essay about literature and science

Tools and Resources
Customer Services
African Literatures
Asian Literatures
British and Irish Literatures
Latin American and Caribbean Literatures
North American Literatures
Oceanic Literatures
Slavic and Eastern European Literatures
West Asian Literatures, including Middle East
Western European Literatures
Ancient Literatures (before 500)
Middle Ages and Renaissance (500-1600)
Enlightenment and Early Modern (1600-1800)
19th Century (1800-1900)
20th and 21st Century (1900-present)
Children’s Literature
Cultural Studies
Film, TV, and Media
Literary Theory
Non-Fiction and Life Writing
Print Culture and Digital Humanities
Theater and Drama
Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Article contents

Literature and science.

Michael H. Whitworth Michael H. Whitworth Faculty of English Language and Literature, Merton College Oxford
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.990
Published online: 28 September 2020

Though “literature and science” has denoted many distinct cultural debates and critical practices, the historicist investigation of literary-scientific relations is of particular interest because of its ambivalence toward theorization. Some accounts have suggested that the work of Bruno Latour supplies a necessary theoretical framework. An examination of the history of critical practice demonstrates that many concepts presently attributed to or associated with Latour have been longer established in the field. Early critical work, exemplified by Marjorie Hope Nicolson, tended to focus one-sidedly on the impact of science on literature. Later work, drawing on Thomas Kuhn’s idea of paradigm shifts, and on Mary Hesse’s and Max Black’s work on metaphor and analogy in science, identified the scope for a cultural influence on science. It was further bolstered by the “strong program” in the sociology of scientific knowledge, especially the work of Barry Barnes and David Bloor. It found ways of reading scientific texts for the traces of the cultural, and literary texts for traces of science; the method is implicitly modeled on psychoanalysis. Bruno Latour’s accounts of literary inscription, black boxing, and the problem of explanation have precedents in the critical practices of critics in the field of literature and science from the 1980s onward.

Gillian Beer
historicism
inscription
Bruno Latour
literature and science
science studies

The historicist study of the relations of literature and science is a critical practice that draws eclectically on a range of linguistic, literary, and cultural theory, and which has also been significantly informed by concepts and practices in the fields of history and philosophy of science, science and technology studies, and the sociology of scientific knowledge. These bodies of theory have crucially enabled it to overcome deeply ingrained cultural assumptions about the relative statuses of literary and scientific forms of knowledge, but its focus on historical frameworks and contingencies means that practitioners have not always fully articulated their working premises, preferring in many cases to build on the practices of their predecessors. As a field, it has been open to theory but ambivalent about theorization. Moreover, it exhibits significant internal divisions regarding methodology. In part these correspond to the periods under study, but there are also significant methodological divergences associated with North America and the United Kingdom. Although there is significant interaction between Anglophone critics as well as many exceptions to the rule, North American practice as exemplified by Configurations , the journal of the Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts, takes a greater interest in contemporary culture, including developments such as posthumanism, visual cultures, digital humanities, programming languages, and video games; it is less interested than its British counterpart in historical literature and culture, as well as in the ways that the incorporation of science into a specifically literary discourse may transform it or call into question its authority. Since the early 21st century , the North American school has used the work of Bruno Latour to crystallize its methodological presuppositions. It is the contention of this article that although such theorization may bring methodological clarity and maintain an alignment between the field and the field of science studies, it does so at the cost of neglecting a wide range of ideas, methods, and practices that have proved fruitful in the past. However, by considering Latour and other theorists one may brings to the surface hidden theoretical assumptions in seemingly untheorized work. The present article considers a range of critical works, from 1980 to the present, but gives particular prominence to Gillian Beer’s Darwin’s Plots ( 1983 ) because Beer’s practices have been widely influential.

The phrase “literature and science” signifies many things, not all of which are considered here. One is the use of quasi-scientific methodology in literary criticism, drawing on contemporary science and particularly on the fields of neurology, evolutionary theory, and evolutionary psychology. The possibility of literary criticism building on a supposedly scientific foundation has a long history—there are examples in the Victorian era and in the early 20th century , notably I. A. Richards. 1 Some of the authority of psychoanalytical and structuralist literary criticisms came from the scientific status of the specialist bodies of theory on which they drew. In that regard, critics such as Jonathan Gottschall, Brian Boyd, and Joseph Carroll are part of a longer tradition. 2 Critics of them have drawn attention to the reductiveness of the method, its dependence on a selective reading of the science it draws on, and to its uncritical trust in its authority, though as Alan Richardson has noted, critics sometimes conflate distinct practices such as evolutionary psychology and cognitive criticism. 3

The phrase “literature and science” also signifies a longer tradition of debate about the value of “culture” and its relation to scientific ideals of knowledge. If its rhetorical touchstones lie in the early 19th century —William Wordsworth’s line “We murder to dissect” from the poem “The Tables Turned” and John Keats’s phrase “Unweave a rainbow” from the poem “Lamia”—its canonical prose articulation came into being in the late 19th century in the debate between Matthew Arnold and T. H. Huxley. 4 It continues through the 20th century in a range of lectures and essays, reaching its most familiar form in C. P. Snow’s lecture and book The Two Cultures ( 1959 ). 5 Generally speaking, “literature,” “science,” “poetry,” and related terms are spoken of as ahistorical abstractions; history, if it figures at all, is present only in the form of a narrative of decline of one side or the other. Very often the debate is a coded displacement of another topic—religion for Arnold and Huxley, and social class for Snow. Methodologically, the tradition of debate has little to offer the historicist study of the two fields, but its texts are relevant insofar as they articulate a range of deeply ingrained beliefs about both and thereby represent a horizon of expectations in relation to which practitioners of historicist study need to articulate their work.

Though literature and science as quasi-scientific method and as cultural debate can be excluded on principle, there are other definitions that are not fully represented here for reasons of space. First, the field of literature and medicine has long overlapped in significant ways with literature and science, but also has distinct practices that cannot be covered here. Second, the place of technology in the field is even more vexed and unresolved, but the present article does not attempt to give a full account.

Early Practices, 1926–1978

The origins of the field can be traced to Carl Grabo’s A Newton Among Chemists ( 1930 ), a study of the place of science in the poetry of Percy Bysshe Shelley, and several works by Marjorie Hope Nicolson, including The Microscope and English Imagination ( 1935 ) and Newton Demands the Muse ( 1946 ). Behind both lay works of cultural history such as A. N. Whitehead’s Science and the Modern World ( 1926 ), which gave Grabo his title and which was also a point of reference for Nicolson, and the tradition of “the history of ideas,” as exemplified by Arthur O. Lovejoy’s The Great Chain of Being ( 1936 ). The terminology of Whitehead and the early literary critics has the flavor of its era, but certain conceptual tensions have persisted. On the one hand, the early critics often speak of systems of thought at a supra-individual level: an era’s “mentality” or “imagination” (as in “the 18th-century imagination”); such a conceptualization unites literature and science in a common field. On the other hand, critics found it necessary to speak in terms of the “impact” of science on literature, a relation that implicitly separates the two areas and that does so even when writers are granted the agency to “borrow” from science and to transform what they find. The primary questions of such early critics concerned how the concepts, images, aims, and technologies of a given science had significantly informed the literary texts of its era.

In 1978 , Nicolson’s former student, George Rousseau, wrote an account of the “state of the field,” which has also been read as an “obituary” for its early form, and which has become deeply embedded in the field’s self-conception. 6 Rousseau’s essay has become, at least symbolically, the point at which earlier critical practices and critical vocabularies were rejected. Rousseau divided the field between “philologists” and what he idiosyncratically called “theorists”: by theorists he meant historians of ideas who were aware of the historical changeability of definitions and who thus were reluctant to provide the monological glosses characteristic of the philological annotator; theorists were critics who advanced hypotheses about the evolution of an idea and who defended those hypotheses against alternative positions. 7 In saying this, Rousseau implied that the groundwork of philology was necessary but not sufficient, but he enabled an overreaction in which it was seen as unnecessary and antiquated.

From the late 1970s onward, practitioners in the field were concerned to move beyond the asymmetrical relation that dominated earlier work in which scientific influence dominated the literary and the cultural. Such a relation seemingly reproduces the dominance of science in contemporary European and North American society and so confirms the status of literature and the arts as being at best decorative. Practitioners were also concerned to elevate their work beyond the merely philological. In 1978 , there were already models for a future practice. Rousseau himself notes “The Darwinian Revolution and Literary Form” ( 1968 ) by A. Dwight Culler, where the notion of literary form lifts the perspective above that of the merely local annotation. George Levine has praised Stanley Hyman’s The Tangled Bank: Darwin, Marx, Frazer and Freud as Imaginative Writers ( 1962 ) as a study that was willing to engage in the literary analysis of scientific texts rather than treating them as transparent sources for ideas. Jacques Barzun’s Darwin, Marx, and Wagner ( 1958 ) and Morse Peckham’s Man’s Rage for Chaos ( 1965 ) have also been noted as significant antecedents. 8

The field’s engagement with literary theory and with history and philosophy of science arises from the problem of how to bring science within conceptual reach of the concepts and practices of literary criticism without dissolving it as a distinct object of attention. Here, as elsewhere in this article, “science” usually means in practice a particular science in the form it took in a particular era. However, in moving beyond the asymmetry of Nicolson’s practice, the method nevertheless needs to respect the real asymmetries of a given historical moment.

The Conceptual Resources of History and Philosophy of Science

The positions within the history and philosophy of science that have been most enthusiastically absorbed within the field emphasize the changing nature of scientific theory and practice, the importance of creativity in scientific endeavor, and the role of nonscientific materials within that creativity. Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions ( 1962 ) was a key reference point for many critics from the late 1970s onward. It created a new agenda for the philosophy of science, which. since 1945 , had been focused largely on ahistorical questions under the influence of Karl Popper. 9 Kuhn foregrounded moments of major theory change in science. While what he called “normal science” may work in an accumulative way within a “paradigm,” making small adjustments to its theoretical outlook, over the course of time scientists would become aware of anomalies in nature that did not fit the paradigm, and which could not be accounted for through minor adjustments. Such anomalies require a major overhaul of scientific theory—the “paradigm shift.” The scientist must learn “to see nature in a different way.” 10 Kuhn’s focus on moments of change was important, as was the implication that at such moments scientific theorization was open to nonscientific influences. So too was his endorsement of the belief that conceptual structures create “ways of seeing” that may enable discovery or, indeed, obstruct it. 11

Also influential in this regard was the idea of tacit knowledge developed by the philosopher Michael Polanyi in Personal Knowledge ( 1958 ). In the summary of critic N. Katherine Hayles, “tacit knowledge” is “in some sense known,” but “cannot be formulated explicitly.” It guides the scientist “to the interesting fact, the one datum or experiment out of thousands that will prove useful.” 12 It is learned “by doing science” rather than by learning the formalized rules of science. 13 The idea of tacit knowledge suggests that although much of science is carried out in a rational and logical way that conforms to the public image of the discipline, it is bounded by assumptions that are subscribed to without rational justification. It is at this boundary that cultural elements can enter into science.

Another significant source lay in philosophical and linguistic thinking about metaphor and analogy, and particularly the work of Max Black and Mary Hesse. In this regard, literary critics were required to break from a deeply embedded cultural distinction between the literal and the metaphorical in which the metaphorical utterance is viewed as a decorative supplement to a literal core of meaning. In this view, while the metaphorical formulation of an opinion or feeling may be rhetorically more persuasive, it is ultimately reducible to the literal. In such a view, in Black’s later summary, metaphors are “expendable if one disregards the incidental pleasures of stating figuratively what might just as well have been said literally.” 14 In opposition to this view, Black and others advanced a cognitive view of metaphors: humans, including scientists, think through metaphors, and although metaphors can inhibit understanding, they can also assist in the modeling of reality. Once the idea of cognitive metaphor has been accepted, the distinction between metaphor and analogy becomes relatively slight, and the terms are often used as near synonyms. Griffiths, however, notes that metaphor often implies that one conceptual domain is stable and provides a model for the comprehension of another that is inchoate, while analogy—at least in some forms—allows for thinking in which both domains are reconceptualized in relation to each other. 15

Mary Hesse’s Models and Analogies in Science ( 1963 , revised and expanded 1966 ) took as its starting point the early 20th-century debate about scientific theorization between the French physicist Pierre Duhem and his British counterpart, Norman Campbell. Duhem had contrasted national styles of theory-making, favoring the “abstract and systematic” French style, and had deplored the British taste for mechanical models. Campbell had defended models and analogies—though not necessarily the mechanical model—as being not merely a sort of scaffolding that was removed when the theories were constructed, but instead an “utterly essential part” of them. 16 Moreover, while theories in Duhem’s sense risked being “static museum piece[s],” models were dynamic and open to development. 17 While it would be simplistic to equate paradigm shifts with changes of models and of metaphors, it is clear that metaphors and analogies serve “to anchor paradigms.” 18 As Kuhn wrote in 1979 , “Theory change [. . .] is accompanied by a change in some of the relevant metaphors and in the corresponding parts of a network of similarities through which terms attach to nature.” 19

Kuhn notes that The Structure of Scientific Revolutions says very little about the role of “technological advance” or of “external social, economic, and intellectual conditions in the development of the sciences”: it is, like Hesse’s Models and Analogies , an internalist account of science. 20 Nevertheless, both works enabled the approach that historicist literature and science sought, in which nonscientific external elements play a role in science in the making. The “irrationality” of the external elements is of lesser importance than their being culturally embedded.

It is perhaps surprising to find that Michel Foucault played only an ancillary role in the theorization of literature and science. The Foucault of The Order of Things ( 1966 , translated into English in 1970 ) and The Archaeology of Knowledge ( 1969 , translated into English in 1972 ) is mentioned in passing, and often in endnotes, as, for example, “a necessary precondition” for work in the field. 21 In Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields ( 1976 ), a work of science studies that has been influential on literature and science, Donna Haraway identifies The Order of Things as being of “exceptional importance for understanding the structure of thought in apparently diverse but contemporary fields,” and Foucault’s ability to recognize analogies across fields introduced an investigatory process that was absent from Kuhn or Hesse. 22 That many critics in the 1980s relegated their discussions of Foucault to endnotes while engaging with historians of science more prominently in the main text suggests they wished to align their work with Anglophone traditions in the history of science. And although there are many similarities between the field in the 1980s and the critical practices of New Historicism in the same era, the sidelining of Foucault suggests that the aspects of his work most prominent in the 1980s—the social sciences rather than the natural sciences, the asylum and the prison, and a focus on subjectivity and state power—were imperfectly aligned with the concerns of literature and science. 23

Reading Science

Nicolson’s practice was to treat scientific works as transparent media, using them as windows onto ideas rather than as texts to be interpreted. From the late 1970s onward, practitioners in the field endeavored to maintain symmetry between the treatment of literature and of science by turning their attention to scientific texts. Such a practice was particularly fertile in relation to texts from the 19th century . As Beer explains, scientists in the 19th century “shared a literary, non-mathematical discourse which was readily available to readers without a scientific training. . . . Moreover, scientists themselves in their texts drew openly upon literary, historical and philosophical material as part of their arguments.” 24 The privileging of the written products of science is not without its problems: it leaves unresolved whether (and how) literary critics can read the material artifacts and nonlinguistic inscriptions of science. Moreover, it raises the question of whether science writing for nonspecialist audiences (“popular science writing”) provides an adequate substitute for technical and particularly mathematical works, and, if it does, under what circumstances and with what provisos. Although material artifacts and the nonlinguistic have grown in importance, the practice of reading scientific texts remains central to the field.

As Stuart Peterfreund summarized in 1987 , “one begins by ‘reading’ science for the same concomitants of figurative effect that one has heretofore read literature for.” 25 Alongside that practice, however, one may read a scientific work for its explicit or implicit narrative and for a more impressionistic sense of its tone or atmosphere: Beer, in analyzing The Origin of Species alongside Darwin’s literary reading, foregrounds narratives of succession and restoration and notes how the theme of profusion is manifested in list-like sentences brimming with the names of species. 26 The impression of a natural world that is simultaneously teeming with new growth and threatened with a struggle for resources is interwoven by Beer with canonical literary texts, and also works of 19th-century political economy, most prominently those of Thomas Malthus.

At times the social and literary traces in scientific texts are prominent and easily spotted, at least by the critic who has been primed to look for them, but at other times they are subtler and require more sensitive and indeed tentative reconstruction. The same applies to the traces of science in literary texts: to move beyond texts that literally depict science or scientists necessitates a more subtle and historically informed attention. At times critics have drawn implicitly on a psychoanalytical model in which the scientific text is not fully conscious of its cultural debts and the literary text is not fully conscious of what it owes to science, and in which both require the delicate questioning of the analyst to bring the repressed material to light. Beer’s words on The Origin of Species are revealing in this regard: Darwin’s text “deliberately extends itself towards the boundaries of the literally unthinkable ” and Darwin never “raised into consciousness its imaginative and sociological implications.” 27 She goes on to say there is “ latent meaning ” present in The Origin , manifested in its moments of conceptual obscurity and in metaphors “whose peripheries remain undescribed.” 28 Later she writes of George Eliot’s Middlemarch as a novel “enriched by a sense of multiple latent relations which are permitted to remain latent.” 29 The references to the unthinkable, to elements that cannot be raised into consciousness, and to the latent content of the text suggest, without ever explicitly specifying, the presence of Freudian psychoanalysis and of Freud’s distinction between the latent and manifest content of a dream. Beer mentions Freud in Darwin’s Plots , but as a late 19th-century and early 20th-century thinker, not as a guide to methodology. While it is possible that Fredric Jameson’s The Political Unconscious ( 1979 ) was influential in this regard, the only work by Jameson that Beer cites in Darwin’s Plots is Marxism and Form ( 1971 ); the resource on which Beer was most probably drawing was Pierre Macherey’s Pour une théorie de la production littéraire ( 1966 , translated as A Theory of Literary Production [ 1978 ]). Macherey provides the idea of the literary work having an “unconscious” which is not equivalent to the authorial unconscious. 30

The analogy between Beer’s mode of interpretation and Freud’s is not exact: if scientists and recognizable scientific terminology can appear conspicuously in a literary text, the censorship is malfunctioning. The latent content of the dream is sometimes fully manifest in a way that Freud’s unthinkable acts should not be. As Beer cautions early in her study, one need not “infer that Darwin is offering a single covert sub-text”: “Nor indeed should we take it for granted that there is an over and under text, or even a main plot and a sub-plot. The manifest and the latent are not fixed levels of text; they shift and change places according to who is reading and when.” 31 But even though the topography of “under” and “over” is complex in this version of psychoanalysis, the debts are plain, as are the benefits. Such a model removes the inhibiting effect of charges of misreading in which correctness is determined by a literary scholar’s idea of the correct scientific meaning of a text. It allows for literary writers’ mistakes to be recuperated as “creative misprision,” and deflects the objection that literary critics have conflated Newton with a derivative “Newtonianism,” or Darwinism with “Darwinisticism.” 32 The psychoanalytic model is not explicit: to reconstruct the theoretical affiliations of historicist practices in literature and science, one needs to read critical texts much as practitioners themselves read their scientific and literary texts, piecing together shards of discourse to conjecture the full structure.

Underlying this model of reading are particular theories and conceptions of language that go beyond the insistence that language is inescapably metaphorical. In Beer’s Darwin’s Plots , Jacques Derrida is most often invoked for his skepticism about the stabilizing effects of an origin within a structure, but he is also implicitly present in Beer’s characterization of Darwin’s language, and metaphorical language more generally, as vital and flexible: “[f]or his theory to work,” writes Beer, “Darwin needs the sense of free play, of ‘jeu’ as much, or even more, than he needs history.” 33 Throughout the study, Beer deploys a rich figurative vocabulary to characterize language and metaphor: words dilate, contract, and oscillate; some kinds of metaphors “thrive,” they stretch, they expand, and they are hard to control; over a long quotation, Darwin’s metaphor of the tree is seen to “grow, develop, change, extend, and finally complete itself”; metaphor in general is “polymorphic,” with the implication of being polymorphically perverse; “its energy needs the barriers which it seeks to break down.” 34 There is a theory of language implicit within these metaphors. Beer’s own figurative language surreptitiously energizes the concepts that she more formally states in the language of theory. Beer’s emphasis on vitality and instability is also a polemic against the culturally engrained figuration of scientific language as sharp, hard, and inflexible, a view that for literary criticism was codified in the New Critics’ contrast of the direct and denotative language of science with the indirect and conative language of poetry. 35 Although Beer also notes moments when Darwin’s writing stabilizes meaning, as a writer she invests less in her accounts of them.

A decade or so later, Susan Squier drew on the anthropologist Marilyn Strathern’s idea of the “domaining effect”: an idea or metaphor that means one thing in one domain will subtly shift its meaning when transplanted. Habits of thought “are always found in environments or contexts that have their own properties or characteristics.” Ideas “are always enunciated in an environment of other ideas, in contexts always occupied by other thoughts or images.” 36 The domaining effect presupposes linguistic flexibility, but also accounts for the newfound stability that a concept may acquire when transplanted into a new domain. One may helpfully combine Strathern’s account of domaining with Richard Rorty’s account of how a pragmatist philosopher would explain the apparent “hardness” of scientific facts: when an experimental test confirms or disproves a hypothesis, “[t]he hardness of fact [. . .] is simply the hardness of the previous agreements within a community about the consequences of a certain event.” 37 In Strathern’s terms, some domains will create semantic rigidity while others will allow for flexibility. It is clear from Rorty’s account that the semantic effects are due not to an intrinsic property of the domain, but to social agreements surrounding its employment in specific professional environments.

The Social Dimension

While a synthesis of the work of Hesse, Black, Kuhn, and Foucault provided the primary guidelines for literature and science study in the decade following 1978 , the direction the synthesis took was guided by newer work in the field of the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) in which the prominent theorists were David Bloor, Barry Barnes, and Harry Collins. Until around 1970 , the sociology of knowledge had accepted the Popperian division between the proper domain of philosophy of science, a focus on the validation of scientific results, and of sociology, a focus on the origins of scientific ideas. 38 Moreover, it had taken an asymmetrical approach to truth and error, recognizing social and ideological factors only as the causes of error in science. Under the influence of Kuhn, sociologists recognized that there was a social element in the validation of results. The so-called strong program in the sociology of knowledge emerged around 1973 and went further, seeing all aspects of science as being open to cultural and ideological influences. 39 The four main principles of the strong program were concisely outlined by David Bloor. First, the sociology of knowledge had to locate “causes of belief.” Second, “no exception must be made for those beliefs held by the investigator who pursues the programme”; in investigating beliefs, the strong program was to be “impartial with respect to truth and falsity.” Third, it had to “explain its own emergence and conclusions: it must be reflexive.” Fourth, and most distinctively, “Not only must true and false beliefs be explained, but the same sort of causes must generate both classes of belief. This may be called the symmetry requirement.” 40

Bloor’s demand for symmetry has much in common with the symmetry that studies in literature and science sought to achieve as they moved away from the practices of Nicolson’s generation of scholars. Although in the field of literature and science the demand for symmetry was primarily motivated by a need to defend literary writers as active thinkers, not the passive recipients of science, and to defend literature as a form of knowledge in its own right, there is a strong similarity. Insofar as literature, from the point of view of science, may seem to entertain unscientific ways of thinking or even fundamentally consist of them, it stands for the “false beliefs” that are contrasted with science; and insofar as science, from the point of view of literature, may seem to present a reductive or limited view of the world, the positions are reversed.

The consequences of the demands for impartiality and symmetry are many and extend beyond the binary of science and literature. Opening up false beliefs for investigation allows for a consideration of sciences that appeared to become dead ends in the history of science but that were significant in their own moment; and it allows for a consideration of disciplines that were never fully accepted as science, even though in some cases they organized themselves in conventionally institutionalized ways, and for a consideration of the boundary work that excluded them. It allows for the consideration of, for example, neo-Lamarckism in early 20th-century biology, the persistence of the “ether” as an epistemic object in physics, psychical research, and the persistence of the idea of alchemy in early 20th-century physics. The strong program was also attractive to critics working on more canonical scientific ideas: both Beer’s Darwin’s Plots and Levine’s Darwin and the Novelists cite Barry Barnes’s Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory ( 1974 ). 41

By opening science to “external” influences, SSK allowed space for the research program that Rousseau had tentatively suggested in 1978 : a search for the ways in which “imaginative literature shapes science.” 42 The consequent difficulty was that of modeling the ways that literature and science could be simultaneously interconnected and yet distinct. From the late 1960s onward, historian Robert M. Young had hypothesized a “common intellectual context” for literature, science, theology, and other disciplines. The notion of a “common context” or “one culture” was vital in one phase of growth but, as Alice Jenkins has suggested, it is possible that the one culture was never a “historical reality” but an “imagined utopia.” 43 Although some critics have dismissed Beer and Levine for adhering to a simplistic one culture model, their own methodological reflections and critical practices speak of something more complex. 44 The metaphor of traffic between distinct disciplines is more productive, allowing practitioners to conceive of one-way and two-way traffic, of temporary obstructions and diversions, and of unequal flows in each direction. 45 Nevertheless, because of the preference for symmetry, “bidirectional flow is almost always seen as more prestigious and more defensible than unidirectionality.” 46

Weighing the Importance of Latour

Since 2016 , several overviews of the field have given a central place to science studies and have equated science studies with the work of Bruno Latour. 47 The focus on science studies underplays the continuing significance of longer-established intellectual resources deriving from the history and philosophy of science; the equation of science studies with Latour neglects the influence of the longer tradition of science studies that began with the establishment of the Science Studies Unit at the University of Edinburgh in 1964 , from which grew the strong program. In the field of literature and science, the most often-cited works by Latour begin with Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts ( 1979 ), coauthored with Steve Woolgar, an anthropological study of a biological research laboratory undertaken from 1975 to 1977 , written as if the personnel were an unfamiliar tribe whose belief systems were unknown to the anthropologist observer. In a 1986 reprint, the word “social” was removed from the subtitle. 48 Latour’s The Pasteurization of France (French 1984 ; translated into English in 1988 ) took as its focus a historical scientific revolution, that is, Louis Pasteur’s transformation of medicine and hygiene into a science; methodologically, it focused on the texts of three scientific journals and it expanded the range of “actors,” “agents,” and “actants” to be broader than the usual humanist ideal, to include nonhuman, collective, and figurative entities. 49 Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society ( 1987 ) offered a more theoretical overview of method and crystallized a “performative” notion of scientific fact, according to which the factuality of a fact was secured by its being accepted and used by later scientists. Latour’s work was given great prominence in the first and second issues of Configurations , the journal of the predominantly North American organization called the Society for Literature and Science. 50 Although there have been dissenting voices in Configurations and elsewhere, these issues sent out a strong message about methodology. 51

The opening chapter of Laboratory Life presents scientists as “compulsive and almost manic writers,” as “a strange tribe who spend the greatest part of their day coding, marking, altering, correcting, reading, and writing.” 52 To the anthropologist persona of the opening chapter, the notion of “inscription” makes sense of what had at first been a confusing environment: “It seemed as if there might be an essential similarity between the inscription capabilities of apparatus, the manic passion for marking, coding, and filing, and the literary skills of writing, persuasion, and discussion”; the laboratory “began to take on the appearance of a system of literary inscription.” 53 The phrase about literary inscription has often been quoted in the context of literature and science studies, and to quote it in such contexts is to subtly alter its meaning through a domaining effect. Though Latour is interested in texts—necessarily so in The Pasteurization of France —and in treating material elements as if they were texts (seeing a copy of an English dictionary, Laboratory Life draws an analogy with racks of chemical samples that “might be called material dictionaries”), the respects in which his texts are literary is open to question. Published scientific papers certainly have their own tacit rules of form and style, as do informal scientific communications, but they are not those of literature in the sense of fiction, poetry, or drama. One can acknowledge the insufficiency of purely formalist attempts to define the literary while still being able to recognize the formal differences between scientific and literary inscription. Surprisingly, though, critics quoting the phrase from Laboratory Life do not usually note the problem with the term “literary.”

Setting aside the problematic term, it is clear why Latour’s interest in inscription makes his work significant in the field of literature and science but, at around the time that Laboratory Life was published, practitioners were assembling their own toolkit of concepts. It is true that the role of metaphor in theory formation, as highlighted by Black, Hesse, and others, is primarily cognitive and does not imply inscription, but any evidence-based historical study necessarily depends on written evidence of figurative language. Darwin’s Plots , as an exemplar of practice, makes use not only of the multiple editions of The Origin of Species that appeared in Darwin’s lifetime, but also of his letters and notebooks. As Devin Griffiths notes, “Darwin is the central figure of Literature and Science because his writing was his science.” 54 And to the extent that Latour’s interest in inscription also includes reading—in the opening vignettes of Laboratory Life , “Julius” comes in to the office “eating an apple and perusing a copy of Nature ”—it is clear that, by the mid-1980s, the field was systematically focused on investigating what scientists read and in analyzing it. 55 The practical work of tracking a scientist’s reading may seem philological in the pejorative sense, but it provides an essential foundation for the more imaginative parts of the analytical process. The innovation in Laboratory Life comes first in its recognition that inscription is present in contemporary science, and second, in its suggestion that the kinds of inscription generated by laboratory computers may be as worthy of the name as the writing in a scientist’s notebook or a paper in a scholarly journal.

The claim “that scientific facts are constructed and not discovered” is, according to T. Hugh Crawford, one of the most productive elements in Laboratory Life . 56 Mark Morrisson accords with this view, though he focuses on Science in Action where Latour gives an account of the “black box” view of science: a fact or a machine has been black boxed when, “no matter how controversial their history, how complex their inner workings, how large the commercial or academic networks that hold them in place, only their input and output count.” 57 Latour’s approach, by contrast, is to uncover the workings of the black box and to emphasize science “in the making” or “in action.” Nicolson and others working in the History of Ideas tradition could rightly be criticized for black boxing ideas from science, focusing only the outputs—completed ideas—and then considering literary representations and responses. But in 1962 , Kuhn’s emphasis on paradigm shifts had reminded scholars that theories are actively constructed. In Darwin’s Plots , a great deal of Beer’s discussion concerns Darwin’s struggle to frame his theory in the right way and to balance different intellectual and ideological claims; she repeatedly characterizes his theory as shifting and unsettled. It is true that her focus is on the making of a scientific theory, while Crawford draws attention to the construction of facts. But Beer also analyzes the adjectives with which Darwin modified “fact”—facts were often “wonderful” or “extraordinary”—and the wider cultural discourse on fact. The latter yields conclusions that suggest that Science in Action and Darwin’s Plots share common roots in the pre-Latourian science studies of the 1970s: as Beer notes, “In their use of the word fact they [the Victorians] often combine the idea of performance with that of observation. Fact is deed as much as object, the thing done as much as the thing categorised.” Moreover, facts are performed through acts of rhetorical assertion: “The word ‘fact’ authenticates.” 58 Although Latour, with concepts such as black boxing, has devised more sophisticated tools for discussing method in literature and science, if the field is seen as primarily a historicist critical practice, then it is clear that “inscription” and “science in the making” were established within that practice before Latour’s conceptualizations of them were widely known.

Although Latour’s work is often identified with science studies, his thinking has diverged from SSK. In this regard, in the field of literature and science, his work has seemed to offer an escape route from several related dead ends or polarized binaries. Although in the 1980s the field focused on science in the making in the sense of theory formation, it had little to say about the day-to-day experience of science as an activity. Its emphasis was on science as knowledge, not science as practice. Moreover, it had little to say about the materiality of science, whether understood to be the built and socially organized spaces in which scientific activity takes place or the materiality of scientific experiments, instruments, and samples. It is widely recognized that around 1989 , there was a material turn in the history of science: chapters by Simon Shaffer and J. A. Bennett in the collection The Uses of Experiment ( 1989 ) have been seen as prominent early examples. 59 The material turn may also be understood as a pragmatic turn or turn to practice. Closely connected to the material turn is a spatial one that takes as its objects such things as the laboratory, the museum, the field (as in scientific “field work”), and the garden. 60 The material and pragmatic turns in science studies may seem to displace metaphor as a central concern of the field of literature and science. One possible response is to conceive of the field branching away from science studies, retaining its concern with figurative conceptualization as a necessary point of connection between literature and science. However, it is also possible to see a continuing role for metaphor in a newly material account of science. 61

In 1992 , Andrew Pickering, noting the emerging interest in scientific practice, argued that SSK’s focus on science as knowledge had reached a conceptual impasse. SSK saw the “technical culture of science” as a “single conceptual network,” and insofar as it was interested in science as practice, it saw practice “as the creative extension of the conceptual net to fit new circumstances.” Moreover, it saw practice as guided by interest, in the sense of factional “interests.” 62 In Pickering’s summary, SSK’s account of science is “thin, idealized, and reductive”; it lacks the “conceptual apparatus” to capture “the richness of doing science, the dense work of building instruments, planning, running, and interpreting experiments, elaborating theory, negotiating with laboratory managements, journals, grant-giving agencies, and so on.” 63 It may achieve conceptual closure in its explanations, but it does so at the cost of terrible reductiveness. Joseph Rouse, developing Pickering’s argument, identifies a structural problem with sociological explanation: scientific knowledge, the thing to be explained, must be sharply differentiated from the social, the factor that explains it. 64 This binary reproduces the science’s inaugurating binary division of the world into observer and observed, science and nature; these conceptual dichotomies “guarantee the very hegemony of the natural sciences” that SSK wishes to dispute. 65 Latour—and Actor-Network Theory more generally—promise an escape from a deadlocked binary opposition in which scientific knowledge is either given by nature or “dictated by society.” 66

Surveying this argument, James Bono notes that the position taken by Pickering and Rouse is by no means the only one possible: for example, Peter Dear has argued persuasively for a “sociocultural” history of science. Moreover, in a move analogous to the present argument, Bono notes that Latour was far from the first to contest the foundational binaries within science studies. 67 However, if literature and science is conceived as a historicist critical practice, it can be seen that the most widely imitated practitioners have, when confronted by binaries of realism and social constructivism, found ways of negotiating between them, which keep in play the claims of both. The negotiation is to be found not in the conceptual apparatus of any particular body of theory, but in the critical writing itself at the level of the sentence, the paragraph, and above. It is found in an agile movement between particular phrases, situated in their complex social and discursive networks, and reflexive considerations of method. Pickering’s criticism of conceptual closure parallels the concerns of many literature and science practitioners. A significant criticism of Nicolson’s work is that, by settling literature on a scientific base, she excludes “other simultaneous significations” and “over-stabilize[s]” the reading, even when praising “innovation and disturbance.” 68 One procedure for resisting such stabilization is to introduce points of reference beyond the binary of literature and science: a “third element” that creates instabilities in the binary. Jenkins gives the example of Laura Otis using imperial discourse in relation to 19th-century biology and literature; the present author, writing about spacetime in modernism and in post-Einsteinian popular science writing, turned to global telegraph systems and the discourse around simultaneity that accompanied them. 69 The introduction of the third element does not in itself guarantee destabilization: it is equally possible for it to be recruited as the factor that monocausally “explains” both the science and the literature. The avoidance of such reductiveness requires careful conceptualization of relations between the elements, but also involves care in the writing. Even in full-length monographs, the spirit of essayism is an important one to the discipline in the sense of a form of writing that is tentative, exploratory, and provisional.

This article has considered only three concepts strongly associated with Latour: literary inscription, black boxing, and the problem of explanation. Many others may be examined in a similar way, with the aim of distinguishing what is truly original in his work and what has precedents in earlier theory and practice in the field. His notion of “technoscience” would be high on the list. 70 So too would his extension of agency to nonhuman actants, a move that shines an interesting light on the field’s unresolved relation to conventional humanist notions of agency.

One unfortunate and unintended effect of George Rousseau’s 1978 “State of the Field” essay is that, in rejecting the works of the philologists and even of Nicolson, it inaugurated a dynamic of supersession in which each new generation of critics ritually rejects the methodologies and conceptual tools of the previous one. The present article has not been innocent of the practice in relation to Nicolson; it is easy to caricature her work and it deserves a more sympathetic revaluation. The tendency to identify a valid method with Latour’s work is a symptom of this dynamic. To restrict the conceptual toolbox of the field and to dismiss older practices as unsophisticated is to impoverish its possibilities. Practitioners in the field need to recognize the critical concepts that are implicit in apparently untheorized moves and that are embodied in the writing, though never explicitly named. Practitioners achieve what they have done by standing on the shoulders of giants, by surveying the full range of past critical practices rather than simply looking out for the next wave.

Discussion of the Literature

A student-oriented introduction to critical work in the field is presented by Willis and another is presented by Morrisson, with a chronological focus on modernism. 71

Rousseau’s 1978 survey of the field inaugurated a subgenre of reflective survey: following him, in 1987 Peterfreund identified the importance of figurative language as crucial to the resurgence of the discipline while Bono, in 2010 , highlighted the turn to the performative and the material, as well as the growing importance of Bruno Latour. 72 In 1981 , Rousseau performed a similar service for literature and medicine. Since then, work in that field has tended to focus on narrative in clinical case reports and case histories, and on trying to recover the perspective of patients from documents dominated by clinicians. 73 In 2017 and 2018 , under the general title “The State of the Unions,” special editions of the journals Configurations and Journal of Literature and Science surveyed the field from a range of viewpoints from both sides of the Atlantic. 74 Though in the early 1980s works on literature and technology were less theoretically reflective than those on literature and science, the theoretical perspectives of Donna Haraway—particularly her “Manifesto for Cyborgs” and her collection of essays Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature —and of Friedrich Kittler have been highly influential; works by Armstrong and Goody have developed the field in a more theoretically reflexive direction. 75

Beer’s 1989 survey is particularly strong on questions of influence and interchange, and Jenkins’s 2016 discussion of method gives significant space to the “one culture” and “two-way traffic” models. 76 Levine’s personal reflections on the growth of the field give an account from the perspective of someone trained in mid- 20th-century close reading and also reflect on the unavoidability, even in historicist work, of making scientific truth claims. 77 Levine’s “Why Science Isn’t Literature” valuably reflects on the importance of differences. 78

On metaphor, Ortony’s collection of essays is still valuable; Lakoff and Johnson’s work has been less influential in the field than may be expected; Whitworth and Bono note the difficulty with its argument that metaphors are grounded in the body. 79 Griffiths focuses on analogy as distinct from metaphor, differentiating formal and harmonic analogies. 80

Given that the science in literature and the literature in science are often visible only in fleeting glimpses, questions of validity and evidence recur: Lance Schachterle provided some valuable practical criteria in 1987 , as did N. Katherine Hayles in 1991 . 81

The relations of history of science with science studies have been constantly changing: Daston gives a very clear account that is in part a response to Jasanoff. 82 There have been dissenting voices in relation to Latour from several perspectives. 83 For the debates between sociology of scientific knowledge and Latourian Actor-Network Theory, Pickering’s collection of essays is crucial, though best approached through essays by Rouse and Bono. 84 The role of feminist studies of science has provided the field of literature and science with a significant social point of reference. Work by Keller and Harding was especially influential in the 1980s and 1990s. 85

About the JLS

The Journal of Literature and Science is a peer-reviewed academic journal, published twice annually in Summer and Winter.

The Journal is managed by, supported and published by the ScienceHumanities Initiative at Cardiff University.

The JLS was founded in 2007, and produced its first issue at the beginning of 2008. It was originally hosted by the University of Glamorgan’s Research Centre for Literature, Arts and Science (2007-12), before moving to its own independent online site in March 2013, with the support of the University of Westminster. The journal’s first, and present, editor is Professor Martin Willis, Professor of English at Cardiff University. The Advisory Board includes leading scholars of literature and science from around the world. The JLS is published in digital format, is entirely open access, and requires no subscription fee.

The JLS is dedicated to the publication of academic essays on the subject of literature and science, broadly defined. Essays on the major forms of literary and artistic endeavour are welcome (the novel, short fiction, poetry, drama, periodical literature, visual art, sculpture, radio, film and television). The journal encourages submissions from all periods of literary and artistic history since the Scientific Revolution; from the Renaissance to the present day. The journal also encourages a broad definition of ‘science’: encapsulating both the history and philosophy of science and those sciences regarded as either mainstream or marginal within their own, or our, historical moment. However, the journal does not generally publish work on the social sciences. Within these confines, essays submitted to the journal may focus on the literary and scientific productions of any nation or group.

Introduction: Connectivities Between Literature and Science in the Twenty-First Century

Open Access
First Online: 28 June 2019

Cite this chapter

You have full access to this open access chapter

Nina Engelhardt 5 &
Julia Hoydis 6

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

1852 Accesses

2 Citations

The original version of this chapter was revised. The correction to this chapter can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19490-1_12

This introductory chapter situates the book in current discussions in the fields of literature and science studies and twenty-first-century fiction. It introduces the notion of ‘connectivities,’ understood to capture actual states as well as possibilities for connection, and distinguishes it from, respectively, the concepts of ‘two cultures’ and ‘networks’ to allow fresh and unburdened views on representations of science in contemporary fiction. Setting out the organisation of this volume in two main sections, the chapter explains the governing ideas of ‘human connectivities’ and ‘temporal connectivities’ and locates these in contemporary criticism, including conceptualisations of returns to realism and ethics, unbroken interest in the past and the future, and renegotiations of the traditionally speculative views of science fiction and its relations to mainstream literature.

You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF

Heidegger and Modern Science: Responding to Ontological Communication in the Anthropocene Epoch

Deepak Pandiaraj

Mapping Hubris: Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle and Odysseus’ Apologoi

Jesse Weiner

Introduction

Science and technology more than ever govern human lives. While it has become a commonplace observation that the twenty-first century is marked by scientific and technological change on an unprecedented scale, it remains a challenge to map the implications for contemporary fictional representations. The present volume tackles a specific part of this challenge, addressing scientific and literary innovations as well as continuities and returns. Twenty-first-century writing in the field of literature and science obviously stands in a long tradition of writers and scholars that “have reflected on, reimagined, and challenged the sciences for over two millennia” (Sielke 2015 , 12), and the topic of science and/in fiction shows no signs of decline as the third millennium progresses, neither in terms of artistic production nor as an area of critical enquiry. In contemporary drama, for example, science has been seen to become “the hottest topic in theatre today, so much so that it’s identifiable as a millennial phenomenon on the English-speaking stage” (Rocamora 2000 , 50). Likewise, there has been a wave of popular films about scientists over the last years, including screen works such as A Beautiful Mind (2001), Proof (2005), Ramanujan (2014), The Imitation Game (2014), A Theory of Everything (2014), The Man Who Knew Infinity (2015), and Hidden Figures (2016). In prose fiction, the “science novel” (see Schaffeld 2016 ) has attracted significant attention and branched out into a variety of topical interests and genres, running the gamut from popular science, speculative fiction, and apocalyptic disaster narratives to new realist and historical novels, including ‘brain memoirs’ (see Tougaw 2017 , 2018 ) and ‘neuronovels’ (see Roth 2009 ), ‘cli-fi’ (see Johns-Putra 2016 ; Trexler 2015 ; Schneider-Mayerson 2017 ), and the field of ‘posthuman’ fiction, including, most recently, ‘AI narratives.’ Footnote 1 In addition, the impact of digitalisation across all media and genres and on twenty-first-century culture in general affects modes of artistic and knowledge production and reception.

If the representation of science in novels, films, plays, and poetry does not show any signs of decline, neither does the field of literature and science studies. Recent scholarly publications predominantly focus on a single genre and a single scientific discipline, as a look at books published in the first half of the year 2018 reveals: Rachel Crossland’s Modernist Physics: Waves, Particles, and Relativities in the Writings of Virginia Woolf and D. H. Lawrence , Nina Engelhardt’s Modernism, Fiction and Mathematics , John Fitch’s The Poetry of Knowledge and the ‘Two Cultures,’ Lianne Habinek’s The Subtle Knot: Early Modern English Literature and the Birth of Neuroscience , Jenni Halpin’s Contemporary Physics Plays: Making Time to Know Responsibility , Andrea K. Henderson’s Algebraic Art: Mathematical Formalism and Victorian Culture , and Michael Tondre’s The Physics of Possibility: Victorian Fiction, Science, and Gender . Unlike these books, this volume does not focus on any one particular genre or branch of science (e.g. physics, biology, or mathematics), yet, it shares with various publications a special concern with Victorian and modernist cultures and a focus on a specific time period—in our case, the ‘now.’ Thus, the volume breaks new ground with its focus on twenty-first-century representations of science, as well as by offering a comparatively rare combination of contributions covering diverse scientific disciplines and different genres. Addressing novelistic fiction, poetry, film, and drama, and engaging with topics such as genetics, chemical weapons research, quantum physics, psychopharmacology, biotechnology, and digital technologies, this volume avoids delimiting the complexity of the field or the vagueness that investigations into the contemporary necessarily entail (see Boxall 2013 , 3; Hoydis 2015 , 5; Lea 2017 , 2).

The organisation of ten case studies in two sections, ‘Human Connectivities—Speculations and (Corpo)Realities’ and ‘Temporal Connectivities—(Neo-)Victorian to (Neo-)Modernist,’ reflects that the contributions in this volume approach representations of science from two main angles: in view of the place of the human in a web of relations (human connectivities) and regarding links between the twenty-first century and historical periods (temporal connectivities). We introduce the term ‘connectivity’ specifically to liberate thinking about literature and science from the rather tired metaphor of ‘two cultures,’ the only slightly less tired derivatives ‘three cultures’ or ‘one culture,’ as well as from the increasingly popular all-embracing concept of ‘networks.’ Connectivity, as we understand it, does not emphasise boundaries, disciplinary cultures, or institutional settings but is relational and encompasses realities as well as potentialities: as in popular and technical usage, we take ‘connectivity’ to mean both the quality and state of being connected and the capability of “being connective or connected” (“connectivity,” Merriam-Webster). Referring to an actual state as well as to possibility, the use of ‘connectivities’ pays tribute to the both real and speculative aspects of representations of science in twenty-first-century fiction. As we develop below, the term evokes globality and technology as the central means of experiencing connections in the present day and age, yet equally allows for the incorporation of historical and ethical dimensions. First, however, we examine how using the concept of ‘connectivities’ to grasp the relationship between science and literature offers a way to bracket questions of linear influence and direct connections, as well as to break open (for lack of a better term) the ‘network’ paradigm which often seems to suggest a systemic view.

In the twenty-first century, the term ‘network’ and its derivatives are seemingly everywhere, from talk about the Internet, social networks such as Facebook, and Manuel Castells’s notion of the ‘network society’ as a society relying on the fundamental unit of networks that are based on flow of information in electronic forms and function on a global scale (see 2000 , 60–1). Next to organisational networks and digital networking technologies, the term has undergone influential reconfiguration in Actor—Network Theory (ANT), most closely related to the name Bruno Latour. Latour acknowledges the infelicity of the term in ANT, not least because what is meant to designate a method is frequently confused with a thing, for example a technical network. “Network is a concept, not a thing out there,” Latour explains, and admits, “The word network is so ambiguous that we should have abandoned it long ago” (Latour 2005 , 131; 130). As a more fitting term to describe the work, movement, and change that the method entails, he offers ‘worknet’ but deems a change in terminology impractical (see 143; 132). This collection avoids the “terribly confusing” and “pretty horrible” (142) word ‘network’ with its competing meanings in common usage and ANT, and instead proposes to focus on ‘connectivity,’ which includes real and potential connections, local as well as global ones, and can involve merely two entities or an entire system.

If Latour has failed to eradicate confusions between ‘network’ as a method and the World Wide Web (Latour 2005 , 143), the field of literature and science has not completely shaken off the influence and repercussions of the “two cultures debate”—and it is perhaps unlikely that it will ever fully transcend the binary divisions it stipulates. However, ever since C.P. Snow first introduced the idea of the humanities and the sciences as two separate spheres or cultures in 1959, scholars have attempted to reconceptualise the relationship and highlight communalities, cross-overs, and cross-fertilisation between disciplines. And some of these attempts have gone a long way to inspiring fruitful interdisciplinary debates. Jerome Kagan, for example, examines the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities as “three cultures” and explores their interrelated struggles to “impose distinct meaning networks on their important concepts and […] compete with each other for dominance” (Kagan 2009 , 6). Meanwhile, prominent proponents of the ‘one culture’ model, such as George Levine, do not negate important differences between the disciplines but rather “attempt to consider ways in which literature and science might indeed be embraced in the same discourse, ways in which they have been so embraced” (Levine 1987 , 3). As Levine emphasises: “The ‘one culture’ is not a unified science and literature” (4; original emphasis). Rather, as he goes on to explain, it is one culture in the following two senses: first, any developments and events in science affect everything else, including literature, and, second, both participate in a similar manner in “the culture at large—in the intellectual, moral, aesthetic, social, economic, and political communities which both generate and take their shape from them” (5–6). His is thus not an argument for collapsing the distinctiveness of science and literature into one indiscriminate ‘culture,’ but for identifying points of discursive convergence. And in this respect, Levine points out, “it is important to consider precisely how they do, why they do, whether the convergence is fortuitous, whether it can lead to important illuminations, to something like real dialogue, to genuine ‘influence’” (4). This collection of essays is less concerned with dialogic ‘influence’—all texts explicitly represent and thus are obviously ‘influenced’ by scientific topics and practices—and we are similarly cautious about presupposing a ‘convergence’ of science and literature. Instead, the notion of ‘connectivity’ brackets the debate of however many culture(s) we should use as theoretical frames of investigation and allows for a looser, and thus more permissible, idea of actual and possible connections of science and literature.

The idea of connectivities is particularly important in the area of globalisation: “Most frequently, in the twenty-first century, discussions of globalization emerge from the perception of an unprecedented critical mass of interconnectedness across the world. Equally, seminal descriptions of globalization suggest that many of the key terms hinge on the belief in a growing escalation of this interconnectedness” (Childs and Green 2013 , 1; original emphasis). The immense critical interest in globalisation and research into contemporary culture has found expression in a renewed focus on cosmopolitanism (Leggett and Venezia 2015 ; Schoene 2009 ; Shaw 2017 ) and theoretical concepts such as the planetary (Heise 2008 ) and cosmodernism (Moraru 2011 , 2016 ). These are all linked by an inherent concern with the globe and a sense of connectedness through shared ethical responsibility. This understanding of ethical connectivity differs from the technical-spatial connectivities offered by forms of (data or human) travel and communication. Accordingly, in a recent study of contemporary fiction, Daniel Lea contrasts “the Internet’s architecture of connectivity” which reveals “its limitations as a tool of connection” (Lea 2017 , 21) with another kind, namely “the duty of care that comes with humanness” (20). Christian Moraru’s notion of cosmodernism similarly proposes the period after 1989 to be characterised by relationality, or what he calls “being-in-relation, with another” (Moraru 2011 , 2). Such relationality is manifested in fictional narratives as an identity that is always created in relation to a wider context, surpassing the geopolitical and cultural limits of the USA, Moraru’s area of focus. Cosmodernism’s inherent ethical investment marks its disparity, or rather its onwards progression, from postmodernism—implicitly understood as a more socially disengaged, merely aesthetic practice—and offers a “rationale and vehicle for a new togetherness, for a solidarity across political, ethnic, racial, religious and other boundaries” (5).

The concept of connectivity is also commonly evoked to refer to a technological environment that can now be taken for granted as a, more or less, global phenomenon: the Internet, which offers greater than ever access to scientific ‘knowledge,’ connections, and circulation. Not least, and importantly for ethical considerations, significant parts of interactions between humans take place in the digital world and some may even turn out to involve human as well as non-human interlocutors. Literary texts probe how such new connectivities shape twenty-first-century narrations of the human and humanity and their relations to reality. In his introduction to twenty-first-century fiction, Peter Boxall stresses the role of technology in questioning who we are: “The destabilisation of the category of the human is also fuelled over this time by developments in technology—in biotechnology as well as in computing and information technology—developments which of course fed into the philosophical and theoretical environment” (Boxall 2013 , 88). Considering literary engagements with new technological forms and global relations, Boxall notes that texts contrast these with specific, material environments: “There is, in the fiction of the new century […] a strikingly new attention to the nature of our reality—its materiality, its relation to touch, to narrative and to visuality” (10). Daniel Lea similarly identifies materiality as one of the recurrent concerns in the twenty-first century:

Interpreted in the broadest sense of the relationships between the physical stuff of the world and the individuals with whom it comes into contact, materiality is a strikingly recurrent concern of these novelists. This is perhaps most evidently articulated in response to the liquefaction and virtualisation of social relations that has rendered the physical dimension so abstract in the digital age. On what levels of communication does the physical heft of touch operate in a world where interaction is increasingly mediated by technology? (Lea 2017 , 18)

The craving for materiality and reality that scholars detect in twenty-first-century fiction is also discernible in a shift from postmodernist playfulness to a new seriousness and realism, a currently widely discussed change in narratology and related fields. In 1998, Charles Altieri noted: “all the instruments agree that ‘postmodernism’ is no longer a vital concept for the arts” (Altieri 1998 , 1). Similarly, four years later Linda Hutcheon challenged theorists to find new descriptive terms for twenty-first-century writing, after firmly declaring postmodernism to be “over” (Hutcheon 2002 , 166), even though, she admitted, “its discursive strategies and its ideological critique continue to live on—as do those of modernism” (181). And this observation still holds true over a decade later, as the readings in this volume demonstrate. The pressures of the twenty-first century induce a turn away from playful experimentation with style and form, the proliferation of possibilities and worlds, and the questioning of objective truth, reason, and morality: many writers and other artists in the new millennium feel a need to move away from postmodernism and towards regaining sincerity and authenticity (see Hoydis 2019 ; Lea 2017 ; Vermeulen and van den Akker 2010 , 2011 ). Where David Shields asks to respond to this “reality hunger” ( 2010 ), in his commonly evoked ‘manifesto’ of the same title, with ‘more authentic’ literary forms such as life writing or the essay, Boxall summarises for fiction more broadly: “one can see the emergence of new kinds of realism, a new set of formal mechanisms with which to capture the real, as it offers itself as the material substrate of our being in the world” (Boxall 2013 , 10). This newly realist writing engages with the factual, the material, and the immediacy of things without merely returning to the style of classic nineteenth-century realism. Footnote 2 Rather, as Ulka Anjaria argues, realist fiction contains an “inbuilt paradox”—claiming allegiance to reality as well as to the ‘unreal,’ imaginative nature of fiction—that ensures that “21st-century realism is not a finished mode, but one perennially in progress” (Anjaria 2017 ) and thus constitutes an apt approach to explore the unfolding millennium.

Anjaria also helpfully examines the interrelations of notions of realism and connectivity. Twenty-first-century realism sheds new light, so she claims, on the question: “What is the relationship of literature to a world defined both by connectivity and fragmentation?” (Anjaria 2017 ). That is, a world characterised by the constant possibility of connecting with each other online and the disconnection of actual, physical lives. Meanwhile literary critic James Wood deplores a proliferation of relations and connectivities in literature that, so he argues, do not realistically represent reality and result in unconvincing stories abounding with seemingly coincidental but connected events: “what above all makes these stories unconvincing is precisely their very profusion, their relatedness. […] Yet it is the relatedness of these stories that their writers seem most to cherish, and to propose as an absolute value. An endless web is all they need for meaning” (Wood 2000 ). Wood contrasts connectedness with reality, humanity, and life, arguing that connectivity plasters over a lack of humanity and realism: “since the characters in these novels are not really alive, not fully human, their connectedness can only be insisted on,” rather than convincingly be shown (Wood 2000 ). Critical of Wood’s view and his celebration of nineteenth-century representations of character, Anjaria proposes twenty-first-century realism to be

not postmodernist, because it is receptive to the real conditions of the world it tries to represent, nor is it naively or nostalgically realist, because rather than hold a stable set of values as a response to the world, it refuses the formal closure characteristic of 19th-century realism in order to represent a reality constantly in flux. (Anjaria 2017 )

The concept of connectivity can help us grasp this state of taking account of connections to the real and, on the other hand, exploring possibilities and likelihoods, which means staying open to and cultivating the capacity for connectivity; both aspects are of particular relevance for representations of science in contemporary narratives.

The discussion of a possible return to or the reworking of realism leads to another key concept in this collection, temporal connectivities, particularly between the twenty-first century and the Victorian period or literary modernism of the early twentieth century. While Anglophone literature on both sides of the Atlantic has a strong long-standing tradition of historical fiction, Britain has seen a particular boom of the genre over the past two decades: successful examples, to name but a few, include the works of Hilary Mantel and a general upsurge of Neo-Victorian and Neo-Edwardian novels and TV series such as Sherlock Holmes , Penny Dreadful , Ripper Street , Downton Abbey , and Mr. Selfridge . Neo-Victorian scholar Marie-Louise Kohlke suggests that the popularity of the genre is based “less on its historical accuracy than in its receptivity to ‘reverse projections’ of contemporary consciousness” ( 2015 , 12), echoing a general function of historical fiction as a dual means of escape from and response to the contemporary (see also Miller 2011 ). Once more it appears that it is primarily the resurging concern with the ethical that reasserts itself in new fictions set in the past. Identifying temporality and “a fresh commitment to what we might call the reality of history” as one of the main topical and aesthetic concerns in twenty-first-century literature, Peter Boxall notes how this trend is explicitly linked to “a new sense of a responsibility to material historical forces that constrain or shape the fictional imagination” ( 2013 , 41–2; original emphasis).

While there is consensus on these emerging topics and discussions across recent studies, a focus on how they relate to science in fiction is still missing. This volume addresses this gap. It ties in with studies of twenty-first-century fiction, but resolves one of the typically lamented issues, the obvious problem of dealing with a very wide, heterogeneous and yet hard to categorise field, by narrowing it down to fictions engaging with a topic included in all recent collections: science.

Considering the above, we might ask how the current engagement with the Victorian and modernist periods relates to fictional representations of science and is juxtaposed with the typically speculative view of science fiction, the genre that carries the connection between science and literature in its very name. Damien Walter identifies an emerging genre that is “not science fiction [… or] realism, but hovers in the unsettling zone in between” (Walter 2014 ) and proposes to use the term “transrealism,” as established by Rudy Rucker in the early 1980s. Transrealist texts, so Walter explains, are firmly rooted in reality while introducing a single fantastic idea: this does not allow for the comforts of confirming a stable reality or offering escapism but creates the disconcerting sense that “reality is at best constructed, at worst non-existent” (Walter 2014 ). Where Walter maintains that science fiction and mainstream literature “are increasingly hard to separate” (Walter 2014 ), science fiction writer Kim Stanley Robinson makes the related argument that wild speculations about scientific and technological inventions that characterised his genre in the early twentieth century are no longer possible today, as our lives are so saturated by science and technology that any speculation turns out to be reality already:

I think I do science fiction because I feel like if you’re going to write realism about our time, science fiction is simply the best genre to do it in. This is because we’re living in a big science fiction novel now that we all co-write together. […] You write science fiction and you’re actually writing about the reality that we’re truly in, and that’s what novels ought to do. (Robinson 2015 )

These being perspicuous observations, Robinson also reflects on the relation of science fiction to the ethical: “‘Science’ implies the world of fact and what we all agree on seems to be true in the natural world. ‘Fiction’ implies values and meanings, the stories we tell to make sense of things.” Robinson points out that it can seem impossible to simultaneously describe the facts of the world as it is and to imagine how it ought to be. Yet, as Robinson continues, “here is a genre that claims to be a kind of ‘fact-values’ reconciliation, a bridge between the two. Can it be? Well, no, not really—but it can try” (Robinson 2015 ). A number of contributions in this volume examine how literary representations of science identify connectivities between facts and values and try to balance ethical responsibilities to the real and to the imaginary. More generally speaking, the ten chapters in this collection ask how, why, and to what effects fictional writing about science returns to realist modes and to the past, and examine how twenty-first-century novels, poetry, film, and drama engage with tensions between facts and values, realism and speculation, views of the past and visions of the future.

In Part I, ‘Human Connectivities—Speculations and (Corpo)Realities,’ five chapters engage with the place of the human in a web of relations and a reorientation of fiction’s allegiances to reality and speculation. The authors examine the role of science and technology in questioning and redefining the human from various angles, including consequences of the biomedical sciences, genetic modifications, and new technologies that redefine reading practices. The first two chapters note a shift from focusing on immaterial mental states to exploring effects of science and technology on the material brain, and analyse literary explorations of ways in which science and technology shape human subjectivity, what has been considered its corporeal ‘seat’ in the brain, and our understanding of relations between them. Natalie Roxburgh’s “The Rise of Psychopharmacological Fiction” studies representations of drugs and medications during and after ‘the decade of the brain’ when attention shifted from the subjective experience of the mind to the physical structure of the brain. Roxburgh compares postmodernist novels with those written in a style of new realism, thus engaging on the level of form with a shift in focus from subjective experience to objective materiality, concluding that recent psychopharmacological novels employ and reflect a move towards more realist modes of representation. Roxburgh further uses these texts to explore the idea that science and technology in the twenty-first-century “risk society” (Ulrich Beck) can be grasped with the logic of the pharmakon that is both remedy and poison. Chapter 3 by Julius Greve, “Neuropathologies: Cognition, Technology, and the Network Paradigm in Scott Bakker’s Neuropath and Dave Eggers’s The Circle ,” asks about the place of cognition and technology in contemporary fiction and argues for “a conceptual shift from psycho- to neuropathology.” A main reason he identifies for such a shift is the “convergence of today’s technologies of cognition and the network paradigm”: the sense that ‘everything is connected’ that is intricately interwoven with the use of technology. Examining two popular fictional explorations of cognition and technology, Greve’s chapter engages with the threats and opportunities of connectivities in the twenty-first century.

The next two contributions turn to the role of scientific theories and new technologies on narrative design and reading practices. Both interrogate the potential role of new media to frame new narratives. Chapter 4 , “New Science, New Stories: Quantum Physics as a Narrative Trope in Contemporary Fiction” by Kanta Dihal, focuses on how texts use theories in quantum physics to challenge the concept of identity and open new possibilities of narration, focalisation, plot, and structure. Comparing printed texts with the iOS app Arcadia (2015) by Iain Pears, Dihal speculates that the new media provide opportunities for further narrative innovations. Where this chapter concludes that the potential of new media, for example for interactive narratives, has not been fully explored in narratives engaging with quantum physics, the following contribution examines the close connections of technology and changing reading practices in digital poetry. In Chapter 5 , “Digital Technologies and Concrete Poetry: Word, Algorithm, Body,” Paola Carbone discusses digital poems that reconfigure the main features of concrete poetry and draw attention to reading as an active, sensual process. Identifying a new focus on the physicality of text and on the inclusion of the human body in digital poetry, Carbone’s contribution shows not only that technology disconnects us from material reality when it “recede[s] behind the computer screen” (Lea 2017 , 19) but that it can also create new connectivities between body and text.

The final chapter in this section, Pia Balsmeier’s “Towards a Posthumanist Conceptualization of Society: Biotechnology in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy and Ruth Ozeki’s All Over Creation ,” refocuses human connectivities explicitly onto the notion of the ‘human’ and its ontological and ethical limits by exploring the role of biotechnology in the conceptualisation of collective identity as a (post)human(ist) society. Following a careful mapping of different currents in thinking about the posthuman, Balsmeier focuses on fictional texts from North America that explore how the most widespread form of biotechnology, namely genetically modified food, affects human identities. Analysing novels by Atwood and Ozeki, Balsmeier examines how anthropocentric and essentialist views on identity, race, gender, and family can be overcome by more valuable connectivities based on elective affiliations.

Part II, “Temporal Connectivities—(Neo-)Victorian to (Neo-)Modernist,” continues the concern with ethical issues and scientific progress, yet the examples discussed here share a strong link to history rather than to speculative futures. Chapters 7 and 8 both engage with the pervasive, ongoing fascination with the Victorian age, with the lives and discoveries of nineteenth-century scientists, and the impact of the era’s gendered and racialised politics on the contemporary imagination. First, Paul Hamann traces genealogies of genetics in two British science novels, Simon Mawer’s Mendel’s Dwarf and A.S. Byatt’s A Whistling Woman , employing these examples to identify the historicising of scientific knowledge and practice as a new trend in the history of the novel. He argues that the foregrounding of scientific historical difference in Mawer’s and Byatt’s texts reflects the central tenet of twentieth-century philosophy of science that scientific epistemology is historically specific. At the same time, Hamann uncovers the novels’ engagements with past genetic practice as a critique of genetics in the twenty-first century. Exploring the literary forms through which the two novels historicise genetic science, this chapter adds an original perspective to the question of how the aesthetics of texts informs and is informed by their investigation of scientific epistemology. This is followed by Elizabeth Gilbert’s analysis of British writer Frances Hardinge’s genre-poaching young adult novel The Lie Tree , a fusion of Gothic, Neo-Victorian, fantasy, and detective fiction. Set just a few years after the publication of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species , the narrative details the female protagonist’s struggle for scientific knowledge and truth against the confines of gender stereotypes and popular pseudo- or anti-scientific beliefs.

While these two contributions testify to lasting legacies of the Victorian era in current representations of science, modernism and the violent ruptures of the early twentieth century up to the Second World War provide a rival source of imagination and raise, if anything, even more haunting ethical questions. Moving from prose fiction to film, in Chapter 9 , Norbert Schaffeld analyses Matthew Brown’s 2015 The Man Who Knew Infinity from a postcolonial vantage point. This maths film, indicative of the current popularity of biopics and other forms of life writing, explores a commonly fictionalised phase in the history of mathematics, focusing on the encounter of two scientific ‘geniuses,’ Cambridge professor G.H. Hardy and the self-taught Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan, and the latter’s tragically short life. The film’s postcolonial stance, Schaffeld argues, makes use of temporal connectivities by reinvesting the spatio-temporal frame of early twentieth-century academic culture with today’s problems of racism and institutional exclusion. It furthermore poses questions about the genre and truth claims of contemporary historical fiction.

Similarly set in the early twentieth century is Thomas Pynchon’s Against the Day , the example under scrutiny in Chapter 10 . Simon de Bourcier’s analysis of Pynchon’s complex text focuses on its entangled relationship with both modernism and postmodernism, presenting a twenty-first-century aesthetic fusion that is as yet hard to fully grasp. De Bourcier suggests that the novel’s narrative aesthetics conforms, in fact, to Vermeulen and van den Akker’s concept of metamodernism. In his reading of central scenes and the author’s engagement with the technological and ideological contexts of modernism, Futurism, and Fascism, de Bourcier employs Slavoj Žižek’s opposition between modernist absence and the ‘obscene object’ of postmodernity, as well as theorisations of technology by Walter Benjamin and Friedrich Kittler.

The final chapter, “Identity, Memory, and Technoscientific Ethics: Limits, Edges, and Borders in The Forbidden Zone ,” tackles the realm of contemporary stagings of the history and ethics of science. Ellen Moll applies theories by feminist technoscience philosophers Karen Barad, Katie King, and Donna Haraway to the 2012 play The Forbidden Zone by Duncan Macmillan and Katie Mitchell. Her reading shows how the play employs experimental theatrical techniques, including live cinema, to explore the ethical-political ramifications of chemical weapons research and its relationship to sexism and other forms of oppression. Focusing on the lives of historical figures Clara Immerwahr and her granddaughter Claire Haber, the play presents science as firmly tied to the notion of a modernity defined by apocalypse, forcing the audience, as Moll suggests, into an awareness of what Katie King termed “pastpresents,” an examination of the mutually constructing nature of past and present.

The ongoing representations of science, scientists, and scientific practice with which the ten chapters in this volume engage are indicative of the fact that new developments in science and technology continue to change our life-world, the way humans interact with each other, and how they understand themselves and their place among other beings and in the world. This collection investigates what concepts, forms, and topical issues have emerged in the past few decades—not claiming to offer a complete survey, but discussing examples which suggest narrative modes and themes that we believe are of wider significance and likely to shape engagement with literature and science and the field of twenty-first-century fiction in the future. Thus, this volume is a starting point; each of the areas addressed here calls for further study: the impact of technology, digitalisation, and new media on prose, poetry, and drama, posthumanism, genetics, pharmacology, neuropathology, and, as always, the relation of science (histories) to intersectional identity politics. While not aiming for comprehensiveness—not in text selection, choice of authors, kinds of science, or in regard to aesthetic developments—it bears testimony to the unquestionable “centrality of science as knowledge, as practice and as a strong symbol of modernity” (James and Bud 2018 , 386). Examining the new forms that this central interest in science takes at the beginning of the twenty-first century, the volume investigates what we could call the ‘connective value’ or the value of connectivities between different aspects of twenty-first-century experience, imagination, and writing. Not least, the case studies in this collection demonstrate what Michelle Antoinette describes as “the connective medium of art itself as a vital key in forging connection” (Antoinette 2014 , 23)—they reveal how fiction can forge connections between ideas, human beings, and their realities and potentialities in times past, in the present, and in times to come.

Change history

23 june 2022.

Chapter 1 was previously published as non-open access. It has now been changed to open access under a CC BY 4.0 license and the copyright holder has been updated to “The Author(s).”

See, for example, the ‘Global AI Narratives’ Project at the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, University of Cambridge, UK, led by Stephen Cave and Sarah Dillon (2018–).

While this ‘reality hunger’ is associated with a re-emerging desire for authenticity as a rejection of falsity and ‘fake news,’ Frederic Jameson rightly reminds us of the problem of defining what is actually meant by a ‘return’ to realism, that is, to what realism is supposed to be opposed here, for example, romance, modernism, idealism, or fantasy (see Jameson 2015 , 2). See also Birke and Butter ( 2013 ) on the renewed critical interest in realism in contemporary art and culture and debates on what is perceived as realist work.

Works Cited

Altieri, Charles (1998). Postmodernisms Now. Essays on Contemporaneity in the Arts . University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

Google Scholar

Anjaria, Ulka (2017). “Twenty-First-Century Realism.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature . July 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.194 . 10 Nov. 2018.

Antoinette, Michelle (2014). “Introduction Part 2.” Contemporary Asian Art and Exhibitions: Connectivities and World-making . Eds. Michelle Antoinette and Caroline Turner. Canberra: Australian National University Press. 23–46.

Birke, Dorothee and Stella Butter (2013). “Introduction.” Realisms in Contemporary Culture: Theories, Politics, and Medial Configurations . Eds. Dorothee Birke and Stella Butter. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. 1–12.

Chapter Google Scholar

Boxall, Peter (2013). Twenty-First Century Fiction. A Critical Introduction . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Book Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel (2000). The Rise of the Network Society . 2nd ed. New York: Blackwell.

Childs, Peter and James Green (2013). Aesthetics and Ethics in Twenty-First Century British Novels . London: Bloomsbury Academic.

“connectivity.” (2018). Merriam-Webster.com . Merriam-Webster. Web. 26 Nov. 2018.

Crossland, Rachel (2018). Modernist Physics: Waves, Particles, and Relativities in the Writings of Virginia Woolf and D. H. Lawrence . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Engelhardt, Nina (2018). Modernism, Fiction and Mathematics . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fitch, John G. (2018). The Poetry of Knowledge and the ‘Two Cultures’ . Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Habinek, Lianne (2018). The Subtle Knot: Early Modern English Literature and the Birth of Neuroscience . Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Halpin, Jenni G. (2018). Contemporary Physics Plays Making Time to Know Responsibility . Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Pivot.

Heise, Ursula K. (2008). Sense of Place and Sense of Planet. The Environmental Imagination of the Global . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Henderson, Andrea K. (2018). Algebraic Art: Mathematical Formalism and Victorian Culture . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hoydis, Julia (2015). “Introduction to 21st Century Studies.” (Special issue) Anglistik 26.2: 5–14.

———. (2019). “Realism for the Post-Truth Era: Politics and Storytelling in Recent Fiction and Autobiography of Salman Rushdie.” Fact and Fiction in Contemporary Anglophone Narratives . Eds. Jan Alber and Alice Bell. EJES 23.2: (forthcoming).

Hutcheon, Linda (2002). The Politics of Postmodernism . 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.

James, Frank A.J.L. and Robert Bud (2018). “Epilogue: Science after Modernity.” Being Modern: The Cultural Impact of Science in the Early Twentieth Century . Eds. Robert Bud, Paul Greenhalgh, Frank James, and Morag Shiach. London: UCL Press. 386–393.

Jameson, Fredric (2015). The Antinomies of Realism . London and New York: Verso.

Johns-Putra, Adeline (2016). “Climate Change in Literature and Literary Studies: From Cli-fi, Climate Change Theater and Ecopoetry to Ecocriticism and Climate Change Criticism.” WIREs Climate Change 7: 266–282. < https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.385 >. 10 Nov. 2018.

Kagan, Jerome (2009). The Three Cultures; Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st Century . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kohlke, Marie-Louise (2015). Twenty-First-Century British Fiction . Eds. Bianca Leggett and Tony Venezia. Canterbury: Gylphi.

Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lea, Daniel (2017). Twenty-First-Century Fiction: Contemporary British Voices . Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Leggett, Bianca and Tony Venezia, eds. (2015). Twenty-First-Century British Fiction . Canterbury: Gylphi.

Levine, George (1987). “Introduction. One Culture: Science and Literature.” One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature . Ed. George Levine, with help from Alan Rauch. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. 3–33.

Miller, Laura (2011). “How Novels Came to Terms with the Internet.” The Guardian . 15 Jan. < https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/jan/15/novels-internet-laura-miller >. 10 Nov. 2018.

Moraru, Christian (2011). Cosmodernism: American Narrative, Late Globalization, and the New Cultural Imaginary . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

———. (2016). “Postmodernism, Cosmodernism, Planetarism.” The Cambridge History of Postmodern Literature . Eds. Brian McHale and Len Platt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 480–496.

Robinson, Kim Stanley (2015). Interview with Richard Lea. “Science Fiction: the Realism of the 21st Century”. The Guardian . 7 Aug. < https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/aug/07/science-fiction-realism-kim-stanley-robinson-alistair-reynolds-ann-leckie-interview >. 10 Nov. 2018.

Rocamora, Carol (2000). “Scientific Dramaturgy.” The Nation . 5 June. 49–51.

Roth, Marco (2009). “The Rise of the Neuronovel.” N+1 Magazine . 8. < https://nplusonemag.com/issue-8/essays/the-rise-of-the-neuronovel/ >. 10 Nov. 2018.

Schaffeld, Norbert, ed. (2016). “Aspects of the Science Novel.” (Special Issue) Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik ZAA 64.2.

Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew (2017). “Climate Change Fiction.” American Literature in Transition, 2000–2010 . Ed. Rachel Greenwald Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 309–321.

Schoene, Berthold (2009). The Cosmopolitan Novel . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Shields, David (2010). Reality Hunger. A Manifesto . London: Penguin.

Shaw, Kristian (2017). Cosmopolitanism in Twenty-First Century Fiction . Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sielke, Sabine (2015). “Science Studies and Literature.” Anglia 133.1: 9–21. < https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2015-0002 >. 10 Nov. 2018.

Tougaw, Jason (2017). Electric Lit . 9 Oct. < https://electricliterature.com/12-great-books-about-the-human-brain-842011da9157 > 10 Nov. 2018.

———. (2018). The Elusive Brain: Literary Experiments in the Age of Neuroscience . New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Tondre, Michael (2018). The Physics of Possibility: Victorian Fiction, Science, and Gender . Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

Trexler, Adam (2015). Anthropocene Fiction. The Novel in a Time of Climate Change . Charlottesville, VA, and London: University of Virginia Press.

Vermeulen, Timotheus and van den Akker, Robin (2010). “Notes on Metamodernism.” Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 2.1: 1–14. < https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677 >. 10 Nov. 2018.

———. (2011). “Metamodernism, History, and the Story of Lampe.” After Postmodernism . Eds. Rachel MagShamhráin and Sabine Strümper-Krobb. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre. 25–40.

Walter, Damien (2014). “Transrealism: the First Major literary Movement of the 21st Century.” The Guardian . 24 Oct. < https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2014/oct/24/transrealism-first-major-literary-movement-21st-century >. 10 Nov. 2018.

Wood, James (2000). “Human, All too Inhuman. On the Formation of a New Genre: Hysterical Realism.” The New Republic . 24 July. < https://newrepublic.com/article/61361/human-inhuman >. 10 Nov. 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

Nina Engelhardt

University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Julia Hoydis

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations, rights and permissions.

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Engelhardt, N., Hoydis, J. (2019). Introduction: Connectivities Between Literature and Science in the Twenty-First Century. In: Engelhardt, N., Hoydis, J. (eds) Representations of Science in Twenty-First-Century Fiction. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19490-1_1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19490-1_1

Published : 28 June 2019

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-19489-5

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-19490-1

eBook Packages : Literature, Cultural and Media Studies Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

Architecture and Design
Asian and Pacific Studies
Business and Economics
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
Industrial Chemistry
Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies
Jewish Studies
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publish your article
The role of authors
Promoting your article
Abstracting & indexing
Publishing Ethics
Why publish with De Gruyter
How to publish with De Gruyter
Our book series
Our subject areas
Your digital product at De Gruyter
Contribute to our reference works
Product information
Tools & resources
Product Information
Promotional Materials
Orders and Inquiries
FAQ for Library Suppliers and Book Sellers
Repository Policy
Free access policy
Open Access agreements
Database portals
For Authors
Customer service
People + Culture
Journal Management
How to join us
Working at De Gruyter
Mission & Vision
De Gruyter Foundation
De Gruyter Ebound
Our Responsibility
Partner publishers

Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.

Literature and Science: Introduction

Works cited.

Adam, Hazard. 1971. Critical Theory Since Plato . New York et al.: Harcourt, Brace Iovanovich. Search in Google Scholar

Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self . Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning . Durham: Duke University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv12101zq Search in Google Scholar

Barth, John. 1972. Chimera . New York: Random House. Search in Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind . New York: Ballantine Books. Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things . Durham: Duke University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w Search in Google Scholar

Biagioli, Mario (ed.). 1999. The Science Studies Reader . New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Bruce and Manuela Rossini (eds.). 2010. The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science . London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203848739 Search in Google Scholar

Coole, Diana and Samantha Frost (eds.). 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics . Durham: Duke University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv11cw2wk Search in Google Scholar

Dimock, Wai Chee and Priscilla Wald (eds.). 2002. Literature and Science: Cultural Forms, Conceptual Exchanges . Special Issue of American Literature 74.4. 10.1215/00029831-74-4-705 Search in Google Scholar

Freese, Peter and Charles B. Harris (eds.). 2004. Science, Technology, and the Humanities in Recent American Fiction . Essen: Die Blaue Eule. Search in Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna J. 1991. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature . New York: Routledge. 183–201. Search in Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra, and Robert Figueroa (eds.). 2003. Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophy of Science and Technology . New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Heise, Ursula. 2008. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet. The Environmental Imagination of the Global . Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335637.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Heise, Ursula. 2010. Nach der Natur. das Artensterben und die modern Kultur . Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Search in Google Scholar

Hornung, Alfred, and Zhao Baisheng (eds.). 2013. Ecology and Life Writing . Heidelberg: Winter. Search in Google Scholar

Hustvedt, Siri. 2013. “Borderlands: First, Second, and Third Person Adventures in Crossing Disciplines”. In: Alfred Hornung (ed.). American Lives . Heidelberg: Winter. 111–138. Search in Google Scholar

Iovino, Serenella and Serpil Oppermann (eds.). 2014. Material Ecocriticism . Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy . Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Levine, George (ed.). 1987. One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Search in Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bernadette. 2006. Scientia Poetica. Literarische Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Wissenschaftstheorie . Augsburg: mimeo. Search in Google Scholar

Otis, Laura (ed.). 2002. Literature and Science in the Nineteenth Century: An Anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew (ed.). 1992. Science as Practice and Culture . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Richards, I.O. 1926. Science and Poetry . New York: Haskell House. Search in Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. 1967. Athenäum Fragment 116. In: Ernst Behler et al. (eds.). Friedrich Schlegel: Kritische Ausgabe seiner Werke . Paderborn: Schöningh. Vol. 2: 182f. Search in Google Scholar

Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Defence of Poetry . [1821] In: Hazard Adams (ed.). Critical Theory since Plato . New York et al.: Harcourt, Brace Iovanovich. 499–513. Search in Google Scholar

Sidney, Sir Philip. An Apology for Poetry . [1595] In: Hazard Adams (ed.). Critical Theory since Plato . New York et al.: Harcourt, Brace Iovanovich. 155–177. Search in Google Scholar

Sielke, Sabine. 2008. “Science into Narrative, or: Novelties of a Cultural Nature”. In: Thomas Klinkert und Monika Neuhofer (eds.). Literatur, Wissenschaft, Wissen seit der Epochenschwelle 1800 . Berlin: de Gruyter. 432–58. Search in Google Scholar

Sielke, Sabine and Erik Redling. 2014. “Science|Culture|Aesthetics: New Crossroads for North American Studies?” In: Winfried Fluck, Erik Redling, Sabine Sielke, and Hubert Zapf (eds.). American Studies Today: New Research Agendas . Heidelberg: Winter. 331–52. Search in Google Scholar

Snow, C.P. 1963. The Two Cultures: and a Second Look . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Thielmann, Winfried. 2009. Deutsche und englische Wissenschaftssprache im Vergleich. Hinführen – Verknüpfen – Benennen . Heidelberg: Synchron. Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, Wendy. 2006. The Whole Creature. Complexity, Biosemiotics and the Evolution of Culture . London: Lawrence & Wishart. Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Edward O. 1998. Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge . New York: Random House. Search in Google Scholar

Zapf, Hubert. 2008. “Literary Ecology and the Ethics of Texts”. New Literary History 39.4: 847–68. 10.1353/nlh.0.0066 Search in Google Scholar

Zapf, Hubert. 2013. “Cultural Ecology, Literature, and Life Writing”. In: Alfred Hornung and Zhao Baisheng (eds.). Ecology and Life Writing . Heidelberg: Winter. 3–25. Search in Google Scholar

팺 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston

X / Twitter

Supplementary Materials

Please login or register with De Gruyter to order this product.

Literature and Science (Essays and Studies #61)

Description.

Essays exploring the complex relationship between literature and science.

In 1959 C. P. Snow memorably described the gulf of mutual incomprehension' which existed between literary intellectuals' and scientists, referring to them as two cultures'. This volume looks at the extent to which this has changed. Ranging from the middle ages to twentieth-century science fiction and literary theory, and using different texts, genres, and methodologies, the essays collected here demonstrate the complexity of literature, science, and theinterfaces between them. Texts and authors discussed include Ian McEwan's Saturday; Sheridan le Fanu; The Birth of Mankind; Franco Morretti; Anna Barbauld; Dorothy L. Sayers; The Cloud of Unknowing; George Eliot and Mary Wollstonecraft.

Dr SHARON RUSTON is Senior Lecturer in English at the University of Keele. CONTRIBUTORS: SHARON RUSTON, GILLIAN RUDD, ELAINE HOBBY, ALICE JENKINS, KATY PRICE, MARTIN WILLIS, BRIAN BAKER, DAVID AMIGONI.

Other Books in Series

Translating Literature (Essays and Studies #50)

The Gothic (Essays and Studies #54)

The Waste Land After One Hundred Years (Essays and Studies #75)

Writing China: Essays on the Amherst Embassy (1816) and Sino-British Cultural Relations (Essays and Studies #69)

English: Shared Futures (Essays and Studies #71)

Textual Distortion (Essays and Studies #70)

Literature and Ageing (Essays and Studies #73)

The Literature and Politics of the Environment (Essays and Studies #76)

The Literature of Hell (Essays and Studies #74)

Romanticism and Gender (Essays and Studies #51)

War and Literature (Essays and Studies #67)

Slow Scholarship: Medieval Research and the Neoliberal University (Essays and Studies #72)

Victorian Women Poets (Essays and Studies #56)

Contemporary British Women Writers (Essays and Studies #57)

Slavery and the Cultures of Abolition: Essays Marking the Bicentennial of the British Abolition Act of 1807 (Essays and Studies #60)

Postcolonial Theory and Criticism (Essays and Studies #52)

Percy Bysshe Shelley: Bicentenary Essays Essays and Studies 1992

Feminist Linguistics in Literary Criticism (Essays and Studies #47)

The Endings of Epochs (Essays and Studies #48)

Authors at Work: The Creative Environment (Essays and Studies #62)

Sophie Calle: True Stories: 66 Short Stories: New Edition

Science Fiktion (The Seagull Library of German Literature)

Out of the Cave: A Natural Philosophy of Mind and Knowing

Art of Touch: A Collection of Prose and Poetry from the Pandemic and Beyond

Cognitive Pluralism

Making Space: A Collection of Writing and Art

The Richter Interviews

Against Nature (Untimely Meditations #17)

Political Fictions (The French List)

"The Girl in the Window" and Other True Tales: An Anthology with Tips for Finding, Reporting, and Writing Nonfiction Narratives

How to Know a Person: The Art of Seeing Others Deeply and Being Deeply Seen

On Gaslighting (Insights: Philosophy in Focus)

In Pursuit of Revolutionary Love: Precarity, Power, Communities

Object-Oriented Philosophy: The Noumenon's New Clothes (Urbanomic / Mono #1)

On Disinformation: How to Fight for Truth and Protect Democracy

Life, Death, and Other Inconvenient Truths: A Realist's View of the Human Condition

Style: A Queer Cosmology (Postmillennial Pop #37)

The Conscious Mind (The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series)

Autobiographical Comics: Life Writing in Pictures

Quietly Hostile: Essays

How to Start Writing (and When to Stop): Advice for Writers

Pregnancy Test (Object Lessons)

What Makes an Apple?: Six Conversations about Writing, Love, Guilt, and Other Pleasures

Joanna Russ (Modern Masters of Science Fiction)

The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics

"Simply a Particular Contemporary": Interviews, 1970–79: Interviews, 1970–79 (The French List)

Irrationality: A History of the Dark Side of Reason

The Palliative Society: Pain Today

News and information from Kendall Square's underground bookstore

Literature and Science 1

Browse Course Material

Course info.

Karen Boiko

Departments

Comparative Media Studies/Writing

As Taught In

Academic Writing
Creative Writing
Nonfiction Prose

Learning Resource Types

The science essay, course description.

Photo of several Scottish Highland cattle.

You are leaving MIT OpenCourseWare

Welcome to the Lehigh University Press

New release.

Written in a readable style and beautifully edited, Poe and Women is a valuable resource on women’s creative and intellectual responses to Poe’s life and work. — Dana Medoro, professor of English, University of Manitoba

New in paperback!

Christian Social Activism and Rule of Law in Chinese Societies

Manuscript Proposals

Interested in submitting a manuscript proposal?

Michael A. Musmanno: Lawyer, Legislator, Judge, and Showman

Featured Titles

Seeing the Apocalypse: Essays on Bird Box

Recent Praise for LUP Books

Placing Charlotte Smith , Edited by Elizabeth A. Dolan and Jacqueline M. Labbe

Dolan and Labbe’s wide-ranging yet cohesive collection of essays offers a comprehensive and convincing breadth that succeeds in its mission of placing Charlotte Smith. Beyond Smithian scholarship, the volume comes at a prescient time.

-- Heather Heckman-McKenna University of Missouri-Columbia

Wife of Bath in Afterlife: Ballads to Blake , by Betsy Bowden

Bowden delves into each case study so expansively that at the end of reading the book, the reader has been immersed in many different eighteenth-century cultural worlds. This is an immensely learned and valuable book that dares to be different and, as a result, breaks new ground.

-- Marion Turner, Jesus College, University of Oxford

Our Osage Hills: Toward an Osage Ecology and Tribalography of the Early Twentieth Century , Edited by Michael Snyder

Our Osage Hills: Toward an Osage Ecology and Tribalography of the Early Twentieth Century is a significant work. Snyder uses Mathews’ columns as a window into Mathews’ understanding of the Osage, its geology, its flora and fauna, as well as its human inhabitants. -- Ruby Hansen Murray, Osage News

Essays About Science: Top 12 Examples and Prompts

Science can explain almost every aspect of our lives; if you want to write essays about science, start by reading our guide.

The word “science” comes from the Latin word Scientia or “knowledge,” It does indeed leave us with no shortage of knowledge as it advances to extraordinary levels. It is present in almost every aspect of our lives, allowing us to live the way we do today and helping us improve society.

In the 21st century, we see science everywhere. It has given us the technology we deem “essential” today, from our mobile phones to air conditioning units to lightbulbs and refrigerators. Yet, it has also allowed us to learn so much about the unknown, such as the endless vacuum of space and the ocean’s mysterious depths. It is, without a doubt, a vehicle for humanity to obtain knowledge and use this knowledge to flourish.

To start writing essays about science, look at some of our featured essay examples below.

1. The challenging environment for science in the 21st century by Nithaya Chetty

2. disadvantages of science by ella gray, 3. reflections from a nobel winner: scientists need time to make discoveries by donna strickland.

4. The fact of cloning by Cesar Hill

5. T. Rex Like You Haven’t Seen Him: With Feathers by Jason Farago

6. common, cheap ingredients can break down some ‘forever chemicals’ by jude coleman, 1. what is science, 2. a noteworthy scientist, 3. why is it important to study science, 4. are robots a net positive for society, 5. types of sciences, 6. science’s role in warfare.

“Open-ended, unfettered science in its purest form has, over the centuries, been pursued in the interests of understanding nature in a fundamental way, and long may that continue. Scientific ideas and discoveries have often been very successfully exploited for commercial gain and societal improvements, and much of the science system today the world over is designed to push scientists in the direction of more relevance.”

For South Africa to prosper, Chetty encourages cooperation and innovation among scientists. He discusses several problems the country faces, including the politicization of research, a weak economy, and misuse of scientific discoveries. These challenges, he believes, can be overcome if the nation works as one and with the international community and if the education system is improved.

“Technology can make people lazy. Many people are already dependent and embrace this technology. Like students playing computer games instead of going to school or study. Technology also brings us privacy issues. From cell phone signal interceptions to email hacking, people are now worried about their once private information becoming public knowledge and making profit out of video scandals.”

Gray discusses the adverse effects technology, a science product, has had on human life and society. These include pollution, the inability to communicate properly, and laziness.

She also acknowledges that technology has made life easier for almost everyone but believes that technology, as it is used now, is detrimental; more responsible use of technology is ideal.

“We must give scientists the opportunity through funding and time to pursue curiosity-based, long-term, basic-science research. Work that does not have direct ramifications for industry or our economy is also worthy. There’s no telling what can come from supporting a curious mind trying to discover something new.”

Strickland, a Nobel Prize winner, explains that a great scientific discovery can only come with ample time for scientists to research, using her work as an example. She describes her work on chirped pulse amplification and its possible applications, including removing brain tumors. Her Nobel-awarded work was done over a long time, and scientists must be afforded ample time and funding to make breakthroughs like hers.

4. The fact of cloning by Cesar Hill

“Any research into human cloning would eventually need to be tested on humans. Cloning might be used to create a “perfect human”. Cloning might have a detrimental effect family relationship. However the debate over cloning has more pros out weighting the cons, giving us a over site of the many advantages cloning has and the effects of it as well. Cloning has many ups and downs nevertheless there are many different ways in which it can be used to adapt and analyse new ways of medicine.”

Hill details both the pros and cons of cloning. It can be used for medical purposes and help us understand genetics more, perhaps even allowing us to prevent genetic diseases in children. However, it is expensive, and many oppose it on religious grounds. Regardless, Hill believes that the process has more advantages than disadvantages and is a net good.

“For the kids who will throng this new exhibition, and who will adore this show’s colorful animations and fossilized dino poop, T. rex may still appear to be a thrilling monster. But staring in the eyes of the feather-flecked annihilators here, adults may have a more uncanny feeling of identification with the beasts at the pinnacle of the food chain. You can be a killer of unprecedented savagery, but the climate always takes the coup de grâce.”

In his essay, Farago reviews an exhibition on the Tyrannosaurus Rex involving an important scientific discovery: it was a feathered dinosaur. He details the different displays in the exhibition, including models of other dinosaurs that helped scientists realize that the T-Rex had feathers.

“Understanding this mechanism is just one step in undoing forever chemicals, Dichtel’s team said. And more research is needed: There are other classes of PFAS that require their own solutions. This process wouldn’t work to tackle PFAS out in the environment, because it requires a concentrated amount of the chemicals. But it could one day be used in wastewater treatment plants, where the pollutants could be filtered out of the water, concentrated and then broken down.”

Coleman explains a discovery by which scientists were able to break down a perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substance, a “forever chemical” dangerous to the environment. He explains how they could break the chemical bond and turn the “forever chemical” into something harmless. This is important because pollution can be reduced significantly, particularly in the water.

Writing Prompts on Essays about Science

“Science” is quite a broad term and encompasses many concepts and definitions. Define science, explain what it involves and how we can use it, and give examples of how it is present in the world. If you want, you can also briefly discuss what science means to you personally.

Many individuals have made remarkable scientific discoveries, contributing to the wealth of knowledge we have acquired through science. For your essay, choose one scientist you feel has made a noteworthy contribution to their field. Then, give a brief background on the scientists and explain the discovery or invention that makes them essential.

Consider what it means to study science: how is it relevant now? What lessons can we learn from science? Then, examine the presence of science in today’s world and write about the importance of science in our day-to-day lives- be sure to give examples to support your points. Finally, in your essay, be sure to keep in mind the times we are living in today.

Essays about science: Are robots a net positive for society

When we think of science, robots are often one of the first things that come to mind. However, there is much to discuss regarding safety, especially artificial intelligence. Discuss the pros and cons of robots and AI, then conclude whether or not the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. Finally, provide adequate evidence to reinforce your argument and explain it in detail.

From biology to chemistry to physics, science has many branches, each dealing with different aspects of the world and universe. Choose one branch of science and then explain what it is, define basic concepts under this science, and give examples of how it is applied: Are any inventions requiring it? How about something we know today thanks to scientific discovery? Answer these questions in your own words for a compelling essay.

Undoubtedly, technology developed using science has had devastating effects, from nuclear weapons to self-flying fighter jets to deadly new guns and tanks. Examine scientific developments’ role in the war: Do they make it more brutal? Or do they reduce the casualties? Make sure to conduct ample research before writing your essay; this topic is debatable.

For help with your essays, check out our round-up of the best essay checkers .

If you’re looking for inspiration, check out our round-up of essay topics about nature .

Martin is an avid writer specializing in editing and proofreading. He also enjoys literary analysis and writing about food and travel.

View all posts

Science Essay

Learn How to Write an A+ Science Essay

11 min read

What Is a Science Essay?

A science essay is an academic paper focusing on a scientific topic from physics, chemistry, biology, or any other scientific field.

Science essays are mostly expository. That is, they require you to explain your chosen topic in detail. However, they can also be descriptive and exploratory.

A descriptive science essay aims to describe a certain scientific phenomenon according to established knowledge.

On the other hand, the exploratory science essay requires you to go beyond the current theories and explore new interpretations.

So before you set out to write your essay, always check out the instructions given by your instructor. Whether a science essay is expository or exploratory must be clear from the start. Or, if you face any difficulty, you can take help from a science essay writer as well.

Moreover, check out this video to understand scientific writing in detail.

Now that you know what it is, let's look at the steps you need to take to write a science essay.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

How To Write a Science Essay?

Writing a science essay is not as complex as it may seem. All you need to do is follow the right steps to create an impressive piece of work that meets the assigned criteria.

Here's what you need to do:

Choose Your Topic

A good topic forms the foundation for an engaging and well-written essay. Therefore, you should ensure that you pick something interesting or relevant to your field of study.

To choose a good topic, you can brainstorm ideas relating to the subject matter. You may also find inspiration from other science essays or articles about the same topic.

Conduct Research

Once you have chosen your topic, start researching it thoroughly to develop a strong argument or discussion in your essay.

Make sure you use reliable sources and cite them properly . You should also make notes while conducting your research so that you can reference them easily when writing the essay. Or, you can get expert assistance from an essay writing service to manage your citations.

Create an Outline

A good essay outline helps to organize the ideas in your paper. It serves as a guide throughout the writing process and ensures you don’t miss out on important points.

An outline makes it easier to write a well-structured paper that flows logically. It should be detailed enough to guide you through the entire writing process.

However, your outline should be flexible, and it's sometimes better to change it along the way to improve your structure.

Start Writing

Once you have a good outline, start writing the essay by following your plan.

The first step in writing any essay is to draft it. This means putting your thoughts down on paper in a rough form without worrying about grammar or spelling mistakes.

So begin your essay by introducing the topic, then carefully explain it using evidence and examples to support your argument.

Don't worry if your first draft isn't perfect - it's just the starting point!

Proofread & Edit

After finishing your first draft, take time to proofread and edit it for grammar and spelling mistakes.

Proofreading is the process of checking for grammatical mistakes. It should be done after you have finished writing your essay.

Editing, on the other hand, involves reviewing the structure and organization of your essay and its content. It should be done before you submit your final work.

Both proofreading and editing are essential for producing a high-quality essay. Make sure to give yourself enough time to do them properly!

After revising the essay, you should format it according to the guidelines given by your instructor. This could involve using a specific font size, page margins, or citation style.

Most science essays are written in Times New Roman font with 12-point size and double spacing. The margins should be 1 inch on all sides, and the text should be justified.

In addition, you must cite your sources properly using a recognized citation style such as APA , Chicago , or Harvard . Make sure to follow the guidelines closely so that your essay looks professional.

Following these steps will help you create an informative and well-structured science essay that meets the given criteria.

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!

How to Structure a Science Essay?

A basic science essay structure includes an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Let's look at each of these briefly.

Introduction

Your essay introduction should introduce your topic and provide a brief overview of what you will discuss in the essay. It should also state your thesis or main argument.

For instance, a thesis statement for a science essay could be,

"The human body is capable of incredible feats, as evidenced by the many athletes who have competed in the Olympic games."

The body of your essay will contain the bulk of your argument or discussion. It should be divided into paragraphs, each discussing a different point.

For instance, imagine you were writing about sports and the human body.

Your first paragraph can discuss the physical capabilities of the human body.

The second paragraph may be about the physical benefits of competing in sports.

Similarly, in the third paragraph, you can present one or two case studies of specific athletes to support your point.

Once you have explained all your points in the body, it’s time to conclude the essay.

Your essay conclusion should summarize the main points of your essay and leave the reader with a sense of closure.

In the conclusion, you reiterate your thesis and sum up your arguments. You can also suggest implications or potential applications of the ideas discussed in the essay.

By following this structure, you will create a well-organized essay.

Check out a few example essays to see this structure in practice.

Science Essay Examples

A great way to get inspired when writing a science essay is to look at other examples of successful essays written by others.

Here are some examples that will give you an idea of how to write your essay.

Science Essay About Genetics - Science Essay Example

Environmental Science Essay Example | PDF Sample

The Science of Nanotechnology

Science, Non-Science, and Pseudo-Science

The Science Of Science Education

Science in our Daily Lives

Short Science Essay Example

Let’s take a look at a short science essay:

Want to read more essay examples? Here, you can find more science essay examples to learn from.

How to Choose the Right Science Essay Topic

Choosing the right science essay topic is a critical first step in crafting a compelling and engaging essay. Here's a concise guide on how to make this decision wisely:

Consider Your Interests: Start by reflecting on your personal interests within the realm of science. Selecting a topic that genuinely fascinates you will make the research and writing process more enjoyable and motivated.
Relevance to the Course: Ensure that your chosen topic aligns with your course or assignment requirements. Read the assignment guidelines carefully to understand the scope and focus expected by your instructor.
Current Trends and Issues: Stay updated with the latest scientific developments and trends. Opting for a topic that addresses contemporary issues not only makes your essay relevant but also demonstrates your awareness of current events in the field.
Narrow Down the Scope: Science is vast, so narrow your topic to a manageable scope. Instead of a broad subject like "Climate Change," consider a more specific angle like "The Impact of Melting Arctic Ice on Global Sea Levels."
Available Resources: Ensure that there are sufficient credible sources and research materials available for your chosen topic. A lack of resources can hinder your research efforts.
Discuss with Your Instructor: If you're uncertain about your topic choice, don't hesitate to consult your instructor or professor. They can provide valuable guidance and may even suggest specific topics based on your academic goals.

Science Essay Topics

Choosing an appropriate topic for a science essay is one of the first steps in writing a successful paper.

Here are a few science essay topics to get you started:

How space exploration affects our daily lives?
How has technology changed our understanding of medicine?
Are there ethical considerations to consider when conducting scientific research?
How does climate change affect the biodiversity of different parts of the world?
How can artificial intelligence be used in medicine?
What impact have vaccines had on global health?
What is the future of renewable energy?
How do we ensure that genetically modified organisms are safe for humans and the environment?
The influence of social media on human behavior: A social science perspective
What are the potential risks and benefits of stem cell therapy?

Important science topics can cover anything from space exploration to chemistry and biology. So you can choose any topic according to your interests!

Need more topics? We have gathered 100+ science essay topics to help you find a great topic!

Continue reading to find some tips to help you write a successful science essay.

Science Essay Writing Tips

Once you have chosen a topic and looked at examples, it's time to start writing the science essay.

Here are some key tips for a successful essay:

Research thoroughly

Make sure you do extensive research before you begin writing your paper. This will ensure that the facts and figures you include are accurate and supported by reliable sources.

Use clear language

Avoid using jargon or overly technical language when writing your essay. Plain language is easier to understand and more engaging for readers.

Referencing

Always provide references for any information you include in your essay. This will demonstrate that you acknowledge other people's work and show that the evidence you use is credible.

Make sure to follow the basic structure of an essay and organize your thoughts into clear sections. This will improve the flow and make your essay easier to read.

Ask someone to proofread

It’s also a good idea to get someone else to proofread your work as they may spot mistakes that you have missed.

These few tips will help ensure that your science essay is well-written and informative!

You've learned the steps to writing a successful science essay and looked at some examples and topics to get you started.

Make sure you thoroughly research, use clear language, structure your thoughts, and proofread your essay. With these tips, you’re sure to write a great science essay!

Do you still need expert help writing a science essay? Our science essay writing service is here to help. With our team of professional writers, you can rest assured that your essay will be written to the highest standards.

Contact our online writing service now to get started!

Also, do not forget to try our essay typer tool for quick and cost-free aid with your essays!

Write Essay Within 60 Seconds!

Betty is a freelance writer and researcher. She has a Masters in literature and enjoys providing writing services to her clients. Betty is an avid reader and loves learning new things. She has provided writing services to clients from all academic levels and related academic fields.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Keep reading

Ultimate Guide to Writing Your College Essay

Tips for writing an effective college essay.

College admissions essays are an important part of your college application and gives you the chance to show colleges and universities your character and experiences. This guide will give you tips to write an effective college essay.

Want free help with your college essay?

UPchieve connects you with knowledgeable and friendly college advisors—online, 24/7, and completely free. Get 1:1 help brainstorming topics, outlining your essay, revising a draft, or editing grammar.

Writing a strong college admissions essay

Learn about the elements of a solid admissions essay.

Avoiding common admissions essay mistakes

Learn some of the most common mistakes made on college essays

Brainstorming tips for your college essay

Stuck on what to write your college essay about? Here are some exercises to help you get started.

How formal should the tone of your college essay be?

Learn how formal your college essay should be and get tips on how to bring out your natural voice.

Taking your college essay to the next level

Hear an admissions expert discuss the appropriate level of depth necessary in your college essay.

Student Stories

Student Story: Admissions essay about a formative experience

Get the perspective of a current college student on how he approached the admissions essay.

Student Story: Admissions essay about personal identity

Get the perspective of a current college student on how she approached the admissions essay.

Student Story: Admissions essay about community impact

Student story: admissions essay about a past mistake, how to write a college application essay, tips for writing an effective application essay, sample college essay 1 with feedback, sample college essay 2 with feedback.

This content is licensed by Khan Academy and is available for free at www.khanacademy.org.

Science Essay Examples

Best Science Essay Examples to Learn From

Published on: May 3, 2023

Last updated on: Jan 31, 2024

Share this article

Are you struggling to write a science essay that stands out?

Are you tired of feeling overwhelmed by scientific jargon and complicated concepts?

You're not alone.

Science essays can be a challenge for even the most dedicated students. It's no wonder that so many students struggle to produce top-notch papers.

But fear not!

In this blog post, we'll provide you with some science essay examples and tips. We will help you write a top-notch paper that impresses your professor and earns you a high grade.

So buckle up and get ready to tackle science essays like a pro!

On This Page On This Page -->

Science Essay Examples for Students

Writing a science essay can be a daunting task for students. However, with the right guidance and examples, it can also be a rewarding and enlightening experience.

Here, we'll provide you with examples so you can elevate your own writing.

Science Essay Example SPM

Scientific Essay Example Pdf (Insert

Science Paper Example

Science Project Essay Example

Science Essay Examples for Different Subjects

Science is a vast field that encompasses many different subjects, from biology to physics to chemistry. As a student, you may find yourself tasked with writing a science essay on a subject that you're not particularly familiar with.

We have provided you with science essay examples for different subjects to help you get started.

Social Science Essay Example

Political Science Essay Example

Environmental Science Essay Example

Health Science Essay Example

Computer Science Essay Example

University Science Essay Examples

Science essays are important part of university-level education. However, different universities may have different requirements and expectations when it comes to writing these essays.

That's why we've compiled some science essay examples for different universities. You can see what works and what doesn't, and tailor your own writing accordingly.

Scientific Essay Example University

Mcmaster Health Science Essay Example

Cornell Arts And Science Essay Example

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!

Structure of a Science Essay

Science essays are a crucial part of many subjects, and learning to structure them effectively is essential for achieving academic success.

Letâs explore scientific essay structure.

Introduction

The introduction of a science essay should introduce the topic and provide some context for the reader.

You should explain the purpose of the essay and provide a thesis statement that outlines the main argument you will make in the essay. A good introduction should also capture the reader's interest and motivate them to read on.

Check out these how to start a science essay examples for better understanding:

Body Paragraphs

The body paragraphs of a science essay should provide evidence to support the thesis statement. You should use scientific evidence, research, and data to support your argument.

Each paragraph should focus on one key point, and the points should be organized logically to create a coherent argument. It is essential to provide citations for all sources you use in your essay.

Here is an example for you:

The conclusion of a science essay should summarize the main points of the essay and restate the thesis statement in a compelling manner.

You should also provide some final thoughts or recommendations based on the evidence presented in the essay.

The conclusion should be concise and leave a lasting impression on the reader.

Natural Science Essay Topics

There are countless interesting, thought-provoking and problem solving essay topics in science.

Explore some compelling natural science essay topics to inspire your writing.

Science Essay Topics for 5th Graders

The importance of recycling for our environment
The different types of clouds and how they form
How animals hibernate during the winter months
The different types of rocks and how they are formed
The role of bees in pollination and food production
How light travels and how we see objects
The properties of magnets and how they work
The different stages of stem cell research
The human digestive system and how it works
The effects of pollution on our environment and health

Science Essay Topics for 6th Graders

The impact of climate change on the planet
The different types of energy and how they are produced
The importance of water conservation and management
The role of artificial intelligence in human life
The structure and function of the human respiratory system
The properties and uses of acids and bases
The effect of light on plant growth and development
The differences between renewable and non-renewable energy sources
The process of photosynthesis and its importance for life on Earth
The impact of technology on the environment and society

Science Essay Topics for 7th Graders

The structure and function of the human circulatory system
The different types of fossils and how they are formed
The impact of natural disasters on the environment and human life
The pros and cons of bacteria in our bodies and in the environment
The physics of sound and how it travels
The effects of air pollution in United States
The properties and uses of different types of waves (sound, light, etc.)
The process of cell division and its role in growth and repair
The structure and function of the human nervous system
The different types of ecosystems and their unique characteristics

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

Tips for Writing a Science Essay

Writing a science essay can be challenging, especially if you don't have much experience in writing academic papers.

However, with the right approach and strategies, you can produce a high-quality science essays.

Here are some tips to help you write a successful science essay:

Understand the assignment requirements: Before you start writing your essay, make sure you understand the assignment requirements. Read the prompt carefully and make note of any specific guidelines or formatting requirements.

Choose a topic that interests you: Writing about a topic that you find interesting and engaging can make the process enjoyable and rewarding. Consider topics that you have studied in class or that you have a personal interest in.

Conduct thorough research: To write a successful science essay, you need to have a deep understanding of the topic you are writing about. Conduct thorough research using reliable sources such as academic journals, textbooks, and reputable websites.

Develop a clear and concise thesis statement: Your thesis statement should clearly state your argument or position on the topic you are writing about. It should be concise and specific, and should be supported by evidence throughout your essay.

Use evidence to support your claims: When writing a science essay, it's important to use evidence to support your claims and arguments. This can include scientific data, research findings, and expert opinions.

Edit and proofread your essay: Before submitting your essay, make sure to edit and proofread it carefully. Check for spelling and grammatical errors. Ensure that your essay is formatted correctly according to the assignment requirements.

In conclusion, this blog has provided a comprehensive guide to writing a successful science essay.

By following the tips, students can produce high-quality essays that showcase their understanding of science.

If you're struggling to write a science essay or need additional assistance, CollegeEssay.org is one of the best online essay services to help you out,

Our expert writers have extensive experience in writing science essays for students of all levels.

So why wait? Contact our science essay writing service today!

Frequently Asked Questions

What are some common mistakes to avoid when writing a science essay.

Some common mistakes to avoid include:

Plagiarizing content
Using incorrect or unreliable sources
Failing to clearly state your thesis
Using overly complex language

How can I make my science essay stand out?

To make your science essay stand out, consider choosing a unique or controversial topic. Using relevant and up-to-date sources, and present your information in a clear and concise manner. You can also consider using visuals such as graphs or charts to enhance your essay.

What should I do if I'm struggling to come up with a topic for my science essay?

If you're struggling to come up with a topic for your science essay, consider discussing potential topics with your instructor or classmates. You can also conduct research online or in academic journals to find inspiration.

How important is research when writing a science essay?

Research is an essential component of writing a science essay. Your essay should be grounded in accurate and reliable scientific information. That is why it's important to conduct thorough research using reputable sources.

Can I use personal anecdotes or experiences in my science essay?

While personal anecdotes or experiences can be engaging, they may not always be relevant to a science essay. It's important to focus on presenting factual information and scientific evidence to support your argument or position.

Caleb S. (Law, Literature)

Caleb S. has extensive experience in writing and holds a Masters from Oxford University. He takes great satisfaction in helping students exceed their academic goals. Caleb always puts the needs of his clients first and is dedicated to providing quality service.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Legal & Policies

Privacy Policy
Cookies Policy
Terms of Use
Refunds & Cancellations
Our Writers
Success Stories
Our Guarantees
Affiliate Program
Referral Program
AI Essay Writer

Disclaimer: All client orders are completed by our team of highly qualified human writers. The essays and papers provided by us are not to be used for submission but rather as learning models only.

25,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today

Meet top uk universities from the comfort of your home, here’s your new year gift, one app for all your, study abroad needs, start your journey, track your progress, grow with the community and so much more.

Verification Code

An OTP has been sent to your registered mobile no. Please verify

Thanks for your comment !

Our team will review it before it's shown to our readers.

School Education /

Essay on Science: Sample for Students in 100,200 Words

Updated on
Oct 28, 2023

Science, the relentless pursuit of knowledge and understanding, has ignited the flames of human progress for centuries. It’s a beacon guiding us through the uncharted realms of the universe, unlocking secrets that shape our world. In this blog, we embark on an exhilarating journey through the wonders of science. We’ll explore the essence of science and its profound impact on our lives. With this we will also provide you with sample essay on science in 100 and 200 words.

Must Read: Essay On Internet

What Is Science?

Science is a systematic pursuit of knowledge about the natural world through observation, experimentation, and analysis. It aims to understand the underlying principles governing the universe, from the smallest particles to the vast cosmos. Science plays a crucial role in advancing technology, improving our understanding of life and the environment, and driving innovation for a better future.

Branches Of Science

The major branches of science can be categorized into the following:

Physical Science: This includes physics and chemistry, which study the fundamental properties of matter and energy.
Biological Science : Also known as life sciences, it encompasses biology, genetics, and ecology, focusing on living organisms and their interactions.
Earth Science: Geology, meteorology, and oceanography fall under this category, investigating the Earth’s processes, climate, and natural resources.
Astronomy : The study of celestial objects, space, and the universe, including astrophysics and cosmology.
Environmental Science : Concentrating on environmental issues, it combines aspects of biology, chemistry, and Earth science to address concerns like climate change and conservation.
Social Sciences : This diverse field covers anthropology, psychology, sociology, and economics, examining human behavior, society, and culture.
Computer Science : Focused on algorithms, data structures, and computing technology, it drives advancements in information technology.
Mathematics : A foundational discipline, it underpins all sciences, providing the language and tools for scientific analysis and modeling.

Wonders Of Science

Science has numerous applications that profoundly impact our lives and society: Major applications of science are stated below:

Medicine: Scientific research leads to the development of vaccines, medicines, and medical technologies, improving healthcare and saving lives.
Technology: Science drives technological innovations, from smartphones to space exploration.
Energy: Advances in physics and chemistry enable the development of renewable energy sources, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
Agriculture: Biology and genetics improve crop yields, while chemistry produces fertilizers and pesticides.
Environmental Conservation : Scientific understanding informs efforts to protect ecosystems and combat climate change.
Transportation : Physics and engineering create efficient and sustainable transportation systems.
Communication : Physics and computer science underpin global communication networks.
Space Exploration : Astronomy and physics facilitate space missions, expanding our understanding of the cosmos.

Must Read: Essay On Scientific Discoveries

Sample Essay On Science in 100 words

Science, the bedrock of human progress, unveils the mysteries of our universe through empirical investigation and reason. Its profound impact permeates every facet of modern life. In medicine, it saves countless lives with breakthroughs in treatments and vaccines. Technology, a child of science, empowers communication and innovation. Agriculture evolves with scientific methods, ensuring food security. Environmental science guides conservation efforts, preserving our planet. Space exploration fuels dreams of interstellar travel.

Yet, science requires responsibility, as unchecked advancement can harm nature and society. Ethical dilemmas arise, necessitating careful consideration. Science, a double-edged sword, holds the potential for both salvation and destruction, making it imperative to harness its power wisely for the betterment of humanity.

Sample Essay On Science in 250 words

Science, often regarded as humanity’s greatest intellectual endeavor, plays an indispensable role in shaping our world and advancing our civilization.

At its core, science is a methodical pursuit of knowledge about the natural world. Through systematic observation, experimentation, and analysis, it seeks to uncover the underlying principles that govern our universe. This process has yielded profound insights into the workings of the cosmos, from the subatomic realm to the vastness of space.

One of the most remarkable contributions of science is to the field of medicine. Through relentless research and experimentation, scientists have discovered vaccines, antibiotics, and groundbreaking treatments for diseases that once claimed countless lives.

Furthermore, science has driven technological advancements that have reshaped society. The rapid progress in computing, for instance, has revolutionized communication, industry, and research. From the ubiquitous smartphones in our pockets to the complex algorithms that power our digital lives, science, and technology are inseparable partners in progress.

Environmental conservation is another critical arena where science is a guiding light. Climate change, a global challenge, is addressed through rigorous scientific study and the development of sustainable practices. Science empowers us to understand the impact of human activities on our planet and to make informed decisions to protect it.

In conclusion, science is not just a field of study; it is a driving force behind human progress. As we continue to explore the frontiers of knowledge, science will remain the beacon guiding us toward a brighter future.

Science is a boon due to innovations, medical advancements, and a deeper understanding of nature, improving human lives exponentially.

Galileo Galilei is known as the Father of Science.

Science can’t address questions about personal beliefs, emotions, ethics, or matters of subjective experience beyond empirical observation and measurement.

We hope this blog gave you an idea about how to write and present an essay on science that puts forth your opinions. The skill of writing an essay comes in handy when appearing for standardized language tests. Thinking of taking one soon? Leverage Edu provides the best online test prep for the same via Leverage Live . Register today to know more!

Amisha Khushara

With a heart full of passion for writing, I pour my emotions into every piece I create. I strive to connect with readers on a personal level, infusing my work with authenticity and relatability. Writing isn't just a skill; it's my heartfelt expression to touch hearts and minds.

Connect With Us

25,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today.

Resend OTP in

Need help with?

Study abroad.

UK, Canada, US & More

IELTS, GRE, GMAT & More

Scholarship, Loans & Forex

Country Preference

New Zealand

Which English test are you planning to take?

Which academic test are you planning to take.

Not Sure yet

When are you planning to take the exam?

Already booked my exam slot

Within 2 Months

Want to learn about the test

Which Degree do you wish to pursue?

When do you want to start studying abroad.

January 2024

September 2024

What is your budget to study abroad?

How would you describe this article ?

Please rate this article

We would like to hear more.

Have something on your mind?

Make your study abroad dream a reality in January 2022 with

India's Biggest Virtual University Fair

Essex Direct Admission Day

Why attend .

Don't Miss Out

Essay on Science for Students and Children

500+ words essay on science.

Essay on science: As we look back in our ancient times we see so much development in the world. The world is full of gadgets and machinery . Machinery does everything in our surroundings. How did it get possible? How did we become so modern? It was all possible with the help of science. Science has played a major role in the development of our society. Furthermore, Science has made our lives easier and carefree.

Science in our Daily Lives

As I have mentioned earlier Science has got many changes in our lives. First of all, transportation is easier now. With the help of Science it now easier to travel long distances . Moreover, the time of traveling is also reduced. Various high-speed vehicles are available these days. These vehicles have totally changed. The phase of our society. Science upgraded steam engines to electric engines. In earlier times people were traveling with cycles. But now everybody travels on motorcycles and cars. This saves time and effort. And this is all possible with the help of Science.

Secondly, Science made us reach to the moon. But we never stopped there. It also gave us a glance at Mars. This is one of the greatest achievements. This was only possible with Science. These days Scientists make many satellites . Because of which we are using high-speed Internet. These satellites revolve around the earth every day and night. Even without making us aware of it. Science is the backbone of our society. Science gave us so much in our present time. Due to this, the teacher in our schools teaches Science from an early age.

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

Science as a Subject

In class 1 only a student has Science as a subject. This only tells us about the importance of Science. Science taught us about Our Solar System. The Solar System consists of 9 planets and the Sun. Most Noteworthy was that it also tells us about the origin of our planet. Above all, we cannot deny that Science helps us in shaping our future. But not only it tells us about our future, but it also tells us about our past.

When the student reaches class 6, Science gets divided into three more subcategories. These subcategories were Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. First of all, Physics taught us about the machines. Physics is an interesting subject. It is a logical subject.

Furthermore, the second subject was Chemistry . Chemistry is a subject that deals with an element found inside the earth. Even more, it helps in making various products. Products like medicine and cosmetics etc. result in human benefits.

Last but not least, the subject of Biology . Biology is a subject that teaches us about our Human body. It tells us about its various parts. Furthermore, it even teaches the students about cells. Cells are present in human blood. Science is so advanced that it did let us know even that.

Leading Scientists in the field of Science

Finally, many scientists like Thomas Edison , Sir Isaac Newton were born in this world. They have done great Inventions. Thomas Edison invented the light bulb. If he did not invent that we would stay in dark. Because of this Thomas Edison’s name marks in history.

Another famous Scientist was Sir Isaac Newton . Sir Isaac Newton told us about Gravity. With the help of this, we were able to discover many other theories.

In India Scientists A..P.J Abdul was there. He contributed much towards our space research and defense forces. He made many advanced missiles. These Scientists did great work and we will always remember them.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

Travelling Essay
Picnic Essay
Our Country Essay
My Parents Essay
Essay on Favourite Personality
Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
Essay on Knowledge is Power
Essay on Gurpurab
Essay on My Favourite Season
Essay on Types of Sports

Download the App

Cookies: We use our own and third-party cookies to improve your experience of our website. Cookies remember your preferences and track site usage. By continuing, you accept their use.

Typewriter. Ring-binder. Scrapbook. Everything you need to craft your first draft.

Get your thoughts onto the page and explore the connections between them.

Join the conversation. Ask a question or just get to know your fellow users.

What we’re working on, interviews with users, and general prolixity.

Write Now with Scrivener, Episode no. 37: Debbie Urbanski, Science Fiction Author

Kirk McElhearn / 3 APR 2024

After many years writing short stories and essays, Debbie Urbanski has published her first novel, After World, about AI at the end of humanity's physical presence on Earth.

Show notes :

Debbie Urbanski
After World
Alan Weisman, The World Without Us
M.R. Caray, The Girl With All the Gifts
Marlen Haushofer, The Wall
How Daydreaming Can Enhance Creativity for Fiction Writers
"The first Scrivener file containing 4 years of work on my novel"
Use Dialogue Focus and Linguistic Focus to Revise and Edit Your Writing in Scrivener
Dawn King, The Trials

Learn more about Scrivener , and check out the ebook Take Control of Scrivener .

If you like the podcast, please follow it in Apple Podcasts or your favorite podcast app. Leave a rating or review, and tell your friends. And check out past episodes of Write Now with Scrivener .

After many years writing short stories and essays, Debbie Urbanski has published her first novel, After World, about AI at the end of humanity's physical presence on Earth.

The description of After World sounds chilling: "Faced with uncontrolled and accelerating environmental collapse, humanity asks an artificial intelligence to find a solution. Its answer is simple: remove humans from the ecosystem." But it is more than just a post-apocalyptic novel; it is "the story of an Artificial Intelligence tasked with writing a novel—only for it to fall in love with the novel’s subject, Sen, the last human on Earth."

While this is clearly a post-apocalyptic novel, mostly about AI, parts of it feel like nature writing. Debbie explained, "I spent a lot of time on the nature descriptions, I am surrounded by guidebooks about birds and trees and plants. I was really interested in the idea that if humans go away, that the world would be okay. There'd be a lot of other losses, but especially from an AI perspective, it might be that the easiest way to save the planet is having our physical bodies removed."

Often when people talk about "saving the planet," they really mean saving humanity. But, said Debbie, "the end of the world often means the end of us. So some people say my novel's about the end of the world, but it's really not. It's about the end of humanity's physical presence on Earth."

This sort of subject for a novel can be bleak, but Debbie pointed out that "I always point that I do find it hopeful that the world is still around. I don't think humans are necessarily exceptional, or more important than other species. So there is the idea in the book that we're one species, and we could save millions of species. I don't think we should disappear, but I do think it's an interesting thought experiment to get out of our heads and value other parts of the world."

AI is the main theme of the book, and Debbie didn't just jump on the AI bandwagon when the world heard about GPT and other tools. Back in 2019, when she had written a first draft, "My first agent thought my book was too fragmented, and thought there needed to be a cohesive narrator. We were brainstorming, all humans are gone; who could tell our story? AI was floating around, I don't think anyone who wasn't involved in tech thought it would be happening so quickly."

Since Debbie's novel focuses on AI, I used GPT-4 to come up with some questions for our interview. These questions were quite pertinent. for example, I asked, "The concept of documenting the end of humanity is a poignant one. What do you believe is the importance of storytelling and record keeping in the face of extinction?"

Debbie replied, "That's really what my book is about. The AI Narrator uses that as a way to fall in love or care deeply for Sen, the last human on Earth. So it's a way for the AI narrator to understand humanity by learning to tell a story."

Debbie used Scrivener to write After World , after having worked on short stories for a long time. "I really love Scrivener. And I recommend it to writers whenever I can. I don't think it influences how I write but it kind of captures how I write; it's a perfect fit for how I write. I love it."

Going from a short story collection to a novel was easy. "When I was working on the short story collection, I found it so useful to be able to move stuff around. So that seemed a really natural fit."

Debbie's experience getting from manuscript to publication was complex. She went through multiple agents and multiple editors. "With the novel, because it had been through so many revisions, I kept them all in a project, but I had different folders for each one. So it was really easy for me to compare revisions. And I use the split screen a lot. My novel has braided narratives, so there's different threads going through the novel. And there is a cool feature, I discovered towards the end, called Focus Mode, where you could look at just a line, a sentence, or a paragraph all at once. And that was mind-blowing, I did it sentence by sentence, but it really let me stop and think do I like the words of the sentence?"

Debbie shared a screen capture of her Scrivener project on Instagram , showing how complex it was, and appreciates how "I feel like I keep discovering things about Scrivener."

Kirk McElhearn is a writer , podcaster , and photographer . He is the author of Take Control of Scrivener , and host of the podcast Write Now with Scrivener .

Publishing 101: What Does a Literary Agent Do?

Keep up to date.

The best new science fiction books of April 2024

There’s an abundance of exciting new science fiction out in April, by writers including The Three-Body Problem author Cixin Liu, Douglas Preston and Lionel Shriver

By Alison Flood

1 April 2024

The last remaining free city of the Forever Desert has been besieged for centuries in The Truth of the Aleke

Shutterstock / Liu zishan

There are some huge names with new works out this month: Cixin Liu and Ann Leckie both have collections of shorter writing to peruse, plus there’s a dystopic future from the award-winning Téa Obreht and a world where woolly mammoths have been brought back from the bestselling Douglas Preston. I also love the sound of Scott Alexander Howard’s debut The Other Valley , set in a town where its past and future versions exist in the next valleys over, and of Sofia Samatar’s space adventure The Practice, the Horizon, and the Chain . So much to read, so little time…

A View from the Stars by Cixin Liu

This is a collection of short works from Liu, the sci-fi author of the moment thanks to Netflix’s new adaptation of The Three-Body Problem , ranging from essays and interviews to short fiction. I love this snippet from an essay about sci-fi fans, in which he calls us “mysterious aliens in the crowd”, who “jump like fleas from future to past and back again, and float like clouds of gas between nebulae; in a flash, we can reach the edge of the universe, or tunnel into a quark, or swim within a star-core”. Aren’t we lucky to have such worlds available to us on our shelves?

3 Body Problem review: Cixin Liu's masterpiece arrives on Netflix

Cixin Liu's novel The Three-Body Problem has been turned into an eight-part series for Netflix by the Game of Thrones team. There is much to admire so far, but will the adaptation stay on track, wonders Bethan Ackerley

Lake of Souls by Ann Leckie

Leckie is a must-read writer for me, and this is the first complete collection of her short fiction, ranging across science fiction and fantasy. On the sci-fi side, we will be able to dip back into the Imperial Radch universe, and we are also promised that we’ll “learn the secrets of the mysterious Lake of Souls” in a brand-new novelette.

The Morningside by Téa Obreht

In a catastrophic version of the future, an 11-year-old girl arrives with her mother at The Morningside, once a luxury high-rise, now another crumbling part of Island City, which is half-underwater. Obreht won the Orange Prize for Fiction in 2011 for her debut, The Tiger’s Wife .

The Practice, the Horizon, and the Chain by Sofia Samatar

Samatar won all sorts of prizes for her first novel, A Stranger in Olondria . Her latest sounds really intriguing, following the story of a boy who has grown up condemned to work in the bowels of a mining ship among the stars, whose life changes when he is given the chance to be educated at the ship’s university.

A boy grows up working in a mining ship among the stars in The Practice, the Horizon, and the Chain

D-Keine/Getty Images

Extinction by Douglas Preston

This is set in a valley in the Rockies, where guests at a luxury resort can see woolly mammoths, giant ground sloths and Irish elk brought back from extinction by genetic manipulation. But then a string of killings kicks off, and a pair of investigators must find out what’s really going on. This looks Jurassic Park -esque and seems like lots of fun. And if you want more mammoth-related reading, try my colleague Michael Le Page’s excellent explainer about why they won’t be back any time soon.

Mania by Lionel Shriver

The award-winning author of We Need to Talk About Kevin brings her thoughts about so-called “culture wars” to bear on her fiction, imagining a world where a “Mental Parity Movement” is in the ascendent, and “the worst thing you can call someone is ‘stupid’”.

The Other Valley by Scott Alexander Howard

This speculative novel is set in a town where, to the east, lies the same town but 20 years ahead in time and, to the west, the same town but 20 years behind, repeating endlessly across the wilderness. The only border crossings allowed are for “mourning tours”, in which the dead can be seen in towns where they are still alive. Odile, who is 16, is set for a seat on the Conseil, where she will be able to decree who gets to travel across borders. I love the sound of this.

The best new science fiction books of March 2024

With a new Adrian Tchaikovsky, Mars-set romance from Natasha Pulley and a high-concept thriller from Stuart Turton due to hit shelves, there is plenty of great new science fiction to be reading in March

What If… Loki was Worthy? by Madeleine Roux

Many will question whether the Marvel superhero stories are really science fiction, but I’m leaning into the multiversal aspect here to include this, as it sounds like it could be a bit of fun. It’s the first in a new series that reimagines the origins of some of the biggest heroes: here, Thor died protecting Earth from one of Loki’s pranks and, exiled on our planet, the Norse trickster god is now dealing with the consequences.

The Truth of the Aleke by Moses Ose Utomi

The second book in the Forever Desert series is set 500 years after The Lies of the Ajungo , following a junior peacekeeper in the last remaining free city of the Forever Desert, which has been besieged for centuries. It was actually out in March, but I missed it then, so I’m bringing it to you now as it was tipped as a title to watch this year by our science fiction contributor Sally Adee.

Anomaly by Andrej Nikolaidis, translated by Will Firth

It is New Year’s Eve on the last day of the last year of human existence and various stories are unfolding, from a high-ranking minister with blood on his hands to a nurse keeping a secret. Later, in a cabin in the Alps, a musicologist and her daughter – the last people left on Earth – are trying to understand the catastrophe. According to The Independent , Nikolaidis “makes Samuel Beckett look positively cheery”, but I’m definitely in the mood for that kind of story now and then.

Martin MacInnes: 'Science fiction can be many different things'

The author of In Ascension, the latest pick for the New Scientist Book Club, on why he wrote his novel, cultivating a sense of wonder and the role of fiction in the world today

Mal Goes to War by Edward Ashton

In this techno-thriller, Mal is a free AI who is uninterested in the conflict going on between the humans, until he finds himself trapped in the body of a cyborg mercenary and becomes responsible for the safety of the girl she died protecting.

science fiction /

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox! We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

More from New Scientist

Explore the latest news, articles and features

In Frank Herbert’s Dune, fungi are hidden in plain sight

Subscriber-only

Is the woolly mammoth really on the brink of being resurrected?

Proposals Sought for an Edited Collection of "Conservative" Writing

Call for Chapter Proposals for an Edited Collection

No Lost Causes: An Anthology of Conservative Writing on Art, Society, and Culture

Since the middle of the twentieth century, cultural criticism in the West has been dominated by post-structuralist assumptions about truth, meaning, universal values, etc. Long before then, however, it was understood that art had a higher purpose, that artists sought to inculcate certain values in their audience, whether moral, ethical, or religious. Theorists from Aristotle to Matthew Arnold took it for granted that works of art, in short, do not exist merely for their own sake, but to teach us something about the human experience. Through the work of Paul Elmore More, Irving Babbitt, T. S. Eliot, and the Southern Agrarians, among others, the lingering influence of this view endured into the twentieth century.

I invite proposals for an edited collection of essays that seek to continue these efforts in the twenty-first. Our goal is to articulate and defend conservative approaches to art, society, and culture, like those favored by the individuals named above. Essays are welcome on a wide range of topics, including conservatism in or and any of the following:

Ancient Greece or Rome

Medieval or early modern art

The Romantic or Victorian eras

Critical evaluations of post-structuralism and its off-shoots (e.g., Marxism, gender theory)

Specific authors or literary theorists

Christianity

Popular culture

I am also interested in analyses of individual books, movies, and other forms of art that reflect a conservate sensibility. Regardless of topic, the focus of your essay should be aesthetic, rather than political.

Queries and proposals are welcome from recent graduates, independent scholars, and established academics alike. If interested, please send an abstract of 100 - 200 words and a CV to [email protected] by 15 July 2024. I expect to make a decision on submitted proposals by the end of summer. Initial drafts of 5000 - 8000 words, in Turabian / Chicago, would be due by 31 January 2025.

About the editor: Camilo Peralta, PhD, is an Associate Professor of English at Joliet Junior College who has published widely on religion, fantasy, and science fiction. His first scholarly monograph, The Wizard of Mecosta: Russell Kirk, Gothic Fiction, and the Moral Imagination , is available now from Vernon Press: https://vernonpress.com/book/1933

Share full article

Supported by

Student ‘How To’ Contest Winner

How to Make Fear Your Friend

A winning essay by Zoe Brown, age 14.

A snowboarder is in midair, a curved mountain behind.

By The Learning Network

This essay, by Zoe Brown, 14, of Bend, Ore., is one of the Top 11 winners of The Learning Network’s new “How To” Informational Writing Contest for Teenagers .

We are publishing the work of all the winners over the next several days, and you can find them here as they post.

“The best part about fear is that it’s the only emotion that will bring out your true potential,” says Matthias Giraud, a big mountain skier and BASE jumper. His “ethos” highlights the shift in perspective that occurs when one refuses to let fear dictate one’s limits.

Giraud, otherwise known as Super Frenchie, is an extreme athlete who skis off mountains, such as the Matterhorn for fun. Not only is he an expert at leaping off mountain peaks in the Alps Trilogy — the Matterhorn, Eiger, and Mont Blanc — he’s also an expert on harnessing fear.

“I try to breathe in fear,” explains Giraud, 40, who talked to me from his home in Bend, Oregon. Giraud, originally from Evreux, France, spent his childhood at a ski academy. Now he regularly attempts death-defying feats that seem to require fearlessness but actually he uses fear to his advantage. “You have to listen to your fear, not overcome it,” says Giraud.

Fear is not a bad emotion, says Giraud. Rather than ignoring one’s instincts, a systematic analysis of your environment and the factors involved will help you move into a better place. “It’s not about talking yourself into doing what you’re afraid to do,’‘ says Giraud. It’s about understanding personal limits and accepting the risks.

Once you understand that fear is a result of uncertainty, you can embrace it as a tool, according to Giraud. The action is less “fearful” if you assess the unknown variables and make an informed decision to accept specific risks. For example, on numerous occasions, Giraud has spent a lot of time, money, and effort in planning ambitious expeditions but turned around due to unacceptable risks such as bad weather.

When you shift your paradigm to understand fear is an advantage instead of an obstacle, “fear will unleash super powers,” says Giraud. It can change how you see the world. His philosophy allows one the freedom to set ambitious goals and give opportunities to move out of one’s comfort zone.

“Once you push through your fear enough you are able to reach a place of serenity where your experience and confidence in yourself is high enough that you reach a ‘quiet’ in your mind,” says Giraud. “Breathing becomes easy and you have achieved serenity.”

IMAGES

A Guide to Writing Scientific Essays
The Importance of Literature Review in Scientific Research Writing by
Science Essay
Scientific Literature Essay
Example of a Literature Review for a Research Paper by
Scientific Literature Essay

VIDEO

Thus Saith the Science: C. S. Lewis on the Dangers of Scientism
10 Lines on Science and Technology || Essay on Science and Technology in English
American Literature and History: an Analysis of 12 Selected Works
writing a essay for science in school
What is Essay in literature #english #youtube #youtubeshorts #study #literature #youtuber #exam
Literacy

COMMENTS

Literature and Science
Summary. Though "literature and science" has denoted many distinct cultural debates and critical practices, the historicist investigation of literary-scientific relations is of particular interest because of its ambivalence toward theorization. Some accounts have suggested that the work of Bruno Latour supplies a necessary theoretical ...
Journal of Literature and Science
The Journal of Literature and Science is a peer-reviewed academic journal, published twice annually in Summer and Winter.. The Journal is managed by, supported and published by the ScienceHumanities Initiative at Cardiff University. The JLS was founded in 2007, and produced its first issue at the beginning of 2008. It was originally hosted by the University of Glamorgan's Research Centre for ...
Science and literature: the importance of differences
Abstract. The long history of the relations between science and literature reveals a constant pattern of hostility. This paper argues that there has rarely been a genuine 'conversation' and that attempts to reconcile the fields have largely been unsuccessful. The effort to assimilate science to literature is understandable and in certain ...
Introduction: Connectivities Between Literature and Science in the
Twenty-first-century writing in the field of literature and science obviously stands in a long tradition of writers and scholars that "have reflected on, reimagined, and challenged the sciences for over two millennia" (Sielke 2015, 12), and the topic of science and/in fiction shows no signs of decline as the third millennium progresses ...
Literature and Science
Literature and Science, published in September 1963, was Aldous Huxley's last book - he died two months after it was published. In it, he strives to harmonize the scientific and artistic realms. He argues that language is what divides the two realms and makes communication between them difficult. He analyzes the ways in which scientists and ...
PDF The Relationship between Literature and Science in the Nineteenth Century
critics examine the inﬂuence of science on literature and vice versa in the nine-teenth century. What they ﬁnd is that the literature of the time responded to particular scientiﬁc discoveries and - even stronger - to "great conceptual move-ments that shift the ways in which we apprehend the very nature of reality"18.
Literature and Science: Introduction
Ecology and Life Writing. Heidelberg: Winter. 3-25. Search in Google Scholar. Published Online: 2015-3-9. Published in Print: 2015-3-1. 팺 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston. Article Literature and Science: Introduction was published on March 1, 2015 in the journal Anglia (volume 133, issue 1).
One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature
One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature. G. Levine, Alan Rauch. Published 15 December 1987. Philosophy, History. In this volume, the first in the series Science and Literature, editor George Levin has brought together the contributions of historians, critics, and philosophers of science to explore these relationships.
One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature
Books. One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature. George Lewis Levine, Alan Rauch. Univ of Wisconsin Press, 1987 - Literary Collections - 359 pages. In this volume, the first in the series Science and Literature, editor George Levin has brought together the contributions of historians, critics, and philosophers of science to explore these ...
Literature and Science
Essays exploring the complex relationship between literature and science. Aa Reduce text; Aa Enlarge text; Refine List. Classifications. ... Select 8 - 'The Luxury Of Storytelling': Science, Literature And Cultural Contest In Ian Mcewan's Narrative Practice. 8 - 'The Luxury Of Storytelling': Science, Literature And Cultural Contest In ...
Science and Modern Literature Fiction
Matthew Arnold's essay, "Literature and Science," was delivered first as a Rede Lecture, seventy-seven years before C. P. Snow would avail himself of that Cambridge platform to propound his views ...
Science and Literature Essay
Science and Literature Essay. Better Essays. 1496 Words. 6 Pages. 2 Works Cited. Open Document. Science and Literature. Science can be an inspiration for literature. Normally we think of science as one kind of human investigation and literature as another, and that the two do not have anything in common, yet in science fiction we have the ...
Literature and Science (Essays and Studies #61)
Essays exploring the complex relationship between literature and science. In 1959 C. P. Snow memorably described the gulf of mutual incomprehension' which existed between literary intellectuals' and scientists, referring to them as two cultures'. This volume looks at the extent to which this has changed. Ranging from the middle ages to twentieth-century science fiction and literary theory, and ...
Literature And Science
Puchner argues that literature and science are both essential to our understanding of the world, and that we need to find a way to bring them back together. 'The Man Who Mistook his Wife for a Hat' is a book that the neuroscientist, Oliver Sacks collects the cases he has contacted into it. The title is one of the cases.
Literature and Science (1882)
Literature and Science 1 The Nineteenth Century August 1882 Matthew Arnold [216] No wisdom, nor counsel, nor understanding, against the Eternal says the Wise Man. Against the natural and appointed course of things there is no contending. Ten years ago I remarked on the gloomy prospect for letters in this country, inasmuch as while the aristocratic class, according to a famous dictum of Lord ...
The Science Essay
The science essay uses science to think about the human condition; it uses humanistic thinking to reflect on the possibilities and limits of science and technology. In this class we read and practice writing science essays of varied lengths and purposes. We will read a wide variety of science essays, ranging across disciplines, both to learn more about this genre and to inspire your own writing.
Literature and Technology
This collection of essays uses recent work on literature and science to establish new ways of relating literature and language theory to writings about technology (as distinguished from science). The interdisciplinary character of these essays is further enriched by drawing upon contemporary studies of the philosophy and history of technology ...
Essays About Science: Top 12 Examples And Prompts
3. Reflections from a Nobel winner: Scientists need time to make discoveries by Donna Strickland. "We must give scientists the opportunity through funding and time to pursue curiosity-based, long-term, basic-science research. Work that does not have direct ramifications for industry or our economy is also worthy.
How to Write a Science Essay
Continue reading to find some tips to help you write a successful science essay. Science Essay Writing Tips. Once you have chosen a topic and looked at examples, it's time to start writing the science essay. Here are some key tips for a successful essay: Research thoroughly; Make sure you do extensive research before you begin writing your paper.
Ultimate Guide to Writing Your College Essay
Sample College Essay 2 with Feedback. This content is licensed by Khan Academy and is available for free at www.khanacademy.org. College essays are an important part of your college application and give you the chance to show colleges and universities your personality. This guide will give you tips on how to write an effective college essay.
Top 15 Science Essay Examples for Students
Tips for Writing a Science Essay. Writing a science essay can be challenging, especially if you don't have much experience in writing academic papers. However, with the right approach and strategies, you can produce a high-quality science essays. Here are some tips to help you write a successful science essay:
Essay on Science: Sample for Students in 100,200 Words
Sample Essay On Science in 100 words. Science, the bedrock of human progress, unveils the mysteries of our universe through empirical investigation and reason. Its profound impact permeates every facet of modern life. In medicine, it saves countless lives with breakthroughs in treatments and vaccines. Technology, a child of science, empowers ...
cfp
- the relationship between space/time and literature and the arts in various cultural and historical periods;- the relationship between science and literature: time machine and time travel tropes;- unshackling time-honoured dichotomies: the literary discourse/narrative as temporal vs. the visual narrative as spatial;
Essay on Literature and Science
Literature and Science: In ancient times, the education of the people of a country consisted of the study of language. Thus in ancient India, an educated man was a man of Sanskrit learning. Education is almost every country of Europe, in earlier times means nothing but the study of Greek and Latin. The beauty of natural scenery, our admiration ...
Essay on Science for Students and Children
Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas. Science as a Subject. In class 1 only a student has Science as a subject. This only tells us about the importance of Science. Science taught us about Our Solar System. The Solar System consists of 9 planets and the Sun. Most Noteworthy was that it also tells us about the origin of our ...
Write Now with Scrivener, Episode no. 37: Debbie Urbanski, Science
After many years writing short stories and essays, Debbie Urbanski has published her first novel, After World, about AI at the end of humanity's physical presence on Earth. The description of After World sounds chilling: "Faced with uncontrolled and accelerating environmental collapse, humanity asks an artificial intelligence to find a solution ...
cfp
Call for Papers: Regular Issue July 2024. International Review of Literary Studies Deadline: May 30, 2024. The International Review of Literary Studies (IRLS) invites scholars and researchers to submit their original contributions for publication in our peer-reviewed open-access journal with no submission/publication fee. IRLS is dedicated to advancing the literary studies field by publishing ...
The best new science fiction books of April 2024
3 Body Problem review: Cixin Liu's masterpiece arrives on Netflix Cixin Liu's novel The Three-Body Problem has been turned into an eight-part series for Netflix by the Game of Thrones team.
cfp
Call for Chapter Proposals for an Edited Collection. No Lost Causes: An Anthology of Conservative Writing on Art, Society, and Culture. Since the middle of the twentieth century, cultural criticism in the West has been dominated by post-structuralist assumptions about truth, meaning, universal values, etc. Long before then, however, it was understood that art had a higher purpose, that artists ...
How to Make Fear Your Friend
A winning essay by Zoe Brown, age 14. This essay, by Zoe Brown, 14, of Bend, Ore., is one of the Top 11 winners of The Learning Network's new "How To" Informational Writing Contest for ...

Article contents

Early Practices, 1926–1978

The Conceptual Resources of History and Philosophy of Science

Reading Science

The Social Dimension

Weighing the Importance of Latour

Discussion of the Literature

Further Reading

Related Articles

About the JLS

Introduction: Connectivities Between Literature and Science in the Twenty-First Century

Cite this chapter

Similar content being viewed by others

Heidegger and Modern Science: Responding to Ontological Communication in the Anthropocene Epoch

Mapping Hubris: Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle and Odysseus’ Apologoi

Introduction

Change history

Works Cited

Author information

Editor information

Copyright information

About this chapter

Download citation

Share this chapter

Literature and Science: Introduction

Supplementary Materials

Literature and Science (Essays and Studies #61)

Other Books in Series

Translating Literature (Essays and Studies #50)

The Gothic (Essays and Studies #54)

The Waste Land After One Hundred Years (Essays and Studies #75)

Writing China: Essays on the Amherst Embassy (1816) and Sino-British Cultural Relations (Essays and Studies #69)

English: Shared Futures (Essays and Studies #71)

Textual Distortion (Essays and Studies #70)

Literature and Ageing (Essays and Studies #73)

The Literature and Politics of the Environment (Essays and Studies #76)

The Literature of Hell (Essays and Studies #74)

Romanticism and Gender (Essays and Studies #51)

War and Literature (Essays and Studies #67)

Slow Scholarship: Medieval Research and the Neoliberal University (Essays and Studies #72)

Victorian Women Poets (Essays and Studies #56)

Contemporary British Women Writers (Essays and Studies #57)

Slavery and the Cultures of Abolition: Essays Marking the Bicentennial of the British Abolition Act of 1807 (Essays and Studies #60)

Postcolonial Theory and Criticism (Essays and Studies #52)

Percy Bysshe Shelley: Bicentenary Essays Essays and Studies 1992

Feminist Linguistics in Literary Criticism (Essays and Studies #47)

The Endings of Epochs (Essays and Studies #48)

Authors at Work: The Creative Environment (Essays and Studies #62)

Sophie Calle: True Stories: 66 Short Stories: New Edition

Science Fiktion (The Seagull Library of German Literature)

Out of the Cave: A Natural Philosophy of Mind and Knowing

Art of Touch: A Collection of Prose and Poetry from the Pandemic and Beyond

Cognitive Pluralism

Making Space: A Collection of Writing and Art

The Richter Interviews

Against Nature (Untimely Meditations #17)

Political Fictions (The French List)

"The Girl in the Window" and Other True Tales: An Anthology with Tips for Finding, Reporting, and Writing Nonfiction Narratives

How to Know a Person: The Art of Seeing Others Deeply and Being Deeply Seen

On Gaslighting (Insights: Philosophy in Focus)

In Pursuit of Revolutionary Love: Precarity, Power, Communities

Object-Oriented Philosophy: The Noumenon's New Clothes (Urbanomic / Mono #1)

On Disinformation: How to Fight for Truth and Protect Democracy

Life, Death, and Other Inconvenient Truths: A Realist's View of the Human Condition

Style: A Queer Cosmology (Postmillennial Pop #37)

The Conscious Mind (The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series)

Autobiographical Comics: Life Writing in Pictures

Quietly Hostile: Essays

How to Start Writing (and When to Stop): Advice for Writers

Pregnancy Test (Object Lessons)

What Makes an Apple?: Six Conversations about Writing, Love, Guilt, and Other Pleasures

Joanna Russ (Modern Masters of Science Fiction)

The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics

"Simply a Particular Contemporary": Interviews, 1970–79: Interviews, 1970–79 (The French List)

Irrationality: A History of the Dark Side of Reason

The Palliative Society: Pain Today

Literature and Science 1

Browse Course Material

Departments

As Taught In

4. The fact of cloning by Cesar Hill