight lines, divided into two quatrains. Emily Dickinson was known for her unconventional way of writing: her poems lacked perfect rhymes, were full of ambiguity and odd punctuations.

Rhyme Scheme

The poem does not follow a set rhyme scheme: the first quatrain follows the ABAB scheme and the second stanza follows the CDED. Lines 1 and 2 almost end with a similar rhyme called a slant rhyme. For instance, the terms “Groove” does not perfectly rhyme with “swerve” due to the presence of the “r” sound in the latter. The 6 and 8 lines in the second quatrain are in perfect rhyme, “Hills” and “Mills.”

The overall poem is composed of a regular meter that is the iambic trimeter. There is only one variation, and it occurs in the 7th line that is in iambic tetrameter. The shift of meter indicates a volta in the poem’s dynamics that aptly resembles the devastating impact of floodwaters. Let’s have a look at the scansion of the poem.

The Brain ,/ wi- thin / its Groove Runs e /-ven- ly /—and true — But let / a Splin /-ter swerve — ‘Twere ea /-si- er / for You — To put / a Cur /-rent back — When Floods / have slit / the Hills — And scooped / a Turn /-pike for / Them- selves — And trod /-den out / the Mills —

Poetic Techniques

Capitalization.

In this poem, too, she uses several dashes and capitalizes the first letters of certain words such as “Brain,” “Groove,” “Splinter,” etc. The use of capitalization hints at stressing the words and guides the attention of the readers.

Metaphysical Conceits

The form of the poem reads almost like a flash flood. Dickinson begins the poem by using the metaphor of a train, only to abandon it later. She then uses the word “Splinter,” an unusual word choice as it does not relate to the conceit of the train. Finally, the last quatrain uses the conceit of “Floods” and is heavy in kinesthetic imagery. It’s almost like Dickinson wants to flood readers’ minds with complex ideas.

Use of Punctuation: Dashes

As a poet, Emily Dickinson’s style has been called idiosyncratic as it does not adhere to the poetics of conventional writing in the 19th-century. “The Brain, within its Groove” could thus be read as an embodiment of her unconventionality. Dickinson may not state outright, but her poem “swerve[s]” from its original thought.

The dashes seem to indicate a derailment in the train of thoughts, the “Splinter.” The first dash appears right after Dickinson writes, “The Brain, within its Groove/ Runs evenly—”, indicating a halt in the course caused by an unwelcome thought. This break eventually becomes a “Splinter,” so that Dickinson abandons the first two conceits in the second stanza.

Poetic Devices

Dickinson uses several poetic devices in “The Brain, within its Groove” in order to illustrate the theme. The important devices used in the poem include:

  • Metaphor: In the first stanza, the “Groove” is a metaphor for the natural course of thoughts. People remain content with the thoughts that satisfy their hearts. According to the poet, “thoughts,” a train runs “evenly” on its desired “Groove.” However, a “Splinter,” a metaphor for an unwelcome thought, can derail the moving train of thoughts and open the floodgates for its kindred.
  • Anaphora: Dickinson uses this device in the last two lines of the second stanza: “ And scooped a Turnpike for Themselves—/ And trodden out the Mills—” The repetition of “And” at the beginning of these lines is meant for the sake of emphasis.
  • Alliteration: This device is evident in “Splinter swerve.” Here, the repetition of the soft “s” sound creates a sibilance. It also hints at the nature of “Splinters” (an unwelcome thought) that silently changes the course of the thought-process of a person who fails to notice the modifier.
  • Imagery: The poem is brimming with visual imagery of floods and machines like turnpikes and mills. Words like “Groove” and “Turnpike” establish the images in the readers’ minds. Dickinson also borrows the image of the grooved brain in human anatomy. Besides, she depicts a devastating current of flood in the second stanza. It is a use of kinesthetic imagery.
  • Personification: “Floods” is given human characteristics as it is shown scooping out the turnpike to make way for entering into the land.

Line-by-Line Analysis & Explanation

The Brain, within its Groove Runs evenly—and true— But let a Splinter swerve— ‘Twere easier for You—

The first four lines of the poem establish Dickinson’s central idea. The poet writes that the “Brain” runs smoothly when it follows a particular train of thought. However, a sudden change in the form of a “Splinter” can irrevocably affect this train of thought. The use of the word “Splinter” hints at a fleck of an unwelcome thought.

“Splinter” usually has violent or unpleasant connotations. Using this term, Dickinson could imply that it is an unwelcome change or impulse that induces a chain reaction within the brain. It halts the usual train of thought. Similarly, Dickinson herself “swerve[s]” and changes the course of her ideas throughout the poem. The dashes signify sudden breaks in her thought process.

To put a Current back— When Floods have slit the Hills— And scooped a Turnpike for Themselves— And trodden out the Mills—

The last quatrain is almost violent for its images. Dickinson depicts how the “Floods” slit the hills—a surgical and violent image in the second line. The “Turnpike” is scooped out of the earth, and it is now impossible to trace the direction of the original course of thought. It is bound to be affected by the splintery changes.

Continuing from the first stanza, Dickinson writes that it is easier to redirect the current of thought than to be unaffected by these changes. The last quatrain has an effect, almost like a flood in itself. The lines 5 to 7 of the poem keep increasing in their length, ending with dashes, depicting the uncontrollable flow of the current. In the last line, as the flood washes away the “Mills,” the line is shorter than the rest. In this way, Dickinson visually depicts a tumultuous flood in order to compare it to the ravaging impact of unleashed thoughts.

The theme of “The Brain, within its Groove” boils down to the impact of change in thought patterns. Readers could find this change to be either positive or negative, as Dickinson describes in her poem. However, when compared to her poems like “I dwell in Possibility –”, one can assume that this poem regards change as necessary. This turn in the thought process will eventually open up more possibilities.

In 19th-century America, during Dickinson’s lifetime, several changes occurred simultaneously, such as industrialization. There was rapid growth, and people were relying more on technology. Dickinson probably referred to this socio-economic change in her poem, as hinted by the use of mechanical conceits. From her tone, it can be assumed that she is not skeptical of this change.

Lack of Control

Another critical theme tied to this piece is the lack of control while encountering a change. Dickinson suggests a lack of control, as a social change often brings and compares it to losing control over one’s thoughts. This is established by the use of flood imagery. According to the poet, it is impossible to control a flood if a “Splinter” causes damage to a floodgate. The flood trods out the turnpike that was holding it back and forcefully topples gigantic mills. The change it brings is indeed unwelcome.

Dickinson also wrote, “The Brain—is wider than the Sky—” that is all about the capacity of the human mind. Therefore it can be argued that she thinks that even if the change has a positive or negative influence on the mind, it is a necessary evil that helps broaden the mind’s limit.

Historical Context

Emily Dickinson’s “The Brain, within its Groove” was first published in 1890 in her posthumous collection Poems , edited by M. L. Todd and T. W. Higginson. Emily Dickinson gained popularity posthumously, and the Todd and Higginson collection went for three editions. The poems in this collection, despite Todd’s claims, were heavily edited to fit into the mold of 19th-century American poetry. This is evident from the lack of capitalization and dashes – two trademarks of Dickinson’s poetry. The 1890 edition deliberately replaces certain words.

It was in 1955 that Thomas H. Johnson published The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson . This edition included the original punctuation used by Dickinson as Johnson wanted to be genuine to the poet. He did not give titles to the poems like the poet. Instead, he numbered them according to the period of their composition.

Every poet is a product of their time, and Dickinson is no exception. Her style may be unconventional, but her poems often reflect the American milieu in the 19th-century. Compared to her peers, Emily Dickinson was well-educated and thus had studied Calvin Cutter’s study on the brain. According to Cutter, the brain was “the organ of the mind.” The function of the brain was to control the rest of the body.

This makes for an interesting footnote for the poem, where Dickinson “swerve[s]” (line 3) out of control. The use of the train track (“Groove”) and the “Mills” as conceits suggests the impact of industrialization on society, culture, and economy. Emily was interested in the cerebrum—she often uses it in her poems, as evident in her probing lyric “The Brain, within its Groove.”

Questions & Answers

Emily Dickinson is known for the capitalization of words, mainly nouns. It helps Dickinson to stress certain words, like the “brain” and “groove” in “The Brain, within its Groove.” Dickinson also knew German, where nouns are usually capitalized. By doing this, Dickinson also developed a characteristic style of hers, regarded as unique and peculiar in 19th-century American poetry.

Emily Dickinson was known for her extensive use of dashes in poetry. She used dashes not just in her poems but also in writing down recipes or copying poems by other poets. This style was not exclusive to Dickinson, but she was the only one who used it in her poems. In “The Brain, within its Groove,” Dickinson uses dashes to signify a break/halt in her train of thoughts. She also ends the poem with a dash, which can be interpreted as incomplete. Perhaps she wanted to show that her course of thoughts was yet again interrupted.

In this poem, Dickinson writes that the mind, when following a particular course of thought, runs smoothly. However, a “Splinter” or a sudden change can affect the flow and start another catastrophic chain reaction resembling the floodwater breaking the floodgates, scooping the “Turnpike,” and trodding out the “Mills.”

The speaker of the poem is none other than the poet Emily Dickinson. She writes this piece from the second-person point of view and directly addresses the readers.

Emily Dickinson uses two major metaphors in the poem – that of a train and “Splinter.” The use of these conceits describes how a splintery, unwelcome thought influences one’s thought process. In the second stanza, “Turnpike” and “Mills” denote the impact of industrialization in 19th-century American society. Dickinson borrows the train imagery from the phrase “train of thought,” which is controlled by the “Brain,” synonymous with the human mind in this poem.

This line marks a shift in Dickinson’s “The Brain, within its Groove.” Through this line, the poet signifies that a simple “Splinter,” a metaphor for an unwelcome thought, causes to change the direction of one’s thought process abruptly. Then, it becomes hard to hold the other “Current” of thoughts back.

Similar Poems about the Human Mind

  • “ Have you got a brook in your little heart ” by Emily Dickinson — This Dickinson poem is about the human heart compared to a brook.
  • “ Journey to the Interior ” by Margaret Atwood — This poem describes the poet’s metaphorical journey into her mind.
  • “ Spring ” by Edna St. Vincent Millay — In this poem, Millay captures how the coming of spring induces her mind.
  • “ One’s Self I Sing ” by Walt Whitman — This poem celebrates the unique “self” or the human mind.

External Resources

  • Discussion on Dickinson’s “The Brain, within its Groove” — Watch this informative discussion on different connotations of the poem.
  • Original Manuscript of “The Brain, within its Groove” — Explore the original handwritten manuscript of the poem.
  • Different Versions of “The Brain, within its Groove” — Check out two slightly different versions of the poem published in 1890 and 1955, respectively.
  • Dickinson’s Town & Times — Read about the poet’s town and her surroundings.
  • Significant Characteristics of Emily Dickinson’s Poetry — Learn about the unique poetic styles of Dickinson.
  • About Emily Dickinson — Learn about the poet’s life and explore some of her best-known poems.

Share this:

emily dickinson 585 analysis

At Poemotopia, we try to provide the best content that you can ever find. Each article is the fruit of a rigorous editorial process.

Similar Posts

A Wounded Deer – leaps highest – by Emily Dickinson

A Wounded Deer – leaps highest – by Emily Dickinson

Emily Dickinson’s “A Wounded Deer – leaps highest –” is about full-spirited desperation in times of dire need, for instance, while dying.

The Heart asks Pleasure—first— by Emily Dickinson

The Heart asks Pleasure—first— by Emily Dickinson

Dickinson’s “The Heart asks Pleasure—first—” is about the desires of an aching heart. It highlights what a person needs the most, down to the least.

In a Library by Emily Dickinson

In a Library by Emily Dickinson

Emily Dickinson’s poem “In a Library” is about “an antique book” from a library. The speaker compares the book to a wise old man with whom she spends some quality moments.

I had no time to hate, because by Emily Dickinson

I had no time to hate, because by Emily Dickinson

“I had no time to hate, because” by Emily Dickinson is about the speaker’s disillusionment of love and hate induced by life’s brevity.

If I can stop one Heart from breaking by Emily Dickinson

If I can stop one Heart from breaking by Emily Dickinson

“If I can stop one Heart from breaking” (919) by Emily Dickinson is about the poet’s wish to help one individual in their need in order to give meaning to her own life.

To fight aloud, is very brave – by Emily Dickinson

To fight aloud, is very brave – by Emily Dickinson

Emily Dickinson’s “To fight aloud, is very brave –” is about the individual struggles and hardships that people often have to deal with in life.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

emily dickinson 585 analysis

I felt a Funeral, in my Brain Summary & Analysis by Emily Dickinson

  • Line-by-Line Explanation & Analysis
  • Poetic Devices
  • Vocabulary & References
  • Form, Meter, & Rhyme Scheme
  • Line-by-Line Explanations

emily dickinson 585 analysis

Emily Dickinson wrote "I felt a Funeral, in my Brain" in 1861, the beginning of what is regarded as her most creative period. The poem employs Dickinson's characteristic use of metaphor and rather experimental form to explore themes of madness, despair, and the irrational nature of the universe. Dickinson depicts an unnerving series of events based around a "funeral" that unfolds within the speaker. Starting out deep within the speaker's mind, the poem gradually expands to probe cosmic mysteries whose answers only come in the form of silence.

  • Read the full text of “I felt a Funeral, in my Brain”

emily dickinson 585 analysis

The Full Text of “I felt a Funeral, in my Brain”

1 I felt a Funeral, in my Brain,

2 And Mourners to and fro

3 Kept treading - treading - till it seemed

4 That Sense was breaking through -

5 And when they all were seated,

6 A Service, like a Drum -

7 Kept beating - beating - till I thought

8 My mind was going numb -

9 And then I heard them lift a Box

10 And creak across my Soul

11 With those same Boots of Lead, again,

12 Then Space - began to toll,

13 As all the Heavens were a Bell,

14 And Being, but an Ear,

15 And I, and Silence, some strange Race

16 Wrecked, solitary, here -

17 And then a Plank in Reason, broke,

18 And I dropped down, and down -

19 And hit a World, at every plunge,

20 And Finished knowing - then -

“I felt a Funeral, in my Brain” Summary

“i felt a funeral, in my brain” themes.

Theme Madness

  • See where this theme is active in the poem.

Theme The Nature of Despair

The Nature of Despair

Theme The Irrational Universe

The Irrational Universe

Line-by-line explanation & analysis of “i felt a funeral, in my brain”.

I felt a Funeral, in my Brain,

emily dickinson 585 analysis

And Mourners to and fro Kept treading - treading -

till it seemed That Sense was breaking through -

And when they all were seated, A Service, like a Drum - Kept beating - beating -

till I thought My mind was going numb -

And then I heard them lift a Box

Lines 10-12

And creak across my Soul With those same Boots of Lead, again, Then Space - began to toll,

As all the Heavens were a Bell,

And Being, but an Ear,

Lines 15-16

And I, and Silence, some strange Race Wrecked, solitary, here -

Lines 17-18

And then a Plank in Reason, broke, And I dropped down, and down -

Lines 19-20

And hit a World, at every plunge, And Finished knowing - then -

“I felt a Funeral, in my Brain” Symbols

Symbol Mourners

  • See where this symbol appears in the poem.

Symbol Box

“I felt a Funeral, in my Brain” Poetic Devices & Figurative Language

  • See where this poetic device appears in the poem.

Alliteration

Polysyndeton, stream of consciousness, parallelism, “i felt a funeral, in my brain” vocabulary.

Select any word below to get its definition in the context of the poem. The words are listed in the order in which they appear in the poem.

  • See where this vocabulary word appears in the poem.

Form, Meter, & Rhyme Scheme of “I felt a Funeral, in my Brain”

Rhyme scheme, “i felt a funeral, in my brain” speaker, “i felt a funeral, in my brain” setting, literary and historical context of “i felt a funeral, in my brain”, more “i felt a funeral, in my brain” resources, external resources.

Biography of Dickinson — An extensive biography of Dickinson on the Poetry Foundation website.

Emily Dickinson Museum — Biographical information on Dickinson and other resources from the Emily Dickinson Museum in Amherst, MA.

Visual Interpretation of the Poem — An attempt to visualize the poem through stop-motion illustrations on a white board.

Dickinson's Original Manuscript — Photos of Dickinson's original handwritten manuscript, followed by scholarly excerpts about the poem.

A Reading of the Poem — A recitation of Dickinson's poem from Poetry Out Loud.

LitCharts on Other Poems by Emily Dickinson

A Bird, came down the Walk

After great pain, a formal feeling comes –

A Light exists in Spring

A Murmur in the Trees—to note—

A narrow Fellow in the Grass

An awful Tempest mashed the air—

As imperceptibly as grief

A still—Volcano—Life—

Because I could not stop for Death —

Before I got my eye put out

Fame is a fickle food

Hope is the thing with feathers

I cannot live with You –

I cautious, scanned my little life

I could bring You Jewels—had I a mind to—

I did not reach Thee

I died for Beauty—but was scarce

I dreaded that first Robin, so

I dwell in Possibility –

If I can stop one heart from breaking

I had been hungry, all the Years

I have a Bird in spring

I heard a Fly buzz - when I died -

I like a look of Agony

I like to see it lap the Miles

I measure every Grief I meet

I’m Nobody! Who are you?

I started Early — Took my Dog —

I taste a liquor never brewed

It was not Death, for I stood up

I—Years—had been—from Home—

Like Rain it sounded till it curved

Much Madness is divinest Sense -

My Life had stood - a Loaded Gun

Nature is what we see

One need not be a Chamber — to be Haunted

Publication — is the Auction

Safe in their Alabaster Chambers

Success is counted sweetest

Tell all the truth but tell it slant —

The Brain—is wider than the Sky—

The Bustle in a House

The Mushroom is the Elf of Plants

There came a Wind like a Bugle

There is no Frigate like a Book

There's a certain Slant of light

There's been a Death, in the Opposite House

The saddest noise, the sweetest noise

The Sky is low — the Clouds are mean

The Soul has bandaged moments

The Soul selects her own Society

The Wind – tapped like a tired Man –

They shut me up in Prose –

This is my letter to the world

This World is not Conclusion

'Twas the old—road—through pain—

We grow accustomed to the Dark

What mystery pervades a well!

Whose cheek is this?

Wild nights - Wild nights!

Everything you need for every book you read.

The LitCharts.com logo.

IMAGES

  1. The Tragic Real-Life Story Of Emily Dickinson

    emily dickinson 585 analysis

  2. Emily Dickinson:Poetry analysis by claudia hirons

    emily dickinson 585 analysis

  3. Emily Dickinson Early Life, Poetry, and Literature, Facts & Worksheets

    emily dickinson 585 analysis

  4. Analysis of "Because I Could Not Stop For Death" by Emily Dickinson

    emily dickinson 585 analysis

  5. ⇉Emily Dickinson Analysis Essay Example

    emily dickinson 585 analysis

  6. Emily Dickinson PPT and Lesson Plans. Essential Vocabulary PPT included

    emily dickinson 585 analysis

VIDEO

  1. I Cannot Live With You by Emily Dickinson Analysis, Summary, Meaning Explained Review

  2. What is the structure of the poem I could not stop for death?

  3. Researchers find picture of Emily Dickinson

  4. Emily Dickinson quote about Business And Marketing

  5. Emily Dickinson ✒ Success... read aloud

  6. About the Poet Emily Dickinson

COMMENTS

  1. I like to see it lap the Miles Summary & Analysis

    1 I like to see it lap the Miles — 2 And lick the Valleys up — 3 And stop to feed itself at Tanks — 4 And then — prodigious step 5 Around a Pile of Mountains —

  2. I like to see it lap the Miles

    Analysis, meaning and summary of Emily Dickinson's poem I like to see it lap the Miles ... Poet: Emily Dickinson Poem: 585. I like to see it lap the Miles — Volume: Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson Year: Published/Written in 1955 American Poems - Analysis, Themes, Meaning and Literary Devices ...

  3. Friendship, Love, and Society

    Literature Notes Emily Dickinson's Poems Friendship, Love, and Society The Poems Friendship, Love, and Society In an enigmatic four-line poem beginning "That Love is all there is" (1765), Emily Dickinson implies that love is impossible to define and that it transcends the need for definition.

  4. I like to see it lap the Miles

    Summary 'I like to see it lap the Miles' by Emily Dickinson is a short riddle -like poem that uses figurative language to describes a train. Through the four stanzas of 'I like to see it lap the Miles' Dickinson describes the train as if it's a living, breathing creature with human qualities. It licks, moves, and feeds.

  5. PDF Emily Dickinson (1830-1886)

    ANALYSIS Emily Dickinson (1830-1886) #585 (c.1862) I like to see it lap the Miles - And lick the Valleys up - And stop to feed itself at Tanks - And then - a prodigious step Around a Pile of Mountains - And supercilious peer In Shanties - by the sides of Roads - And the a Quarry pare

  6. Much Madness is divinest Sense

    Emily Dickinson's "Much Madness is divinest Sense" argues that many of the things people consider "madness" are actually perfectly sane —and that the reverse is also true: many of the things that people consider normal are, in fact, totally mad.

  7. I like to see it lap the Miles

    I like to see it lap the Miles - (383) By Emily Dickinson. I like to see it lap the Miles -. And lick the Valleys up -. And stop to feed itself at Tanks -. And then - prodigious step. Around a Pile of Mountains -. And supercilious peer. In Shanties - by the sides of Roads -.

  8. I like to see it lap the Miles- by Emily Dickinson Analysis & Poem

    Analysis "I like to see it lap the Miles-" is a poem by Emily Dickinson. In this writing, "it" refers to a train. It is somewhat of a riddle, actually. As she watches "it" "lick", "feed itself", "crawl", and "chase", and even "neigh". It's almost as if it is like a horse. This poem consists of four stanzas with four lines in each.

  9. Emily Dickinson Poetry: American Poets Analysis

    One of Emily Dickinson's poems (#1129) begins, "Tell all the Truth but tell it slant," and the oblique and often enigmatic rendering of Truth is the dominant theme of Dickinson's poetry. Its...

  10. Dickinson's Poetry: Full Book Analysis

    Full Book Analysis. Emily Dickinson is such a unique poet that it is very difficult to place her in any single tradition—she seems to come from everywhere and nowhere at once. Her poetic form, with her customary four-line stanzas, ABCB rhyme schemes, and alternations in iambic meter between tetrameter and trimeter, is derived from Psalms and ...

  11. Emily Dickinson Analysis

    Emily Dickinson's poetry is undeniably original in its subject matter while also pushing the boundaries of what can be considered poetry, abandoning traditional restraints and conventional topics ...

  12. An Analysis of Poems 585 and 754 Essay

    In poem 585, a train 's daily journey is given a meaning beyond that of a cold, iron machine when Dickinson describes its animal qualities to show its strength, stubbornness, and perseverance. In poem 754, a gun is portrayed as a protective, devoted servant.

  13. I died for Beauty—but was scarce Summary & Analysis

    1 I died for Beauty—but was scarce 2 Adjusted in the Tomb 3 When One who died for Truth, was lain 4 In an adjoining Room—

  14. Emily Dickinson Poems

    Themes: Death, Immortality, Religion Emotions: Confidence, Courage Topics: Afterlife, Christianity, Fate Form: Quatrain Genre: Lyric 98 / 100 Hope is the Thing with Feathers 'Hope is the Thing with Feathers' by Emily Dickinson is a poem about hope. It is depicted through the famous metaphor of a bird.

  15. Dickinson's Poetry: Study Guide

    A collection of her works, Poems by Emily Dickinson, of the American poet Emily Dickinson edited by Mabel Loomis Todd and Thomas Wentworth Higginson. It was first published in 1890 by Roberts Brothers publishing house. Dickinson's poems explore themes of nature, death, and love. Her unique voice and unconventional style make her a seminal ...

  16. PDF An Ecological Analysis of Emily Dickinson's The Grass

    ecological and linguistic analysis of Emily Dickinson's representative nature poetry ... (Huang & Zhao, 2017, p.585) By this way, they always complement each other and should not be discussed separately, even in this paper. As an analytic paradigm with grand target, ecological discourse analysis is concerned about the positive development

  17. Analysis of The Brain, within its Groove by Emily Dickinson

    Emily Dickinson's "The Brain, within its Groove" is one of her poems on the brain. However, in this poem, the word "Brain" means mind or, more accurately, a train of thoughts. This piece, as per Dickinson's writing style, this piece does not have a title. It was published as poem number 556 in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson ...

  18. I had been hungry, all the Years Poem Summary and Analysis

    1 I had been hungry, all the Years— 2 My Noon had Come—to dine—

  19. An Analysis of Poems 585 and 754

    Emily Dickinson's use of poetic diction in poems 585 and 754 brings to life two inanimate objects, a train and a gun, both of which perform actions that are useful to man. Though these items cannot act on their own, Dickinson's diction provides them with their own movements, characteristics, and feelings.

  20. The Soul selects her own Society Summary & Analysis

    Emily Dickinson's "The Soul selects her own Society" was first published posthumously in 1890, long after Dickinson wrote the poem in 1862. In this poem, the speaker celebrates the virtues of an independent and mostly solitary life. The speaker envisions her soul as a queenly figure who chooses her company carefully, without regard for worldly ...

  21. About Emily Dickinson (Biography & Facts)

    Emily Dickinson was an American poet of famously reclusive habits, publishing only a few of her poems during her lifetime. Her work, filled with mystery and depth, continues to baffle and enchant readers today. Emily Dickinson is now one of the most popular poets of all time and is credited with writing some of the most skillful, and beautiful ...

  22. I felt a Funeral, in my Brain Summary & Analysis

    LitCharts Get the entire guide to "I felt a Funeral, in my Brain" as a printable PDF. Download The Full Text of "I felt a Funeral, in my Brain" 1 I felt a Funeral, in my Brain, 2 And Mourners to and fro 3 Kept treading - treading - till it seemed 4 That Sense was breaking through -