- Society and Politics
- Art and Culture
- Biographies
- Publications
History Grade 11 - Topic 2 Essay Questions
Essay Question:
To what extent did Rooseveltâs New Deal succeed in mitigating the negative effects of the Great Depression in USA in the 1930âs? Present an argument in support of your answer using relevant historical evidence. [1]
Introduction:
On 29 October 1929 (also known as âBlack Tuesdayâ), the United States (US) stock market crashed which initiated the Great Depression. [2] Â After winning the US elections and taking office in 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt sought to bring economic relief to the US during the 1930âs by implementing a series of reforms and restructures in what he called the âNew Dealâ. [3] Â Although the âNew Dealâ succeeded somewhat in relieving economic situations on a macro-level, the âNew Dealâ, in the long run, is considered a failure as it did not ultimately succeed in what it was set out to do, which was to recover the economy from its âdepressed stateâ. [4] Â This statement will be discussed by analyzing the two phases of the âNew Dealâ, as well as discussing the effects of some of the relief, recovery and reform programs implemented.
The First Hundred Days
When analyzing the legacy of the âNew Dealâ, it is important to understand that there were two phases of the deal, namely the âFirst New Dealâ and the âSecond New Dealâ. The First New Deal consisted mainly of the first three months of Rooseveltâs presidency and is referred to as the âhundred daysâ. [5]  Within the first hundred days, various relief programs such as the âFederal Emergency Relief Administrationâ (FRA), the âCivilian Conservation Corpsâ and the âAgricultural Adjustment Actâ were implemented in order to create employment opportunities for Americans as well as providing some extent of economic relief for struggling citizens. [6]
Another significant program that was implemented during the hundred days, was the âNational Industrial Recovery Actâ (NIRA). This recovery act allowed working Americans to unionize and in a sense bargain for better working conditions, as well as wages. [7]  Roosevelt felt that a significant part of the recovery process will come from decreasing competition through using set prices, wages and commodities. [8]  Mixed reviews came from the implementation of these recovery acts, as many felt that corporate heads were being disadvantaged by the state, and in some instance some corporations felt as though their competition became the US government itself. [9]  However, on the larger part, many felt that the hundred days and the âFirst New Dealâ was relatively successful as it was marked by a decrease in unemployment and the stabilization of US banks.
The Second New Deal
In 1935, Roosevelt decided that the New Deal should take a more aggressive approach in the attempt to diminish the Great Depression. [10]  This phase is known as the Second New Deal. One of the more prominent acts implemented was the âSocial Securityâ Act which provided the elderly and widowed people with some financial support, allowed some unemployment and disability compensation and set a framework or minimum wages and maximum work hours. [11]  Furthermore, the âWorks Progress Administrationâ (WPA) was implemented to provide the unemployed with opportunities in the public sector. These opportunities included building bridges, schools and roads. [12]  To some extent, the Great Deal built a platform for more financial security and opportunity for the American citizens during the onslaught of the Great Depression with its housing, employment and financial interventions. [13]
Criticism of the New Deal
When analyzing some of the programs and acts implemented by the Great Deal, one also has to mention points of criticism. One of the more popular points of criticism stems from the âinterventionalistâ and anti-competitive nature of the New Deal. [14]  Larger companies and the Supreme Court also felt that some of the reform initiatives were unconstitutional and did not go through the right channels to implement reform acts. [15]  However, with this criticism in mind, the main reason why the New Deal was deemed unsuccessful, is simply because it did not achieve what it set out to do. The American economy and employment rates did not recover enough for the New Deal to have remedied the effects of the Great Depression. Rather, American entrance into the Second World War stimulated more economic growth than the New Deal. [16]
Therefore, one could say that the New Deal mitigated the effects of the Great Depression to an extent where it improved the employment rate from 25% of 1933 to 17% in 1939. [17] Â One could also say that some of the relief and reform acts were deemed successful as some of them, such as the Social Security Act, still remains today. [18] Â The New Deal also led to a, albeit short-lived, coalition between âwhite working people, African Americans and left-wing intellectualsâ. [19] Â Many also argue that the New Deal built a surface for the future economy of America post-World War Two. [20] Â However, with regards to the mitigation of the Great Depression itself, the New Deal ultimately did not succeed in ending the Great Depression and its effects.
This content was originally produced for the SAHO classroom by Sebastian Moronell, Ayabulela Ntwakumba, Simone van der Colff & Thandile Xesi.
[1] National Senior Certificate.: âGrade 11 November 2017 History Paper 1 Exam,â National Senior Certificate, November 2017.
[2] M, Johnston.: âThe Economic Effects of the New Deal,â Investopedia [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/011116/economic-effects-new-deal.asp ).
[3] History. Editors of History.: âNew Deal,â History [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/new-deal ).
[4] Johnston, M.: âThe Economic Effects of the New Deal,â Investopedia [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/011116/economic-effects-new-deal.asp ).
[5] Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia.: âNew Deal,â Encyclopedia Britannica [online]. Accessed on 20 March 2021 ( https://www.britannica.com/event/New-Deal ).
[6] Fiorillo, S.: âWhat were the New Deal Programs and what did they do?â The Street [online]. Accessed on 24 March 2021 ( https://www.thestreet.com/politics/new-deal-programs-14861940 ).
[7] History. Editors of History.: âNew Deal,â History [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/new-deal ).
[8] Fiorillo, S.: âWhat were the New Deal Programs and what did they do?â The Street [online]. Accessed on 24 March 2021 ( https://www.thestreet.com/politics/new-deal-programs-14861940 ).
[9] J. Green.: âThe New Deal: crash Course US History #34,â Crash Course [YouTube Online]. Accessed on 23 March 2021 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bMq9Ek6jnA&t=380s ).
[10] History. Editors of History.: âNew Deal,â History [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/new-deal ).
[11] Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia.: âNew Deal,â Encyclopedia Britannica [online]. Accessed on 20 March 2021 ( https://www.britannica.com/event/New-Deal ).
[12] History. Editors of History.: âNew Deal,â History [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/new-deal ).
[13] D.M. Kennedy.: âWhat the New Deal Did,â Political Science Quarterly, (124), (2), 2009, pp. 265-267.
[14] M, Johnston.: âThe Economic Effects of the New Deal,â Investopedia [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/011116/economic-effects-new-deal.asp ).
[15] History. Editors of History.: âNew Deal,â History [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/new-deal ).
[16] History. Editors of History.: âNew Deal,â History [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/new-deal ).
[17] Johnston, M.: âThe Economic Effects of the New Deal,â Investopedia [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/011116/economic-effects-new-deal.asp ).
[18] Fiorillo, S.: âWhat were the New Deal Programs and what did they do?â The Street [online]. Accessed on 24 March 2021 ( https://www.thestreet.com/politics/new-deal-programs-14861940 ).
[19] History. Editors of History.: âNew Deal,â History [online]. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/new-deal ).
[20] D.M. Kennedy.: âWhat the New Deal Did,â Political Science Quarterly, (124), (2), 2009, p. 267.
- Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia.: âNew Deal,â Encyclopedia Britannica [online], January 2021. Accessed on 20 March 2021 ( https://www.britannica.com/event/New-Deal ).
- Fiorillo, S.: âWhat were the New Deal Programs and what did they do?â The Street [online]. Accessed on 24 March 2021 ( https://www.thestreet.com/politics/new-deal-programs-14861940 ).Â
- Green, J.: âThe New Deal: Crash Course US History #34,â Crash Course [online]. Accessed on 24 March 2021 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bMq9Ek6jnA&t=391s ).
- History. Editors of History.: âNew Deal,â History [online], November 2021. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/new-deal ).
- Johnston, M.: âThe Economic Effects of the New Deal,â Investopedia [online], January 2021. Accessed 20 March 2021 ( https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/011116/economic-effects-new-deal.asp ).
- Kennedy, D.M.: âWhat the New Deal Did,â Political Science Quarterly, (124),(2), 2009, pp. 251-268.
Return to topic: Capitalism in the USA 1900 - 1940
Return to SAHO Home
Return to History Classroom
Collections in the Archives
Know something about this topic.
Towards a people's history
- Ancient Rome
- Medieval England
- Stuart England
- World War One
- World War Two
- Modern World History
- Philippines
- History Learning >
- Modern World History >
- America 1918 - 1939 >
- Was the New Deal a Success?
To answer the question, âwas the New Deal a success?â we first have to define âsuccessâ. For Franklin D Roosevelt (FDR) in 1933, success meant working towards relief and recovery.
However, over time the idea of success evolved. By 1936 many hoped that the New Deal could provide solutions to a huge range of social, political and economic problems. With such high expectations, the New Deal was destined to be the subject of both praise and criticism.
FDRâs First Hundred Days were a success in many ways. As Roosevelt said in 1933: âAll we have to fear is fear itself.â
Through his âfireside chatsâ he managed to restore confidence in the banks - a vital element of recovery. Roosevelt took on the role of commander in chief during wartime by working quickly and confidently. On his first night in office he directed Treasurer William Woodin to draft an emergency banking bill. He then halted transactions in gold and proclaimed a national bank holiday. This fast and assertive action was welcomed by the public and proved Rooseveltâs success as a leader.
The New Deal was also effective in offering relief to the poor. Relief schemes, such as the CWA and WPA, provided jobs and support for millions of Americans.
However, the New Deal was less successful in terms of recovery. The figures below show the slow Americaâs slow recovery.
America's Gross National Product 1928 to 1939:
Amount of consumer goods brought 1928 to 1939:, private investment in industry:.
These figures show that FDR was not able to return the American economy to 1929 levels. However, considering the brevity of the depression this would have been virtually impossible anyway. Moreover, the figures do show a marked improvement in the economy in 1939, compared to 1933.
The New Deal is often criticised for not actually ending the Great Depression . Recovery was painfully slow and throughout the decade unemployment remained high.
Number Unemployed in America:
Those who criticise the New Deal claim that it never laid the foundations to end unemployment. Although âAlphabetâ Agencies, such as the Civilian Corps, put many Americans to work, they did not offer a long-term solution. In 1938 unemployment increased again to over 10 million. It only began to fall steeply again in 1939 when the US began to build up its armaments in case of war.
Economists who attacked the New Deal claimed that all the acts introduced by the New Deal were short-term policies and that there was no long term planning for America's future.
But despite its economic weaknesses, the New Deal successfully restored the confidence of the American people. Through the New Deal, Roosevelt changed the role of government forever.
See also: USA 1919
MLA Citation/Reference
"Was the New Deal a Success?". HistoryLearning.com. 2024. Web.
Related Pages
- Quotes from the Nuremberg Trials
- 2012 US Presidential Election Results
- Admiral William Frederick Halsey
- Curtis LeMay
- Chester Nimitz
- General Mark Clark
- Admiral Raymond Spruance
- Dwight Eisenhower
- Douglas MacArthur
- George Patton
- History Classics
- Your Profile
- Find History on Facebook (Opens in a new window)
- Find History on Twitter (Opens in a new window)
- Find History on YouTube (Opens in a new window)
- Find History on Instagram (Opens in a new window)
- Find History on TikTok (Opens in a new window)
- This Day In History
- History Podcasts
- History Vault
By: History.com Editors
Updated: March 28, 2023 | Original: October 29, 2009
The New Deal was a series of programs and projects instituted during the Great Depression by President Franklin D. Roosevelt that aimed to restore prosperity to Americans. When Roosevelt took office in 1933, he acted swiftly to stabilize the economy and provide jobs and relief to those who were suffering. Over the next eight years, the government instituted a series of experimental New Deal projects and programs, such as the CCC , the WPA , the TVA, the SEC and others. Rooseveltâs New Deal fundamentally and permanently changed the U.S. federal government by expanding its size and scopeâespecially its role in the economy.
New Deal for the American People
On March 4, 1933, during the bleakest days of the Great Depression , newly elected President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivered his first inaugural address before 100,000 people on Washingtonâs Capitol Plaza.
âFirst of all,â he said, âlet me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.â
He promised that he would act swiftly to face the âdark realities of the momentâ and assured Americans that he would âwage a war against the emergencyâ just as though âwe were in fact invaded by a foreign foe.â His speech gave many people confidence that theyâd elected a man who was not afraid to take bold steps to solve the nationâs problems.
Did you know? Unemployment levels in some cities reached staggering levels during the Great Depression: By 1933, Toledo, Ohio's had reached 80 percent, and nearly 90 percent of Lowell, Massachusetts, was unemployed.
The next day, Roosevelt declared a four-day bank holiday to stop people from withdrawing their money from shaky banks. On March 9, Congress passed Rooseveltâs Emergency Banking Act, which reorganized the banks and closed the ones that were insolvent.
In his first â fireside chat â three days later, the president urged Americans to put their savings back in the banks, and by the end of the month almost three quarters of them had reopened.
The First Hundred Days
Rooseveltâs quest to end the Great Depression was just beginning, and would ramp up in what came to be known as â The First 100 Days .â Roosevelt kicked things off by asking Congress to take the first step toward ending Prohibition âone of the more divisive issues of the 1920sâby making it legal once again for Americans to buy beer. (At the end of the year, Congress ratified the 21st Amendment and ended Prohibition for good.)
In May, he signed the Tennessee Valley Authority Act into law, creating the TVA and enabling the federal government to build dams along the Tennessee River that controlled flooding and generated inexpensive hydroelectric power for the people in the region.
That same month, Congress passed a bill that paid commodity farmers (farmers who produced things like wheat, dairy products, tobacco and corn) to leave their fields fallow in order to end agricultural surpluses and boost prices.
Juneâs National Industrial Recovery Act guaranteed that workers would have the right to unionize and bargain collectively for higher wages and better working conditions; it also suspended some antitrust laws and established a federally funded Public Works Administration.
In addition to the Agricultural Adjustment Act, the Tennessee Valley Authority Act and the National Industrial Recovery Act, Roosevelt had won passage of 12 other major laws, including the Glass-Steagall Act (an important banking bill) and the Home Ownersâ Loan Act, in his first 100 days in office.
Almost every American found something to be pleased about and something to complain about in this motley collection of bills, but it was clear to all that FDR was taking the âdirect, vigorousâ action that heâd promised in his inaugural address.
Second New Deal
Despite the best efforts of President Roosevelt and his cabinet, however, the Great Depression continued. Unemployment persisted, the economy remained unstable, farmers continued to struggle in the Dust Bowl and people grew angrier and more desperate.
So, in the spring of 1935, Roosevelt launched a second, more aggressive series of federal programs, sometimes called the Second New Deal.
In April, he created the Works Progress Administration (WPA) to provide jobs for unemployed people. WPA projects werenât allowed to compete with private industry, so they focused on building things like post offices, bridges, schools, highways and parks. The WPA also gave work to artists, writers, theater directors and musicians.
In July 1935, the National Labor Relations Act , also known as the Wagner Act, created the National Labor Relations Board to supervise union elections and prevent businesses from treating their workers unfairly. In August, FDR signed the Social Security Act of 1935, which guaranteed pensions to millions of Americans, set up a system of unemployment insurance and stipulated that the federal government would help care for dependent children and the disabled.
In 1936, while campaigning for a second term, FDR told a roaring crowd at Madison Square Garden that âThe forces of âorganized moneyâ are unanimous in their hate for meâand I welcome their hatred.â
He went on: âI should like to have it said of my first Administration that in it the forces of selfishness and of lust for power met their match, [and] I should like to have it said of my second Administration that in it these forces have met their master.â
This FDR had come a long way from his earlier repudiation of class-based politics and was promising a much more aggressive fight against the people who were profiting from the Depression-era troubles of ordinary Americans. He won the election by a landslide.
Still, the Great Depression dragged on. Workers grew more militant: In December 1936, for example, the United Auto Workers strike at a GM plant in Flint, Michigan lasted for 44 days and spread to some 150,000 autoworkers in 35 cities.
By 1937, to the dismay of most corporate leaders, some 8 million workers had joined unions and were loudly demanding their rights.
The End of the New Deal?
Meanwhile, the New Deal itself confronted one political setback after another. Arguing that they represented an unconstitutional extension of federal authority, the conservative majority on the Supreme Court had already invalidated reform initiatives like the National Recovery Administration and the Agricultural Adjustment Administration.
In order to protect his programs from further meddling, in 1937 President Roosevelt announced a plan to add enough liberal justices to the Court to neutralize the âobstructionistâ conservatives.
This â Court-packing â turned out to be unnecessaryâsoon after they caught wind of the plan, the conservative justices started voting to uphold New Deal projectsâbut the episode did a good deal of public-relations damage to the administration and gave ammunition to many of the presidentâs Congressional opponents.
That same year, the economy slipped back into a recession when the government reduced its stimulus spending. Despite this seeming vindication of New Deal policies, increasing anti-Roosevelt sentiment made it difficult for him to enact any new programs.
On December 7, 1941, the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and the United States entered World War II . The war effort stimulated American industry and, as a result, effectively ended the Great Depression .
The New Deal and American Politics
From 1933 until 1941, President Rooseveltâs New Deal programs and policies did more than just adjust interest rates, tinker with farm subsidies and create short-term make-work programs.
They created a brand-new, if tenuous, political coalition that included white working people, African Americans and left-wing intellectuals. More women entered the workforce as Roosevelt expanded the number of secretarial roles in government. These groups rarely shared the same interestsâat least, they rarely thought they didâ but they did share a powerful belief that an interventionist government was good for their families, the economy and the nation.
Their coalition has splintered over time, but many of the New Deal programs that bound them togetherâSocial Security, unemployment insurance and federal agricultural subsidies, for instanceâare still with us today.
Photo Galleries
Sign up for Inside History
Get HISTORYâs most fascinating stories delivered to your inbox three times a week.
By submitting your information, you agree to receive emails from HISTORY and A+E Networks. You can opt out at any time. You must be 16 years or older and a resident of the United States.
More details : Privacy Notice | Terms of Use | Contact Us
- SUGGESTED TOPICS
- The Magazine
- Newsletters
- Managing Yourself
- Managing Teams
- Work-life Balance
- The Big Idea
- Data & Visuals
- Reading Lists
- Case Selections
- HBR Learning
- Topic Feeds
- Account Settings
- Email Preferences
Why Collaboration Is Critical in Uncertain Times
- Jenny Fernandez,
- Kathryn Landis,
Working together can catalyze innovation — even in risk-averse companies.
Recent research suggests that when resources become limited, many business leaders’ inclinations are to become risk-averse and protect their own interests, fostering a culture of conservatism and prioritizing stability over innovation. In such circumstances, the emphasis often shifts toward preserving existing assets, reducing expenditures, and maintaining the status quo, which can hinder the organization’s ability to adapt, pivot, and thrive in a competitive environment. However, it’s precisely during these challenging times that the untapped potential of collaboration can be a game-changer. If you’re a leader struggling with risk-taking, here are four strategies to make the mindset and behavior shifts to become more collaborative and unlock growth.
A client of ours â letâs call her Mary, a senior executive in the technology industry â faced significant challenges managing a large organization amid economic uncertainty. Both her company and industry were experiencing tough times, resulting in budget cuts and a hiring freeze. Moreover, she was tasked with exceeding her annual revenue goals to compensate for the underperformance of a struggling business line, which was beyond her direct control.
- Jenny Fernandez , MBA, is an executive and team coach, Columbia and NYU faculty, and future of work and brand strategist. She works with senior leaders and their teams to become more collaborative, innovative, and resilient. Her work spans Fortune 500 companies, startups, and higher education. Jenny has been recognized by LinkedIn as a “Top Voice in Executive Coaching, Leadership Development, and Personal Branding” and was invited to join the prestigious Marshall Goldsmith’s 100 Coaches community. She is a Gen Z advocate. Connect with her on LinkedIn .
- Kathryn Landis , MBA, is the founder and CEO of the global coaching and advisory firm Kathryn Landis Consulting, which helps senior leaders empower and inspire their teams, create a lasting positive impact, and become the best versions of themselves in work and life. She is an adjunct professor at New York University and a former leader at American Express and Automatic Data Processing. Connect with her on LinkedIn .
- Julie Lee , PhD, is a clinical psychologist, NYU faculty, and a leading Gen Z employment and mental health strategist. Dr. Lee’s work spans Fortune 500 companies, startups, and higher education institutions, including Harvard and Brown University. In her consulting work, Dr. Lee helps organizations to motivate and retain Gen Z professionals and coaches executives to lead with purpose and empathy. Connect with her on LinkedIn .
Partner Center
âPeople say all the time, âI understand.â No, you donât.â
âTalk to us about our wants and needs. Talk to us like adults. Like human beings.â
As this country struggles with a growing crisis of homelessness, itâs time to start listening to the people who are living it.
A Life Without A
Voices from the tents, shelters, cars, motels and couches of America.
A record number of people across the country are experiencing homelessness: the federal governmentâs annual tally last year revealed the highest numbers of unsheltered people since the count began in 2007. Politicians and policymakers are grappling with what can be done. But the people who are actually experiencing homelessness are rarely part of the conversation.
Lori Teresa Yearwood, a journalist who lived through years of homelessness, spoke of the ways we discount those without shelter. âSociety created a new species of people, and we carefully crafted an image of them: one of broken passivity and victimhood, people in need of constant scrutiny and monitoring,â she said in a 2022 speech. âWhen we shift and widen the perspective of the unhoused, thatâs when things radically change.â Ms. Yearwood collaborated with Times Opinion on this project before her untimely death in September. She understood what many who have not experienced homelessness ignore: that people without shelter have something to say â and often something of great worth â about what itâs like to live inside this countryâs cobbled-together solutions.
Thatâs why we sent reporters and photographers to different parts of the country to meet with people experiencing homelessness in very different ways. We asked them to fill out surveys, take videos, use disposable cameras and have their children share drawings.
Whatever led them to homelessness, the people who spoke to The Times want a way out. As the nation debates how to help them, they shared the solutions they want to see.
Chelsie Stevens has been sleeping on friendsâ couches while she attends community college.
She and her children are some of the estimated 3.7 million Americans who are doubled up, a kind of homelessness hidden in plain sight.
A Is Not a Home
By Linda Villarosa Photographs by Sasha Phyars-Burgess
Crashing at someoneâs house, doubling up, couch surfing: It all conjures a rosy scenario in which someone takes in friends or family members who have fallen on hard times, offering them comfort, safety and a roof over their âŚ
Crashing at someoneâs house, doubling up, couch surfing: It all conjures a rosy scenario in which someone takes in friends or family members who have fallen on hard times, offering them comfort, safety and a roof over their heads. But in reality, doubling up is a much more complicated, under-the-radar form of homelessness. It may be a temporary solution, a precursor to living in a shelter or on the street, or part of a cycle of housing instability that involves crowded living conditions and a devastating lack of privacy and safety. The Department of Housing and Urban Development doesnât recognize doubling up as homelessness, which can mean that families and individuals who live with others â by necessity, not choice â lose out on essential government services and benefits.
Chelsie Stevensâs sons, 11 and 14, sleeping on an inflatable bed.
But we can have a sense of the size of the problem by looking at the children. Thanks to landmark 1987 legislation, children who share housing because of economic hardship or loss of their homes qualify for benefits through their public schools: dedicated liaisons, free lunch, free transportation to school even if they are living out of the district. In 2022, public schools counted 1,205,292 homeless students, 76 percent of whom were doubled up. We met with four single moms, all of whom were crashing at someone elseâs house with their children.
For parents who lose stable housing, options are limited: In many areas, family shelters are few and far between, and motel rooms get expensive. But staying with others comes with its own costs.
Jackie Randolph , 34, is staying with her five children in a bedroom at her ex-partnerâs place in Cincinnati : We got to be quiet. We canât talk loud. We canât have fun. We canât do nothing. Itâs like living in jail. We got to be sneaky because of the neighbors. Theyâre really set in their ways and they ainât trying to have nobody that stay over there that donât live there.
Chelsie Stevens, 33, has been on friendsâ couches with one of her children while the others sleep at their grandparentsâ house near Sarasota, Fla . : I met my current host getting cleaning jobs from him. Thankfully he understood my situation because he has been in my shoes and let me pay him $600 a month to stay with him. He makes me feel like weâre welcome to stay in his house but itâs a little uncomfortable because now that I am staying here, our relationship went from a friendship about work to some odd feeling like he likes me or wants to date me. But we have nowhere else to go.
Michelle Schultz, 52, has been staying on friendsâ couches with her daughter near Waukesha, Wis. : It can cause a strain on even the best friendships. As much as it's nice that people will do that, itâs a burden for them to take up that extra space.
Lizbeth Santiago, 28, sleeps with her two children on the floor of her sisterâs living room in Fort Worth : Living with my sister feels terrible. Itâs very tense. My children are very loud and rambunctious while her son is quiet. My sister, having anxiety and paranoia and autism, itâs upsetting for her. So I feel quite bad.
Staying at someoneâs house makes securing benefits tricky: The government often counts benefits by household instead of per individual family.
Lizbeth Santiago : I donât have SNAP benefits or anything. My sister gets a Social Security check for my nephew because heâs autistic and that helps them a lot. If they didnât have that, they also would not be making it. But because I live with them, I canât apply for SNAP benefits â that would negatively affect her. And would put an even bigger strain on our relationship.
Michelle Schultz : Because state regulations want to include everybody youâre living with in their income, I had to lie this whole 10 years that I've been homeless. If they know what the household income is, I would lose food stamps. I would lose benefits to the point where Iâd probably have to pay copay for doctor prescriptions. I just had to tell them I was homeless and I gave them a mailing address of a P.O. box.
Beyond their own day-to-day concerns, these parents worry about how their living conditions are affecting their children.
Chelsie Stevens : They are behaving poorly in school. My oldest is always worried about me and has a hard time focusing. The kids seem depressed more now.
Lizbeth Santiago : I know it affects her. She tries to hide it. Sheâs a child. I want her to be a child. I donât want her to worry about why Mommyâs upset. Those are adult concerns. Those are things that she shouldnât have on her mind. I wish she didnât have to experience any of that.
Jackie Randolph : My only goal is making sure my kids stay happy so they donât think about the situation we are in. Every time they start doubting or they get weary, I just say: âThis is just going to make us stronger. Itâs going to bring us closer together. You could tell your kids about this.â So they could say: âMy mom, she did not give up. She did not give up. She kept fighting.â My kids is the reason why Iâm not in a crazy house right now. Because I probably should have been years ago.
Jackie Randolphâs youngest daughter, Clinteria.
Chelsie Stevensâs youngest daughter, Faith.
Navigating the bureaucracy of homelessness is difficult for people who are doubled up. Hereâs what they want and need.
Lizbeth Santiago : A job that pays enough. But the harsh reality is it wonât be enough. I donate plasma two times a week and Iâm still going to continue to have to do that. I also go to a food pantry once a week to get food.
Jackie Randolph : Stop making the process so long. If somebody needs help today, why would you say, âNext week weâll be here to help youâ or âGive us 30 days to help youâ?
Michelle Schultz : If I could have had some help with day care to be able to go and look for a job.
Chelsie Stevens : There needs to be something in place for the young kids growing up in poverty, and parents of those kids. To guide them at a young age how to not end up like I am. Not everyone is born into normalcy and structure or love. Until a person is taught, how can they know?
Like so many others experiencing homelessness, Chelsie Stevens found that her situation deteriorated the longer she was out of stable housing.
After staying at her friendâs apartment for several months, she left when her host made her feel uncomfortable. Her children slept at their grandparentsâ house while she slept in her car.
Scroll to read what people living in motels, cars, encampments and shelters want others to understand about homelessness in America.
Times Opinion asked people experiencing homelessness to respond to a survey in their own writing.
How has your life changed since you became homeless?
Edward Taylor, 47, has been sleeping in his car for several months.
Chelsie Stevens, 33, sleeps on friendsâ couches and in her car.
Since she lost her family home nearly a year ago, Kimberly has been living in a motel.
Terri Ann Romo, 43, sleeps in a car she shares with her elderly mother.
People like Kimberly who turn to motels for shelter are often not even counted as homeless.
By Samantha M. Shapiro Photographs by Paul DâAmato
They arrive in cars crammed with the contents of the homes they were evicted from, or by bus, weighed down by bags. They walk over, in wet socks or ruined pants, from a tent encampment nearby when the weather is too rough to be âŚ
They arrive in cars crammed with the contents of the homes they were evicted from, or by bus, weighed down by bags. They walk over, in wet socks or ruined pants, from a tent encampment nearby when the weather is too rough to be outside. They leave their kids sleeping in the queen beds when they go to work the night shift at an Amazon warehouse. Few of the guests at this airport motel arrive on a flight; most are locals in search of affordable shelter. A yellow school bus picks up children outside the lobby and police cars and outreach workers do rounds through the parking lot, but mostly the true role the motel plays is invisible and improvised by desk clerks. The capacity of shelters and subsidized housing hasnât kept pace with the growing homelessness crisis, so New York and other cities have turned to private motels to house people, and some charities offer emergency vouchers for brief stays. During the Covid pandemic, empty hotels and motels were also temporarily converted into official homeless shelters; most of those programs have since wound down. But even in places where motels are not officially serving as homeless shelters, people who have lost their housing simply pay the rack rate when they have nowhere else to go. Motels offer an option for those who are shut out of rentals because of evictions on their records or for parents who do not want to be separated from their children, as many shelters do not accept families. We spoke with 11 people who are temporarily staying in a motel on the outskirts of Milwaukee.
Ashley and her twin children in their motel room.
Paying by the night or week is more feasible for those who struggle to put together enough cash for a security deposit and one monthâs rent. But the cost of a room can vary from night to night and the monthly cost of a motel stay is often much higher than rent.
Ashley, 38, has been staying with four of her five children in a motel room for the last several months : This is my first time being displaced from housing. The first two weeks were the roughest. I didnât know where to go. Iâm used to having birthday parties at hotels for my kids â Iâm really only in hotels then or if weâre on vacation. I didnât know you can rent hotels to live. I pay daily at these hotels. Itâs expensive. On a good night, it costs $51; with tax, $56. On weekends itâs $73. They usually tell me if something special is going on, because itâll go up. For the state fair, they actually put all the homeless people out. I was back in my car for two weeks.
Kala, 32, has been battling drug addiction for years. She and her partner stay in motel rooms whenever they have enough money : You are basically on a timer that gives you anxiety and puts you on an edge. I have to figure out how to come up with another 70 bucks in less than 24 hours every day. Itâs the same thing as being homeless. Yeah, I can sleep here for 12 hours but in 12 hours I got to figure something out, so I am not doing anything with that 12 hours â just stressing over how Iâm going to pay for the next 12 hours. I canât focus on what I am going to do to move forward. You canât do that in 12 hours.
Kimberly, 53, sold the family home to a âsell for cashâ group when her father became ill : Iâve been here a year in December. Itâs an every day struggle trying to pay for everything. Thatâs why I donât have food. Room, food, bus. I do plasma. It makes you depressed being stuck in this room 24/7.
Brenda, 53, is staying in a room with her cousin and her 19-year-old autistic son : I have more anxiety. Iâm unsure of everything. Iâm scared only because of my 19-year-old son. Itâs hard to get inside the mind of somebody with autism, but I know one thing for certain is that when his schedule gets disrupted, it disrupts him. And then I feel badly. I tell him things are going to be better, but itâs hard. I tried and failed to make a life for myself.
Just six months after Covid-era moratoriums were lifted, eviction filings doubled in Milwaukee County. With rents rising , even two-income families can easily fall into homelessness, where a constant barrage of bills and bureaucratic hurdles keep stable housing out of reach.
Max, 47, has been staying in motel rooms with his wife and their sons for several months : Our rent went up unexpectedly. We had had a yearlong lease but then the landlord made it month to month. We couldnât suck it up and pay. The rent was $1,400 and the next month went up to $1,900.
Kimberly : My storage alone is $260 a month because it was a house full of things we left â I even threw out two giant dumpsters â itâs all our photo albums and furniture. Iâm over $1,000 behind. Thereâs interest, late fees. I owe the storage place on the 20th and if I donât pay them it will go to auction. You canât pay here at the motel and come up with money to get a place. Itâs impossible. And thatâs why a lot of us are stuck.
Ashley : I owe the storage unit $100 so they locked it. The twins were supposed to go to the pumpkin farm today for a school trip but the kidsâ coats and boots are in there. I knew they were going to be outside all day at the pumpkin farm so I kept them at home. Itâs expensive being homeless. Itâs expensive being outside. Iâve applied to places, but I have an open eviction right now.
David, 63, has been homeless for about two years : I didnât receive my benefits one month. I was fighting with the QUEST card people. You get a review every few years to keep the benefits going. Well, not living in a permanent place, I donât receive my mail, so I missed the review. Thatâs why my benefits were cut off.
People living day to day in motels often are not counted as homeless by HUD, making it difficult for them to get access to the services put in place to help people experiencing homelessness.
Ashley : I called 211 and told them I was homeless and my situation. One night at 3 in the morning, they called me. They said weâre out and about at the address you gave us but we donât see your car. Iâm like, âWell, tonight we got a roomâ and theyâre like, âWell, thatâs not considered homeless. When you go back out to that spot give us a call, maybe we can come back out to that spot.â They can help with housing if they can prove that Iâm in my car 24/7. But I canât keep my kids in my car. If I have to pay for a room I will. But theyâre saying, âBecause youâre inside a hotel youâre not considered homeless.â This doesnât make sense to me. Iâve never noticed how many homeless people were out here until I became one.
Scroll to read what people living in cars, encampments and shelters want others to understand about homelessness in America.
What is the biggest stress you deal with in daily life?
David, 63, sleeps in a tent behind a motel in Milwaukee.
Rob Travis Jackson, 59, stays in a shelter in Pennsylvania.
Kala, 32, has been sleeping on the street and in a motel when she can afford it.
Haven, 11, is sleeping on couches with his mom and siblings near Sarasota, Fla.
Sage and Fiona Reuscher and their son have been homeless since May.
The Reuschers are among the over 19,000 people in Los Angeles living out of their cars.
By Christopher Giamarino Photographs by Ricardo Nagaoka
When Americans lose their housing, their cars are often the first place they turn. The federal government doesnât collect data specifically on vehicular homelessness, but recent studies show that over 40 percent of unsheltered âŚ
When Americans lose their housing, their cars are often the first place they turn. The federal government doesnât collect data specifically on vehicular homelessness, but recent studies show that over 40 percent of unsheltered people in Los Angeles County live in their vehicles â cars, vans, campers and R.V.s. The cold reality: Finding a safe place to park is a challenge, made worse by a web of complicated ordinances that in much of the country make sleeping and living in your car illegal , with towing and expensive tickets a constant worry. The Los Angeles area is home to the nationâs largest population of âvehicle dwellers.â One nonprofit, Safe Parking L.A. , has set up in parking lots across Los Angeles in response, allowing people to stay in their cars during the night when businesses are closed, providing amenities like restrooms, security guards and sometimes even financial services and opportunities to find shelters and housing. We spoke with people in one such parking lot, sandwiched between the Los Angeles airport runway and industrial land. The people staying there shared why theyâre living in their cars, and what they need to get back into housing.
Chloe Heard by the car where she sleeps.
An empty parking lot, even one with planes blaring overhead every 90 seconds, provides a degree of safety for people who have been sleeping in their cars on streets and in parks.
Chloe Heard, 36, has been homeless since August 2020 : Before this lot, I was parking by the beach. I was really unsafe. The police were coming to my car, and I was scared. My main concerns were if someone was going to walk up to my car and bust my windows, or if the police were going to arrest me for trespassing. You donât really rest because youâre constantly jumping up to look around to make sure youâre not going to get in trouble for being there. Iâd be getting tickets for parking on streets, sleeping in my car. Sometimes, street sweeping has come before you wake up and youâve already gotten a ticket before you noticed the person.
B.A., 52, works as a bus driver at the airport and lives out of his car : Living in my car is hard. I donât have any electricity. I always have to run the car. Thatâs wasting gas. I feel like Iâm not safe wherever I sleep â these lots or wherever I sleep on the street.
Edward Taylor, 47, lives in his car with his husband after they lost their apartment in 2022 : The way that parking on public streets impacted us was just sleep. Being here in a safe zone that is monitored and secluded from whatâs happening on the other side of these barricades allows you to get sleep. It allows you to sleep a little bit more peacefully than if I have to worry about other homeless people. Sorry, I forgot I am homeless now.
Curtis Lynch and Edward Taylor
Juana Zabala in the car where she sleeps.
Living out of your car might seem like a good way to save money when youâve lost your housing, but often, a vicious cycle of bills and bad credit causes a temporary sleeping situation to stretch into a months-long ordeal.
Chloe Heard : How do they expect people facing homelessness to have 700 or 800 credit scores? Or have co-signers? People donât even trust that you can make it on your own, let alone use someone elseâs assistance to get there. How in the heck could someone vouch for you to maybe help ruin their credit?
B.A. : On a big lot like this, they should just let people park there all day and all night. With Safe Parking I donât like that you have to leave, come back, leave, come back. I want to just leave my car here and then I could just take off somewhere or walk. But instead, I got to drive, waste gas, come back. I spend more money on gas than I spend on anything.
Edward Taylor : I have an income. I have money saved. I tell people I have enough money to pay them three times the deposit. But even right now that is not acceptable because your credit score is not good or you have an eviction on your record.
The longer homelessness stretches on, the harder it is for people experiencing it to recover.
Fiona Reuscher, 43, lives in her car with her partner, Sage, and their teenage son : Once everything is taken from you, it becomes how much more do you have to give up? Weâve had shelters that have said, âWe can take you, but we donât allow dogs.â Weâve already given up everything. Youâre not going to take away our best friends. These are our dogs. These are our emotional support animals. These are our protectors. Theyâre like our kids. You canât do that. But they expect you to do this. They expect you to give these things up. They expect you to be happy with a doghouse because youâre in your car. No, we want housing. Whatâs good for you should be good for me. If itâs not good for you then why are you trying to pawn it off on me?
Edward Taylor : I am not grounded in some place to update my rĂŠsumĂŠ and have access to the internet to look for jobs and network. Iâm not able to access my full belongings to get into my full self to go out to places to network with people.
Chloe Heard : People think that because you donât have a home that youâre dirty, you may stink, that youâre crazy for sleeping in a car. I told my friend that I sleep in my car. She said: âYou sleep in your car? Whatâre you talking about?â It makes me refrain from telling people because then theyâre looking at me in a judging sense like Iâm lesser than. It makes me feel like less of an active citizen in society because people look down on you.
Fiona and Sage Reuscher prepare their car to sleep for the night.
The people sleeping in the lot have ideas on ways their homelessness could have been prevented, and how aid programs, including the Safe Parking program hosting them, could better meet their needs.
Curtis Lynch, 38, lives in his car with his husband, Edward : The eviction moratorium should have lasted longer. There should have been a proper system in place where the government helped pay during that process â like, pay back 30 percent of what you owe, and your eviction could be withheld. Thereâs a better system they should have worked with.
Terri Ann Romo, 43, lives in her car with her mom, Juana : It would be nice if you could shower. We went a whole month without showering until recently.
Frankey Daniels, 32, has two jobs and has been homeless since July : Create more housing programs for people who work and are going through homelessness. It takes some time to really figure it out and do your research when you have to go to work, and some people are working two jobs.
B.A . : At the Convention Center, they had plugs. They had bathrooms that you could walk into with a private sink and toilet. They use port-a-potties here. They need to be cleaned out every day.
Fiona Reuscher : Having weekly meetings so that the people who are the decision makers out here talk to us on the lot. We need better transparency. If youâre not talking to the people that youâre serving, then youâre not serving them.
Scroll to read what people living in encampments and shelters want others to understand about homelessness in America.
Do you think the government, or either political party, is doing enough to help you?
David, 62, with his partner, Terri. He uses a wheelchair and sleeps in a tent in Nashville.
Chloe Heard, 36, has been homeless since 2020.
Bobby Conner Jr., 29, lives in an encampment in Nashville.
Tyrese Payeton has been living in an encampment for several months.
He is one of hundreds of people living in tents and other temporary shelters in Nashville.
By Wes Enzinna Photographs by Tamara Reynolds
Less than a mile from Nashvilleâs bustling tourist district, the Old Tent City homeless encampment lies in a forest hidden between the banks of the Cumberland River and the shadow of a steep, dusty bluff. At the top of the bluff âŚ
Less than a mile from Nashvilleâs bustling tourist district, the Old Tent City homeless encampment lies in a forest hidden between the banks of the Cumberland River and the shadow of a steep, dusty bluff. At the top of the bluff is a new condominium building where two-bedroom units with panoramic views of the downtown skyline sell for $1.2 million. The sprawling shantytown below is home to dozens of people who live in tents and makeshift abodes â the winners and the losers of the new Nashville economy live in one another's shadows. Tent cities, which often include other shelters like wooden sheds and R.V.s, have become a common feature in the landscape of American cities. In Nashville, one of the fastest-growing metro areas in the United States, 17 percent of people who are homeless are living on the streets and in encampments. According to service providers, there are dozens of encampments spread out across the city and the surrounding county. The people living in them often arenât included in decisions over their fates, even as the city has made closing the camps a key part of its larger fight against homelessness for the last year. We spoke to residents of Old Tent City and four other encampments in Nashville. Most of them want to be off the streets. All of them want a system that better supports them.
Wade in his âtiny home,â a temporary shelter the size of a shed.
Some people who live in encampments worry about their safety, while others say they provide a sense of community and security hard to find elsewhere on the street.
Fred Moore , 57, has been homeless for about 12 years : I love the homeless people thatâs out here. Most of them thatâs new donât know how to live being homeless. There are so many different tricks and ways around it that people just donât know how and when you got somebody thatâs already been out here, they know the ways to do things and help pass information.
Cynthia Gaddis, 35, ended up on the streets several months ago : Iâve learned you can depend more on the homeless people than you can with the people that have everything.
Bobby Conner Jr., 29, who has been homeless since he was 13, was struggling with addiction when he arrived in Old Tent City : Any time I ever need a place to come, just lay low and just crash, and need a family, I know I can always come down here. When I came down here, I looked at them, I was like: âI want off of that. I want to start my life new again . â They were like: âYou really want to do it? Youâre more than welcome to bring your stuff down here. Set up your spot. Weâll make sure you stay off of it.â
Casey Guzak, 47 , became homeless two years ago after a rent increase : I donât think Hoovertowns are appropriate unless thereâs a major depression. Shantytowns accumulate hostility, disease, and everyoneâs calamity is amplified.
But even as encampments provide stability to some residents, the unique challenges â financial, mental, physical â of living there can also make it harder for residents to eventually find their way out of the camps and back into housing.
New York is an Army veteran living in a tent in Old Tent City : I can afford to pay the rent. I just canât afford the deposit. And being out here kind of messed up my credit. But now Iâm paying three credit fixers to fix my credit. Nobody in my family knows Iâm out here. Iâm too embarrassed to reach out and say something because theyâve never seen me. When I was out there, I had an apartment and a house and had two cars. I was making good money. So itâs a pride thing.
Terri Masterson and her partner lost their home of 23 years just miles away from where they stay on the street now : I am ashamed of it. Iâm ashamed that Iâm ashamed, but I truly am. You know, I am an old-fashioned girl. This is not how I was raised, as my grandmother would say.
Fred Moore : Itâs hard for me to hold down a job because I canât concentrate on what Iâm doing. Iâve been down here trying to get signed up on disability and try to give my brain time to rest and really see whatâs going on.
Jacquelyn Manner, 61, lost her job and her home after a debilitating brain injury : Iâm a pretty healthy person, but Iâm also 61. I canât eat a lot of the stuff that they have out there. I need fresh vegetables. I have food stamps, but I didnât have a place that I could eat fresh vegetables and yogurt. Itâs going to be pasta, rice. A lot of sugar and a lot of salt. It creates health problems.
Riley, 23, moved into an encampment to try to save money : I was living in a motel. I was making $600 a week doing day labor, and the motel was so expensive. I had the idea: I'll come out here and Iâll stack some money up for a few weeks. Thought Iâd be able to get back up on my feet in no time. I had to be at the day-labor office at five in the morning, so I was buying Ubers, spending like 40 bucks in the morning. And then Iâm getting off work at rush hour. And the prices go up. Iâm spending another $30 to get home. Itâs 70 bucks. I made $125 a day, so I got 55 bucks left. I got to eat, so I bought a camp stove. I just stopped going to work after three months.
Casey Guzak
Brandi and her boyfriend, Robert.
According to one nonprofit group, over the last two years at least 25 encampments in Nashville have been cleared. In July 2022, Tennessee became the first state ever to make camping on public property a felony . So far, no one has been prosecuted under the law, but numerous encampment residents say that the police have invoked it to intimidate them.
Casey Guzak : They use the landscapers to cut trees around you, expose you. Then they tell you you need to get everything in your tent â thereâs too much stuff out here, too much litter. I agree! But they take your tent when youâre not there. They figure if youâre exposed, youâll be embarrassed. We werenât. We just sat there. You know, who are we going to be embarrassed by? Their message is, âWe got to clear this place out for gentrification . â Itâs about to happen here. Itâs happening all over Nashville. Itâs like a war.
Wade lives in a 60-square-foot shed in an encampment in the backyard of a church : When I was homeless, and I mean homeless â no housing, no nothing, bushes and trees right behind me â the police, they say, âOh, you canât sleep here.â And youâre sitting there saying, âBut that ainât fair.â They don't care. If youâre not doing anything and youâre not causing any disturbance why come over and harass you? Theyâre not doing what the police are supposed to do. Theyâre supposed to protect and serve.
C.J . has lived in an encampment for four years and worries he and his fellow residents will be evicted soon : All youâre going to do is bust up a nest, and that nest is going to spread out somewhere else. When you bust it up, the ones that are scattered are going to find somewhere else and then you got another problem. ⌠Iâm going to go to another area, find another spot, set up another camp and start the process all over again.
The people living in tent cities want to have a say in the policies that affect them.
Jacquelyn Manner : I need to get permanent shelter and I need to get a good job. And I canât do that unless I have an outfit. Unless I have a place that I can shower. Unless I can have a place where I can keep my clothes decent, and know that I can wear some decent clothes to work.
Clyde Hohn, 52, and his wife, Norvalla, have been residents of Old Tent City for about a month : We should have security guards in the encampments. We got people firing off firearms. Somebody ran a knife through my tent. There are noises all night, people arguing. A security guard would help us keep safe, help us sleep so we can go to work in the morning and get ourselves off the street. Sheâs a cashier at a gas station. Itâd be a lot worse if she lost her job.
Mama V : A goal of ours is to find the land and make it where the homeless can have somewhere and nobody can tell them, âHey, youâve got to go.â I tell everybody, you never know when you're going to be one paycheck away from where weâre at right now.
Jacquelyn Manner in front of the tiny home where she sleeps.
Scroll to read what people living in shelters want others to understand about homelessness in America.
Could the government have done anything to prevent your homelessness?
Terri Ann Romo, 43, lost stable housing after an eviction in 2022.
Clyde Hohn, 52, lives in an encampment and hasnât had stable housing since 2022.
Fiona Reuscher, 43, fell into homelessness after a workplace injury and layoff.
Cynthia Gaddis, 35, lives in an encampment in Nashville.
Levon Higgins lost his housing after expensive surgery. He lives in a shelter, sharing a room with dozens of men.
Every night, some 445,000 Americans stay in shelters like the one where he sleeps.
By Matthew Desmond Photographs by Adam Pape
The shelter comes after it all. After the pawnship and plasma donation. After the diagnosis, the divorce, the eviction, the relapse. After the final family member âŚ
The shelter comes after it all. After the pawnship and plasma donation. After the diagnosis, the divorce, the eviction, the relapse. After the final family member says no. Emergency shelters provide a place to sleep â even if only a mat on a floor â and meals. At some, you can get clean socks, a haircut, a tooth pulled, even therapy. The shelter represents the last stop from the bottom, a bulwark from the street, but it can also represent a chance: to leave your abuser, to earn your G.E.D., to make a new start. Homelessness is highest in cities with exorbitant rents, but small cities and rural communities are not shielded from the housing crisis. Some small towns have eviction rates that rival those of big cities. Because rural America lacks many social services, like free clinics, soup kitchens and shelters, the rural homeless often make their way to places like the Water Street Mission . A Christian rescue mission in Lancaster, Pa., a city of roughly 57,000, it has been serving the hungry and homeless since 1917. We spoke with several people staying at the Water Street Mission, some of whom were there for the first time and some who had sought refuge there many times before.
James Costello
Because there is no single agency or governmental organization that oversees Americaâs shelter system, shelters can vary as much in funding â some private, some religious, some public â as in the kinds of services and amenities they offer.
James Costello, 58, lost a leg to diabetes complications, then his job and housing soon after : When I first came here, we were sleeping on the chapel floor here on âboats.â They were like hard things, maybe about a foot high. And you threw a mat on it and that was what we slept on. And they said: âThis is not good for the people. Theyâre losing dignity.â Thatâs the one thing here. They want you to have dignity; youâve lost everything else. So they donât want to take that from you either. Yeah, youâre in your room with 45 other guys, but you still feel like a person. You donât feel like cattle being shoved in and shoved out of a room.
Tamekia Gibbs, 48, arrived at Water Street after surviving domestic violence : Knowing that you have a place to lay your head and knowing youâll have food in your mouth, thatâs a good thing. Itâs everything else that comes along with it, especially if youâve never been in that predicament â sleeping in a room full of women, you just never know how strange, how stressful that is. You have to get used to different things. You got to get used to having to get used to it.
Shawna, 44, is recovering from an addiction and has been in and out of homelessness for over a decade : You donât have to go, âWell, why are they throwing God in my face all the time?â Just sit down, listen. Maybe that lesson was meant for you and thatâs why youâre getting mad. I just go, I listen. If itâs for me, I sit and listen. If not, I play with something on my phone.
The resources dedicated to helping people who have lost stable housing in rural communities are more limited, but the causes are often the same as in major cities.
Levon Higgins, 50, has been staying at Water Street for the last six months : I just couldnât afford to live where I was. Rent went up to $1,500 a month. For a two-bedroom. I just couldnât do it. When the pandemic first started, I had a savings account, had a SIMPLE I.R.A. Over the past year, things just got worse. Your rent just keeps going up and going up and going up.
Shawna : This is my fifth or sixth time back. This time I decided to come back just so I could get away from my drug of choice and being out on the street and not feeling safe. My daughter came here after me. This would be her second time back with my grandbabies. We stayed here a couple of times together when it was just me and her. Itâs just like Iâm reliving everything over again. I know something has to change.
Tamekia Gibbs : I endured a lot of physical, emotional and mental abuse. I just got to the point where I lost me completely in that relationship. I said: âThis is enough. I got to find somewhere else to go.â So when I did that, of course, it got physical because they didn't want me to leave. I had my son come get me and I took what I could carry. And Iâve been homeless ever since.
Tamekia Gibbs
Rob Travis Jackson
Securing a spot in a shelter isnât always straightforward: There are far fewer beds available than people who need them . And for those who get in, adjusting to life in the shelter is its own process.
Evelyn, 39, is a mother of two staying in the family section of the mission : When I first got here, I was so mad, so angry, so hurt that I was even put in this position. To be a single mom and have two kids and be out on the streets, itâs very worrisome because they tell you if you donât have a place, then C.Y.S. [Children and Youth Services] can take your children. Even going to them for help it was like: âWell, if you don't have a place, then we canât do anything for you. But legally we can take your children.â And it was like: âNo, I donât think so. Youâre not taking my children.â So I was scurrying around trying to find shelter for them.
Jennifer Berrie, 45, was staying in an overnight-only shelter before Water Street : I miss little things you don't even think of. People complain like I used to about cooking, but then you canât do it for a while and you miss it. Going to bed when you want, not having a curfew, just, you know, living your life. The freedom.
Tamekia Gibbs : There are the ladies that are talking about each other. Theyâre just doing a lot of backbiting, and when you have that in a community, it causes a lot of friction and tension. I try to stay away from it, I hunker down, do what Iâm supposed to in my classes. I stay busy. I tell the ladies: âI came here broken. If I can do it, you can do it.â
In addition to addressing the housing crisis and deepening investments in mental health and drug treatment services, the residents of Water Street believe it is critical to treat people in their situation with dignity and empathy.
James Costello : This is a human condition. Humans have to solve it. Politics can't do that. And thatâs the main problem. With the government it is not going to happen. Theyâre always going to be wanting money. âWhere are we going to get the biggest buck?â And as long as that goes on, this problem is going to get worse.
Rob Travis Jackson, 59, became homeless after a financially draining divorce : Itâs a little scary to think about what life might be like for any of us after we leave Water Street. If youâre here for a year, youâve had three meals and three hot meals available through the seasons of the year. And what does my life look like after I leave?
Levon Higgins : Some people who come across hard times, itâs because they maybe lost a job or some mental issues that happened. But thatâs not how the world sees it. When they see, they automatically assume: âHeâs a drug addict. Heâs an alcoholic. They don't want to work. They don't want to do nothing.â And that canât be further from the truth. They just want some help. People get scared to ask for help because theyâve been denied so many times.
Scroll to read what people who are living through homelessness actually want.
If you were in charge, what would you do to stop homelessness?
Clyde Hohn, 52, lives in an encampment in Nashville.
Layla, 9, a fourth grader who is navigating homelessness with her mom and three siblings.
Frankey Daniels, 32, lives out of his car in Los Angeles, where he also works two jobs.
Tamekia Gibbs, 48, hasnât had stable housing since 2016.
We kept in touch with some of the people we met through our reporting. During the months of producing this project, we heard about their triumphs and their setbacks. Fred Moore was on the verge of receiving Section 8 housing when we met him in Nashville. After 12 years of homelessness, he moved in last September. âIâm still not adjusted to it. Iâm like a baby in a crib. It seems easier, but really itâs a lot harder,â he said recently. âAt the apartment, I get cabin fever staying in it so much. I miss being outside a lot because you get fresh air. It gets summer time, I might throw up a tent around town and stay there a few days out of the week. Itâs hard to pull away from this kind of life, being homeless.â
In October, after Mr. Moore moved into his apartment, the encampment where he had lived was razed by the city. That same month, Nashville provided transitional or permanent housing to 191 people who were once on the streetâ and 373 people became newly unhoused.
- Share full article
Advertisement
- Election 2024
- Entertainment
- Newsletters
- Photography
- Press Releases
- Israel-Hamas War
- Russia-Ukraine War
- Latin America
- Middle East
- Asia Pacific
- AP Top 25 College Football Poll
- Movie reviews
- Book reviews
- Financial Markets
- Business Highlights
- Financial wellness
- Artificial Intelligence
- Social Media
Trumpâs legal debts top a half-billion dollars. Will he have to pay?
A New York judge has ordered Donald Trump and his companies to pay $355 million. The judge found they engaged in a years-long scheme to dupe banks and others with financial statements that inflated his wealth. (Feb. 16)
Former U.S. President Donald Trump vowed to appeal after a New York judge ordered him and his companies on Friday to pay $355 million in penalties, finding they engaged in a yearslong scheme to dupe banks and others with financial statements that inflated his wealth. (Feb. 16)
Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks at his Mar-a-Lago estate, Friday, Feb. 16, 2024, in Palm Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell)
- Copy Link copied
New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks during a press briefing, Friday, Feb. 16, 2024, in New York. A New York judge ordered Donald Trump and his companies on Friday to pay $355 million in penalties, finding they engaged in a yearslong scheme to dupe banks and others with financial statements that inflated his wealth.(AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)
NEW YORK (AP) â Donald Trumpâs legal debts might now exceed a half-billion dollars.
A New York judge ordered Trump and his companies Friday to pay $355 million in fines, plus interest , after ruling that he had manipulated his net worth in financial statements.
The stiff penalty comes just weeks after Trump was ordered to pay $83.3 million to the writer E. Jean Carroll for damaging her reputation after she accused him of sexual assault. A separate jury last year awarded Carroll $5 million from Trump for sexual abuse and defamation.
Add interest payments on top of that and the judgments could deal a staggering blow to the personal fortune that remains core to Trumpâs political appeal. He has adamantly denied wrongdoing and pledged to appeal, a process that could take months or even years.
In the meantime, hereâs what we know about what Trump owes, whether heâll have to pay up, and what comes next:
How much money does Trump owe now?
The verdict in the civil fraud trial requires Trump to pay interest on some of the deal profits he has been ordered to give up. New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the case, said the interest payments totaled $99 million and would âcontinue to increase every single day until it is paid.â
Between Fridayâs ruling and the two judgments in Carrollâs case, Trump would be on the hook for about $542 million in legal judgments.
Trump owes another $110,000 for refusing to comply with a subpoena in the civil fraud case and $15,000 for repeatedly disparaging the judgeâs law clerk in violation of a gag order. As part of Fridayâs ruling, the judge also ordered both of Trumpâs sons to pay $4 million apiece.
Trumpâs court-ordered debts donât end there. Last month, he was ordered to pay nearly $400,000 in legal fees to The New York Times after suing the newspaper unsuccessfully. He is currently appealing a judgment of $938,000 against him and his attorney for filing what a judge described as a âfrivolousâ lawsuit against Hillary Clinton.
Can he get any of these judgments reduced?
Itâs not uncommon for the size of judgments, particularly high-dollar amounts, to be reduced on appeals.
The appeal in Trumpâs civil fraud case will go before an intermediate-level court first. If it returns an unfavorable ruling, Trump could try to get the case taken up by New Yorkâs top appellate court, though legal experts say that is unlikely.
How quickly does Trump have to pay?
Trump has already deposited $5 million owed to Carroll for the first defamation case into a court-controlled account, along with an additional $500,000 in interest required by New York law. Carroll will not have access to the funds until the appeals process plays out.
He may soon be forced to do the same for the $83.3 million judgment in the second Carroll verdict. Alternatively, he could secure a bond and pay only a portion up front â though that option would come with interest and fees and likely require some form of collateral. Trump would have to find a financial institution willing to front him the money.
In the civil fraud case, it will be up to the courts to decide how much Trump must put up as he mounts his appeal. And he may be required to pay the full sum immediately after the appellate court rules, which could come as soon as this summer, according to University of Michigan law professor Will Thomas.
âNew Yorkâs judicial system has shown a willingness to move quickly on some of these Trump issues,â Thomas said. âWhen we hear from the first appellate court, thatâs a point where money is almost certainly going to change hands.â
Can Trump afford to pay?
Trump has claimed heâs worth over $10 billion. Most estimates, including an assessment by the New York attorney general, put that figure closer to $2 billion.
In his 2021 statement of financial condition, Trump said he had just under $300 million in âcash and cash equivalents.â He has since made a number of sales, including his New York golf course and his Washington, D.C., hotel, and may also soon get a windfall when his social media company, Truth Social, goes public.
But even with those income streams, itâs unclear whether Trump and his family members have enough cash on hand to pay all the money they now owe.
Could he use campaign contributions â or PAC money â to pay?
Federal election law prohibits the use of campaign funds for personal use. But the rules are far murkier when it comes to tapping political action committees â or PACs â for a candidateâs expenses.
Over the last two years, Trumpâs Save America political action committee, his presidential campaign and his other fundraising organizations have devoted $76.7 million to legal fees. Campaign finance experts expect Trump will try to spend PAC money to defray the cost of his judgments in some way.
âThe likelihood of the Federal Election Commission in its current configuration pursuing these violations is not terribly great,â said Daniel Weiner, director of the Brennan Centerâs Elections and Government Program.
Can he or his businesses declare bankruptcy?
Under the judgeâs ruling Friday, Trump would still be liable to pay even if the Trump Organization declares bankruptcy. If Trump personally declared bankruptcy, the enforcement of the judgment against him would be paused. But political commenters say such a drastic step is unlikely.
Despite the fact that several of his previous companies have gone bankrupt, Trump has repeatedly bragged about the fact that he has never, personally, declared bankruptcy.
What if Trump simply refuses to pay the money?
Legally, Trump would face the same consequences as any American refusing to pay a legal judgment, including the possibility of having his assets seized and his wages garnished.
âThe president is not a king and the presidentâs assets are not sacrosanct just because he happened to be the president,â Weiner said.
On Friday, the judge overseeing Trumpâs civil fraud case appointed an additional monitor to oversee the Trump Organizationâs finances, finding they could not be trusted to follow the law. In the event that Trump refused to hand over payments, the courts would have additional discretion to go after Trump and his businesses.
âThey have a huge amount of power particularly for someone like Trump who has physical assets inside the state,â Thomas, the law professor, said. âThe court might say weâre going to freeze your bank account. Or even worse, they could say, âWeâre seizing Trump Tower and weâre putting it up for sale.ââ
Watch CBS News
Read the full decision in Trump's New York civil fraud case
By Graham Kates
Edited By Stefan Becket, Paula Cohen
Updated on: February 16, 2024 / 8:27 PM EST / CBS News
The judge overseeing the civil fraud case in New York against former President Donald Trump and the Trump Organization has issued his long-awaited ruling , five weeks after the trial in the case concluded .
Judge Arthur Engoron ordered Trump and his company to pay $354 million in fines — a total that jumps to $453.5 million when pre-judgment interest is factored in. It also bars them from seeking loans from financial institutions in New York for a period of three years, and includes a three-year ban on Trump serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation.
Additional penalties were ordered for Trump's sons, Eric and Donald Trump Jr., who are executives at the company, and two former executives, Allen Weisselberg and Jeffrey McConney.
New York Attorney General Letitia James brought the civil suit in 2022, seeking a penalty that grew to $370 million and asking the judge to bar Trump from doing business in the state.
Judge Engoron had already ruled in September that Trump and the other defendants were liable for fraud , based on the evidence presented through pretrial filings.
The judge had largely affirmed James' allegations that Trump and others at his company had inflated valuations of his properties by hundreds of millions of dollars over a the course of a decade and misrepresented his wealth by billions in a scheme, the state said, intended to trick banks and insurers into offering more favorable deal terms.
Trump and his legal team long expected a defeat, with the former president decrying the case as "rigged" and a "sham" and his lawyers laying the groundwork for an appeal before the decision was even issued. He is expected to appeal.
Read Judge Engoron's decision here :
- The Trump Organization
- Donald Trump
- Letitia James
Graham Kates is an investigative reporter covering criminal justice, privacy issues and information security for CBS News Digital. Contact Graham at [email protected] or [email protected]
More from CBS News
Trump fraud ruling adds to his string of legal losses in New York
Biden raised $42 million in January, his campaign says
Trump hopes to reshape RNC into "seamless operation" with leadership changes
Haley vows to stay in race, ramping up attacks on Trump
Middle East latest: Gunmen open fire in West Bank - as UK authority warns of 'incident' in shipping lane
One person has been killed and five wounded after Palestinian gunmen opened fire near an Israeli checkpoint in the occupied West Bank near Jerusalem. Listen to a Daily podcast on the potential Rafah offensive while you scroll through the news updates.
Thursday 22 February 2024 08:40, UK
- Israel-Hamas war
- Shooting attack near Jerusalem kills one person
- Israel intercepts 'attack by Houthis' near Eilat
- 'Early signs of progress' on hostage deal, Israeli minister says
- Live reporting by Bhvishya Patel
A total of 29,410 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli strikes on Gaza since 7 October, the Hamas-run health ministry in the enclave says.
Another 69,465 have been injured since the war began.
The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and fighters killed in its figures.
The UK's maritime authority says it has received reports of an incident 70 nautical miles southeast off the Yemeni port city of Aden.
The authorities are investigating the matter, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) says.
Vessels are being advised to "transit with caution".
Israel has intercepted what appears to be an attack launched by the Houthis near the port city of Eilat, the authorities have said.
Sirens sounded early this morning over Eilat, followed by reports of an interception in the sky overhead.
The Israeli military later described the interception as being carried out by its Arrow missile defence system.
The system, which intercepts long-range ballistic missiles, "successfully intercepted a launch which was identified in the area of the Red Sea and was en route to Israel", the Israeli military said.
"The target did not cross into Israeli territory and did not pose a threat to civilians."
Eilat, on the Red Sea, is a key port city of Israel.
One person has been killed and five wounded after Palestinian gunmen opened fire at motorists near an Israeli checkpoint in the occupied West Bank near Jerusalem, the emergency services have said .
Two women were seriously wounded, the head of Israel's ambulance service Eli Bean told public broadcaster Kan this morning.
Police said officers shot dead two gunmen and wounded a third.
A spokesperson said the gunmen were Palestinian but gave no further details.
Hello and welcome back to our coverage of the Israel-Hamas war - and wider crisis in the Middle East.
Yesterday, an Israeli war cabinet minister said he had seen "early signs" of progress on another hostage deal with Hamas, but warned the IDF was still preparing to assault Rafah from the ground. Rafah is currently home to more than one million displaced Gazans and it is feared a ground offensive would have devastating consequences for civilians.
There were also several strikes in Syria and Lebanon carried out by Israel yesterday.
Here are the other key updates from the past 24 hours:
- An explosion was reported by UKMTO off the coast of Yemen;
- An Israeli report said Hamas carried out "systematic" rape during the 7 October attacks;
- Israeli strikes across Gaza killed at least 67 Palestinians overnight into Wednesday, according to the Associated Press;
- The UK home secretary apologised after a Jewish baby's birth certificate was returned to her parents "with the word Israel scribbled out".
These images show devastation in the southern Gazan city of Rafah following continued Israeli airstrikes.
Ground operations in the city will commence in the coming weeks if Israeli hostages are not released, according to senior war cabinet ministers.
CIA director Bill Burns is expected to travel to Paris on Friday to hold talks with Qatari, Egyptian and Israeli officials to discuss a hostage deal, according to a report.
Two sources told Axios Mr Burns would be attending the talks, with the US keen to help get a deal done before Ramadan - which begins in less than three weeks.
Israeli officials have said they will attack the southern city of Rafah from the ground if hostages are not returned by then - with humanitarian organisations warning of the catastrophe that could create for Palestinian civilians on the ground.
The main sticking point of the negotiations is the number of Palestinian prisoners to be released in exchange and how the list will be determined, the Axios report said.
It also reported that a senior Hamas delegation arrived in Cairo yesterday for talks with Egyptian intelligence officials over the possible hostage deal.
Lord David Cameron has reiterated his stance on the Gaza conflict - urging an "immediate pause" in fighting between Israel and Hamas after a night of chaos in the House of Commons regarding calls for a ceasefire.
"Simply calling for a ceasefire doesn't make it happen," he said.
"If Hamas are still there, if they're still firing rockets, if they still got the ability to do another 7 October, that's not going to last," he added, referring to peace.
"So our way of doing it is a pause or leading to a sustainable ceasefire without return to fighting. That's the best way."
The Israel Defence Forces says it has conducted more strikes in Lebanon this afternoon.
Among the targets struck was "an observation post in the area of Khiam, and a military post in the area of Zibqin from which launches toward the area of Shlomi in northern Israel were carried out earlier today", an IDF statement read.
Additionally, a helicopter struck an observation post near the border village of Ramyeh and artillery targeted nearby Aitaroun "in order to remove an immediate threat," the IDF added.
A separate Israeli airstrike killed a woman and young girl in a village four miles over the border in southern Lebanon, according to sources on the ground (see 3.49pm post).
The home secretary has apologised after a Jewish baby's birth certificate was returned to her parents "with the word Israel scribbled out".
The Campaign Against Antisemitism said the certificate was sent off as part of a passport application two weeks ago and returned on Monday with the father's place of birth defaced.
You can read James Cleverley's apology to the family here, having ordered an investigation into the matter yesterday:
Be the first to get Breaking News
Install the Sky News app for free
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Conclusion Therefore, one could say that the New Deal mitigated the effects of the Great Depression to an extent where it improved the employment rate from 25% of 1933 to 17% in 1939. [17]
New Deal, domestic program of the administration of U.S. Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) between 1933 and 1939, which took action to bring about immediate economic relief as well as reforms in industry, agriculture, finance, waterpower, labour, and housing, vastly increasing the scope of the federal government's activities. The term was taken from Roosevelt's speech accepting the ...
To answer the question, 'was the New Deal a success?' we first have to define 'success'. For Franklin D Roosevelt (FDR) in 1933, success meant working towards relief and recovery. However, over time the idea of success evolved. By 1936 many hoped that the New Deal could provide solutions to a huge range of social, political and economic problems.
Overview The New Deal was a set of domestic policies enacted under President Franklin D. Roosevelt that dramatically expanded the federal government's role in the economy in response to the Great Depression.
Quick answer: The New Deal can be considered a success in that its reforms prevented future economic depressions. It also provided important temporary relief to Americans in the 1930s that...
Success Of The New Deal In The United States Essay. In 1929, the Stock Market crashed, sending Americans into a panic. ... Relief, Recovery and Reform Programs in the USA: The New Deal Essay. The new deal of the 1930s was seen as the radical action needed during the depression to help American people and the American economy. However, some ...
I owe special thanks to Shawn Kantor who got me involved with the New Deal and co-authored many of the New Deal papers with me cited here. John Wallis gave me numerous insights based on his own research on the New Deal and has worked with me on several projects. The reference list is truly an acknowledgment list because nearly everybody on the ...
Words: 908 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read Published: Sep 1, 2020 In 1929, the Stock Market crashed, sending Americans into a panic. Franklin Delano Roosevelt won the presidential election of 1932, restoring people's faith with his promise to end the Great Depression with his New Deal.
copy page link. Getty Images. The New Deal was a series of programs and projects instituted during the Great Depression by President Franklin D. Roosevelt that aimed to restore prosperity to ...
Ultimately, the New Deal programs that Roosevelt initiated helped to improve the lives of millions of Americans affected by the Great Depression, but they did not end the Depression itself. The ...
Comparative Analysis of the New Deal and the New Green Deal Essay In our world, the government will often want people to see the good things in their country instead of the details including poverty, racial discrimination, social and economic issues, and so much more.
Introduction The New Deal is one of the most talked-about eras in American history. Transpiring during the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, it contained some of the country's most notable accomplishments and failures during the Great Depression. Looking at it as a whole, was the New Deal a success or failure?
In this essay I will evaluate the successes and the failures of the New Deal: Firstly, Roosevelt?s most important step was to prevent banks from collapsing from all American people trying to withdraw their money that the banks didn?t have. So Roosevelt set up the Emergency Relief Act (ERA) which involved closing banks for four days.
How Successful Was The New Deal Essay Decent Essays 446 Words 2 Pages Open Document I believe that although the New Deal was not an immediate success, it did slowly bring up numerous factors that were lacking before Roosevelts presidency.
The New Deal was politically and socially successful by providing structural reform in banking and the stock market as well as helping people get back on their feet, while its economic success was limited because his policies needed to be funded, so money was taken out of the government. FDR's New Deal was both socially and politically successful.
đ Essay description: Since Roosevelt took office in 1933, he received recognition from his nation due to his dedication to tackling the Great Depression's c...
The Great Depression started in 1929 because of the stock market crash. It caused many people to go into debt and be unemployed. The New Deal created by Franklin Delano Roosevelt was successful because it gave millions of people jobs and helped farmers. The New Deal helped millions of people get jobs.âŚ. 375 Words.
The Success of the New Deal Essay. In 1932 the citizens of the USA were eager to see Herbert Hoover out of office. From the start of The Wall Street crash (1929), President Hoover had done next to nothing to try and counter the Depression following. He and the republicans argued that Economy went in cycles of "bust" and "boom".
The New Deal was a success because it helped and changed a variety of people's lives. For instance, in Document C George Dobbin clearly says that it was the first time that someone stood up for the workmen. New Deal DBQ 949 Words | 4 Pages
Overall, The New Deal was successful to our economy and the people in our economy because it made people money which allowed them to buy more goods and it also gave tons of unemployed people jobs. For this reason the New deal was very successful and FDR ended the Great Depression in 1939.
The New Deal was very successful in employing citizens, in 1937 the unemployment rate was at 9.1% comparing that to in 1932 when it was at 20.6% that was an 11.5% drop in five years ( Document E). Another program that helped unemployed men were the CCC, the CCC sent "250,000 young men to work camps to perform reforestation and conservation task.
The New Deal created by Franklin Delano Roosevelt was very successful because it is still very important for majority of people today. " In the first hundred days of his presidency, FDR got much legislation passed in the form of a series of government agency creating new laws collectively called the New Deal.
Why Collaboration Is Critical in Uncertain Times. Summary. Recent research suggests that when resources become limited, many business leaders' inclinations are to become risk-averse and protect ...
New York is an Army veteran living in a tent in Old Tent City: I can afford to pay the rent. I just can't afford the deposit. I just can't afford the deposit. And being out here kind of messed ...
NEW YORK (AP) â Donald Trump's legal debts might now exceed a half-billion dollars. A New York judge ordered Trump and his companies Friday to pay $355 million in fines, plus interest, after ruling that he had manipulated his net worth in financial statements.. The stiff penalty comes just weeks after Trump was ordered to pay $83.3 million to the writer E. Jean Carroll for damaging her ...
Hong Kong CNN â. Every Lunar New Year, China ushers in a new zodiac sign from a cycle of 12 auspicious animals. This year, it's the Year of the Dragon, or more accurately, the "Year of the ...
It can be argued that the New Deal was ineffective due to the inability to end the Great Depression with its short-term solutions and created more problems, however; it was successful in regards to providing direct relief for the needy, economic recovery and some structural reform for the majority of the general public in the severity of the Gre...
New York Attorney General Letitia James brought the civil suit in 2022, seeking a penalty that grew to $370 million and asking the judge to bar Trump from doing business in the state. Judge ...
Most Israelis, both Jewish and Arab, do not believe "absolute victory" is possible in the war against Hamas, a survey has found. Listen to a Daily podcast on the IDF's potential offensive in Rafah ...
Thailand's prime minister has claimed that Singapore sought a deal with Taylor Swift to prevent her from playing elsewhere in south-east Asia on her Eras tour.